let's recognize the data breach affects everyone. as the chairman referenced the report retailers suffered their share of breaches the living present. government agencies and currie slightly higher percentage, hotels and restaurants constitute 10% while financial institutions represent 34%. it's not because those with the most breaches of the weakest security. it's because bad actors are always looking for the biggest bang for the buck and no single set of data security standards is fully protected in the industry. in the complex economy coming each type of business is vulnerable to data breaches in a different way via to the theft of account numbers were cloudy that were intellectual property. congress needs to provide incentives for companies to increase their security and nothing motivates like sunlight. requiring every company have the same public notice obligations will provide this needed light. uniform notice has two benefits. it can help individuals take steps to protect themselves but equally important, the consequences of re

data. theeral student privacy law is clear that organizations when that data is shared, they cannot use it for commercial gain. they cannot use it to market it. they cannot sell it. and it will be destroyed as soon as the purposes of the contract are over. when you get to this education technology data that's being driven, barmak is absolutely right. we don't understand well enough, particularly at the school and barriers barriers. where with can he contract? what kind of leverage do peeve? i think again there is a role for the state to come in to be thoughtful about: how do we help these people on the ground? through training? through model comforts and policies? through stronger state laws that hold our vendors accountable? >> page we have about a minute left. we are talking about how to fix it, make it safer, more secure. what are the benefits to this data for kids in the schools? >> absolutely. so data matters. we use it in all aspects of our life. i think health is a wonderful example espe

from san francisco's on data portal with the finance data i'm going to pass it on to jeff who will talk about the specifics of the project. >> hello. thank you again for having us i'm jeff as christen mentioned we took the data if on san francisco on data we've used a data visualization called tabla that allows us to create a story with chapters and section that tells a story of what will happy in 2014 in the campaign finance data so when we started to look at the specific sections that encoop lasts the story we're going to try to tell in the sections they include the first total spending in 2014 it also i should note within the city and county of san francisco 2, 3, 4 addition to the assembly race there was specifically within the kunlt jurisdiction from the alliance additionally the types of contributors and there's 15 of those who are the largest contributors and the resent of those and the lobbyist consulate data and the political parties and the pack general committee data welling we get a good sense of whooped in 2014 cycle and eventually we will be hosting all 9 story that has ch

. >> i want to appreciate that i feel like the department has a lot of great data and if it's not the right data we need what's the right data to 4th i know that every case is a unique situation but this is you know a large issue for our shelter providers and i feel like we need concrete ways of addressing larger categories and making sure they're getting the needs met and if the data is not helping us to figure out this it would be good to know what data to inform the work with the dph but i want to mention in our conversations with director barbara garcia she's talked about a lot of great ideas we're interested in the providers partnering up and doing a pilot with one of our health clinics that provides additional help and something we've decided last friday as well. >> we are looking that and hopefully work with the dph based on all the questions that are coming up maybe that can be considered so we can easy out how many people we'll help like kate is saying one or two but we need to figure out one or two that needs that level of care so that intense of data thaim they'll be collec

i noticed in the of them data breach this week -- in the end anthem data breach, they were becoming the victim of breach fatigue by constantly being notified he could be in a group where information has been breached. many people in that group -- the impact of that -- we are not lookup legislation with the idea that we need an arbitrary deadline. i have a couple of questions. the question would be, what would you perceive in terms of how a deadline should be established or the criteria for what would be a reasonable response and your view on whether an arbitrary deadline is something that should be included in a data breach notification. >> thank you. i think an arbitrary deadline with a specific timeframe is not useful in that it sets an objective standard. each incident is different. each incident requires special consideration to address vulnerabilities, cooperate with law enforcement. some breaches will require cooperating with many different types of law enforcement. i do not think a specific deadline is useful. that being said, a number of the states have deadlines that do not inv

cowen's point about the index g a it's good investments for future but good data draws good policy and decisions one question i have is the proposed legislation by supervisor kim is that on the affordability and the thing i think i read off last week is that taking into consideration any of the numbers legislation that's proposed around affordable it and murray it. >> that requires i think the burden on that to implement that legislation will fall in the data group it requires us to kind of keep the balance and running total of the balance between affordable and market rate. >> so what the request is it is an fte. >> i don't believe we're associated with that. >> generally, you should emigrate additional ftes with additional work (laughter). >> commissioner johnson. >> you thank you very much yeah. a couple of quick things and question for staff so one of the other comments that i made at least you're going our u during our informational hearing how do we measure the effectiveness of having entire agency personnel and our staffing plan that was at least one fte for a through z staff to

although we should be looking at the data they tend to look at the calendar more than the data. they want to know how many meetings before she moves. over at citi what are your expectations on the calendar side of things? >> i'm telling our clients that it's better in this world of uncertainty that the fed moves later. so for me it's probably late in the year probably december is my best guess. i'm later than the consensus, because the fed has one firmed in their minutes they're not sure where the inflation is. they're not sure how strong the economy is. there's a lot of debate not only where the inflation is but the underlying model with the inflation. a lot of commentary was the links between wage pressure and inflation are really quite weak in the data. >> i was just going to ask you, inflation is one thing, but the job growth is very key for them as well. is job growth where you think it should be and where you think janet yellen wants it to be right now? >> i think the word full employment is not the same as reaching 5% or 5.5% unemployment not reaching 300,000 play roll emp

the data is kind of flat and the medicare data -- even though it's 6700 people it looks like they're not going to the doctor that much and used to be the case with early retirees so the trend rates are very nice so with that being said unless there are questions i will just move on. okay. >> question here. >> oh there is a question. yes, sir? >> no, i am just going ahead of you and looking at the 2016 rates. >> these right here. >> yeah. >> okay. you have a question or you want me -- >> just go -- [inaudible] >> go right ahead. >> so i'm at the preliminary rate on page 10. okay. on plan year 2015 we have the rates that are presently part of the rate basis for this year. we did all the math with the numbers we have and the trends that we developed, and overall the rates for 16 -- from 15 which dropped approximately 20% from 14 i am saying they should only go up 4%, three and a half, 4%. now, that's good, real good as an act area and if we have the rates and they need to go up based on this information we over did it but this indicates everything we knew about the program sustained itse

this is how the data break down. he total number is 17.3% confirmed of re-engaging, 12.4% suspected of re-engaging for a total of 29.7% confirmed or suspected. before january 2009, that is those transferred in the last administration the numbers show 19% confirmed, 14.3% suspected re-engageing for a total of 33%. the data after january 2009 shows 6.8% confirmed of re-engaging. 6 out of 88 transfers. 1.1% suspected for a total of 7.9. in other words, the rate of re-engagement has been much lower for those transferred since 2009 which attests to the rigor of this new process. of the detainees transferred during this administration, over 90% are confirmed or suspected of not having re-engaged. this speaks to the scrutiny given to the transfer of the review process and security measures the refugee government intends to take pursuant to its domestic laws and determinations to mitigate the threat. one additional point. of the 107 confirmed of reengaging the vast majority transferred before 2009. 48 are either dead or in cu

the most complex that's the area receiving the most teegs although he we're, of course covering the data but that's the most complex and taking the lions share of the resources. >> so that pushed me to ask another question case inspections that's a big part find our job which divisions building and which part of building mechanic or electrical or plumbing then the housing and the code enforcement inspections so which inspections have having a harder time migrating. >> the mechanic i refer to the he spishths. >> the building inspection but again so i talked to to someone main it is kind of like putting up a building if the building is being held up you have to find out which step is holding it up so focus on you know is it mechanic or electrical or the plumbing and what's happening so this is y what i want to kind of bore into what is and what are those obstacles what's the complications what are they having a hard time capturing one of the things when we go live or test we want to capture the old system and the new; right? so they're both joined so you can go back and so that's why it is

but at the end of the day this is my personal data. some of the most intimate data flowing through the systems of these great companies now and it should be protected. >> so i want to return to the issue of the framework and ask you, maybe starting with brian, about do you use the nist framework and how do you use it and is it helpful to your company? >> as i said earlier, my observations are colleagues and institutions are people at different levels, some sort of figuring out and we're sort of of in the implementation on a framework which helps us think through some of the management practices going to the commentary that ajay had earlier. i think people use it because people are looking for -- especially boards of directors are looking for frameworks of how to deal with companies. and interestingly enough, last week, the board giving my review and it's not that we're not good at cybersecurity. that's the process where they can remain engaged without getting into the details about what's going on and frameworks using this as a series o

it's to examine the merits of the federal data security standard and the need for preemptive and uniform federal data breach notification. we all know we live in a digital world where consumers have embraced online products and services. my folks at home, they know they can make purchases, determine their credit score, conduct banking and examine health care plans all from a mobile phone computer or a tablet. that is true of consumers across the country and increasingly around the globe. but this digital economy creates new risks. in a world where one bad actor can battle against a team of highly trained experts we face challenges to make certain that consumers are protected and that businesses have the tools and incentives to protect their customers from harm. for more than a decade, congress, the commerce committee in particular, has been contemplating issues surrounding data security and data breach notification. in 2004, the committee held its first congressional hearing to examine the high-profile breach of choice point, a data aggregation firm. this breach forced the first of many

if the objection is, how good of a job are they doing anonymized data, that is a perfect a legitimateoncern. i just eight people, privacy advocates in general, have really modeled the argument. what exactly are we objecting to here? it is not clear to me. i do not think the objection is that somehow the devices in our homes should not access our commands. if that is, i think apple should go back to living in caves. >> there was a point between voice commands and caves, but all right. julie, companies have to think about the anonymous asian of the data or is there a point at which they will not be able to collected in certain ways like seery or like a tv? >> i think i would just like to correct something that paul said, which is that the issue is not anonymous asian. it is certainly not the use of new technologies. i think the real it shoe -- real issue is over collection and not careful planning. companies that do not know what use they will put to data they will collect should not be over collecting in this way. >> yes, i mean paul -- >> it is interesting. >> a lot of companies that

this i was hoping you'd bring the medical health assessment our office requested in 2012 i know the data is a little bit old and helpful in informing our office on the demographics in the shelters and i know that we need to do another assessment to get the details on the actual services we need to provide at our shelter i think the data was informative even in looking at what the current demographics are and i have the presentation here or the data you had presented to our office last year to address the needs even the 059.5 percent of clients in you'll our shelters at some point needs our medical emergency assistance that's a high percentage we're not talking about one or two clients a broad swath of our population that's homeless when they think about what we look at aerial shelter system and understanding our sheltered system is not set up to address the clinic tell hoping the changes i think we have to face realty and adjust the types of services and staff in place i know our office worked hard with barbara garcia to find the full-time nurses under our directorship in the shelter sys

>> equipment data plan is actually the cost for the data host the laptop computers. daas funded some of our providers with laptop computers so the social worker can do the work while they are on the road with the client and helps to increase efficiency documenting all the data that is needed in our data base and the data plan is is to help cover some of that cost for the data for the mobile devices. >> and i think there is an error in the total units. >> okay. >> listed as 428.5, should be 382.5. >> which page are you on. >> appendix x, the last page. >> oh, okay, the total on the bottom, i see it. >> units. >> thank you, we will correct that. thank you. >> any further questions? >> also, over the page, the total units again should be 407.5 instead of 428.5. >> what page are you on? >> the last page, the back of the last page. >> yeah, we actually -- sorry, we had updated the units and overlooked updating the total. thank you, we will make that correction. thank you for catching that. >> any further corrections? hearing none, could i have a motion to approve with the

the data is kind of flat and the medicare data -- even though it's 6700 people it looks like they're not going to the doctor that much and used to be the case with early retirees so the trend rates are very nice so with that being said unless there are questions i will just move on. okay. >> question here. >> oh there is a question. yes, sir? >> no, i am just going ahead of you and looking at the 2016 rates. >> these right here. >> yeah. >> okay. you have a question or

on the resources and we went from intersection data to the correlation with crossroads there's on overlap of neighbors one thing we saw we added in some additional data that come in that includes the various modes as they came available like the corridors we recently added last spring one thing we've found is while we see the fatalities between vehicles and people the fatalities by mode are quite stalk only 2/3rd's felt fatalities are motorist collision so the difference between this and vision zero it is proving street traffic so this is a big shift since the network so what you see now we have the data for pedestrian vehicle to pedestrian collisions and fatalities we have motorcyclist collisions and bicycle there are 12 percent of street miles that is not that many still a high concentration of the streets that equalities one hundred and 25 miles from the goal of 13 of those miles you saw three-quarters regardless of the modes the traffic collisions it is a focused allocations we have in the city can you ask a quick question i want to make sure i said 12 percent of our streets or 70 per

and that is like - brings all the data into question. st we want to make value judgment. they don't give you accuracy. >> could it be a difference of strides. >> i'm bringing the same amount of calories. it doesn't spend a lot of time educating you on what the data means and how to interpret it. >> i tried out the fit bit. it was higher in terms of the step count. you can check it. you can watch it tally up the steps. you are trying to develop a lifestyle of habits. using this and the app. from green stadiums to birds with goggles, i check my pulse. talking about the science, my heart is beating a little faster. for more exciting innovations join us next time on "techknow". go behind the scenes at aljazeera.com. >> monday on techknow. what if there was a miracle >> grace's stem cells are in this box >> that could save the life of your child >> we're gonna to do whatever we can >> would you give it a try? >> cell therapy is going to be the next big advance in medicine >> tech know, every monday go >> tech know. >> we're here in the vortex.

but we don't know what they wanted to do with the data. we just know they wanted a lot of it. >> the line between state-sponsored criminal -- state-sponsored and criminal is hard to distinguish. >> and there is a very interesting dynamic at play where we have seen cases where nationstate attackers, espionage attackers, will be inside a system and see a bunch of data that they can tell in the criminal underground and take it. is that a nationstate attack? over these individuals that tried to take a little off the top? it's hard to tell without intercept and nsa intelligence whatever what's the motivation of these attackers will ultimately be. >> jordan robertson and michael kaiser, thank you very much. this is already raised the ire of government officials, one is the attorney general, who is asking the company some tough questions about what measures they had in place to protect that viable information. he will join us in an exclusive interview next. ♪ >> this is "bloomberg west." i'm cory johnson. here's a check of world news. an emergency

it's to examine the merits of the federal data security standard and the need for preemptive and uniform federal data breach notification. we all know we live in a digital world where consumers have embraced online products and services. kansans, my folks at home, they know they can make purchases determine their credit score conduct banking and examine health care plans all from a mobile phone, computer or a tablet. that is true of consumers across the country and increasingly around the globe. but this digital economy creates new risks. in a world where one bad actor can battle against a team of highly trained experts, we face challenges to make certain that consumers are protected and that businesses have the tools and incentives to protect their customers from harm. for more than a decade congress, the commerce committee in particular, has been contemplating issues surrounding data security and data breach notification. in 2004, the committee held its first congressional hearing to examine the high-profile breach of choice point, a data aggregation firm. this breach forced the first

the benefits i can get from being online? it is a cost problem that they cannot afford data. ne of the things we in cooperation with governments and other companies are trying to do is figure out, are there business models and ways to address the awareness and cost issue? one is by providing some free basic services. about a month ago, internet.org rolled out an app in zambia which provides basic services. facebook is on there, so is wikipedia, so are a number of maternal health organizations. >> that is the curated stuff i was referring to. >> things that are important to get to the people in that country. we will see how it works. so far, there is good interest. that is a way to started -- to start addressing the access problem. we think that is a good thing. >> it almost suggests a path from no internet, non-neutral internet is not such a terrible alternative path to neutral internet. >> i think there are issues we are properly focused on in the united states and other areas in the developing world that will be important in the developing world as well. there are threshold

>> they are concerned about the data privacy. the issue of data sovereignty, whether the data leaves their country is very important to them. >> today have other options -- do they have other options? it's hard to have a higher cost is because of the dollar. is the real competition -- is there real competition that could take that away? >> they are creating a localized present so we can keep the data in country. that's one of the challenges for us. the more business you have in europe, 50% of our businesses overseas. we have to look at that, if you are a smaller company, it becomes much more difficult. >> is disconcerting, to say the least. do you think that's one of the messages that presidents will share today? >> are messages were about what we need to do, following on the executive order for information sharing. we are pleased to see the leadership there. semantic is a -- sematech -- semantic -- we want to share christ with private companies, as well as the government. so we can get a better -- >> that was michael brown speaki

they will report to the board of supervisors on the data it collects. any trends in pay discrimination, the number of investigations have commenced based on reports received and the number of contractors that were penalized for violating equal pay laws. discrimination based on sex and race is already prohibited in the city's administrative code and by federal law. however the human rights commission only enforces the provision when individuals file allegations of unequal pay. it is hard for women to determine whether they are victims of wage discrimination because of the 2011 survey from the institute of research found that much of the information is discouraged and/or prohibitd and could lead to punishment. there is a culture of secrecy around compensation in work places and throughout this country. this legislation is groundbreaking because it provides the human rights commission the data it needs to proactively investigate businesses without relying on individual workers' complaints and ensure equal pay for equal work at hundreds of businesses that co

and then you start to tie the data streams together. so if i can take information hear and influence this decision over hear with this experience, and that, to me, is the ultimate test. something happens in the physical world, we digitize it it connected since rising and that is kind of the easy part. the real question is do we close that feedback loop and get something to then change back in the physical world? if it is a fitness device, now digitize the level of fitness the steps cause me to eat differently, to sleep differently, to do different things, to change my behavior. if it doesn't that is where things start unwind and i i think that is some of what will start to set and. or the use case scenario is isn't that rich and so i'm going to keep my analog whatever because knowing that i have payments on my wrist to and really influence. whatever it is. >> but with technology prices collapsing so fast do you actually even need to make this decision? the question is everything we will be digital and is just a question of whether it's o