the obama justice department ended it. i understand that it has been reinstated during the trump administration. i'd like you to inform us about its progress as well as any other measures or programs or enforcement priorities of the department of justice with respect reducing gun violence in this country. >> thank you, congressman. as you know we served as united states attorney together until you went into politics, and i went into private practice. i want to talk specifically and it's a good question about project safe neighborhoods. in 2017 the attorney general sessions announced the expansion of project safe neighborhoods which encourages u.s. attorneys offices to work specifically with the unique communities they serve to develop a customized crime reduction strategy. one study showed when you and i were doing it, it reduce crime overall by 4.1% and with case study showing reductions up to 42% of violent crime. we had the project safe neighborhoods national conference as a mention in my opening statement and i can tell

because the department of justice oversees the executive office for immigration review, will the departmentm-seekers have access to counsel in mexico in order to allow them to prepare for the hearing? yes or no. >> we are going to continue to follow the policies of currently in place. >> will you facilitate, assist, help, ensure that asylum-seekers have access to legal counsel in mexico? yes or no. >> congresswoman, there is a very well-defined process for asylum-seekers to obtain counsel and we will continue to follow that. >> mr. whitaker, even while they're in mexico? >> is the acting attorney general i cannot make an assurance, especially regarding what happens in a foreign country, i know you understand that. >> this is part of the reason why this is such a terrible policy. another question, about a week after the policy was announced, reports surfaced that immigrant rights advocates and attorneys were denied entry into mexico. the attorneys set their passports had been flagged and reports also indicated that this was not an issue on the mexican side but on the u.s. side. the departmen

, were there any moneys at that time shifted from the health department's budget to the fire department budget. i know it was 17 or 18 years ago. >> it was just the personnel that moved over in the operating budget for equipment. things along those lines. -- >> in terms of equipment it was sort of used equipment that literally came over and we repainted it. i mean, i don't know that it was a july 1st of 199 #. it was personnel. the f.t.e. count that came over. >> i see. >> well, i think that's just a start. the whole financial landscape of the city has changed from that time to this this merger of sorts predates the crisis we find ourselves in. so, with the onset of the homeless crisis, we have it to make adjustments and the rest of the city has to make adjustments. this is the situation that is untenable. we cannot continue like this. >> thank you mr. president. commissioner veronese. >> thank you for pointing those items out. you are absolutely correct. commissioner covington, you are also correct in over the last few years, the city has a homeless department that is a 300 million-dol

he loved the department of justice into the american people you can go to fed soon knowing that the department of justice is in good hands. to my colleagues that vote against him, give him a chance. i think he will deliver for the country and to the committee and thank you for allowing the nomination to go through so quickly and to diane feinstein who is a great partner, i appreciate processing the nomination and we may have differences of opinion about what the right answer is but i could not have asked for a better process. i thought he was challenged but respectfully so but having said that, we are about to confirm a new attorney general at the time when we need one and this is just not somebody but the job this is a special person for the job and with that, i yield the floor. >> chairman. >> senator from rhode island. >> i guess i am here to follow my friend senator graham and bring the opposing view regarding mr. barr. i want to offer my appreciation to the chairman as he leaves the way he conducted hearing and i know he offered his appreciation to the ranking member but the hearing, i th

while the department of the environment doesn't receive any general fund support, we do face some impact as nongeneral fund departments are expected to absorb any increases in our budgets, in our costs for the fiscal year, without requesting any additional funds via work orders with other city departments. lastly, the mayor has mandated that there be no new positions added to the departmental budget submissions. that won't affect our departments at all because we don't anticipate adding any positions in the next fiscal year. for fiscal 2019-2020, our total operating budget currently stands at approximately $27.2 million. this operating budget includes both funds being requested through the annual appropriation ordnance or a.a.o. process, as well as funds that have been previously approved that will be utilized in the next fiscal year. this is the midyear approval requests called system expend processes. for awareness, these previously approved funds will not be part of the annual submission to the mayor's office and will not be reflected in our final a.a.o. budget presentation to this co

do you know if the president directed department of justice lawyers to make that request? >> congresswoman, this is the subject of ongoing litigation. >> you will not answer that question either? thank you. was acting assistant attorney general john warren involved in the drafting of that request to ask the census question? >> congresswoman, as previously stated, this is subject of ongoing litigation. >> let the record reflect again you are refusing to answer the question. >> okay, we can agree one function of the department is justice enforce voting rights act; correct? >> correct. >> and isn't it also true the most recent voting rights act enforcement action filed january 10 2017? >> as i've mentioned previously, the department -- >> is it correct the most recent voting rights enforcement act action was in 2017s, january 10? >> congresswoman, i'll give you -- >> yes-or-no question. >> first term of the obama administration, they filed one -- >> reclaiming my time. no running out the clock. chairman, if we can enter into the record the department of justice website, which

i also want to thank the san francisco police department. thank you for so much for the officers who continue to walk the beach and develop relationships with the community on a regular basis. it definitely means a lot to have community policing so that members of our community feel safe when they are walking the streets. thank you to so many folks who are a part of really the driving force. they are the reasons why we, as a city, pay a lot of attention to providing resources to the community, starting with randy shot in the tenderloin housing community clinic, essential safety s.r.o. collaborative, thank you so much. [cheers and applause] >> u.c. hastings, and unite here local two. incredible partners. people who are fighting and advocating for the tenderloin. i have made a commitment as i have said to you all before that we will continue to invest, invest, invest in resources. in fact, many of you heard about the significant amount of money that we actually came into recently. it is a one-time fund, and my proposal with conversations with s

this isn't what about the department of justice, fbi agents doing their job. idn't do their job. we'll hear about that today. there is plenty of frustration of issues of doj oversight. sir, i'm not sure that the oversight of your financial situation from 2014 to 2016 has anything to do with this hearing. it's beyond the scope of the hearing. so if this is what we are going to do, if this is where we are going i want to remind everyone that this is not the senate. if my friends on the other side of the aisle of this committee wanted to do a confirmation hearing they ought to set it up front. if they want to do it on senators, run for senate. this is not a confirmation hearing. this is a department of justice oversight hearing -- oops, i'm sorry. back to theater again. the curtain opened up and we found out what was really going on. no, we want to damage the president, talk about your private conversations, what you did and why the president -- the most amazing quote. we want to know why the president may have put you there. that's offensive. when we look at this

i'm so proud of the work this department does and everybody that's part of the commission, part of the department, we have extraordinary people. i know that someone is retiring today so that breaks my heart. i'm looking forward to another amazing year and great progress. so welcome. with that, is there any public comment on the welcome? please come forward. >> this is public comment. >> but we also need to do the roll call as well. >> oh, sorry. i just jumped right in because i was so excited about everything that's going on today. but we have to do the roll call, make sure we're all legal. [ roll call >> this is a meeting on the commission january 22, 2019. the time is 5:07 p.m. roll call quickly. [ roll call ] >> there is a quorum. a note to the public, there's an opportunity to comment on every item and general comment for items that are not on the agenda, we ask that folks fill out a speaker card. hand them to me. i will hand them to the chair. they will be called in the order received. you have the right to speak anonymously. after we call all the speaker cards, i will call folks

is the president changing department for his -- >> the time is expired. the witness may answer the question. >> we have a unitary executive and if the president sets a policy and issues a policy directive, we'll follow that policy. >> thank you. >> mr. attorney general, thank you for being here. you want to thank my colleague the distinguished gentleman from south dakota for his support of criminal justice reform and looking forward to working with him. >> north dakota. >> north dakota. my apologies. i want to talk about another policy matter with respect to ucannabis. i represent the state of colorado and colorado recreational use of marijuana was legalized in 2014. researchers at the university of colorado which i'm proud to represent are working hard to understand the health effects. in august of 2016, i understand this is before you were at the department of justice, the dea took a big step toward improving scientific researcher on marijuana in the federal register for applications to produce federally approved research grade marijuana, several instit

now, we've coordinated with the police department so it's going to be sent to the titles and to the specific departments that can be changed, and it'll be electronic so we won't have the same problem that we were having in the past. >> i want to ask you about the cases that are 270 days. 25 of those 20 have a totalled statute, so is somebody's hair on fire? somebody told you about those tolled cases? >> i'm glad you asked that. i get a report on the day of police commission for me to see in red what's happening of that case, and i get that in red every single week of that particular case. >> you're comfortable where those cases are? >> i am. we purposefully did that, and we can talk about those offline. many of them are personnel cases. they're highlighted to me, and a memo gets written to me with what's going on with that case when it gets to this level every single week. >> thank you. commissioner hamasaki. >> commissioner hamasaki: just to follow up on commissioner hirsch's question, are the partied involved -- parties involved, both the complainant and respondent being informed as to tha

ofon the general question department efficiency, we do address that in the report.t is honestly very important. basically ask taxpayers to sit still while the congress appropriates additional dollars for defense, they have to have some level of confidence that it is being a privately and wisely done. reformndorse a number of efforts that have been underway for some time to make sure the department is auditable and we can account for the money. the problem is that all too frequent me, people think, well, whatever the problem is, we can wring it out of waste, fraud and abuse in the pentagon and that will make up for the bogey that we're in and that's just not the case. even the most optimistic assessments we heard of what might be gained from reform and efficiency in the department is about $150 billion over ten years. it's not even close to filling the gap that we are talking about over the next 5 and beyond that, next decade, really. i think that's important. on brac, i would just say we need to rationalize how the department uses its facilities and there's unused c

or did it come out of the department of homeland security? >> neither, sir. when the request is received for assistance, by the department of -- the department of homeland security is the mission holder. and they provide a request for assistance, where they are unable to meet their needs to the defense department. the defense department then looks at those needs, whatever the request is, and tries to identify from the total force the best way to source the mission need. and that's where the decision ended up being made in that particular case, as admiral gilday testified, to use active-duty troops last fall in addition to the national guardsmen that were already deployed. >> so there was a determination that there were no sufficient national guard and reserve forces available to meet that request? >> so it was primarily driven by timing. i described, at the time the direction came from the white house, and those migrants were amassing down in southern mexico, the direction was to move forces fairly expeditiously to the border. and so, based on the fact -- >> i

the red or orange is the general fund department budget. as we discussed previously last year marked the first year we eclipsed the 400 million-dollar threshold for department budget. that's anticipated to increase as you will see on the next slide in the coming years. as a result of that, the general fund, the non general fund is things like the airport and previously the port and other funds that aren't paid by general fund moneys so as i mentioned it's a 21% increase over this time. majority of that is due not to expansion of scope of services but to some extent for sure but it's salary and benefit increases. so here is a look at our current budget as compared to -- our base budget compared to our current and extended year budget. as i mentioned, we're looking at $400 million budget. and 413 the year after that. the reason that is lower, is because a lot of the one-time equipment and capital expenditures are scrape scrippe. that will reduce the budget until those allocations are approved. $269 million is our general fund support. after re

department of the environment. and we needed that deep knowledge base because of events like the global climate action summit, and the commissioners definitely helped extend the reach of the department, of our city's elected officials, of the city's capacity to host visiting nations, visiting cities, del gats from all around the world who are convening in san francisco to talk about the environment, and to learn from us on what we did here on climate action, and the commissioners represented us at events, at talks, at workshops on kind of 0, 80, 100 groups, the paradigm that governs or climate action, and it definitely made sure that we were a gracious environment, but more so, an informed host on the environment. and the commissioner definitely helped the department, the city, and the mayor's global climate action summit here a success. but beyond that, there were other highlights, as well. i know that seems to be the main highlight, but there were a number of special meetings and events that the commission undert

it's in the department as a whole. i mentioned debbie's leadership earlier and how important it is to the work we do i also want to mention our community partners like the unified school district. we work very closely with them to promote our programs like zero waste in the schools. we also work with the san francisco public utilities commission, they funded up to give water presentations and to create water curriculum and that partnership is very deep and satisfying. also, san francisco public works. we've partnered with them for our litter outreach and assemblies and the sf giant sweep. and it's not just city agencies that we partner with. we also partner with recology. that has been a really effective partnership as well. we all have the same goals. [ please stand by ] >> i don't think those words and things motivate kids, either. so what we did was we changed it around. what about if we bring animals into the conversation? what about if we bring nature into the conversation and make the case that we all need nature

the department has resources allocated as well. we have about the same numbers working on the same things. each department is handling it individually, but some of the departments have more requests than others. we are one of those departments. >> is it a timeline or letting people know? >> we have been responsive to all of the requests that have come in so far, and we are trying to prioritize the requests that have come on based on what is available to us in terms what we can pull and disseminate before analyzing each of the individual reports in terms of what everybody is going to get. they are all separate. some of the requests have come in didding everything. we are still using that same prioritization. the officer-involved shootings. >> commissioner hamasaki: some of this is actual you have to dig into boxes? >> that is 100% correct. as far back as 1982. >> commissioner hamasaki: best of luck. >> keep in mind the digital process was the last department in the city to get to the technology status. we are still trying to define a

the obama justice department ended it. i understand that it has been reinstated during the trump administration. i would like you to inform us about its progress as well as any other measures or programs or enforcement priorities of the department of justice with respect to reducing gun violence in this country. >> thank you, congressman. as you know, we served as united states attorneys together until you went into politics and i went into private practice. i want to talk specifically, and this is a really good question about project safe nash neighborhoods. the attorney general announced the expansion of project safe neighborhoods to work with unique communities to develop a customized crime reduction strategy. one study showed when you and i were doing psn it reduced crime overall by 1.4% and case studies showing reduction of 42% of violent crime. we had the project safe neighborhoods national conference as i mentioned in my opening statement. and i can tell you that especially in our largest cities, our 29 major cities,

i met with the department afterwards once or twice. i can't remember exactly, but we did determine all of the different jurisdictions that touched the coast, at least in san francisco, and all of those jurisdictions are listed in the resolution. >> okay. as long as we are able to have a dialogue among the commissioners and be able to your resolution in terms of a really party discussion hearty discussion of comprehension, i also hear two different motions in terms of agendas. something in terms of a modification of the general order that we have, in terms of animals at the workplace, which is separate from what i am hearing, in terms appear support. is that correct, commissioner? >> is it separate from the peer support, yes. it may actually be in conjunction with -- consistent with the peer support unit, but i would like to do is amend the general order to allow the department to have a k-9 for peer support -- not a k9, and animal for peer support purposes. basically what we would be doing is saying to the department, we will change thi

welcome to the department, director colfax. m here to request your approval to recommend to the board of supervisors to accept and expend a cash bequest of $200,000 from the richard and bonnie green survivor's trust. the cash gift will benefit the laguna honda hospital gift fund, which enables us to provide support to and enhance the well being and quality of life to the residents at laguna honda. we are grateful to the green family, who we have learned that mr. green's father may have received care and was a resident at laguna honda. i would be happy to answer any questions you might have, and i thank you in advance for approving the resolution. thank you. >> president chow: commissioners? >> i commend the family and spirit of the nation to the gift fund. it plays a very important part of laguna honda pertaining to activities for our patients and designated benefactors under the rules and procedures of our gift fund, so i would move approval of the motion before us. >> second. >> president chow: moved and seconded. all those in

share to the department share o. in past -- last year, we received approximately 2 million in supplemental revenue from that program. so when i mention expansion or changes along those lines, there is discussion about expanding the scope of eligible calls that are eligible for reimbursement. that's something that's going through legislation. there has been previous pieces of legislation to do that. the most recent one unfortunately was vetoed by then-governor brown at the time, but there's also work to expand that. there's also a gemt quality assurance fee. it is aesan additional fee that would have the same structure as cost share but could potentially result in additional revenue for the department. there is ongoing discussion on that, so there's some reporting we're doing with the state on that, with the anticipation it will become effective later this year, but as soon as we get some more additional information, we'll pass it on. >> are there any indications at the state level of raising the medicaid reimbursement

>> education secretary betsy devos explains her priorities for the education department during a speech to the annual christian colleges and universities in washington dc. to talk to presidents and students regarding changes of sexual harassment and cases on college campuses, this is about 25 minutes.>> with secretary d. this is about 40 minutes. ms>> >> to have you ihere, to have our students here, to be at the 2019 ccc you presidents conference, we know we are about faith and education. and to me that is the lens through which we see all things, this idea about having christian faculty and biblical truths to be so much a part of, and everything we do know with christian information is integral so as we talked today, my questions are going to be through that lens of faith, and lens of cohesion because i thought, we have a wonderful president here, but we also have the secretary of education had an illustrious service, minded career, her whole life. so we are going to get into that a little bit. so, i know your dad gave you encouragement, and i adored vocational life, and something abou

the department says we're going to get an app to help with us federal aid. congratulations on that. that is in fact the kind of innovation i think all of us are doing on our campuses too, how to make competency-based education work, how to make sure people get credit for life experience, knowing that the adult learner is not the 18 to 22-year-old learner, we have to look at all that. let me pivot a little bit to title ix and accreditation, because your department is also doing some really good work in looking at both of those areas. let me ask you about title ix first. you're doing the notice and comment rule making. do you have a sense of the emphasis you want to have in tackling, which is a very important issue on campus, sexual assault and other title ix issues. what are your hopes for that? secretary devos: when i came into this job, i became aware very, very quickly of the fact that what had been promulgated in the previous administration simply wasn't working for too many students and for institutions. and so we began a process very early on, almost tw

. >> has anyone met with the departments, department to ask whether or not they would be able to include any of the funding specifically for this particular topic? >> thithis is the first time the youth commission is doing the budget pen betation to the -- presentation. it is usually in the priorities in may. right now it is february. we are looking through all of our budget priorities. this is a lesson learned moment. hopefully, this will allow for room. hold up, maybe we shouldn't appear for the budget just yet. >> the reason we are doing this. in the past we would give the budget priorities long after these would happen like in may we would be doing this thing now. like everything we would say we wanted as budget priority wouldn't have an effect on the actual budget. this year we are doing it earlier. >> to ask if there is money to help implement this, is that right. >> like today we met with budget and finance committee with the board of supervisors and had a presentation with the police commission. >> what are you doing after this?

because the department of justice oversees the office for immigration review, will the department of justice ensure that asylum speakers have access to counsel in mexico in order to allow them to prepare for their hearing? yes or no. >> we're going to continue to follow the policies that are currently in place. >> will you facilitate, assist, help and ensure that asylum seekers have access to legal counsel in mexico. yes or no. >> congresswoman, there's a well-defined process for asylum seekers to obtain counsel and we're going to continue to follow that. >> mr. whitaker, even while they're in mexico? >> as the acting attorney general, i cannot make assurance what happens in a foreign country. you understand that. >> this is part of the reason this is a terrible policy. another question. about a week after the policy was announced, reports surfaced that immigrant rights advocates and attorneys were denied entry into mexico. the attorneys said their passports had been flagged and reports also indicated that this was not an issue on the mexican side, but it was on the u.s. side. did the

we are changing in the fire department. a wipes policy enacted, we have a gross decontamination policy on the books and about to be enacted, and talking about like real tangible changes that people are making. we don't bring our turnouts into the palm room anymore. when i first got in in 1997, that's what we did do. we wore them, we would sit down at the table, go up into the, our living quarters with our turnouts. the dirtier the turnouts were, you know, i mean i guess kind of the better of a firefighter were. kind of a badge of honor and we are trying to change that, and it is change. change is slow but it's happening. and just real quickly and then i promise i'll stop -- not quite. so, you start something and you get a ground swell and then it starts to morph into other things. so the study when we are waiting it morphed into the training, that then now there's another thing that's on top of this, we got more money on top of that training and it's called the women, the working women biomonitoring collaborative, so, we sec

the obama justice department ended it. i understand that it has been reinstated during the trump administration. i'd like you to inform us about its progress as well as any other measures or programs or enforcement priorities of the department of justice with respect to reducing gun violence in this country. >> thank you, congressman. as you know, we served as united states attorneys together until you went into politics and i went into private practice. i want to talk specifically, and it's a really good question about project safe neighborhoods. in 2017, attorney general sessions announced the expansion of project safe neighborhoods which encourages u.s. attorneys' offices to work specifically with their unique communities to work to develop a customized crime reduction strategy. a study showed it reduced crime overall by 4.1%, and with case studies showing reductions of up to 42% of violent crime. we had the project safe neighborhoods national conference, as i said in my opening statement, and i can tell you that especia

in terms of staffing, the department is at staffing of 2307 officers including the airport. the full duty is 1,869 officers which is 5% below the mandated level of 1,971. the 1,869 does in the include the airport, academy recruit champion currently we have -- which currently we have 79 and doesn't include members on light duty or disability or military leave or personnel issues. again, we have 79 recruits at the academy, two classes are currently running. class 263 and 264. 263 will graduate may 24. and 264 graduates in the fall. i don't have the exact date but i think it's october. we have 265 which begins on march 25, 2019 which will give us a third academy. we're on track at least with the number of academies we lined up for this year. that concludes this portion of my report. >> commissioner: thank you, any questions or comments from commissioners? seeing none, we have an update on the progress of staffing as well under the chief's report. >> executive director catherine mcgwire will present that portion from strategic management bureau. >> good evening, president hirsch

next, an update from the defense department on u.s. troops at the southern border. we will hear what the pentagon has to say about the homeland security department's request for more support at the border during this house of armed committee hearing. >> called the meeting to order, if everyone could take their seats. welcome. since this is our first housekeg , we talked about the five minute rule, i did not get into the specifics. now that we have witnesses and each of you are asking questions. the five minute rule applies to the totality of your conversation. or at least i'm going to try to have it be that way. if you ask a question for five minutes, it does not mean that the witness will answer it for another 10. we try to stop it at five. i will not cut you off midsentence, but when it hits that five minutes, there will be a tapping to remind you that we are supposed to move onto the next person. i will try to let you finish the thought, and we also have the option that if you don't get every thing it was asked. here is the failsafe will take it for the record an

the department of justice is net involved in handling the children. >> you have no idea how many poo em may be, you have not seen nil documents on your test or oh or anybody else? >> again, those are different departments within the executive. >> i know that. i know that you are the acting attorney general and you get a lot of reports and data and documents. you are not seeing anything to give us any idea just as how much children had been torn away in the arms of your mother. >> i have to refer you to hss or ahs again. >> do you know how many have reunited with their families. >> again, you don't have to be the one to break the little tinker stick counting the children. i just want to know if you have seen anything crossing your desk. to america just found this policy to be, you can't tell us that today. >> no, i want have to refer you to hsh. once we only deal with the adults. >> one last time, i am running out of town. >> at the state of the union the president says he's goin going -- does that mean you will drop all the litigation that you are involved in? >> as you know, congress

because the department of justice oversees the executive office for immigration review, will the departmentm-seekers have access to counsel in mexico in order to allow them to prepare for the hearing? yes or no. >> we are going to continue to follow the policies of currently in place. >> will you facilitate, assist, help, ensure that asylum-seekers have access to legal counsel in mexico? yes or no. >> congresswoman, there is a very well-defined process for asylum-seekers to obtain counsel and we will continue to follow that. >> mr. whitaker, even while they're in mexico? >> is the acting attorney general i cannot make an assurance, especially regarding what happens in a foreign country, i know you understand that. >> this is part of the reason why this is such a terrible policy. another question, about a week after the policy was announced, reports surfaced that immigrant rights advocates and attorneys were denied entry into mexico. the attorneys set their passports had been flagged and reports also indicated that this was not an issue on the mexican side but on the u.s. side. the departmen

i actually very confident about the department of justice. part of it is because of the people that i work with, the folks that we have appointed in this administration, which is really an outstanding group. political appointees, who are working with our career folks to enforce the rule of law. not everybody agrees with our policies, that's what elections are about. changing policies. but the principles of the department are being enforced. when we find people who -- when there are credible allegations of wrongdoing by department employees, we're taking action. it's not always as quick as everybody would like because we do follow processes. but we are taking appropriate action and we're promoting rule of law. i think when you look back in the long run it's always hard when you are caught up in any issue of significant public controversy to be objective about it, but i'm very confident when we look back in the long run on this year of the department of justice, we'll be proud of the way the department's conducted itself anti-president will dese

what do you consider to be the leadership of the department of justice? >> the hierarchy with people responding to them, head of a division, deputy attorney generals. if you look at the flow chart of the upper echelon. think about the image doj created for civil rights, opportunity for all. we had a number of agents come here and none of them did find an african-american. your charge of civil rights and making people feel you're fighting for equality. you mentioned charlottesville and charging the person with 30 counts, and i applaud you for that. do you believe that in charlottesville they were good people on both sides? >> congressman, i think the act, while -- again, part of an ongoing prosecution, i can tell you the act was charged as a hate crime. >> i agree with you and i applaud you for that. but that's one individual. i'm asking you in general, do you believe that there were good people that were protesting and there were good people that were anti-protestors? i'm talking about the people marching with the tiki torches and the chants. do you think

the department of elections. and from oewd. any questions for oewd? >> supervisor yee: seeing none, i guess we will continue by having public testimony. okay. would the public in support of -- in support of this assessment district come on up? >> steve gibson, president urban place consulting. you know for the last two and a half years i was the director of the tenderloin cbd. and that is relative when we look at the programs and services that the soma west cbd has designed into their program. particularly, i want to stress the idea that the guiding principle of most cbds and definitely soma west, we have it designed as all district stakeholders housed and unhoused have the right to live, work in a clean, healthy safe neighborhood. that is what cbds are about. and we're looking to building it on the tenderloin model where we employ with the downtown streets team. we work with them to get people off the streets and into employment. in the past year, in the tenderloin we've hired five of the downtown street teams to provide. they have full-time job, bene

which was for a while something that congress would not let the department do. and it's also possible if you do it strategically and look at what the requirements are are going to be going into the future, you may actually end up wanting to go out and acquire more areas to do some of the things that i mentioned. for example, training. and create environments that are conducive to the type of combat environments we're going to see in the future. >> folks, we've run out of time. thanks to those who joined us here today. thanks to those who tuned in online or via cspan. thanks for being here. join me in a round of applause, please. [ applause ] here's a look at what's coming up on cspan 3 next testimony from two governors at a hearing on climate change and its impact on american communities. after that mayors and advocates for gun control talk about gun violence and hate crimes in their cities. it's from a recent meeting of the u.s. conference of mayors. following that, discussions on public health and civil rights, from the recent liberty con conference, from the l

we're the city's largest department. of that, san francisco general represents the most significant portion followed by behavioral health and laguna hospital. expenditure wise, salary makes up more than half of our department's expenditures and it's followed by the non-personal service the contracted services you guys approve on a regular basis. and it really represents primarily direct services as well. the bulk, almost 85% of our department's budget is around personnel and contracted services. this graph shows the revenue and general fund support and revenue support we have within the department. the blue bar represents revenue by division and then the orange bar that sits on top is the general fund that comes in to offset to make whole our total expenditures so what you're seeing here is the bulk of our divisions are predominantly backed by revenue. overall the department does leverage over $1.5 billion of revenue for its $2.3 billion budget. this is more of a table view of the slides. what you see here in that bottom

would you consider the leadership of the department of justice? >> the hierarchy with people responding to them, head of a division, deputy attorney generals. if you look at the flow chart echelon. think about the image to me, d.o.j. created to protect civil rights and advocate for alma, we've had the last two attorney generals come here, not one of them thought they could find or did find an african-american at d.o.j. to bring with them. and you're charged with enforcing civil rights and making people feel that you're fighting for equality. you mentioned charlottesville and charging the person with 30 counts and i applaud you for that. do you believe that in charlottesville there were good people on both sides? >> um, congressman, i think the act, while -- you know, again, part of an ongoing prosecution -- >> let me say this. >> the act was charged as a hate crime. >> i agree with you and i applaud you for that. but that's one individual. i'm asking you in general, do you believe that there were good people that were protesting and there were good

to be influenced by the conclusion of the department. i want them to come to their own conclusion based on their own investigation of the facts that they were able to get, and i want them to get everything. >> commissioner hamasaki: but that's the purpose of an independent agency, right? >> president hirsch: that's not their role. >> commissioner hamasaki: what this suggests to me is what we're going to do would be to memo memorialize in this m.o.u. the restriction of the opportunities to investigate. so i don't know -- it's -- they are independent of the department. the departments exist over here. we don't interfere -- like, to me, this is interfering with their ability to investigate which is why i'm concerned, which is why i don't feel krned with this particular section, but i feel concerned about -- concerned with this particular section, but i feel concerned about -- >> president hirsch: commissioner dejesus? >> commissioner dejesus: so i think a point of clarification. if you read the sentence above, it says the d.p.a. shall send c

the c.s.a. realm? is that goes back to your client department? >> it literally goes back to the client department. the transaction, general hospital is a good example. they are their on own fund. all the money they collect, revenues, everything is in a fund. we get two tenth of one percent of that of our activities. which is couple of million dollars. it becomes subject to any of the controls that are in that fund. if we identify a project or an audit that we think we need to funding for in the future year, we have the option to rerequest that it be carried forward into a future fiscal year. which we do sometimes. in general, i mentioned it so that people are aware that the money that was allocated to us doesn't get spent to us. it goes back to the original purpose that it was allocated from. >> great. thank you for that clarification. the other question i had to tonia was about -- i noticed that in our forward debt calendar, the seismic program is going to issue bonds. this is a program from 1992. that's a different problem. it was originally $350,000 and they've only issued about $89,000 accordin

the department of public works. we're all working together coming up with solutions, we have, to your point commissioner, raised the issue of budgeting and working collaboratively that we're part of the solution and part of the response. they have asked for additional resources as part of our budget. back in november, they worked with me to submit through the hsoc funding for additional resources for 'e e.m.s. and we believe it has a district impact of the street behavior and street conditions. many of us attended, even though we don't work on the streets regularly, we would never ask someone in our department to do something that we weren't willing or capable of doing ourselves. it is part of our minimum requirements for eligibility to retain our positions so many of us went through c.p.r. recertification. it's always interesting. the e.m.s. division and the division of training did a great training data headquarters so i feel very comfortable if there was an emergency here i would be right in there. thank you to th

and how did you become the head of the department of justice. hopefully you can help me work through this confusion. mr. whitaker, that was a statement. if not a question. i assume you know the differenc difference. the investigation into the possible trump-a russian collision on the 2016 election has resulted in 37 indictments, is that correct? >> i believe that number is correct but most of those folks were russian citizens. >> 34 individuals have been indicted, true? >> while i have encountered those as i prepared for my hearing preparation, i believe those are consistent with the numbers. >> three corporate entities have been indicted, correct? >> i believe so, correct. >> the investigation has identified 199 different chemical criminal acts, correct? there have been seven guilty pleas, correct? >> yes, there have been seven guilty pleas. >> four people have already been sentenced to prison, true? >> i believe so, but i do not have this information in front of me so to the extent that i disagree with you, it's because these are facts. >> trum