i'm sure at some point the fbi and the dnc had a dialogue. but you'd have to ask them. >> time expired. five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i would like to yield a member to the ranking member to ask a question. >> i just want to follow up on mr. king's comments and question. i really agree quite completely with mr. king. and i'm not saying this is matter of hindsight. senator feinstein and i were saying this in realtime as it was going on. why didn't the president of the united states and, secretary, you did what you could do. why didn't the president of the united states at the time you were making your attribution or thereafter speak to the american people and say a foreign power is interfering in our affairs. this isn't a democrat thing or republican thing but an american thing. they need to be rejected and they need to stop. why wasn't that done? was there thought given to that? why was that course rejected? >> again, congressman shift, we did make the statement and we were very concerned that we not be perceived as taking sides in

the primary actor that interfaced with the dnc would have been dhs or fbi? >> in a perfect world it would be both of us. it would be law enforcement and asset response so dhs, law enforcement and when necessary the intelligence community and there have been cases where we have worked well hand in hand together, law enforcement and homeland security addressing a situation. >> one of the reasons i raise this issue is and one of the reasons i think are the public nature of these hearings is so important is the russians are among the most capable cyber adversaries in the world, are they not? >> yes. >> and for the most part if the russians want to get into the dnc or the rnc, they're going to find a way to get in, would you agree with that? >> i tend to be not that fatalistic especially in my old role, but it's, you know -- it's like -- it's like saying sooner or later there's going to be another act of violence in this country, but you can minimize the vulnerabilities and the opportunities through a number of steps that can be taken. >> without question, but non

i'm sure at some point the fbi and the dnc had a dialogue. you would have to ask them. >> the time is expired. >> i would like to yield a minute to the ranking member to ask a question. >> i want to follow up on mr. king's comments and question. i agree completely with mr. king. i'm not saying this as a matter of hindsight. we were saying this in real time as it was going on. you did what you could do. why didn't the president of the united states at the time you were making your attribution or thereafter speaking to the american people and say a foreign power is interfering in our affairs, this isn't democratic, this isn't republican, they need to be rejected and they need to stop. why wasn't that done? was there thought given to that? why was that rejected? >> again, congressman schiff, we did make the statement. we were very concerned that we not be perceived as taking sides in the election, injecting ourself into a very heated campai campaign. or taking steps to themselves delegitimize the election process and undermine the integrity of th

the dnc was the victim of a crime. i'm trying to understand why the victim of a crime would not turn over evidence to you and jim comey who were both a political and come from a political backgrounds. i'm quite sure at some point in the timeline, they did do that. time, i wasnitial not satisfied that we were able to get in there ourselves to help them identify the bad actor and patch the vulnerabilities. i'm certain at some point, the fbi and the dnc had a dialogue, but you would have to ask them. >> like to yield a minute to the ranking member. >> point follow up on comments and questions as i really agree quite completely. i'm not saying this is a matter of hindsight. senator feinstein and i were saying this in real time. why didn't the president of the united states -- you did what you could do. why didn't the president of the united states at the time you were making your attribution be to the american people and say that a foreign power is interfering in our affairs? is an american thing. they need to be rejected

the dnc commuter technician finally discovers the breach.gh most of damage has been done the dnc notifies the fbi and hires skroud strike, security firm. crowd strikes quickly identified two culprits, both linked to russia. one dubbed fancy bear, the other cozy bear. familiar foes for cyber security experts. >> long before it had transpired around the elections we've known this actor for many years. >> what kind of evidence, some of it surprisingly simple such as time stamp, showing the hackers were starting and finishing their workdays on moscow time. >> the mistake they made is leaving the time stamps. if you look at enough of them overtime you get a picture of what hours their working. what they come down to is work schedule that fits right in with western russia's time zone. besides that, there's a lot of russia language art facts. >> that means computer code written in the russian alphabet. hole quist and his team did not let down their guards and by the summer of 2016 they discovered fancy bear sniffing out more prey. the russian actor

this is coming from the dnc lawyers. the longer the media does not cover this story, the democratic party is going to be hurt more. and i am crying on the inside as a democrat. nevada,, anthony in democratic caller. we will take a short break. when we come back, democratic in silicon ro khanna valley, we will about his efforts to close the skills gap in the high-tech industry and throughout the economy. later in response to last week's shooting at a congressional baseball practice, republican congressman tom massie of ♪ >> sunday night on afterwards, a financial expert and economic professor detail how low to moderate income families manage their finances. >> the risk of small decisions going

never reaching out to dnc leaders and never making the short trip in person to dnc headquarters. >> what we can probably say, be more aggressive, but again, it's hard to predict where these things are going to end up and this one ended up in a pretty interesting mace. >> the fbi told cnn it tried to alert dnc staff, including sharing information on how to identify breaches in their systems. by november 2015, polls show hillary clinton leading the pack of democratic contenders. >> join my campaign, join this effort. let's go win for america. thank you, all. >> it was now one year to election day. and the fbi agent called again with even more alarming news. a dnc computer was now transmitting information back to russia. still, dnc executives claim they were not made aware of the threat, leaving the russians to roam free inside the democrats' computers for months. in the end, giving them further and further ammunition to disrupt the u.s. election. >> a hostile foreign power is trying to actively engage in our electoral process. you would have thought that that would have are risen up to the

so i think in retrospect, yeah, the movement that phone call came in, the dnc -- the leadership at theuld have been alerted and they should have had people crawling all over that place figuring out what happened and how to plug the leaks. >> you mentioned adam schiff, the ranking democrat on your committee. he's said that the obama administration should have done more to counter russian interference. do you agree with that, should they? >> i absolutely agree with that. look, what the president said that there was some sort of collusion or that president obama did nothing is absolute nonsense. president obama mobilized the intelligence community to put together a unanimous intelligence assessment. he called putin, there were sanctions. a lot was done, but not enough was done. look, vladamir putin is like your schoolyard bully. he's not going to -- he's not going to change his behavior until he gets knocked down. so i do think he didn't pay nearly the cost he needed to pay. therefore, i fear that the lesson he took away from this is he can do this with impunity. i do worry that he's plot

lou: you would have thought that bernie sanders was a little upset with the crimes of the dnc. : you would have thought. lou: since they colluded, you know how democrats react when they hear collusion, colluded to deny the party's nomination. congressman gohmert: now the collusion has been in the department of justice where we're finding most collusion. [vo] when it comes to investing, looking from a fresh perspective can make all the difference. it can provide what we call an unlock: a realization that often reveals a better path forward. at wells fargo, it's our expertise in finding this kind of insight that has lead us to become one of the largest investment and wealth management firms in the country. discover how we can help find your unlock. but when we brought our daughter home, that was it. now i have nicoderm cq. the nicoderm cq patch with unique extended release technology helps prevent your urge to smoke all day. it's the best thing that ever happened to me. every great why needs a great how. dearthere's no other way to say this. it's over. i've found a permanent escap

ainsley: i walked away from her blaming the dnc. didn't win because the trump people, the deplorables, the underbelly. but then she said the d nc is bankrupt and thanks to me, i was injecting money. does this hurt the dems? >> the idea that some saudi prince gives bill clinton $2 million for a speech on diarrhea in africa so that hillary can then give the $2 million to prop up the dnc. at the time, we were told that the dnc had the great ground game, the great data mining and trump had no ground game. he was just winging it. and, again, it's the complete opposite of what it was at the time. >> and are does she really believe it was a nothing burger? >> by the way, russian for nothing. that's what trump's game away. brian: i just want to bring this up. she also when asked, why did you give those speeches to goldman sachs? and she asked a man can do it but a woman can't? really? it's sexist now? what are you talking about? >> again, it's this dissecretary. she was a terrible candidate. this place where the wife of the previous presiden

so i think in retrospect, yeah, the movement that phone call came in, the dnc -- the leadership at the dnc should have been alerted, and they should have had people crawling all over that place figuring out what happened and how to plug the leaks. >> you mentioned adam schiff, the ranking democrat on your committee. he's said that the obama administration should have done more to counter russian interference. do you agree with that, should they? >> i absolutely agree with that. look, what the president said that there was some sort of collusion or that president obama did nothing is absolute nonsense. president obama mobilized the intelligence community to put together a unanimous intelligence assessment. he called putin, john brennan. there were sanctions. a lot was done, but not enough was done. look, vladamir putin is like your schoolyard bully. he's not going to -- he's not going to change his behavior until he gets knocked down. so i do think he didn't pay nearly the cost he needed to pay. therefore, i fear that the lesson he took away from this is he can do this with impunity. i

. >> yesterday during the interview she gave we're seeing right now on screen she was critical of the dnc saying they didn't give her anything, there wasn't enough money there to support her moving forward. is she, you know, what the party needs or does she need to step aside a little bit and let some of the new names that quite frankly i mean the democrats need to rebuild if they'r going to put somebody up against the president come 2020. >> i think that. >> sure. >> i think you make a point there. >> let me jump in. >> yeah. >> number one, is she -- she's absurd i think to blame the dnc 'cause at the end of the day the campaign is the driver and it's always about the campaign win or losers of action. >> i don't think that was blaming the dnc. >> we're in june of 2017. for 2020 election there's plenty of time for lots of democrats to emerge and they will emerge and i assure our whatever happens in 20 -- june of 2017 will have no bearing in november of 2020. >> maurice go for it. >> no, i don't think she was blaming the dnc per se. i think she was explaining how much of ooh a resource she

>> the dnc has a lot to prove right now. w they can organize, that they can make a difference in these midterm elections. i mean, this is the time to show and prove for them. 2016 was a huge loss. >> steve, is there a trust issue? is there a trust problem with the dnc? you talked about your strong opinions. what are they? >> yeah, i think there is. both those points are completely valid. 2016 was not a good year for my party, and there are so many different ways for people to be engaged now with different organizations out there or through candidates themselves. i think the dnc has to go out and prove that it is a viable, usable organization going forward. i'm not worried about the first quarter fundraising. there is a change in the chair. that's natural as people get up and going. the dnc will have to step up and show it is making changes. >> steve joining us from jacksonville. steve, draft biden, totally dead, totally gone, not to be revived? get you on the record. >> let's get through 2018 first. >> okay. door is still ope

except for the part where she went after the dnc which might not have been that helpful. >> yeah. so, kara, you actually asked hillary clinton about the now-infamous covfefe tweet by president trump and here's what she said to you. >> yeah. i don't think we can get into covfefe because it was a longer thing. >> i thought it was a hidden message to the russians. >> oh, you did? >> it's interesting to me because it just sounds like he was tweeting and he fell asleep and, you know, hit the, you know -- >> yeah. >> spelled the wrong thing then hit the button by accident. go on. >> what i think about it, i thought it was very clever. there's a lot of clever response across twitter about this thing. it's a little meme. it will go away. it's funny. that was a funny response by her. of course, she did a perfect, i have to say, it was peak hillary twitter doing that, that response. you know, it's just back and forth. just political back and forth. you knows, know, i have to take with her tearing down the dnc's digital operation. it was a terrible operation. it didn't work. things need tohap

dozen high-level officials that say they can connect president putin with giving instructions to hack the dnc computers and to plant fake stories? what is the current white house doing about this? >> well, alisyn, the president has said previously, and he stands by that, particularly as president-elect, that he would be concerned about anybody interfering in our democracy. we saw a lot of people interfering with our democracy saying he couldn't win here at home. but i really am struck by former homeland security secretary jeh johnson's testimony earlier this week which you covered extensively, he seemed frustrated the dnc refused to help with dhs. they knew the dnc was vulnerable, the rnc i'm sure was vulnerable and had safeguards in place and had a different result. it's clear even the obama administration there was concern. there were actions trying to be taken. the question for the dnc is, why were you so arrogant in not letting the security of your own administration help you? >> that's fine. my question is, what is the white house, what is president trump now doing from preventing russia

>> the dnc to keep it going. >> bret: this was president obama's dnc. in essence she is pointing the blame at president obama there in the election. this is something. if you look at the last three democratic nominees running for president, all three of them believe they were cheated out of an election. hillary clinton talking about it more than al gore or john kerry at this point. let's start there and bring in the panel. jonah goldberg, senior editor at national review. susan page, editor in editor-in-chief of lifezette laura ingraham and syndicated columnist charles krauthammer. >> there's a lot to focus on. short of getting five clock shadow and wearing wingtips on the beach, her transformation into full nixonian bitterness is incomplete. the idea that literally every single possible variable was to blame except her and her actions was remarkable. mesmerizing watching it. we forget that this is a side of hillary that's always been there. in her memoirs, she writes about a vast conspiracy that chief justice rehnquist was leading against her and her hu

on the dnc side he said he found out late in the game that the fbi weren't cooperating.response, symone. >> former chairwoman debbie wasserman schultz has come out and said that is not true, that the dnc was actively combating this and other issues, they actively had contracted with crowd strike to make sure that they were taking all the precautions they could take. could the dnc have done more? absolutely. to say the dnc sat back and did nothing, to assert the obama administration did nothing is not true. what we should be concerned about is with the trump administration. >> ben, this is in the new. the president didn't just learn that the obama administration knew about this, and if he did, that's the most frightening thing i've heard in quite some time. this was reported at the time, even jay johnson, the thing that -- shame on all of us statement during his testimony, it was the same time the access hollywood tape came out and wound up not getting any attention. it was out there. certainly the president has been getting briefings for months where he knows exactly wha

we are going to want to talk to people from the dnc, from the fbi more about this.t for the server? if there was, did the party have a concern about giving up its server in the middle of a presidential campaign and what can we learn from this so that in the next presidential election again the russians hack in the dnc or rnc, how can we make sure that information gets to the top of the party, which apparently didn't at the time, so that action can be taken promptly. >> you mentioned james comey, former fbi director. he also testified that the obama attorney general, loretta lynch, improperly injected politics into the investigation of hillary clinton's e-mails. listen to what he told the senate intelligence committee. >> attorney general had directed me not to call it an investigation but instead to call it a matter. which confused me and concerned me. but that was one of the bricks in the load that led me to conclude, i have to step away from the department if we're to close this case credibly. >> senator, dianne feinstein was on this program recently and she said

but the government can't order the dnc to take control of the servers.tions of why they don't use the tactics earlier. >> lou: appreciate you being here and your views. >> they thought they were going to win like three. wouldn't you say, at least three. the truth is, people love uls. all of uls. they love us. >> lou: is it time for pitiful peel -- pelosi and crying chuck to go. we'll have more from the swamp, next. stay with us. ♪imagine no possessions ♪i wonder if you can ♪no need for greed or hunger ♪a brotherhood of man ♪imagine all the people ♪sharing all the world...you, ♪you may say i'm a dreamer ♪but i'm not the only one ♪i hope some day you'll join us♪ ♪and the world will live as one♪ womathat seed or kernel story, that they might think is mundane and to me is so spectacular. then i want to draw it out of them -- their inspirations, their struggles, their dreams. oh, my god! [ laughs ] i'm a filmmaker, and i wanted to earn a living doing what i love. what i didn't know was business. i did not know how to be an entrepreneur, so i had to learn. the

but the government can't order the dnc to take control of the servers.re is questions of why they don't use the tactics earlier. >> lou: appreciate you being here and your views. >> they thought they were going to win like three. wouldn't you say, at least three. the truth is, people love uls. all of uls. they love us. >> lou: is it time for pitiful peel -- pelosi and crying chuck to go. we'll have more from the swamp, next. stay with us. ♪ hey, i'm the internet! i know a bunch of people who would love that. the internet loves what you're doing... ...so build a better website in under an hour with... ...gocentral from godaddy. the internet is waiting. start for free today at godaddy. ♪ ♪ did you go tanning? ♪ you're getting so tan. ♪ we need some sun. ♪ ♪ protect yourself. ♪ protect your friends. ♪ stop tanning. ♪ learn more at spotskincancer.org >> lou: a few thoughts on the democrats growing desperate and delusional. they failed to buy a victory in george ja and now turning on their own. it is a watershed moment. for the first time they are not attacki

among them is that she was not served well by the dnc data operation. listen to this. >> so, i'm now the nominee of the democratic party. i inherent nothing from the democratic party. >> what do you mean nothing? >> i mean, it was bankrupt. it was on the verge of insolvency. its data was mediocre to poor, non-existent, wrong. i had to inject money into it. >> this is the dnc you're -- >> the dnc, to keep it going. >> had to check to make sure that she was talking about the dnc. all right, brian fallon, number one, is it accurate what she's saying? number two, is it helpful? >> i'm not going to point fingers at the dnc. i think that there is probably -- >> she is. >> fair enough. i'm not going to join in that. i think that there's probably criticisms that could be fairly made against the dnc. there's also criticisms that can be made against our own campaign. i think we're past the time of relitigating our failures and it would be more productive to sit down with tom perez and folks at the dnc and focus on rebuilding our party from the inside out to be bet

is the dnc the real reason she lost?, you know, my focus, erin, has not simply been on 2016 and what happened there but the fact that we lost over 900 seats over the last eight years. what it reflects is we have to up our game at the dnc. i have great respect for our staff but when you have a size 7 budget and a size 14 need that's not enough. that's why we're investing in the basics, including technological innovation. i'm very excited about the tech team that we've put together. i'm very excited about our investments in our grass roots organizing, including the resistant summer we're undertaking. when you don't invest in organizing, in the training of candidates, technology to the extent that you need to, then you're not investing in that basic infrastructure and that's a big part of how we lost a lot of elections over the last eight years and that's what we're trying to change. >> obviously you weren't there at the time at the dnc. i want to make that clear. part of what she's saying is true. the other thing she said

the dnc, and it's that simple. michael, thanks. randy, thank >> thank you, lou dobbs is next. keep it height rear on fox business. lou: we begin tonight with house intelligence committee's investigation o of the obama spying an unmasks scandal. three of the house intel committee sep reapas to the cia, the fbi and the nsa. not to individual officials, committee 1 information from those ages about requests made by the individual. in a include for form -- susan rice. john brennan, samantha power, all of these officials seeking to unmask the names of trump -- committee seekingthe come i classified documents from the agents, so far the committee has met nothing but resis stanlt froresistance from the agent, james rose we rosen with our report. reporter: fbi concerned they were served with sou supervisorinas, each named as figures of interest three senior obama era officials, former "house" national security adviser susan rice was dedicated last month. rice at the time denied wrong doing and told us today she is unaware of subpoenas directed at her, and john bron an was also named in

don't blame comey, don't blame the russians, don't blame the dnc. they were all factors, and don't blame bernie. in best thing that happens 2016 is if bernie sanders ran the primary, it made hillary a better candidate and brought issues to the floor should never would've talked about. a $15 minimum wage and to oppose nafta and oppose the trend atlantic -- the keystone pipeline. universal support college for every kid in america. got her to support almost to support single-payer health care, at least she went to expanding the availability of medicated. i also think it's an unfair cut on bernie. bernie represents basically all white vermont. aswas not there in the south hillary clinton and bill clinton got, to their credit, they a huge majority of the african-american vote and they deserved it. got his chopsders and politics in the civil rights movement and was arrested in the south marching with dr. mark -- dr. martin luther king. and on prison reform, so important to the african american community, nobody has been stronger than bernie sanders. but wh

in the wake of the hack at the dnc, the dnc didn't want the assistance of the fbi.after that, president trump said why did the dnc refuse to turn over its server to the fbi and still hasn't? it's a big dem scam and excuse for losing the election. what is the reason why the dnc didn't ask or even allow help from the homeland security department? >> what was the democratic response, what was the department of homeland security response and the fbi. the only thing i can say that's public thus far is james comey was asked about this during his open system recently. what he testified is that the dnc gave the fbi the forensic report done by a very reputable cyber security firm and that's all they needed in terms of their analysis. >> do you think they did enough? >> i don't know. that's the public testimony we have thus far. we are going to want to talk to people from the dnc, from the fbi more about this. find out, was there a quest for the server? if there was, did the party have a concern about giving up its server in the middle of a presidential campaign and what can

but the government can't order the dnc to take control of the servers. there is questions of why they don't use the tactics earlier. >> lou: appreciate you being here and your views. >> they thought they were going to win like three. wouldn't you say, at least three. the truth is, people love uls. all of uls. they love us. >> lou: is it time for pitiful peel -- pelosi and crying chuck to go. we'll have more from the swamp, next. stay with us. dentures are very different to real teeth. they're about 10 times softer and may have surface pores where bacteria can multiply. polident kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria and helps dissolve stains. so dentures are cleaner, fresher, and brighter. polident. here comes the fun with sea-doo ♪ starting at just $5,299 and up to $500 rebate visit sea-doo.com today hidden in every swing, every chip, and every putt, is data that can make the difference between winning and losing. the microsoft cloud helps the pga tour turn countless points of data into insights that transform their business and will enhance the game for

but the government can't order the dnc to take control of the servers. there is questions of why they don't use the tactics earlier. >> lou: appreciate you being here and your views. >> they thought they were going to win like three. wouldn't you say, at least three. the truth is, people love uls. all of uls. they love us. >> lou: is it time for pitiful peel -- pelosi and crying chuck to go. we'll have more from the swamp, next. stay with us. >> lou: a few thoughts on the democrats growing desperate and delusional. they failed to buy a victory in george ja and now turning on their own. it is a watershed moment. for the first time they are not attacking president trump. but attacking nancy pelosi who faces growing back flash the members of her own party. he is defiant and bragging about p her leadership. >> i am a master legislator and a astute leader and i respect any opinion member ps have. but my decision of how long i stay is not up to them and i am worth the trouble. >> certainly for the republican she is a master legislator who proclaimed on obamaca

but the government can't order the dnc to take control of the servers. there is questions of why they don't use the tactics earlier. >> lou: appreciate you being here and your views. >> they thought they were going to win like three. wouldn't you say, at least three. the truth is, people love uls. all of uls. they love us. >> lou: is it time for pitiful peel -- pelosi and crying chuck to go. we'll have more from the swamp, next. stay with us. ♪ here comes the fun with sea-doo ♪ sea-doo has the most affordable watercraft on the market starting at just $5,299 and up to $500 rebate visit sea-doo.com today to f...nerve pain shoots and burns its way into your day... ...i hear you. when that pain makes simple errands simply unbearable... ...i hear you. i hear you because my dad struggled with this pain. make sure your doctor hears you too. so folks, don't wait. step on up. and talk to your doctor. because you have places to go... ...and people who can't wait for you to get there. if you have diabetes and burning, shooting pain in your feet or hands... step on

but the government can't order the dnc to take control of the servers.here is questions of why they don't use the tactics earlier. >> lou: appreciate you being here and your views. >> they thought they were going to win like three. wouldn't you say, at least three. the truth is, people love uls. all of uls. they love us. >> lou: is it time for pitiful peel -- pelosi and crying chuck to go. we'll have more from the swamp, next. stay with us. you totaled your brand new car. nobody's hurt, but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. but when we brought our daughter home, that was it. now i have nicoderm cq. the nicoderm cq patc

the dnc, and it's that simple. michael, thanks. ews this morning. fbi, cia and nsa ottawa subpoenas over the mystique of american spirit to many documents in gourmet top above officials is not national national security adviser michael flynn and president trump's personal lawyer michael cohen. good morning. i'm cheryl casone. lauren: good morning. i'm trained for. academy blaming russia for her loss. we love the story for you. cheryl: will we stay or will we

three top officials of the dnc were removed from the offices of the dnc because of their collusion. d against the very idea of the democratic party. >> putin was able really to laugh at us. everybody in the world interested in these issues knows that. and they saw this whole thing as a remarkable lack of will on the part of the united states. it right along with president trump's decision several years earlier to first warn the syrians not to use chemical weapons. then when they used chemical weapons to hand the whole problem over to russia. lou: the national media are writing what a brilliant president he was. the same national liberal media taking the president to task for suggesting the nato members would consider raising their support of nato to the required 2% of gdp. we learned nato allies are boosting their defense spending by 4.2%. this is truly a change in tone, term and direction. >> yes. and welcome. absolutely. law * thanks for being with us. be sure to vote in our poll knit. should the senate and the house consider new leadership if they fail to repeal and replace obamac

, and i recalled that it was some months before i was learning of this, the fbi and dnc have been ct with each other about this. i was not very happy to be learning about it several months later. >> is not just the department of homeland security that was late, it was fbi as well. the dnc was not as helpful or forthright as they should have been if they considered themselves victims of crime, which they were, and wanted to address that. you're going to have to talk with the people at the dnc, but it didn't help them in the investigation, that was concerned about russian hacking or russian interference. >> sandra: the american people want answers, as well. as the entire investigation runs out and continues on, what concerns you the most at this point? >> from what i said a little earlier, we've learned lessons from protecting the email. individual states can protect their voter databases and voter machines. democracy are vulnerable to propaganda, and divided democracies as we are right now are even more vulnerable. the people who are responsible for this, are celebrating. how do we

but the government can't order the dnc to take control of the servers.re is questions of why they don't use the tactics earlier. >> lou: appreciate you being here and your views. >> they thought they were going to win like three. wouldn't you say, at least three. the truth is, people love uls. all of uls. they love us. >> lou: is it time for pitiful peel -- pelosi and crying chuck to go. we'll have more from the swamp, next. stay with us. ♪ here comes the fun with sea-doo ♪ sea-doo has the most affordable watercraft on the market starting at just $5,299 and up to $500 rebate visit sea-doo.com today >> lou: a few thoughts on the democrats growing desperate and delusional. they failed to buy a victory in george ja and now turning on their own. it is a watershed moment. for the first time they are not attacking president trump. but attacking nancy pelosi who faces growing back flash the members of her own party. he is defiant and bragging about p her leadership. >> i am a master legislator and a astute leader and i respect any opinion member ps have. but my

but it was an interesting toss of the dnc under the bus by secretary clinton. she raised $1 billion.. she had a modern data organization on her campaign that was, you know, that basilly was as good as it could get within the democratic party. you know, it's an interesting choice of place to lay the blame. >> jonathan allen, azi, thank you so much for joining me this morning. >> thank you. take care. >>> capitol hill showdown as james comey is set to testify about the russian investigation. how the president could stop it from happening. >>> and what the white house says about using that option. ee my friends know me so well. they can tell what i'm thinking, just by looking in my eyes. but what they didn't know was that i had dry, itchy eyes. i used artificial tears from the moment i woke up... ...to the moment i went to bed. so i finally decided to show my eyes some love,... ...some eyelove. eyelove means having a chat with your eye doctor about your dry eyes because if you're using artificial tears often and still have symptoms, it could be chronic dry eye. it

and the rnc but the dnc would not turn their super over. erybody knew hillary was going to win and the leverage was to go to and if hillary won. he had access to of the stuff that all the stuff she had. he had access to her server and everything is destined did. the uranium one deal needs to be looked into. he the first week in office took the anti-ballistic missile thing out of poland. for no reason. he was helping russia. that gave russia leverage over data. withe hot mike thing obama. bill clinton got paid $500,000 from moscow. and another cawley said podesta was tied up in this. when it came up in the debates about romney, they blew him off in the media said russia is the biggest problem. then you have loretta lynch and comey, that's where the collusion is. she got on the plane with bill clinton, she had to step down. she told comey not to start an investigation. then he said all these things where she broke the law. and then hee law said there was no intent. that's where the collusion is. david from connecticut on our republican line. d

the dnc, and it's that simple. michael, thanks. randy, thank >> thank you, lou dobbs is next. rear on fox business. lou: we begin tonight with house intelligence committee's investigation o of the obama spying an unmasks scandal. three of the house intel committee sep reapas to the cia, the fbi and the nsa. not to individual officials, committee 1 information from those ages about requests made by the individual. in a include for form -- susan rice. john

and somehow the fbi was denied access by the dnc and the fbi with the russians invading cyber meeklyd away and left the dnc to his own sqalid fate? >> i think they make up excuses for things they are losing at. with this campaign if you are talking about collusion and influence. look at how google and twitter and facebook, democrat party itself. and cnn were like trying to influence our election and talk about searching allegorithims on the search engine. it is all documented. but no call for investigation to the american companies. we had all of the information we needed. >> lou: googlele and its excutives were moving in and out of the obama white house almost daily. and they had had all of the data tools known to silicon valley

this was a lower level person. >> it sounds like incompetence at the dnc but let's move on. gence officials have been saying for months that russia will continue this election interference, they're obviously doing it in europe right now. what is the u.s. doing to make sure this does not happen again? >> good question, and i think we don't have a good answer. because it was an act of war. it was, in fact, a cyber war attack. we would not just sit back under normal circumstances. because everything is so decentralized, there are some benefits to that, but there is at least one state that doesn't even have a paper trail. i think at the very least we've got to come up to some standardizati standardization, and the most hack-proof systems that exist and then provide the kinds of tools that will be helpful to local jurisdictions. because they will come back at us and they'll come back with a v vengeance. they've already done enough early work to get into voter records. if they can get into voter records, who is to say they can't get into voter tallies. >>> i want to get your reacti

you had a lot of disgruntled employers inside the dnc. that is where happened. this is all a distraction so you can stop the trump agenda. guest: first of all surya are not independent you are obvious the a republican. there were several reasons for losing the election. we did not get enough votes. we did not get folds in pennsylvania, michigan and wisconsin. it was a mistake for hillary clinton not to go back to wisconsin or have as good as policy on certain issues that would appeal to young people in ann arbor, wisconsin and medicine to bring that vote out. the interference in the election by the russians, and bringing out a bunch of stuff that was unnecessary and cause people to have questions, they had fake news out there to make hillary clinton went bad. i have no question in my mind and i don't think a reasonable person, or comments is person would think the russian influence was considerable and in my opinion it did. nobody else could see it might have contributed to the election of donald trump. that's why don lewis called it in illegitimate election. we

. >> this is the dnc. >> he never took the blame for herself.trump quickly responding, crooked hillary clinton blames everybody but herself, refuses to say she was a terrible candidate, hits facebook and even democrats and the dnc. this is how people fight these days, people in covfefe houses shouldn't throw covfefe. joni goldberg and charles krauthammer are saying enough with the excuses. >> short of 5:00 shadow and wearing wink keeps on the beach, the transition to bitterness is complete. the idea that literally every single possible variable is to blame except for her and her actions is remarkable, she launched a humiliating election that was almost unusable and because she never knew why she was running. the thought of sending emails to her staff in the middle of a campaign after essentially being on the road for eight years and begging them to come up with the theme. if you don't know why you're running for president you shouldn't be running for president. >> shocking new video, swaying, slurring his words and struggling to stand. >> abcd e

and put out what was basically the emails in the dnc. host: sir, i tend to agree with you on the election apparatus. i have seen questions about the integrity of the vote counts for the voting machines, but i'm not one of those people. i think we lost the numbers in the states that came the electoral victory. but i think that the russian interference affected the mood of the public and a lot of people on the edge that made a difference. it wouldn't have done that if the fact that she was being investigated, which was the comey angle, not the russian angle, donald trump would not have -- he spent the last 10 days of investigation -- of the election saying that she's under investigation and she's a criminal. worse than watergate. he knew that from polling that that would move a certain number of voters his way. and he was right. some people would say that it may not have been polling, it was his got. his gut was right and he's pretty good and that's what he's good at, using his got to know what gets those people motivated. he use that infor