the t dr has created a significant supply. there's 2 had the 6 million that hadn't think used but brown there's about 3 hundred thousand that's reported as used but the projects didn't ignored and they were not scald. so that leaves 2 hundred 3 million unused t dr out there. so there are 12 buildings that have certified t dr but haven't transferred any of the t dr. and the demand side we're seeing the current dammed is 1.6 million and that's made up of pipeline projects projects that are in the pipeline projects right now. so of this 1 point 67 million 8 hundred and 6 thousand have been acquired by pipeline projects. then the t d projects put together it looks like there's a demand for 8 hundred and 60 t drs. sow looking at into the future for t dr demand and supply oh, i should point out that the lowest price for t dr is $5.51. you can see most of them have been in the range of 18 to $25 given the program has been in existence for almost thirty years a lot of 3 may not be certified. it's interesting after the board of supervis

believe through the t dr program. when i talked to the capital planning committee yesterday, i recommended that price might want as $35 per square feet. currently it's 25 and that's impartial because the city is going to come out with the t dr at 25 square feet. and if you look at what the additional cost is if for example, the market is 10 there's per square feet today, if you increase that to $25 per square feet it would add to the development of $1.67 per square foot. but in the private sector it's very expensive. it mentioned the marys field and that's in excess of many dollars. the height scale - >> if i might. if my fellow commissioners the gentleman is an expert in this and if we don't mind extending his time >> and 10 tractions and that's 8 transactions. part of the issue in cigarette price is if the city sets it at $25 per square foot the private sector is going to sell it at 20 because there's a lot less risk for timing and such. so if the market is $25 per square foot the private sector is going to sell it $

>> the dr requestor, i know that if you could answer some questions. you know, that you have this agreement that was or took place with the previous owners and it is apparent that is the agreement does not have unlike a conditional use which goes with the property, i guess is agreement does not have the status that it remains with the property after it is sold. however, you are hoping that the owners will implement parts of the agreement. and i guess that what i am interested in knowing is what are the issues that are really key here because there were some concern about the historic nature of the building but, this is the size of the deck a key part of it? because it seems like if they enlarged their deck, it might not interfere with the building appearance that much. >> well there is a change, say the owners moved in and they moved the wind screen to where it was not visible from the street. and back to the edge and that was like shocking and i mean in a way. because as planning department, and that was a character in the building and it just does not

to remove the p dr space. we're happy to participate in the process that you guys are under golden in terms of looking at the formula retail from a citywide prospective and so we're perfectly fine with your staffs recommendation on this item. we're fine with holding off on divisional changes but we want some control established in this area so if there is a proposal if we could ask for your support or moving forward with the restricted use district and can work with the planning staff as a result of our study >> thank you. >> thanks andrea. so the properties are zoned p dr 1-b and one before retail operation are priltd but they're not subject to formula retail controls. this will butt put in place the formula retail controls and it would be the same remittance if the code except if any corridor retail use has no persecuted authorization that business would have to get the authorization. the department is recommending that the empathies approve with modifications of the proposed ordinance to redo the boundary to

otherwise the dr would not have been removed that easily. i do see that there is some new information with the previous dr sponsors indicating that there was an agreement, but unfortunately nothing is in writing. i don't know if there is enough here to rehear the case. so i'm still kind of pondering. >> the issue is whether merits of rehearing and i have not heard enough to vote to rehear it. >> i think for me, i think that the live testimony of individuals who are present as well as the affidavit that was submitted do raise issues that compel at least for me a sense of justice that isn't born out by this new development on the project. i think for those reasons, i give weight to testimony that is under that is sworn and under penalty of perjury. i see it for those people who are present whose clients or what not relied upon particular verbal representations do carry weight in the law and in equity and for those reasons i think there is enough to move for rehearing, to approve a rehearing. >> i think the question is when they used the term ag

. >> and the dr, when can they do that? if we approve the dr today could they come back tomorrow and approve the permit. >> yes, this is from a cu or you can make a decision without prejudice and they have a year to come back with the same exact request and in this instance if it is a code complying request, we have to respect that permit and review it and give our professional recommendation on it and if it results in a discretionary review bring it back to this body. in this instance they came in with a revision to that deck, and we did the notification process because we knew that there were neighbors who opposed the alteration and they were notified and the discretion review was filed, and it was brought back, because of prior agreement had been made, it does not negate us the inability to not follow through with the process. >> excuse me, with all due respect, i think that commissioner hillis is asking if under the original dr, that came before the... if it had come before the planning commission and if the planning co

think that it was a well thought-out agreement and we are looking at it and would i move to take the dr in set back the deck without a screen, but with a planter, and five feet from that property line. >> so you get an expanded deck and you don't get it fully to the property line and there is a five-foot buffer and i don't have what i think is an inappropriate screen on that. >> is there a second to that? >> maybe... i will second it at that point and we will want to talk to the project sponsor about the feeling but i will second it. >> commissioner moore? >> just for the record, in my recollection, that is in support of mr. washington and when we ask for two opposing parties, to work things out, it is mostly after we have looked at the project. the agreement was well created here, and it was not with any guidance from any planning commission, i know was seated in 2010. i do not recall this project because the project is a number of others, and it is things and the approval of the planning commission and how you paint your trim and all things and the tonalty of the garage and whatever,

the project sponsor. there any? >> okay seeing none. dr requester you have a two minute rebuttal >> just regarding the reiteratetion i provided there's documented each meeting that i had with the owners and i can assure you from november 2007 those were the items and it take a took a year so there was nothing to meet with the family to a continue to neat. we'd work anti some other stuff and wait, wait, wait. when i came there was a different architect and there was different plans and so they restraining order i brought on a respectable firm. i want to going go back to the third floor the shadow indicates a there's some dramatic impacts. i said there's a need to have a larger home. i have a home for 5 kids but - is this reasoning? i want to point out that i don't think the other edition billed build in the n 60's and the height of the home you can see how the neighborhood is by looking the entire block on both the ocean side and the homes that back up onto the cliff thank you >> second dr requester 0 two minute rebuttal. >> thank you. the

and the neighbors filed the dr in september of 2011. okay. and the principal problems that we have is that the addition of a penthouse and a roof deck that was mentioned. and we were in the neighbors were against those penthouse being built at all but in the negotiations, after all of the offer the dr, the developer became more interested in the negotiating. and the dr only lasted a couple of months, because we do work on the agreement. and that is the key point that i want to make. that the staff person kind of going off. and we reached it, and we withdraw the dr and the agreement was that the owners were shrink the size of the deck and that the plan and that changes. and the developer complied with the agreement and the owners moved in and the owners moved in, they promptly expanded the deck and put the glass screen up against where it is very visible on the west wall. we did not immediately file this dr, instead we had meetings but the owners would not budge, i think that it is important that the record shows that the current owners,

it's not in the agreement that i and the other dr requesters made in 2002. thank you. >> before you sit down, i have a question. did you say you have an e-mail between you and the permit holder that states that something is the final agreement? you have a correspondence is that reflects the final agreement? >> on my computer i have 3 documents. the first was a letter from november 9, 2004. that went to the planning department where i referenced our agreement. >> november 2004? referencing an agreement. do you know with any specificity what agreement you are referring to? >> there were the drawings that we all signed off on. there was a letter from the architect which i included as an attachment in the letter which i no longer have a copy of. but hopefully it's in the planning department files. >> it was communicated via e-mail? >> no. it was a letter and then i have a letter january 3rd, 2005 to the project sponsor asking him about what the progress was. he wrote back to me and in january 12, 2005 i have another letter thanking him for the proceeding and i do

the dr folks are concerned about the post panels and roof access. the planning department is remedying that the planning department match the dr south light well, to adjust to 5 feet >> thank you. dr requester. >> good evening president fong and commissioners. this is my wife. i live at 2154 larkin street. i'd like to say thank you for your consideration of this discretionary review and i appreciate the help of the planning department. my wife and i have been renter and we moved into our home. the proposed project has us concerned that the increased height will adversely effect the light which is the primary reason we purified the home. we have vivid our life savings and the thought of living in this for the next 40 years saddened us. the areas that would be implicated are the window in the stairwell and the windows in the master bedroom and i'll briefly touch on one area. this is the interior view of the stair to and from our master bedroom that window is the only nature light to the stairwell. we suggest adding a light well, in agreement with the

we can show you the cobra. dr. oz: the crow bra! sounds cool. there has been a lot of research for decades how they help with pain. >> you lie on your stomach, bring your palms down. it's similar to the upward dog but easier. you keep the legs on the floor and you just push the upper body up. you notice extreme pain in the low back, no, it shouldn't be extreme. just a nice tension in the low back. you just kind of hang out there and relax and breathe slow and deep and aim the breath into your low back. dr. oz: do we have to straighten the arms the whole way? >> you don't have to. you can walk out farther or keep them a little bit bent. you want to breathe slow and deep, especially into that area that you're trying to stretch, which is the low back. if you keep doing back bends like this, not only does it help back problems, but it gets, it kind of stimulates your whole system. you feel more energetic. dr. oz: how does that feel for you? >> i feel like a new person. dr. oz: it's cool, isn't it. >> i can start cleaning. dr. oz: you can start clean

just a quick review of the t drs. it's from a preservation property to ultimately, the it updated property. the term also referred to the limits. under the t dr program landmarks go consult t dr folks to make sure the code is being followed. the purpose of our study was to review the market and our method daughter-in-law was to review the database. it was a very expensive database. we also looked at body the price of t dr but it was difficult to find base it wasn't until the end of 2010 so that's something now we can get information on. so we interviewed brokers and other t dr market stakeholders to get information. we looked programs in other cities. we were guided by a committee led by the planning department. and in addition to planning staff we also had the real estate division and the controllers office and the office of capital planning. i'd like to thank tim frye and others who spent a lot of time with us answering our questions and how has the promising program worked in practice? >> the number certified is 1.8

in i other speakers in support of the dr? okay. seeing none project sponsor, you have 5 minutes. >> thank you, president fong. jeremy paul, speaking on behalf of the project sponsor, dr requester. i would like to start with a few issues. this location was the location of the market delli. the kitchen it uses was an approved and permitted for the market delli. when bacon moved in there, it did not require a chance of use. there is no separation between bacon and the market. the very come to work within the same space. he filed the permit applications properly and began doing business with their permanence. on the subject of this building permit application is an improved ventilation system. it clear that it needed. an accusation is that there is a cloud of acrid smoke. the have made an inspection. the market. i would ooild -- i would like to go to the overhead computer if i could. there we go. something like it. here the vacant store fronts at frederick street. there have been vacant store fronts. i want to show you the flavor of thi

dr. oz: one to five glasses? >> ideally you're spreading it out over the seven days. dr. oz: you have done this program. i understand that the swelling is better. maybe the blemishes have gotten a little better, the discoloration under the eyes have gotten better. what are we going to look at the end of four weeks? >> we will have reduction in the swelling. less underwie circles and fine reduction in wrinkles. we'll have a more youthful appearance. it's a truly anti-aging diet. dr. oz: after the fourth week, what happens to the sugar in your life? >> it comes back into your life. you're not going to want it as much. we have recalibrated what your palate is. your idea of sweetness has changed. the days that you want an ice cream scoop or a birthday party, have your cake and make loom for it in a healthy controlled portion way. dr. oz: you see this in your clinic? >> everything is based on sugar as well as all of our testers on the diet of this as well. dr. oz: "the sugar detox" outlines this program. check it out on doctoroz.com. the one thing everyone can use to take years off your face. find a simple in

does this make the diagnosis? (dr. ter) i, i still, i personally wouldn't call it a dysfunction, but i think that the semantics of that don't matter. the question is, are we going to address this further, and, and so if she's saying that it affects her relationship, then i would find out more about. (peter) she's worried about it. (dr. shuster) .about their relationship. and then we absolutely should explore it further. (peter) how do you help dora. (dr. schwartz) well, what i would say, if some patient came to someone here, and said, you know, i've given up tennis because my elbow hurts. we'd say, boy, it's important that you enjoy tennis. we'll fix your elbow, even though your elbow can get you through a normal day, you can't play tennis anymore. and i would hear this and think, this is a woman who hasn't had an orgasm. (dr. tiefer) ever, ever? (dr. schwartz) it's not clear from that. either. (peter) it's not clear from this note. she says she's certainly not having orgasms now. (dr. schwartz) .if she's ever had it or

the zoning administrator. sanchez, is this new material? is this dr? is there a lack of clarity in the permitting as you track it? i understand that certain rules have changed. >> this is a discretionary review matter. this is why i believe that the matter is properly before the commission today to make a decision on this building permit application. a couple of things to note, this is a permit to legalize the use. so that is why the matter is before you a discretionary review was filed on that. on the arguments for the conditional use authorization that is based upon the dr requestor that they have abandoned the non-conforming use the limited commercial use for this property and base that on a change of use from 1980. i disagree with that. they site that under the provisions of the code, you can restore a limited commercial use with the cu authorization. so had this been abandoned and not operated it since 1980. then i would agree that it has been abandoned, and that they would need a conditional use authorization to restore the commercial use. that sa

the dr request or primary concern is that it does not meet the market based on the commercial space which requires use authorization. to legalize the use size limits and is considered specification of non-conforming use. there is not a permit of the delli use and helps code violation in sufficient waiting areas. it will provide to dr requester and presentation. according to the record, the former authorized use at 205 frederick street, as the market as a limited commercial non-conforming use with rh 3 zoning district. the subject lot is within a quarter mile of hayes street. the commercial controls, also apply to subject property. within the rh 3 zone is district, the operation of limited commercial non-conforming use should be between the period of the planning code. >> normal days and hours of service, 5 days a week, a minimum of two meal services should be provided during each business day. a catering establishment is used as a commissary and the neighborhood district. it's not conforming use of the 1994 planning code section 191. in addition planning for the provision with the the hay

oh, is this a 3 minute part >> i'm about to ask if there's speakers in favor of the drs proposal. >> good evening. several months ago i was asked to look at the documents for the remodel for 2425. the proposal presented we're going to identify any project adjusts. we look at the guidelines with regards to the light well, it's an understandable revision and you're relating the modifications that in my experienced in san francisco typically smaller lots are for smaller projects and the oppose for larger ones. this structure can lead to over building the site. we came to the following conclusions first, the impact on the clients light well. and second the impact on the other light wells individually may have seemed small but taken as a whole it has a substantial impact on the quality of light and air. there's some things to be discussed and items that are incorporated into the addendum process and including the roof hatches that will have an impact. in summary this is a large project for the lot and my clients expenses are mounting everyday for the drywall cracking. it's unfortunate that

and i don't know, the dr requestor, you stood up and do you have some comment about that quickly? in two sentences? >> thank you, commissioner. two seconds, the restaurant owner, previously suggested a system called a malatron odor abatement system, it is a small but effective misting system that removes the grease from the air and that was the previous suggestion and i would request that they use the system that they previously had specified. and it is not terribly expensive, i think that it is an $8,000 system and including i think many of the things that they have in the smaller proposal. this has no air filtration, system proposed. thank you. >> i don't know to get into the specific product. but i don't know, mr. sanchez or staff? >> if you have any suggestions on resolving? , you can correct the staff to look at that further and see if there are other systems that would better address the odor, and the odor is very difficult. >> yes. to address and i would not want this to be an ongoing enforcement issue with the violation of the condition of approval and so that is why i am c

application that converted the laundry to the deli for the grocery store and it has been noted by the dr requestor that permit did not have planning department approval signature on it, they asked me what the planning department review procedures were at that time in 1980. and i noted that there is an ncu card which is the non-conforming use and we track these over time and so we have a card and it notes the change of use. it says, you know, 1 point there is a grocery store with the laundry and then, the next line is that this is all grocery. and so, my assumption is that the department was aware of this. we had documented it and we did not initiate the enforcement action and this goes back to 1980, where we could have handwritten this note into the tracking system at the time and so with that, it is my interpretation and my reading of this that we did not see this as an enforcement issue at the time. and so that is my position on that matter. >> you are basically saying that it was permitted in lieu of any kind of action by the city to stop its permitting? >> it was approved by the city

the drs. comment was no at&t was to be permitted on the roof without a complete seismic upgrade of the this. so in the absence of a service upgrade is a skeptic issue that was referred to in the previous hearing. the second problem although this application has been in the pipeline for 3 years until residents brought it to their attention both at&t and the city planning department overlooked that was identified as prone to flooding or was prone to flooding. so it appears prior to the june meeting at&t also waved it's magic one day over the department of public works. one day before the planning commission hearing stated this block is no longer prone to flooding. now should we ask the grand jury to look to d b w. why is potential flooding at this location an issue. contrary to at&t would have you believe while it's important to say this has batteries it is highly unusual to place those batteries in a known flood area. this is because the equipment at&t seeks to include has a lady and acid proble

i think that we have always been the one to set the dr policy? >> this is in section 317s of the planning code and so we are aplowing those which were reviewed and adopted by the board of supervisors so this is a legislative matter that the board of supervisors does have purview on and they would have the ability to make further modification to this section as well. to make other changes and i mean that is part of the discussion that the commission can have at a future date if there are changes proposed for section 317. >> okay. >> thank you. >> commissioner, there is a motion to continue to august 8th, on that motion, commissioner antonini? >> no. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu. >> aye. >> and fong. >> aye. >> so moved, that motion passes 4.1 with sugaya decenting. >> that places you under public comment. >> is there any general public this evening? >> no. >> seeing none, the meeting is adjourned. >> i love living here and my husband and i are very nice people and we have a great big family. and

is there a cure on the horizon? (dr. make) i think there is a prevention, and the prevention in addition to cigarette smoking is to figure out why some people get the disease and other people don't get the disease. (peter) does it matter if you have a cure if you have a pretty good treatment? (dr. levy) we don't have that great of a treatment. we have treatments that do minimize symptoms and definitely they are a benefit. if you don't smoke your lifetime risk of copd, living in the us where you have pretty clean air in general, is pretty darn small. (dr. fisher) i just want to mention two things before we slide over them. one is you used in your summary stabilize. you're. (grace anne) i'm stable. (dr. fisher) no, you've improved remarkably. your function has gone from 25% (grace anne) yes, and no one knows why. (dr. fisher) to 68%. you can do much more than stabilize copd. people can lead full lives with copd. (grace anne) yes. (dr. fisher) and that's an important message. and it's not just stabilization and symptom reduc

some of the photographs that dr. carping took of the conditions on the roof are included in appellants exhibit no. 1. the building was built in 1976 and the building is substandard and can't support the equipment that at&t has on the roof. nor can it support any new loads including the 9 antennas that they're asking for. the major conclusions are the folsom 4216 california requires the retrofitting to bring it to the standards of 2010 san francisco building code and the at&t equipment on the roof as well as the proposed rooftop antennas present additional weight that will be subject to largely loads by earthquakes and can't be permit without a service upgrade system. in short the building has accrual proposed equipment is a life safety problem. the city should be instructing alter at to remove its equipment from the building not approving an additional use equipment to be placed on the roof. please deny those permits >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon supervisors. i'm also the neighborhood resident. the res

the dr. oz show. the fda is proposing new limitss on an acceptable level. we're joined this morning by dr. oz, good morning to you. too good to see you. >> good morning. >> it's been nearly two years. r you talked about it on the show and then the government lookedrt into it and now a new ruling. first of all let's start with sr the problem and what you brought to light a couple of years ago? >> well, years ago we got our apple juice sourced from usa appeaapples, they took out somee pesticides in the arsenic in it. and everybody thought we were in good shape. but most of the apples come from overseas, and we don't have controls over the arsenic levels in those products, and it made it uncomfortable because it seemed it was pretty high. we our own study and it seemed like a big debate.bate. i'm proud today because of the fda came back with a decision, they were going to limit thet amount of arsenic allowed in

but the speech against the war in vietnam, dr. -he said, "i'm not going to segregate my conscience. if i'm against violence at home, i'm against violence abroad." and he went on to say that america was the greatest purveyor of violence in the world. he was-he was a preacher. he was a prophet. >> do you agree with him? >> i agree with him. >> that the u.s. is the greatest purveyor of violence. >> we have more-we spend hundreds and thousand, millions and billions of dollars on weaponry. we're supplying the world. we sell arms to everybody. dr. king was saying that we have to put an end to this madness. he was influenced by gandhi, and gandhi said it's nonviolence or nonexistence. dr. king went on to say, "we must learn to live together as brothers and sisters, or we will perish as fools." he was saying, in effect, that we have enough bombs and missiles and guns to destroy the planet. he said it then, and it's still true today. >> at the time, time magazine called the speech "demagogic slander that sounded like a script for radio hano

at any rate the journey's been worthwhile. >> dr. saxon's quest to integrate medicine with the digital world isn't far-fetched. this could be in patients' hands in five years. imagine having an exam and a diagnosis without ever having to leave your home or your car? dr. saxon is finding wireless solutions that bring her closer to patients, transforming the way they live and giving them the power to monitor their own health. that's what earns her a spot on "the next list." i'm dr. sanjay gupta. hope to see you back here next week. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com >>> hello again everyone. welcome to the "cnn newsroom." i'm fredricka whitfield, a look at the top stories we're following this hour. >>> flames shot up in the air after a train carrying oil went off the tracks in a small canadian stoun. officials are trying to figure out how bad it could be. >>> a third country extended an offer of asylum to the nsa leaker. we'll tell you which countries are willing to take in edward snowden. >>> a 911 call took center stage in the geor

and the department and the staff are analysis on all of the dr concerns, first, the project has to be reviewed twice by the residential design team. and the guidelines does not necessarily prohibit the additional source for the addition, even in this situation. but the guidelines do require the source be set back, which the proposal has done. and it has a buried from the front set back and 12 and 16 feet respectively. and then the rear addition, is thes limited to 15 feet that is not deeper than both adjacent houses with the five foot to allow it on either side and then the roof deck on top of this, the two story addition has been limited to ten feet by ten feet and that is a study of five allowing the south side, and further away from the dr requestor's house and immediately north side. and regarding the (inaudible) the map from the... this the line shows the subject loss and this line means the land slide boundary and this line is that is the current rear wall of the subject building from the rear wall to the beginning of the land side and that is approximately 50 feet in distance a