but as the existing sexting. -- that is the existing setting. on the screen is a depiction showing the project but was proposed that was found to have a significant negative impact on views. there were four towers proposed, and they range from 250 feet to to harvard 20 feet tall, much taller than proposed for this project and this site where my hand is appointed, -- is pointing, said the conclusions were for a different location in a different era. is that binding on the board today? the answer is no. this is ultimately an arbiter on what is a significant impact, and you are not bound by conclusions of an earlier eir. earlier this evening there was some discussion of what the visual impact might be. this is actually a page from the eir, showing a visual simulation of the view looking to the north. this is the depiction without the project and then a depiction of what the project will look like, and its concludes that is not as significant as headache impact -- aesthetics impact. there is an area on telegraph hill. this shows the top of you witho