the boards and open to helping out. >> that is something that the documentary makes clear, that the f.c.c. is all over the place, he was open to them coming in. >> they didn't do their job. it's a government agency they should have done their job. >> how devastating has this been for you. i know a lot of what you did to get over this or through it was to help prosecutors. >> it was very therapeutic. >> you had made something of yourself. and then this happened. >> thank you. >> i realised now that they are people, who they seemed to be. and you have to accept them. the way they are, and if anything, like with bernie it took me so long to get over the fact that you know he did this. my feelings had stopped because i said to myself. that you - if you cared about a person that didn't exist, and i have moved on. i don't think about him - i think about his children the people that he worked with. victims. but i don't think anything could happen to me that would surprise or shock me. >> so many victims around the country, around the world, and they are not getting much of what they had invested

why tom brady is in trouble with the f.c.c. >> it is two minutes till the top of the hour. leave the house, here's what's happening today, a u.s. drone strike killing four taliban insurgents overnight one day after an attack on an army school that killed over 130 people mostly children. >>> the hackers who took down sony pictures warning of a 9/11 style attack, so the movie "the interview" was -- premier was canceled. >> time for the good, the bad, and the ugly. first the good. christmas coming early for wal-mart shoppers in pennsylvania. a man paying $50,000 to pay off all lay weaz. -- lay aways. >> next the bad. police in florida looking for this not so smooth criminal. he smashed the front door of a convenience store with a brick and tried to bust open a case filled with quarts but -- quarters but left empty-handed. >> quarterback tom brady could be seen yelling obscenities. the f.c.c. received several complaints. >> it is time for your brew on this responses. a town in ten -- tennessee banning employees from posting bad comments on social immediate yavment -- social med

we had the f.c.c. in the office, they'd audit us. bernie was keep your friends close and enemies closer. bernie was involved with the regulatory firms, he was on the boards and open to helping out. >> that's something the documentary made clear, that the f cc was open, he was open to them, and maybe that's a reason me got away with this. >> they didn't do their job. it's a government agency, they should have done their job. >> how devastating has this been for you. i know a lot of what you did to get over or through this was to help prosecutors. >> it was therapeutic. >> you made something of yourself. then this happened. >> thank you. >> i realised people are not who they seem to be. you have to accept them the way they are. with bernie, it took so long to get over, that he did this. me feelings stopped. i said to myself - you cared about a person who didn't exist. i moved on, i think about his children, the people i worked with, his victims. i don't think anything could happen to me in my life that could surprise or shock me. >> so

it's up to the f.c.c. well, that's exactly what he told us several times about immigration policy before he just came out and announced, well, i'm going to do it myself. could the president make the internet a national publicly regulated utility all by himself? i think that he could. first of all, the electromagnetic spectrum, which is the key scarce resource in the internet, is something that is by declaration owned by the federal government. has been ever since herbert hoover said so in the 1920's. most of that spectrum is allocated by the f.c.c. but the government could take that allocation back in a way i'm going to tell you in a second. and in any event, the executive agencies, defense, commerce, others, they own a huge amount of spectrum that they do not use themselves that can provide enormous bait for the enterprise i have in mind. moreover, the government itself provides many things directly like geostationary positioning systems for our apple and g-map devices on our phones. that actually is based

this made me think of the government, the f.c.c. and the redskins. what's your comments regarding that. looks like the f.c.c. will try to use their power toause he has radio stations force them to change their name. what do you think about that? of think that it's wrong them to do that certainly wrong f.c.c. to do it. the should have no power overbroad casters at all in my view. but i'd have to think more about that. example of government its improper authority to essentially censor speech it an attack on a particular person? morally y constitutionally from a good sense standpoint i'm not sure that distinction should matter. but if that's an issue and you're asking is that an issue of kind of payback against a person, i would say vehement an issue of disagreement with what the -- -- let's say the media and intellectuals think of the "redskins" and the fact have the lefty line on that issue. hether it's -- it's certainly an example of that of just ublic pressure coming to bear on a regulatory agency to regulate somebody because people don't ike the me

then the president signed a climate change accord with china, pushed the f.c.c. to adopt net neutrality, and wants to put cameras on cops. (cheers and applause) obama is totally out of control. he's like both guys in lethal weapon at once: a crazy renegade with nothing to lose and the black guy who's this close to retirement! (laughter) worst of all, i'm getting too old for this (bleep)! worst of all, obama is threatening to give us healthcare again, because from now until february 15th is the obamacare open enrollment period, when you can go online and select whichever death panel you prefer to smother you in your sleep. (cheers and applause) but don't fall for it. no! do not fall for it! or anything this guy says. he can't make things happen. the people with real power in this country are pundits like me and papa bear. >> i have more power doing what i'm doing, okay, than getting involved with the political process. plus, you have to kiss butt to get money. you know, 150 million to run for president. i can get things done like that. and that kind of power i cou

it's up to the f.c.c. well, that's exactly what he told us several times about immigration policy before he just came out and announced, well, i'm going to do it myself. could the president make the internet a national publicly regulated utility all by himself? i think that he could. first of all, the electromagnetic spectrum, which is the key scarce resource in the internet, is something that is by declaration owned by the federal government. has been ever since herbert hoover said so in the 1920's. most of that spectrum is allocated by the f.c.c. but the government could take that allocation back in a way i'm going to tell you in a second. and in any event, the executive agencies, defense, commerce, others, they own a huge amount of spectrum that they do not use themselves that can provide enormous bait for the enterprise i have in mind. moreover, the government itself provides many things directly like geostationary positioning systems for our apple and g-map devices on our phones. that actually is based

. >> the f.c.c. saying it is not obscene to say the name of washington's nfl football team, ruling on a petition over the word of redskins. several broadcasters refers to use the term because native americans and others find it offensive. there's been a push to force the team to change its name. the owner said he will not. >> a new study suggests tiny song birds could impact weather predictions. the l.a. times said the birds left their nesting site days before a massive storm spawned several deadly tornadoes. this is in the central and southern united states. it's the first time researchers documented this type of storm and avoidance behavior by birds during their breeding season. it might be low frequency sounded waves -- >> they said the birds fled before the meteorologist announced there was a tornado on the way. nicole mitchell taking exception to that. >> thursday, amazon unveiling one hour delivery service. it is only for amazon prime users in manhattan. it will be rolled out in other cities in

the first is does the f.c.c. have the capacity to manage the prioritization and distribution of that spectrum? are they thinking about this issue? and then the other thing is to what degree will the internet go nance debate with i can play into the global nature of iot? >> i'll take a stab at the first question at least. you know, shared spectrum use has been technically feasible for a long time. some futurists have argued the f.c.c. shouldn't exist at all because everybody can share all the spectrum and i think that's technically true although there's the issues of enforcement and improper use. but there are these fair amount of capacity set aside for shared use and the technology knows how to hop around when it detects interference and finds unused portions and any pact based systems also have a certain inherent resilience. so i don't personally think that's going to be a big bottleneck in terms of solving problems. >> the issue of prioritization is being looked at. there's a couple of programs around the federa

>> no, no, but it means that the f.c.c. is going to have to bring more cases and make sure that they're strong, and the case law on this is going set the standard for the future. they're going to have to bring more cases and try to work on this. >> i don't have enough money for insider trade, so i don't know how it works, but help me understand. is this plausible to think you can pass on information with no knowledge whatsoever of how the information or whether it's going to be used. >> well, i mean, it's possible, i guess, but to some extent, if you think about it, you should be cautious as an investor before this. when you get information, you should have some sort of due diligence to know where the information came from. >> i think that gets to the gray line that may be looked at. >> do people innocently pass on information with no plans whatsoever? i'm going tell you about this company, do what you will. it's hard to say. you need to know the facts and circumstances, the individual circumstances. we saw, for example, the

to every school instead of taxing people on their cell phones, which is the proposal in front of the f.c.c. i believe right now. there are ways to solve problems in a bipartisan way and get to a point where the complexity of our tax code doesn't retard economic investment in our country. that should be done already. that should have been done, you know, three years ago. my guess is if the president wants to engage, that is something that the republicans and he could agree on. >> i think we have time for one last question. right here. >> governor, maybe just a comment or two on the united states and china and how you see this playing out and what that relationship could evolve to. >> it could evolve to a really ugly place, particularly if we pull back kind of in a permanent fashion. the threat of that is there and we should be cognizant of it. it also could yield economic benefits if we are fully engaged across the board. i thought that hank paulson's efforts to create and i think the obama administration has continued this, to create constant dialogue by sector, private sector as well as g

that was going to be a win for the f.c.c. right now they're at $43 billion. worthless spectrum. it's not amazing stuff, and yet you're seeing amazing values for t. >> is this the market telling the government forget about it, we're in charge? >> this is the market telling the government spectrum is always going to be valuable, and it's always going to be worth more money. >> brendan, i have to disagree with the comment that this is worthless spectrum. this is mid-band spectrum that fits perfectly within the carrier's existing portfolio. the spectrum can get pulled very quickly. the chip sets in the phones are already supported. it's incredibly scarce. >> i completely agree with you. i deferred to simplicity in that case. >> i was talking down to tom. >> there's a good spectrum. >> the bigger issue, frankly, is the battle for spectrum, not just into your home, but the battle into your pocket with your phone. >> yeah. >> let's get to uber, certainly facing a legal challenge in paris as a judge rules whether to block its service. we know l.a., san francisco have

impose itself in terms of defining and imposing net neutrality through more regulations through the f.c.cd here are my concerns. one that the internet needs to be a place where it continues to be operated openly with free speech and open access and i worry about the got getting in the business of deciding to pick winners and losers and advantaging one group over the other. i'm more concern about the international body. but my first concern about the american government is that we have seen a series of scandals that to me at least were unimaginable. if you had gone back ten years and ask did i really think that the i.r.s. would go after conservative groups i would have said no. i would have said i don't think the department of justice would spy on an a.p. reporter. we've seen that happen and i think the american people are less and less trusting of our government because some of these -- the accumulation of these scandals and the violation of civil rights. i'm very worried about tirts if government trying to -- first the government trying to pick winners and losers. one of the thing that's

so there's there are some big-ticket items where the president can be not a lame duck. and he is pushing his f.c.cdo something republicans in congress adamantly oppose. so there are some smaller items on the business front that could make a difference. tax reform it would be a huge item but this president still has small areas where he can make a difference. but i would not put those major items off the radar screen congress is to be controlled. >> no matter how difficult they are. net neutralty seems like a non-starter. >> it's a non-starter. >> look, there's bipartisan, top-level bipartisanship on tax reform and issues like trade. but they have never moved forward. i think some things have is to shift. some dynamics have to shift. there's some optimism on the hill as peter said, but there has to be a change right now, and nobody is sure if that change exists. >> thank you for being here in new york. peter, when are you going to come visit us here? >> come and we'll go ice skating. >> we'll talk cars. >> thanks very much. you will be able to watch the president's news conference at 1:30 p.m. east