the item is for the final eir for the proposed park merced project.lished on may 12, 2010. the public comments closed on july 12, 2010. the response was distributed. you have before you as a supplemental information packet that contains provisions, including of days to transportation committee if -- including updates to azuela's air quality -- as well as air quality measures that take into account changes. these do not present new information that would alter the situation. i have provided you with copies of letters. you have received a letter for the historic national trust, which raises a few concerns, some of which have been raised today the other would like to address. the letter sent to us but it reduces the impact of the proposed project us -- as required. it does not provide information to justify the reaction. a dozen analyze a wide range of alternatives -- it does analyze a wide range of alternatives. those were determined to have of feasibility a, and it is capable of being implemented by a technical seven point. they must consider alternati

the final environmental impact report. >> is there any comment on the certification of the environmental impact reports? >> item number94350 mission street. certification for the final eir -- at item number 9 for 350 mission street. >> this poses demolition of an existing four-story building containing office space and retail uses and construction of a new 24 story 50 foot tall building containing approximately 340,000 square feet. the uses are approximately 6,500 feet of retail space. approximately 23,500 feet of subterranean parking and open space. a copy of the draft eir is before you and it was published on september 15th, 2010. public hearing was held on october 21st. the public comment period closed in november 2nd, 2010. i would like to read into the record and direct the attention to a letter submitted today. the initial study in the appendix, a key boxes were erroneously marked in the checklist. this does not change the pleasures of the eir and is considered accurate. we are here to answer any questions. the valuation -- the evaluation of the issues contained in the eir would result in unavoidable environmental impact that cannot be mitigated to a significant l

final eir in front of you. it has been a long process and i hope that you could help us move beyond the difference of opinion that will probably always exist, debt to common ground, and towards compliance for state housing wall -- state housing law. thank you. >> good evening, commissioners. i am with the planning department. i'm joined by two others who also worked on this project. as sarah said, we started this process in the fall of 2008. it since we were here last, we had published the second draft and a working on the third draft, which was a response to the comments that received both from you the commissioners and from committee members on the second draft. and that is in the packet. while you were on break, i added and eight page document which was the ordinance piece that was missing from your packets accidentally, and there are a couple of copies here for the public, nothing substantive, but just the ordinance for the peace. since we were here last, the director joined us in hosting a few meetings with community members to go over draft two and any other necessary changes. what you have before you are w