it could be at the hospital, where they could be placed somewhere like the healing centre for that time period. >> okay. but it would be a lock towards. >> correct, in most situations. this also mirrors the treatment language, but the conservator's office would have to provide a report to the court every 60 days to show the court that the individual continues to meet criteria for conservatorship, and what the treatment plan is for them, and if they better be served in a less restrictive setting, which is a legal and ethical responsibility for us. it also clarifies the intent of the language around the treatment for a.o.t. to be considered as the least restrictive option, but to not preclude us from moving forward if somebody does not meet the criteria. so this process will look very similar, but there's a couple of things that i would like to highlight around number 2, and this is specific to the assisted outpatient treatment language. if somebody meets the criteria for assisted outpatient treatment, and is determined to be sufficient, a court petition could move forward for that progra