democrats party leader mark martin shultz however he didn't provide any details of how he'll turn the idea into reality. i want a constitutional european treaty that leads to a federal europe europe that's not a threat to its members which are on the contrary complete wisely so. let's debate this topic now shall we in cross live to our guests alan scant the founder of ukip and john lyons from l.s.e. ideas think tank welcome both of you to r.t. international now to first question this idea of a united states of europe is nothing new is that it goes back generations but do you think it's actually realistic to think it's possible to turn this into a reality to one john first place. i think this was something that was. really quite popular in the in the fifty's sixty's and seventy's and i think coming out to the european community into the european union there were quite a lot of advocates for this i think at the moment it doesn't look very realistic that this could happen any time soon because you only have to look at quite a lot of the countries within the european union at the moment and it

we cannot leave the battle of ideas to the academics because we know it most of the ideas are. inasmuch as you can about americanism of progressivism c can tell your neighbors and friends we can self educate the nation. and despite the domination, hollywood politics academic is to have about half of americans who continue to vote for the side the create more liberty. if we can inspire people like ideas you have in the book of the america will step up again and demonstrate their virtue. thank you for the for writing the book of what you do every day. >> c-span, where history unfolds daily. in 1979, c-span was created as a public service america's cable television companies the spreadsheet today by your cable or satellite provider. >> "washington journal", live every day with there's some policy issues that impact too. we'll talk about digital world war. watch c-span's "washington journal", live at 7:00 a.m. eastern on friday morning. join the discussion. the c-span bus tour continues its 50 capitals tour in january with stops in raleigh, columbia, atlanta, montgomery. will speak

so, the idea that the isi sort of controls the taliban is a cartoon. it's not true. certainly they have relations of some kind. - [narrator] while concerns remain over potential support for militant groups flowing out of pakistan, the us is backing the sharif government's counter insurgency efforts. - this is one of the most bizarre situations in international politics, between the united states and pakistan. where pakistan has, for some time been, what seems to be simultaneously an ally and an enemy. now part of the reason that the united states has turned a blind eye to the apparent collaboration between elements of pakistani military and the taliban, is that for a long time we needed pakistan's cooperation for logistical purposes to send supplies to our forces in afghanistan. - one of the most difficult strategic issues that we had during the war in afghanistan, and still have, in many respects, is that there are terrorist groups living, working, building support on the soil of pakistan, and attacking into afghanistan, attacking afghan government forces, attacking

they're just words for the same idea. what want to do with this book -- this is the first time i'm actually saying, this is what i believe and it wheres woo be cool if other people believed it, too. but that is ultimately whatnot i want to do. a british newspaper "the spectator" accused me of wanting to start my own religion and saying give him ten years and he will be wearing a turban and flying his own private jet. and that didn't sound to bad, actually. >> a lot of suspects of your career have led you to interview people who identify as religious. right? i want to know when you have those encounteres, what are you most curious about and is there anything -- you have a rabbi in front of you. anything you ran to ask me? >> what noticed in the conversation is have with religious people is usually twofold. one, that the metaphors they use to express their religion ultimately expresses what seems to me a very similar faith experience, fright the questions they ask, the way they ask them, it's just that they use -- as we have

the. fellow human so tries to gris ideas does reflect to be mirror over and that is the sense of idea and that's constant has nothing to do was informational because information age it is exchange or information that is considered to be normal if not biased but it is biased by the. but. i do respect your here at this channel was created to project an ill turn it of point of view and there are many similar channels in other countries i know you speak to the inter kid there is a similar channel in france there is similar channel in china so we can i think agree that there is no more monopoly at least when it comes to the international information what i was asking you about the information age is because centered around the thought of transparency what allow people to in my view at least would allow people to take a much more active role in deciding their own destiny you perhaps view it as again an individualistic. thing but why does it have to be in contradiction with the collective identity i don't understand why do you have to make it so binary you can be in a patriot of your country you

as the discussion continued, one idea grew stronger. lution doesn't resolve around the victims or offenders but is about fellow passengers intervening when they see harassment? we met on a west london bus when i was assaulted on a bus and fred stepped in. and i, yeah. no one interferes, people tend to think it's an issue on the side, let's let it slide. but one day if you let it slide, it may not directly affect you, it might affect your mother or your sister. i'm afraid we'll have to leave it there because we have to end the programme. we could keep on talking forever but it's a great start to the week... with what felt like a bombardment of ideas, the team has their work cut out for them this week. as the sun sets over london, i can't help thinking about the mammoth task ahead. this is bbc radio 4 and now it's time for woman's hour. early—morning commuters set off for the day ahead. this is the very week that the hashtag #metoo went viral. it was a way for women to tag and share their experiences of harassment. this week, we are taking

the idea of the intermediary almost always fell to men. there were exceptions particularly when you have very powerful goddesses, those kind were extraordinarily powerful and have women in charge of them but even that was a patriarchal thing because the idea was the goddess is a woman's which requires women to take care of her but the other gods are all just male-dominated civet is a process whereby once we start to see is the creation of organized religion almost immediately becomes a patriarchal thing and that just extends for the next. it's a broken chain going back to the civilizations i of the first temple that we built. >> did you think that the running back and of the tendency of some one starts to shift? >> most definitely because it is not coincidence that particularly once we start morphing into the systems but it's always conceived of in male terms of the if you think of it as the essence that he or she, yes it fosters less patriarchal concern over religious institutions. we may still like to exclude these relationships not beca

there's a certain coherence to the idea because you wind up after you have eliminated the bad press a class, where everybody is an equal because nobody is an owner of property. this is a delusional idea and it led to the deaths of 100 million people in the 20th century. very destructive. if you take away peoples identity as individuals, individual merit, the american idea so much more the kings idea that you judge people by the content of their character. however, cultural marxism, identity politics is 100 times worse. because it sees society as divided into racists, ethnicities, and genders and as, the way they judge who was oppressed is who is marginal. so i don't know, it you dress yourself up in address and have a mustache and put rabbit ears on your head, of course you are marginal. just look around you, you are going to be marginal. that doesn't mean we all oppressed. it's just a fact. jews are marginal. we've been marginal throughout history. and persecuted, for that matter. but this is a very pernicious idea that society is divided into an oppressor group based on race, based

the idea was good, but the execution was not and it was first trading -- frustrating for everyone. i had this passion for an idea of these companies and what they could do together, but we could not get out of our own way. years later, i decided to step aside and leave the board. nextad of backing the generation of entrepreneurs -- that is low we have been doing. it was a lot of fun. -- thequote in your book government does not have any single mechanism to address the internet of things or the challenges it is presenting. >> that is one of the concerns i have. when the paperback came out recently ahead of chapter, a seven part of agenda on how america can lead the way. right now, i do not think there was a depreciation of some of the challenges or a fraternity's that present themselves in the third wave. a fragmented approach to regulations which might have worked in the past, i do not think it would've worked in the future. things that are involved, for example in the best financial world, technology issues, ms. are all things that are technology issues as well. i think we have to

when you hear on the counter narrative the point is the idea of the backfire effect that sometimes if you think tit-for-tat if they say they caliphate's is the be careful we can get into a trap and you can reinforce the of predisposed police just to counter the narrative so it is the alternative pathway. like that thousands of young people that i met, how do you tell their stories that our authentic borer organic organic, that is the idea behind this. and a second is social media incubators that they are taking on because you cannot forget a lot of what makes influential is there to use a new media and animation in a and drama so that is one of the best bet they tried video is in the work they will do different things with their lives have said it is like under that umbrella i feet of with these competitions and matthew in now with that organic content that there are a lot of potential vehicles but how do you supercharge those efforts? and third, there is room in this umbrella of confrontational propaganda as there are interesting ways how you tackle then using those techniques there

the idea that i have my teddy bear as the god of my civilisation. at first, it was just quite funny. quickly, i realised it had legs. it could run. you chose things you liked? yes. that is not a trivial thing, what you like. people would dismiss it... why i was given the opportunity was because of who i am, i am a professional intuiter. you were alongside experts in the museum. that must be a strange business. here you are, a professional intuiter and asking them to explain objects to you. how did they respond? brilliantly. they are interested in showing their stuff. an opportunity to dig in the nether regions of the collection was lovely for them. you ended up with 170 objects from the museum. there were 30 of your own pieces of art. one of the first things you see when you come into the exhibition, is the line ‘do not look too hard for meaning here'. do you mean that? what i mean is, people are allowed to make up their own mind. sometimes this huge institution is a generator of meaning, something that it looks for all the time. the experts want to

the public bath and he had the idea all of a sudden. came to him out of the blue. the alligator is mine. i had a dream about an alligator. i was trying to find an answer to something i was -- with my daughter who was less than a year old. we were at our house in new haven where she first started out. she never took naps, and i was exhausted, and i finally got her to, you know, got her in her crib. i don't think she took a nap, but at least i could try to take a nap because i was exhausted. i fell down on the bed, it was about ten years ago because it was fall. you can see the colorful leaves outside the windows. i fell completely asleep, and i had this dream immediately. and the dream was an alligator that flipped over and looked at me and flipped over. and it was a very short dream. i woke up, i immediately knew the answer to the problem i'd been working on for years. and that was how can it be that science was showing these effects of stereotyping say in 5-year-old kids or even infants who had these things, how could it? we always were trained and our field taugh

the ideas how do you get that 90% to move and be motivated? to me, that's where these organic stories are. that is the content wars and what you need to mobilize. >> i have a question about law-enforcement today to dhs. what parts you think they're getting right now know what you think they could prove themselves at the local level? >> there's a recognition in terms of what the enforcement and the importance of it, i have a lot of respect for field agents in the cases they are dealing with ten to be very immediate. the big headline is if you take the public health approach we have to think about this in a citywide model. there is not a cookie-cutter approach nationwide, it is city to city. the strong cities in terms of linking cities together around the world to cooperate. that's where relationships matter. you have community leaders, religious leaders and law enforcement. part of this has to work in tandem. there is a recognition of it. we are still sideload in the sense that there is no borders. the way were broken up his if we have a group f

the idea i cannot have my enemies homeland. the turning point was next year or 43. if you look at the point that it wouldn't be able to go against the premier army they didn't mean a sort of optional but sort of like a defeat and nobody really got out of the army of over 300,000 people. about 11,000 survived. >> so is it too simplistic to say they were the ones who defeated hitler? >> they did kill two out of three. it was soviet blood and the know-how and experience but in our defense they were able to concentrate because we were supplying the tanks and artillery. second, the soviets were one-dimensional. we conducted the campaign. 10,000 of the best were away from the eastern front. we contacted a circus campaign and supplied all of these and they did it at a cost of 27 million. we should remember this was from normandy to the there were .03 and we invest about 45% of the budget without two to 7%. we were very versatile but they wouldn't have been able to off offer. >> discussable but more if you don't mind, why is it wrong to be a material determinist when consid

idea that since the nature. of idea is something that was deny it was the beginning of the mother the mother to. destroy it the concept of idea and they think that. it's all human mind ideas about the original understanding something completely different it's something like enjoy or divinity that's something that exists eternally and isn't independent from the. so human so tries to grass. tries to reflect to be mirror over and that is the sense of idea and that's constant has nothing to do was informational because information age it is exchange information that is considered to be normal if not biased but it is biased by the. wettest. but. i do respect your here at this channel was created to project an alternative point of view and there are many similar channels in other countries i know you speak to the inter kid there is a similar channel in france there is similar channel in china so we can i think agree that there is no more monopoly at least when it comes to the international information what i was asking

that's why an indian doctors association based here in the uk has proposed the idea ofa here in the ukindian doctors to come and train in british hospitals. indian doctors need training and british hospitals need training and british hospitals need people to work here. so we get indian doctors to work here but at the same time trained there and then send them back! a winning formula for both for both countries if the scheme succeeds. rahuljoglekar, bbc news. you're watching newsday on the bbc. still to come on the programme: we hear from a rare survivor of japan's world war ii suicide missions. was it fair to send pilots to their death? also on the programme: a new product in indonesia let's people have their ca ke in indonesia let's people have their cake but let's other people eat it. it's quite clear that the worst victims of this disaster are the poor people living in the slums which have sprung up around the factory. i am feeling so helpless, that the childrens are dying in front of me and i can't do anything. charles manson is the mystical leader of the hippy cult suspected of ki

always not true that islamic law is always -- leaves a woman worse off than the law, so the idea that any aspect of this foreign law to our values is irrelevant when you're looking at the particular aspect that the woman or the man is trying to be accommodated. so anyway, that's the point, and change ersation has to in the public about what is sharia because the public conversation is that it's undamentally bad for people especially for women. i have a couple of suggestions about how we can change our even slichls talk about sharia in a very limited education way. insult.mean that as an i mean, it's unfair that now the average muslim is supposed to levels of ghest islamic jurisprudence just to engage in a conversation with clerk,local grocery store answers,y, i have some i'll give later. we'll get into the solutions at the end. proponents of the legislation, it's not some kind f infiltration of the judicial system, in the few cases where it has come up it's very narrow actually mily law and divorce law setting, where courts and judges actually have some ld latitude, in states, in how

the idea again here is public service uses. projects tht meet the public desire for a vie waterfront. although even the most generous public serving use can face opposition. we'll think about this very carefully. i think it is a tool that the waterfront land group with use and it will inform the work and andmaker it stronger. we cannot wait to genwrate ideas and figure out our plans. we have sea level rise coming an terrible substructure conditions and i feel we have to get out there and generate ideas and figure out a path forward. but we'll be thinking about that timing and making further recommendations. i thought the comments were coming from a good place. so thank you.ç >> and i want to thank alice and veronica for coming out. and i want to say thank you, to you, dianne. you're a stellar leader here at the property. all the long nights and community meetings, thank you very much. appreciate it. i wish this was earlier on agenda. i wish more of the community could hear about this. this has been a mate and potato. this is -

do you support the idea? her in some areas, not as far in others. at the end of the day the european union is a union of states and it is the member states themselves that decide how far they are comfortable at any given point. there will always be federalists and those where the sovereignty of member states is above all else, but the buck stops with the member states. that conflict will always be there. as a result of that conflict then, do you actually see it happening in terms of having a budget minister, if you like, and there is already a sort of foreign minister, but also that sort of close co—operation on defence. in the end, national values will trump, won't they, for many countries in the eu? i would agree. my concern over this structured defence cooperation is it's set up as a rival to nato. if it results in the european nation states spending more on defence, that is to be welcomed. but what we don't want is several more divisions of bureaucrats who don't actually add to defence capability. doesn't

the idea made sense for the execution didn't. i have quoted this great thomas edison quote, visit without execution is pollution nation. it was frustrating. for everyone involved. i have this passion for this idea of these companies and what together they could do but we couldn't get out of our own way. eventually i decided to step aside and leave the board. that is when i went back in the garage and started backing the next generation want to renew -- next generation of entrepreneurs. close with this quote. the government doesn't have any single mechanism to address the internet of things or the challenges it is presenting. have one of the concerns i , which is why when the out, at a seven added a new chapter. a seven part agenda where i called the restart agenda to make sure they can be the third wave to read i don't think there is an appreciation of some challenges and opportunities that present themselves in the third wave. there is a fragmented approach to regulation that might have worked in the past. i don't think will work

the s. and p. five hundred only twenty one. so it gives you an idea of the scaled there and also being powered by social media means means inevitable and investors feel vindicated this post by to coney i'm on reddit how people saw me when i talked about bitcoin at the start of the year clearly a crazy person and how people see me when it cost ten k. intelligent and sophisticated i think is the idea that trying to get across the way you can blame them they're very happy and gloating as you mentioned as well but i mean how exactly does bitcoin differ from. other commodities or currencies that are currently traded why is it successful commodities is really the word there it is more of a commodity than a currency because it isn't stable medium of exchange once it becomes or if it becomes a bit more mainstream and you can go out to your local shop and buy something with declines then you can call it a currency until then it's just too unstable and that will be the thing which seals the fate for better or for worse of because so it will we ever be able to g

sorry, this is the telegraph. yes, good idea, this one. t he's trying to do is reduce the time people need to take their degrees from three years to two. the idea is it will save you a whole lot of money because you don't have to pay extra tuition for the la st have to pay extra tuition for the last year, that's £5,500. you would need a maintenance loan for the last year, what joe need a maintenance loan for the last year, whatjoe johnson need a maintenance loan for the last year, what joe johnson says need a maintenance loan for the last year, whatjoe johnson says is... you will also be out earning a year earlier. this is the point. he says 25,000 is what a student will save by that of sleight of hand because 19,000 of it is the average wage of graduate gets in their first year away from university. that's the assumption that you will learn that in yourfirst broadley, not a bad idea. the idea is it will be available in every subject rather than just if is it will be available in every subject rather thanjust if you, like accountancy, law,

the idea is not that the press has to be perfect, we make mistakes. it's press has to be free.such an important part of, as they say, the systems checks and balances. can you imagine what the trump administration would be without some of these investigative reports that "the new york times," "washington post," usa today, can you imagine what would be happening if you didn't have that counter balance with the press? >> speaking of press and media, i was tickled the other day, i don't know why this never occurred to me, just preparing for our conversation, looking at numbers and you are like literally reaching the largest audiences of your life. >> it's true. >> through social media and the internet. what do you make of the fact you were at the news desk and here you are looking good and sounding good. what do you make of the fact that you have a whole new platform where you first started that's allowing you to reach as many or more people than you have? >> i'm amazed, but grateful. >> yeah. >> you have huge, huge followings of people. >> fairly large following of young people, w

the other thing they do is purge the ideas from the curriculum and they do that by inventing what they call studies, an american studies, black studies, women's studies, they are all political fields, not scholarly field, but they are about learning left-wing politics. women's studies isn't [inaudible] it's about training marxist feminists and fully discredited marxist idea that determines everything and that's how did you get this idea. you learn that it's hardwired which is obvious to any of that hasn't had their brains screwed up by any leftist ideology. so, the fields now are so constructed that a conservative can hardly be part of them are there are no conservative women who've studied those departmen departments. some of the founders of the studies who actually believed they should be about the study of women have been purged and treated by enemies as political radicals on our faculty. the next thing they did is to try to convince the conservative discourse coming in from the outside. their entire report was basically deaf to my presence which is the purpose, the agenda of the le

i was talking to the editor in chief at basic book i think here laura and i explain this idea i said it sounds like the second world wars to me. meaning -- that was the title that we came up with it wasn't mine but what we're getting at is that our idea -- of the second world war is pan inclusive holistic concept that didn't come into currency it was used but until 1941 until it was polish war danish war, norwegian low country war greece all of which germany won except they came it an impasse with britain. at the same time, the japanese had their border were and were creating this greater east asia prosperity per and italy has been in a land and was in north average. and the access had had won. but because they were colluding under the practice of august 1938 and british engaged in appeasement until winston churchill during the fall of france, and we were isolationists and that gave an inexact on improper or misguided view of the strength of the united states and great britain and eventually soviet union and that led in 1941 to three events that change the course of history i think th

i thought the idea of reparations for slavery paid 137 years after the fact from people who were never slave owners to people who were never slaves was a bad idea and actually racist and that the in-- and had the indiscretion to say so. when i was invited to speak by college republicans at the university of california-berkeley, i asked the chancellor, i wrote the chancellor and said -- because i knew that netanyahu had been unable to speak in berkeley because of the threats of violation which they couldn't contain. so i asked him to introduce me or have somebody from his office introduce me just to protect the students. and what he did was he assigned 30 armed guards for my talk. when i had to go to the bathroom before i spoke, six guys in flak jackets preceded me into the bathroom and kicked open the stall doors. and i remember saying out loud, this is an absolute disgrace this america. but when you have university officials like that, there's no way to stop it. you have to expel students who do things like these students did. or like they're doing now at reid college where they're de

collaborative for a few occasions so the idea was to let cross geographic boundaries across different time zones work on the verification of social media our times together and collaboratively before image verification you can use google to reverse a short term or young next so the idea was to bring it all together in this one pop for. all kinds of information can be useful in a verification process where the conditions and even the sun's position can provide crucial information but despite all the technical assistance. what's most important is. the verification of social verification of any continents really really important so of course you want to know is something that is circular and plating in a social network is accurate is a true was of course if we're putting out stuff we don't really we're not solid and we're not hundred percent convinced we're making mistakes so what i encourage with all the volunteers we have done a scene with the da vinci is we have to be honest and fair all the time about yes we are able to find this out but no we aren't we can we are not sure about that

the ideas are on the table. leaders are mindful that we should not be encouraging brain drain recklessly. how it will work in the end, that is unclear. >> let me come back to one point we saw in that short report. camps,a of other detention areas, centers. what ever. whatever euphemism you use. it is an idea the president t of france the spouses. -- espouses. is there any reason to believe the centers would work better than the holding camps in libya? is this aspect do you think really likely to function? thorsten: i doubt it -- i doubt it but at least he would deal with one government. a government with a track record niger. reeve can find some sort of authority and it is not a failed state even though they have problems. this type of measure, what europe is doing is trying to enforce through coercion. we have a plan for africa. we have a marshall plan, africa initiative. it is a confusion. do not knowureaucrats who is talking about which plan. it is a massive scale, they are trying to push something within a f

the romans, 214. he is recognizing this idea of natural law. he says, when the gentiles do not have -- sorry, when the gentiles but do not have the law, but do things instinctive of the law, are a law to themselves and show the works of law written in their hearts. those who don't, who weren't given, don't have, or were not given god's law, still can know the law through their natural reasoning. paul is recognizing the national -- the natural law here. the classic american example you probably know is martin luther king's letter from birmingham jail. i mentioned this last class. he wrote this on scraps of papers in jail. he is asked, how can you justify breaking the laws? -- the sit-ins, and they're not following the positive law, and how can you justify that? martin luther king says "the answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. i would be the first to advocate that one have a moral and legal responsibility to obey just laws, and to disobey unjust laws." what is the difference between the two? how can you tell?

more to an investment logic and that's what i think also these forty billion you mentioned that's the idea of the european union there's also the there isn't many of these plans that for example the germans under the twenty presidency there were all about encouraging investment off western companies in africa and if that's done on fair terms and if that investment actually increases i think there's more of a chance that that will actually eight development later on than many of the development corporation schemes that are currently being rolled out. lots of lip service is also paid to investment and the need to get the private sector involved what holds investment back and where are there areas there for partnering perhaps to create a more effective investment climate i think first of all to late to do. they should have come investing in africa many years ago like all the people in other countries i mean in china and india secondly it's good that the number of jobs are very few but some african leaders and business people have now started to invest into their continent and for example nige

is the chief are not the sole reason. this was his idea and among other things this features the last author is dealing with the consent motion the highly competitive postdoctoral fellowship and chose applicants from all over the united states and has become the highly coveted ashley recognized award. he things briefly you may not know about him. as an aspiring scholar who got us started cornell walter in my opinion is one of the 45 gratis diplomatic historians and he was jeff's initial mentor. then he went to get his phd concentrating on this cold war. those fall by a postdoc at yale. his first book published in 2007 was the cold war 37 feet. it won the paul -- price. his first foray into bush 41 studies occurred in 2008 when he had the presidents private day-to-day account as the presidents private server it, the making of a global president opens a unique window onto this crucial time in u.s. china relations. he wrote us bonded introduction. meanwhile he directed a research team the reviewed and made available 150,000 documents from tha

aspect to us what sometimes is with virtuous substance dualism the idea that the mind in the body are separate and distinct yeah that is a that is a cognitive impulse i think the evidence indicates that that is a function of our brains what we do with that of course is a choice whether we choose to actually continue to believe to explore that impulse that is a choice and i made that statement specifically to address this conversation that we sometimes have to use those kinds of conversation as far as i'm concerned about whether we can disprove god or whether a faith has a rational aspect to it and the answer to all those questions is no you can't prove or disprove god it's at least a time to even have that kind of. and that's the faith the experience the religious impulse however you want to define it is not a rational thing it's an experience or. it is in many ways an emotion like any other emotion and it has everything to do with our person your life experiences how late to the world around you frankly like any emotion so yes it is an inbred inborn impulse but what we do with it is

an elderly catholic lady may learn to accept the idea of hash chocolates but perhaps not some of the other goods on offer here the store owner proudly displays his wares in just a few months he's managed to raise ten million dollars in venture capital a windfall he says that will help as the marijuana market expands worldwide. this fall likely be the only time in my life that i see such a large scale market move from the black market into the legal market consumers are already consuming canvas there's this incredible moment where all around the world the cannabis revolution will happen within the next ten years. many in the u.s. want to see marijuana legalized fifty four percent of americans said they supported legalization and the smoking of it in public spaces and they're doing their part to pave the way for the popular recreational drug to become big business. that was you know thanks for watching. the top stories followed across social media share your comments and content welcome to. their black living in germany. she is reminded what that means on a daily basis presenter like t

president trump himself has embraced the idea that he is a modern day old hickory. earlier this year he went to the hermitage to celebrate andrew jackson's history and said he was a fan. drew a parallel between his populism and that of jackson who he asserted confronted and defined american elite and reclaimed the people's government from an emerging aristocracy. rehabilitated old degrees portrait to the oval office. liberals have responded with soul-searching over how to reconnect with the people. earlier this week, columbia professor gave a talk on his book "the once and future identityagainst politics." example of only one liberals trying to reconnect with a broad swath of americans that trouble allegedly speaks to. others have likewise recommended of the democratic party sees to be the party of identity politics and rebrand itself or to being a party of class or economic appeals. they believe they can do that and bring back the white middle class without pandering to homophobia, and classes him on the right. that identity politics is an artificial one. american p

in 2001 i conducted a campaign, the idea of reparations for slavery 137 years after the fact from people, to people who were never slaves, was a bad idea and actually racist and the indiscretion to say so. when i was invited to speak at the university of california berkeley, i asked the chancellor, i wrote the chancellor and said i knew benjamin netanyahu -- because of threats of violence, asked him to introduce me, just to protect students, and assigned 30 armed guards, from my talk, when i asked to go to the bathroom before i spoke six guys in jackets preceded me into the bathroom and kicked open the stall doors and i remember saying out loud this is an absolute disgrace in america. when you have university officials like that there is no way to stop it. you have to expel students who do things like these students did or like they are doing now and read college, demonstrating inside classrooms, they don't want aristotle talk because he was white, the university, i visited and thought it was a pretty good school even though it is a left-wing school, very traditional and students were al

later on you cannot force them to it's very hard to force individuals then to go back but i think the ideas are on the table and leaders are mindful of the fact that we shouldn't be encouraging brain drain reckless recklessly but. how it will work in the end that's still fairly clear let me come back to one point that we saw in that short report just now given i am gay provide namely the idea of other. camps detention areas if you want to call them that centers migration centers whatever euphemism you use the idea has been something that president mccaw of france strongly spouses but is there any reason to believe that these other centers would work any better than the holding camps. in libya libya is particularly lawless but is this aspect of the plan that thorsten has just outlined do you think really likely to function i doubt it but at least the situation would be somewhat better compared to leave you because at least you would give one government a government that has also a track record like in where you can find some kind of authority and it's not a failed state as such even though t

i'm not too comfortable with the idea that. we are going to be powerful i think the social relations of power are enduring and are in fact the problem that technology is undermining the balances that have been struck they have that result from our inability to do certain things the fact that corporations need their workers governments need their subjects' the aristocracy you needed the peasantry so you don't think it'll take it'll have a critical mass at some point it will kind of self regulate between humanity being able to harness the technology rather than be enslaved by it. well i don't know the technology is out to enslave us but i do think that technology is upset in the social balances and the economic balances and ecological balances that if it evolved over millions and hundreds and dozens of years and this is the great danger i mean the great the greatest dangers arising from the rise of artificial intelligence and the new high technologies that we're seeing emerging now first of all the arms race which we're already se

the underworld in the success of the world really and this this idea that then. villains started to get involved in the arts which is only a matter of time before the art style get involved with villains and i think this this progression of the don't care move made as a conceptual artist and and his film was going to be about the jew ality of man and and the criminal for tony reflected that so basically go on to really support for people to be in his film when you do see a jump indian who then went on to become. quite a few films after that he'd done a stretch for manslaughter you know he killed a man. your club. you know was was a bit of a face and he's if he's first appearance in a in a feature film there's a whole bunch of them they had substantial rap sheets so the idea that everybody in it that wasn't james fox is a real villain and ironically enough is something that goes. richie did with lock stock but something that's a bit more accessible and he's funny and self-effacing with the casting of of lenny maclean and all the other chaps that he used in in his d