you take a hard get the idea and forget this can come in the outer part. you take one bit of wheeler's ideas and they're usually on the mark. at the time of simon's research grandstand, he married his childhood sweetheart and matt art lindgren bomb in queens from a throw from queens and they met at a dance and kept in touch with her throughout m.i.t. and stayed in touch with her princeton and at one point decided it was time to marry her because they've been going together for so long, going to be. unfortunately, she developed a cough in the cost turns out to be tuberculosis, which at the time there was no medicinal cure for tuberculosis. there was a rest and if you are very lucky, it would cure itself. you would go into remission. a lot of people die from tuberculosis because there wasn't a way to treat it the sites from hoping the past. when simon got married, his parents were completely opposed to the marriage. they were very upset, especially his mother. his mother wrote to him and said ritchie, it's not like writing spinach. it's not like something you

it is first based on fear and the idea that we needed to understand how far they have gone and what they've done with the weaponry. and later became, what can we do with these scientists and this material? intelligence operatives conceived of ways to bring them back to the united states or possibly deal with them in countries during occupation. paperclip was first an idea among intelligence professionals and also the american scientific community. that was aware of how germany had progressed in weapons technology during the war. and there was an understanding that with the atom bomb and with the invention of these long-range rockets, we have entered a new era in warfare. it was not quite yet the cold war where you are looking at the soviet union as his intense enemy in 1945. but no matter who is out there, the technology has changed the way warfare can be conducted in we needed to find an advantage against whatever potential enemy there would be. and that involved finding the best scientists and matching it with america's industrial might. so if you could achieve a breakthrough by using tec

the idea that nonresistance to evil is part of scripture is true. it is not just the bible is a militant text. there is also an obstacle in the sense that a lot of christians, because of their faith, because of their love for neighbor, resisted going to war. one of the prominent civil war history in that historians argue that -- historians say arguing to get christians to kill for their country was harder to get them to die for the country. , westians have all along have a sense of self-sacrifice, but getting someone to take up arms and kill, that was the harder courage. that was the harder obstacle to overcome for a lot of people in the civil war. the same case in the revolutionary war era. there was the fact there were loyalists who knew had to quote scripture really well. including the methodists. they would use scripture pretty well. they were like john wesley, loyalists. they were english. i want to talk about a couple of frameworks or kinds of ways to frame the way people looked at the bible in the revolutionary time. colonists could not assist

the idea that nonresistance to evil is part of the scripture is true. it is not just this militant text, it was also an obstacle in the sense that a lot of christians because of their faith, because of their love for neighbor, resisted going to war. one of the most prominent civil war historians has argued that killing, or trying to get christians to kill for their country was harder than trying to get them to die for their country. hadstians have all along this sense of self sacrifice. getting someone to actually take up arms and kill was the harder courage. that was the harder obstacle to overcome. that's the same case in the revolutionary war era. there was the fact that there were a lot of loyalists who knew how to quote scripture really well, including as methodists. were loyalists. i wanted to talk about a couple of frameworks, or waste to frame the way people look at the bible in the revolutionary time. many couldn't assist their wars without assessing scripture. people were doing was going to war, dealing with a new kind of nation, they naturall

so, the idea that the isi sort of controls the taliban is a cartoon. it's not true. certainly they have relations of some kind. - [narrator] while concerns remain over potential support for militant groups flowing out of pakistan, the us is backing the sharif government's counter insurgency efforts. - this is one of the most bizarre situations in international politics, between the united states and pakistan. where pakistan has, for some time been, what seems to be simultaneously an ally and an enemy. now part of the reason that the united states has turned a blind eye to the apparent collaboration between elements of pakistani military and the taliban, is that for a long time we needed pakistan's cooperation for logistical purposes to send supplies to our forces in afghanistan. - one of the most difficult strategic issues that we had during the war in afghanistan, and still have, in many respects, is that there are terrorist groups living, working, building support on the soil of pakistan, and attacking into afghanistan, attacking afghan government forces, attacking

and she founded it with the idea of saving a house on the waterfront in newport in the point section, house that was built in the 1740's called hunter house. and it is a magnificent house. and the worry was that it was going to be disassembled and put on display at the metropolitan museum of art. and nobody in newport wanted that to happen. this was our architectural heritage. we didn't want to lose our architectural heritage to another city. so, a group of women under the leadership of our founder catherine warren gathered together, bought the house, restored the house and then furnished it. and then at some point in time, catherine met with countess deschenes and discussed the idea of opening up the first floor of the breakers to public tours. they would charge $1.00 a tour.

when i first thought of the idea -- with the backup for a minute. actually really manifested the idea. it's like everyone is always like how did you take an idea and then start a business? how did you even come up with the idea. at the time, my life was not great. i was selling fabric machines door-to-door living with my mom, like 25-years-old, and i remember after a whole day of being kicked out of office complexes or they were sometimes my business cards wrapped up in my face, i pulled off on the side of the road and was like i'm in the wrong movie like what just happened. call the director, called the producer, this is not my life. i went home that night and wrote down my strengths are what i thought i was good at and the only thing i had with sales and i felt okay well i know i'm good at selling. what is that i like about it and i realize i like offering something for someone that the need or didn't know they needed that could improve their life would help them. so in a moment, he wrote down in my journal i want to invented products that i can g

i actually really manifested the idea. so it's like everyone is always how did you take an idea and then start a business? well, it's how did you come up with the idea? i was in search of my idea. and at the time my life was not great. i was selling fax machines door to door. i was living with my mom. i was like 25 years old. and i remember after a whole entire day of being kicked out of office complexes again all day, or sometimes my business card ripped up in my face, i pulled off the side of the road one day, kathy, and i was like i'm in the wrong movie. what just happened. call the director. call the producer. this is not my life, this is not my movie. i went home that night and wrote down my strengths or what i thought i was good at. and the only thing in the good column really was sales. and i thought, okay, well, i know i'm good at selling. what is it i like about selling? and i realized i like offering something to someone that they need or didn't know that they needed that can improve their life or help them. and s

the nra has roundly rejected the idea of raising the minimum age to purchase a firearm to 21, something the president tweeted about just today. it's interesting to see what's going to happen between the president and the nra. he was touting his relationship with the nra, saying he has spoken to them often over the past few days. he spoke to the executive director chris cox over the weekend, saying they have a good relationship and he doesn't expect to clash with them over these proposed gun control measures here, brooke. the fact is that the president wants to raise the minimum age to 21 and the nra doesn't. that's an obvious conflict there between those two stances. the other big thing that the president has been pushing for is giving teachers concealed weapons, arming teachers who need to be adept at handling weapons like these firearms, giving them weapons in schools and he touted the idea of giving them a bonus, if you're an armed teacher you would get a 20% bonus or 20% of teachers, he

i came around to the idea of aving to write an actual book. one of the student comments i read was that i make a passionate defense of the founders' view of morality. what i tried to do was make a passionate defense that the founders cared about morality, in defense of the scholars who said no. i tried to remain relatively neutral about what i thought of the founders, although it probably came through that i liked a lot of what they said. but the book is not about that. it is not a defense. it is a description, and that took a while. what especially took a while, and it took me a long time to under, was the political theory of the founding requires a eries of policy -- of policies that went way beyond anything that my teachers and most of the scholarly literature talked about. everybody talks about the structure of he that. >> people talk about freedom of speech, slavery as topics where the theory of founding has something important to tell us about policy. but beyond that, there is a lot of things that government does beyond that at least that

heart is the story of this book so the idea is whether you are at the march or the sister march all around the country or in the world most of you don't know what it took to go behind the scenes so tell us more of those stories and what it took to really put on the largest protest that has ever happened in washington d.c. is similar to the new york city and 600 other places across the country and every continent across the globe? >> that is the most important that you get to go behind the scenes to hear the joy but also the pain in the hard work to persevere and the critiques having to work internally with those extra forces and also what people don't realize this isn't like the established organization that has been around years. some of us have been there done that but some of us have never organized a day in our lives so we were with women who had never marched who were public school teachers or archer for new workers, bakers who were so moved by this election gone wrong ready to move up their sleeves so we were building relationships at the sa

the former labour leader ed miliband is flirting with the idea of a basic universal income. e russians made a sinister and systematic attack on our political system," said the republican speaker of the house of representatives, following the charges against 13 russian nationals and three russian companies. one of those charged, yevgeny prigozhin, is said to be nicknamed putin's chef, a reference to his closeness to the russian president. however, a russian foreign ministry spokeswoman called the allegations of interference in the us elections, "absurd". what is clear from the indictment is that the alleged interference, which involved hundreds of people in a spider's web of online activity going back for years, was not only designed to damage hilary clinton's presidential campaign, but it didn't stop after donald trump reached the white house — his presidency became the target. a little earlier this evening, this is what the us deputy attorney general had to say. on september 13, 2017, soon after the news media reported that the special counsel's office was investigating evid

the school. so for all these reasons, it is a terrible idea. u can -- host: you can watch the full newsmakersomorrow at at 12:40 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. that is with randi weingarten. andrew is on the line from white plains, new york, you oppose encouraging teachers to carry guns. why? caller: good morning, and thank you for c-span. i oppose it because i think you are making schools into an armed camp and i do not think that is a good idea. safe, as my school being i do not know if any parent can say our schools are safe after what has been happening recently. i think that going back to this wild west mentality with everyone armed and able to protect themselves is a terribly romantic and stupid idea that is not going to solve the problem. i would also like to make one observation. donald trump has successfully seized the debate and taken it away from whether or not we should regulate assault rifles, and placed this crazy idea of arming teachers. he has shown his political adeptness, and i am sorry to say we have been pulled off of the real issue, con

the ships. to get an idea. y given time, whether or not we want to open with china could depend on the action or inaction of a commanding officer. brian: tell us more about your background. where you work full-time? writer: right now i am a for james. it is a company that specializes in providing promotional, mostly defense publications. stuff like that. brian: how long if you been there? michael: i have been working for -- well, i started as year ago.ver a brian: i know you grew up in a family where your father was a marine. did you do any service time yourself? no i did not, but my father brought me up like a little maureen. as far as i'm concerned i did my time. brian: where you from originally? what kind of education did you have? michael: i grew up in philadelphia and i went to catholic schools. i went to college in trenton. then i went abroad to australia for a semester. writing: where have you spent most of your work time over the years? michael: i started off with the cutting your teeth on local newspape

the idea is to enhance visibility and public awareness around the issue. nbc has already hosted two of these events, one at stanford law school. the other at the national press club in the fall. they were very successful and we theplanning two events in coming months. the idea is that key legislators and influencers who attend learn more and spread the message, and we think by spreading this message, that is the way to get this done. >> the only thing i would layer on top of that, if you want to do something specifically today, email a guy named dieter court in oregon and tell him to schedule a vote. he happens to be a partisan democrat standing in the way of the enactment. we have majority support in both chambers, but if he would just schedule the house bill for a vote, they would be more electoral votes, so if you are interested in doing something really productive today, you can do that. what we do is the legislative work. we recruited all the sponsors. we put them on the bill. we have enacted the bill and all in 11 states and passed them through those

you know i think it all depends on the execution i think the idea that the trade deficit is a problem is straight od i of course i'm a free markets here and would have stayed in you know the trans-pacific partnership but i think donald trump as president is starting to understand the importance of free trade and the importance of stability and free trade but also the idea that trade deals should be fair to american workers of course american consumers largely benefit from free trade through lower prices so tenuous balance between the short term goal of keeping the economy stable making sure american consumers have enough money in their pockets but also making sure that we're not being taken advantage of by trade agreements with other countries and to go back to china really quickly i mean back during the campaign two thousand and sixteen the president said that he was going to designate china as a currency manipulator you may recall and and one hundred percent he was going to do it it was one of the list of things he was going to do on on day one and that didn't happen and to some ext

so that fits well in the republican world view. another idea in addition to republicanism is martyr dumb. one of the most popular books that protestants read is fox's books of martyr. it is a group of narratives of martyrdom. cat lic catholics on property stants. so it brings together a value that christianity is worth dying for. that this idea of sacrifice is something that is valued. that they find throughout scripture. and one says that they have a martyr complex. they see it everywhere. the idea comes across through war when you see it in washington, soldiers and the continental army and preachers interpret their death dying as martyrs. and it is seen as martyrdom is critical. and this one, i saw everywhere. just everywhere. saturated the documents. saturated the sermons and this concept of military and spiritual warfare. as i said, when people looked at the bible, they found war and conflict everywhere. the bible was a book of war. not just military warfare, but spirituality as a warfare. do you remember seeing anything like this in script

the press. that had no relationship to what anyone else wanted. it was a reiteration of his idea from the convention, namely some way for the national government to block the state legislators from doing nasty stuff. he really, really did not want to give up on that. >> just add one last twist, he had a further reason for thinking congress should be in charge, and that is by the time the convention was over, it was clear they had treated a new hybrid form of government that had never existed before in which the states retain some sovereignty but congress and the federal government exercise over those same citizens. this is what justice kennedy who has a good ear for a phrase that will last, he said the framers split the atom of sovereignty. i'm not sure all of the implications of that metaphor, but that's what justice kennedy said. so, when you break something that everyone believed was ungrateful because sovereignty is posterior root mean one guiding charge for one entity is in charge so how can you break it up, that's high-risk. madison felt there had to be a last word and he w

the idea of let's shine light on the forgotten whites. well certainly, but they haven't been articulated as white and poor. possibly articulated as poor. are they white and poor? that's a different type of poverty. we should do that, but also the way that poverty and racialized and gender and all kinds of a number of things. >> this rolls right into your area. racializing policy often determines whether or not that policy ever sees the light of day or not. we can look at obamacare and when people were asked, the polls have shown the different elements in obamacare, they liked them. when they are talked about as a whole as the affordable care act, they liked it, but they hate obamacare. a professor in irvine has done studies where he showed one group of people a picture of a portuguese water dog. jfk had this dog and president obama had this dog. depending on what he told who the dog belonged to, the level of cuteness of that dog differed. even though it was the same dog, obama's dog was less cute than kennedy's dog. this has nothing do wi

that is the idea. so far, nothing like this has happened during military drills or anything like that. the cno has said that when it comes down to combat operations or those kinds of things, we are top-notch. it is this daily stuff. but the thing is, this daily stuff is what they do most of the time. most of the time there on routine patrol when this stuff has happened. brian: let me read at the end of your book two paragraphs. one is short. " america 2017 is not the america of 2013. that is only a four-year difference. the next time the chinese navy dangerously confronts a worship on the high seas, it seems unlikely that it will be the american commander who orders the engine room to execute "all back emergency full." for america and the u.s. navy, the era of crashbacks seems to be over" why? michael: because i think there is a sense out there, it appears to me, that we realized couple of things. one, embracing the chinese had been the idea during the obama years. this is not working as we thought it w

this party in this country was founded on the competition of ideas. the free marketplace of ideas. that is important. we do not want to impose costs on the american workforce and the american people. i think that is only part of the ressure. washington likes the measure. they like to say, we have taken off x billions of dollars in burden, and that is really important to measure and that is easy to measure. but here is the question that i would ask all of you. what is the cost in terms of liberty? that is a lot harder talk about because that is qualitative. ou need to make judgments. it has to be a very careful conversation. when you're talking to individuals, one of the best things you can do is ask them questions and get them to realize freedom is a beautiful thing. ask them hey, are you making more money now? ey, do you enjoy being able to speak? do you appreciate freedom of speech. you're not going to them saying hey, with your big -- hat. i have one. when you're talking to these individuals, you want to plant the seed of liberty into their minds. you can get them to join organiz

hank: i left home with the idea of becoming a doctor. there was a lady who lived across the street, a lady who also had a little private school. we called her mama joshua, and she thought i was a pretty smart kid because i memorized the books of the bible quicker than any other kid. to this day, i can still recite a few of them. everything was done in the form of singing. like, genesis, exodus, leviticus, numbers, deuteronomy. she thought i was pretty smart. everything was done in the form of singing. like, genesis, exodus, leviticus, numbers, deuteronomy. she thought i was pretty smart. she said, you need to go to school to be a doctor so you can come back here and take care of me and my sister. so i left howard university with the idea of becoming a doctor. the first time i was arrested, i was in jail. the heck with being a doctor, i am going to be a lawyer because i need to fight this injustice. [laughter] hank: that was the idea. i was never a real stellar academic scholar in the classroom. i had to work harder than anyone else just t

so the idea that nonresistance to evil is part of scripture is true too. it's not just the bible is militant text. there was also an obstacle in the the sense that a lot of christians because of their faith, because of their love for neighbor resisted going to war. one of the most prominent civil r war historians has argued that killing or trying to get christians to kill for their country was harder than trying to get them to die for their country. the argument was that christians have all along typically had had this sense of self-sacrifice, but getting someone to actually take up arms and kill, that was the harder courage. that was the harder obstacle to overcome for a lot of people in the civil war era. that's the same case in the revolutionary war era. same kind of situation. there was the fact that there were a lot of loyalists who knew how to quote scripture really well. including those methodists. they do scripture pretty well and they were like john wesley. they were english. so i want to talk about a couple frame w frameworks or ways to frame the

find the idea isjacob rees—mogg being promised both hilarious and terrifying! 't think he would command the support of the majority of the parliament who party. he might have supporters but there are more than 300 tory mps and if there was a leadership challenge at the minute, tory mps would end up bachinger theresa may. but again, let's see where we are. you theresa may. but again, let's see where we are. you are a theresa may. but again, let's see where we are. you are a brave man to make such statement —— backing theresa may. and finally back to the daily telegraph. we need somebody with a technical mind to step in and help us with this story. hackers huack help us with this story. hackers hijack thousands of government websites to mine bitcoin. you're looking at me! it is to do with the internet! that's all i've got. what i know is that it takes a lot of processing power to mine crypto currencies. and it seems that different government websites are being harnessed to bring that processing power. you can use the metaphor. it is the equivalent, we know that so

i mean, you're both foreclosing the idea right off the bat, and it is a reasonable idea. it is -- i mean, it would have fulfilled the mission that the sro was supposed to fulfill and didn't and failed to. >> the sro had a gun -- >> can i finish my thought? >> no. the sro had a gun -- you've spoken a long time. the sro had a gun and didn't use it. to add more guns to an environment -- we keep saying the problem is mental issues, the problem is this, the problem is that. in every study, the only reason this happens is because we have so many guns in this country, too much access to guns. every single country, other than the united states, does not have this problem, and the only reason, and we should be honest about it, is that we have too much access to guns. not that guns need to be confiscated or we need to get rid of them, but it's too much access to guns. if this person did not have an access to a gun, this would not have happened, bottom line. >> in washington, d.c. you have some of the most restrictive gun laws in america, and it's certainly a land of peace and harmon

as we will say for the idea did not last very long. e the early 70s, very early 70s six may 2, 1956 very primitive four inch by four inch screen prototype. had this in a box that the engineers nicknames the possum trap. and they brought this to washington d.c. to present the national science foundation to get big funding to roll this out commercially or will not commercially but in a major multimillion dollar experiment. at the university of illinois and then surrounding geographical area of chicago. and let me read to you the same from that demo because it is, a classic technology demo. now, it starts by saying cerl is the name of the lab. the computer-based education research lab. cerl engineering technicians jim and ray have been tasked with taking one of the four inch prototype plasma panels and incorporating into a full-sized plywood mockup of the plato for the demo. it had a lid on the top of the box that you can open but you had to be careful fiddling about inside. we call it the possum trap. it was accrued -- is possible to get

with blood the founder of a bio hacker group came up with the idea. o hackers refuse to accept biology and the limitations of nature. they want to upgrade their bodies with technology. today so your blood is promoting r f i d chips the same chipset patrick palm and carries in his body. i mean it works like this when you most we are skeptical about things we don't really understand. but if you explain how it works without a good things what about things what on inventors when done most people are simply comfortable with it so this is what i tried to do i'm not in the business of selling implants i just like to share the insights i have. getting a chip implanted in sweden costs about the same as in germany around one hundred twenty euros. the chips are made of bio glass so that the body doesn't reject them and if the size of a grain of rice held right you'll feel it is one of the first who wants to give them a try but it. very much never said i'm washing. it's not worth being given birth so i'm sticking to my thought. try everything once you only live on

s belonging to emmanuel marchand's on marsh party not only bank the idea but have reportedly been given advice to the parties founders r.t. shallot do bensky has more. this is really a brand new political party that's about to launch in the k. its goals are quite ambitious pledging to transform british politics and reverse brigs it it wants a second referendum on it i think there's no chance of bragg's it being reversed the brave people have spoken and that's an end of the matter they can bash their head against a brick wall but all the get is a sore head while the party is launching in the u.k. it's getting advice but of course they can all hear it from the helping hand coming from a manual much calls party the republic of march with advisors said to be at a recent meeting consulting about tactics and its north one your girl friends was glad you came here like us and like many other countries looking for hope because it was feeling despair i think and today july increasing you can look at the future musical and i think the movement that greece and others i meet with when you use the fu

of the second world war as an idea doesn't come into currency but only until 1941 all of which germany one except coming to impasse but at the same time the japanese created a east asia and italy was in the somaliland of north africa. and the axis had one because the russians were actively colluding under august 1939 in the british were engaged in appeasement until the fall of france and we were isolationist with misguided view of the strength and eventually the soviet union that led to three events that changed the course of history the three most momentous events and then changed a second world war that was the soviet invasion on june 22, 1941 with pearl harbor attack and then singapore the next day in malaysia. and then the inexplicable declaration by italy and germany on december 11. at that point suddenly the axis on earlier preparation with the ferocity of the japanese and german soldier with those wonderful munitions and technology found themselves in a war they could not win. 170million against an alliance with the prewar gdp six or seven times larger so what w

the vast majority of teachers oppose this idea. t suggests when you have guns around in a hope, you are far more likely to have incidental shootings. this is the proposal of the nra because they want more guns. this means more guns. >> wouldn't you shoot the teacher first? >> who knows. we don't pay our teachers to have classroom products. they have to buy their own supplies but now we're going to outfit them with guns and train them? it's crazy. >> when i asked white house officials what are the actual things you can do, are you okay with an assault ban? a weapons ban? are you okay with changing the age? they would only say the president is open to changing the age. they said. >> why do you think he's open to that? it is reasonable. it's a starter and gets you on first base. >> the nra isn't. >> why would he challenge -- because here's my theory about politics. it's all about timing. he will say anything for the next two or three weeks because he knows a month from now, people won't be paying attention. >> that's essentially been h

that was the big idea eventually embodied in the pre-ambamble to us constitution. and it wasn't the way things started, when the delegates came to draft the constitution, they came as representatives of individual sovereign states and many of them insisted that we the people of each state are sovereign but wilson, who served in the continental congress saw that the articles of confederation were too weak to achieve centralized purposes and wanted a stronger central government and a strong president elected by the people insisted that we the people of the united states as a whole are sovereign, not the people of each state and not the parliament itself as in britain. that brilliant idea was what lincoln invoked when he insisted the south had no ability to secede without the consent of we the people of the united states as a whole and it's the foundation of the idea in the pre-ample that popular sovereignty rests in we the people. in this gallery, we'll see the e electrocutions of wilson's draft. he was the first important signer who put pen to paper. we're about to

because the idea being, you know, would the apostles support war? what would they do about going to war? and specifically were peter and paul, the great apostles, would they side with the loyalists or would they side with the patriots? and there was a lot of ink spilled over that question. so i want to read you a couple of texts and we'll just read these texts and let's just see which side they tend to fall down on. loyalist or patriot? let's start with peter. pet peter, 1 peter chapter 2.13-17. this is a part of that. submit yourselves to every ordnance of man for the lord's sake. as free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness but as servants of god honor all men, love the brotherhood, fear god, honor the king. well, how night go? here's one from paul which is the most cited text in the revolutionary era. romans chapter 13. and let me say it gets a lot of play in the civil war as well. let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. for there is no power but of god, the powers that be are ordained of god. whosoever therefore resi

that was the idea behind fdr and the g.i. bill. it was what motivated my fellow texan, president lyndon b. johnson, with medicare and medicaid. it was the reason that barack obama had the affordable care act passed into law so that more americans could see health-care coverage. [applause] >> mr. castro's a former mayor of san antonio, texas and is considering running for president in 2020. you can watch the entire program tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern. the conservative political action conference starts its three-day meeting tomorrow with vice president pence, white house counsel don mcgann, senator ted cruz, education secretary betsy devos and labor secretary. live coverage begins on c-span at 10:35 a.m. eastern. on friday, president trump speaks at cpac along with kellyanne conway, sba administrator linda mcmahon and fcc chair ajit pai. day,nday on c-span's q and do -- q and a. ,- talks about her memoir reflecting on being diagnosed with stage four: cancer at the nge of 35 -- stage four colo cancer. >> i felt people pouring in. al

little blogs telling you on the idea that dropping bombs brings police to the chicken hawks forcing you to fight the battles. for new socks for the tell you that every gossip the tabloids are shall. i tell you pull it out by. all the hawks that we along with all the walking. in other news today the french prime minister has presented a new plan to fight the spread of his let me take stream is in the country's prisons it follows weeks of protests by prison stuff after an attack by a radicalized inmate shiela dubin as he takes up the story. well the french prime minister i learned sixty new measures today as part of this new nationwide d. radicalization and against radicalization plan including the creation of fifteen hundred new spaces within prisons where they would be able to isolate radicalized prisoners the idea of being able to stop any contagion amongst the general prison population stop any radicalization of other prisoners now they also announced that there was going to be more training for teachers and sports coaches to sport any signs of radicalization and then how to deal with

a lot of people have the idea. it's strong and a lot of religions. for my father just included doctors. >> most mormons support education in the kleven homeschool and i definitely believe in doctors and things. >> host: i found this interesting in your preface that you wanted to make that point. >> guest: the political environment is so polarized and people will latch onto any story to confirm their misconceptions about something. i think my dad has regular ide ideas, his mind works and i'm not a medical professionals i don't know, i felt like maybe he had a mental irregularity. in my mind the religious extremism with a vehicle for that. whenever was happy in his mind something goes the other way around. i don't want people to take the story and say all religious people are all mormons are like this. it's easy when people are different than you to make them into a caricature. >> host: this is a foreign land to me. in many ways. that is not the take away. i think you can rest assured that will not be the problem. what is interesting is the idea people

so the idea is respect the king. but based on how the king performs the kings duties and not specifically for just because the king is the king. so evaluate leadership. so what the patriots are arguing against the loyalist, really you are proof texting without understanding the true context. you have to read the true context to understand it. but what it really becomes is an argument over what that context is. the loyalists have a view, the patriots have a view over what that context is over all. so several conclusions on this. the revelation it's arguable was the most important event in american history. the revolution, it creates the nation, sets the nation in motion. and the revolution becomes like -- it becomes an enduring symbol for what the nation is all about, fighting for liberty. many different ways in which fighting for liberty manifests itself. but even in the civil war, the revolutionary period is almost like a biblical text of its own. because both the confederates and the unionist are arguing they are t

the idea that the current system benefits small states or rural areas.the founder of our group wrote a book says that it's not true in the real benefit of the current system battleground states everyone else is in. i think people have -- you hear that while i live in a small state and i'll be ignored under national popular vote. no, the biggest city in the country there aren't enough people there to elect a president. candidates have to campaign everywhere. >> i would just say in the introduction of small states he came up is not true. it's a policy. the ten small states are politically ignored under the current system and no one loses more. once you get that education done, you know. >> after uic woman in the front come in for this. >> i am a candidate for state legislator in west virginia. we are not on your list -- you are really not on that many good lists. [laughter] but what i would like to know is with our legislator it is so change resistant, perhaps a good strategy would be not to be can fence them but to use us as your champions of change, the

but the idea was that you are coming, you are participating. what made -- what they make there was that we are going to do some of our operations now, especially from the aircraft. we do not publicly complain and you have as look -- right to be there. so go ahead, that is fine. were --s time when we when we are in international waters are collecting intelligence, he will leave us dead but that didn't happen. there were a couple of incidents, especially some aircraft incidents over the other south china sea where the chinese started complaining. they were flying internationally. >> let me show you video of something that we have seen a lot, a man-made islands off the coast of china. how many of these are there? >> there are dozens. >> they are all man-made? thing, youre is the have these areas that have a little bit of area popped up. but they have done is gone over at low tide and build them up. you have these errors and things like that that they have created into these as part of and. grace you go back about a decade and a decade and a half an

that was the big idea eventually embodied in the preamble to the u.s. constitution. it wasn't the way things started when the delegates came to philadelphia to draft the constitution, they came as representatives of individual sovereign states and many of them insisted that we, the people, of each state are sovereign. wilson horks h wilson, who had served in the continental congress, saw that they were too weak to achieve centralized purpose and wanted a strong president-elected by the people, insisted that we the people of the united states as a whole are sovereign, not the people of each state and not the parliament itself as in britain. that brilliant idea was what lincoln invoked when he insisted that the south had no ability to succeed without the people of the united states as a whole. it is the foundation of the idea in the preamble, the popular sovereignty rests in we the people. we're going to see the evolutions of wilson's draft. he was born in scotland and went to st. andrews university and came to america and studied at ben franklin's new college of phila

>> i left home with the idea of becoming a doctor. my lady who lived across the street, lady who also had a little private school -- we called her mama joshua. she thought i was a pretty smart kid because i memorized the books. bible quicker than any other kid. and to this day i can still recite a few of them. everything was done in the form of singing. like genesis, exodus, le vit cuss -- i did that much quicker than anyone else. she thought i was smarter than anyone else. she said, you need to go to school and become a doctor so you can take care of me and my sister. i left howard university with the idea of becoming a doctor. the first time i was arrested and i was in jail, the heck with being a doctor. i'm going to be a lawyer because i got to fight this injustice. [ laughter ] >> and so that was the idea, and i was never a real stellar academic scholar in the classroom. i had to work harder than anyone else just to get a c out of a class. but that's when i got thoroughly involved. and i guess you can say i realized what my calling

and the stories, arejoining programmes, the ideas and the stories, are joining forces with the

it talks about how i arrived personally and the temperament and the ideas. i talk about the areas that seem to be really troublesome when we talk about a black experience in america. i talk about education, i talk about the economic well-being of the community, the family structure and all the things and with my view was and what i thought the solutions were from a political perspective. what has changed name me is that i acknowledge that because of my upbringing, a lot of things that i experience are not the experiences of a love black people in these communities. i was raised into a military family, two parent family. they are still married and celebrate their 50th wedding anniversary. always an integrated neighborhoodin integratedneighbs corrugate, datedcommunities. i think over time it's become more political and spiritual and i thought to myself was wha wouy life have been like if i'd been born in west baltimore maryland to a single mother or in the ferguson missouri or any of these flash points that we've seen in the news, what is the only thinif theonl