well first of all for the second consecutive day the stock of intel was the biggest loser in the dow jones industrial average at a couple of scenarios are possible for example there could be charges there could be higher costs of for upgrades and then also intel could lose some market share to the competitors even if that might be not as easy as in the past if we think back to maybe ten fifteen twenty years ago when it was the big battle for example between advanced micro devices and intel for computer chips those could be replaced rather easily but today's semiconductors are highly customized so it won't be that easy for the competition to take market share away from intel and let's just mention the dow because it's very clear when the five thousand point what's been driving that. it's really breathtaking it just took twenty three trading days for the dollar of fraud to go from twenty four to twenty five thousand points the fastest pace that we've seen in the history of a crossing such a thousand point mark the reasons are all the same there is the t

and other chip makers some time ago now but the news has only just surfaced intel is still hush hush about it all we're joined at the moment by someone who knows exactly why but first here is what we know so far the intel security flow could allow hackers to obtain access to passwords encryption keys and other sensitive data the newly announced vulnerability could affect every processor released since one nine hundred ninety five at the moment there's no way for users to detect a breach which leaves no trace in traditional log files some security experts are calling it the worst flow ever found by the computer industry is probably more of a problem with a security guy this is what the processor is the core of the computer it's what the operating system runs on and that means when the processor is affected and the hacker takes advantage of that flow they have access to everything. desktops notebooks tablets smartphones running on intel chips are affected the problem may be even bigger than initially reported in a statement intel said recent reports that these exploi

but what was left of his credibility when he said this about the house intel memorandum. ave not seen the memo, but i think it many sloppy, careless and has no ground in fact. lou: thank you, senator for telling us about something about which you know nothing. senator warner is quickly becoming one of my favorites in this. he and burr are just hapless. gregg: warner tends to embarrass himself every time he opens his mouth. his intellectual acute is diminished any time weighs in on a subject of merit. lou: the president having to deal with all sorts of challenged folks like that. but this business returning to the swamp with the "new york times" in full throat, praying about the president's attempted firing of mueller back in june of last year. and the left-wing media following the story like the was something that happened. gregg: it's been amusing and tragic over the last 24 hours, the mainstream media has pronounced president trump guilty of obstruction of justice. they know nothing about obstruction of justice. if they read the statute they will realize it requires that

the intel community, the fbi director, the head of the nsa, the cia director, they have all been out in public on a full core press trying to push this bill through. they wanted to push their version of the bill. they didn't get exactly what they wanted, but right down to the last wire here we were ready to have a vote, and then the tweets began and just threw the house in complete disarray. the ranking democrat on the house intel committee, representative adam schiff, he said that they could only imagine the expletives that were flying in the intel community and perhaps even the cabinet after trump tweeted. we could barely get the news out on the first tweet before he tweeted again and was like doing a u-turn. and anyway, it just sort of all played out very, very quickly this morning and a lot of confusion. >> chuck, how do you convince people that warrantless, when they hear that word, doesn't mean reckless? >> good question, brian. warrantless sounds nefarious. >> right. >> but the 4th amendment talks about the need to get a warrant for u.s. persons on u.s. soil to state with part

spoken to say this could well involve everyone security researchers discovered the problem affecting computer processes built by intel and other chip makers some time ago now but the news has only just surfaced intel is still hush hush about it all will be joined in a moment by someone who knows exactly why but first here's what we know so far. the intel security flaw could allow hackers to access to passwords encryption keys and other sensitive data the newly announced vulnerability could affect every processor released in one thousand nine hundred. at the moment there's no way for you to detect a breach which leaves no trace international logfile some security experts are calling it the worst flood ever found by the computer industry not least because the problem may be even bigger than initially reported. in a statement intel said recent reports that these exploits are caused by a bug or a flaw and are unique to intel products are incorrect based on the analysis to date many types of computing devices with many different vendors processors and operating systems are susceptible to these exploits. researchers who di

. >> frank, if i had the power to appoint you for chief investigator for house intel, what do you want to ask steve bannon? >> yeah, i think i would lead off with the question of what he meant when he said that trump tower meeting was treasonous, and then partially retracted it to say he was only referring to treason by manafort. and whether that means that he felt manafort as a seasoned campaign person should know it is potentially illegal to meet with a foreign government. i think all of that would come up because it is diametrically opposed to what the president told "the wall street journal" today, which is that any politician in washington would have gladly met with foreign government representatives to get dirt on their opponents. so, lots of room for complete clashes of statements prior, current and future. >> and, ashley, does your reporting take it as established fact that we have two parallel tracks going on here? we have whatever the president is saying about the possibility of an interview with robert mueller, and we have the reality, and that is that attorneys from both si

officer before the revelation raises questions as well. intel c.e.o. brian cresent sold thirty nine million dollars in company stocks and options in november months after learning about the flaw and well before the problem was reported publicly intel says the stock sale was unrelated to the chip problem it said it planned on going public with the flaw soon and it was working in the meantime to find a fix the bug is a nightmare for the u.s. tech giant but also for consumers millions of computers and devices are affected and one basic fix for the issue the so-called kaiser patch comes with the caveat as one of its developers explains. it might have economic impact. for cloud providers because now they with the kaiser patches they might have higher energy costs. for regular customers and they will also have higher energy costs because of these patches daniel groups was among those who informed intel of the design flaw in its chips he thinks intell was right not to disclose the problem immediately. i think it's a good idea to not publicly disclose t

will the security threat threaten intel sales? struggles to crack the smart phone market. companies like amazon, apple, and google are working on their own chips. to make matters worse -- in the six months that intel was stealthily trying to work on a fix for the flaw, the ceo sold $24 million of intel shares. the company says it is a routine sale, but that has not stopped lawmakers from investigating. the last time intel had to fix a big chip problem like this was a 1994 pentium recall. that caused into $475 million. -- that cost intel $475 million. that kind of problem might not fly with investors. emily: our bloomberg editor at large, cory johnson. well, the nyse's biggest ipo since snap made its public debut. a brazilian payments company pagseguro raised about $2.7 billion in its ipo and rose more than 4% on its first trading day. the company has made headway by selling rather than renting car processing machine, and providing an easier understanding policy for those that were not expect car payments otherwise. speaking of ipo'

officer worked for 25 years in the intel community wrote this piece. it was basically a warning people who say intel is never plipt sized haven't been around, they -- politicized haven't been around, haven't seen the recent history. i want to play for you to both of you, an interview that catherine herridge of fox did. not getting enough attention, frankly, with natalia, the russian lawyer, at that infamous meeting at trump tower that got so much publicity, she asked a question what was the meeting like, what was the purpose. meeting. let's watch. [speaking russian] trait my meeting wasn't tied with hillary clinton. the democratic block insists i was an agent have the kremlin. >> i did not could lewd with rush yampblgts the president's son-in-law barely attended according to her account. he came after the start of the meeting and left before it ended. he didn't even look each other in the eye. >> laura: apparently she has not been called to testify, questions from the mueller team yet. congressman duffy, you don't know whether to believe her or not beli

the minimum that is c.e.o. is supposed to hold off his own company's sux. and what does this mean for intel because we're talking about chips which is just everywhere. well if we talk about the loss in general it's certainly not helpful and one of the big concerns is that maybe intel might lose market share to some of its competitors and for a second consecutive day intel is the worst performer in the doll jones industrial average by far having that said it's not that easy for customers to replace one semiconductor was another we're talking not ten fifteen years ago where theoretically it wasn't such a big deal to a switch from intel and say to advanced micro devices to me conductors we're talking about chips or semiconductors that are pretty specialized customized and are not that easy to being replaced but it's certainly not helpful and that's why intel is the biggest loser in the dow jones and talking about the doll jones we reached a new milestone today for the first time ever new chips cross the twenty five thousand point mark it's the seventh thousand point mark that we've crossed sin

thanks for being with us. >> sure. >> the house intel committee won't show it to the senate intel committee's my understanding. it wasn't forthcoming. >> why won't your house colleagues share whatever is so important to share, why won't they share it with the senate? >> you're asking the wrong guy. you need to ask them. i don't understand it. there's a great contrast in this situation between the famous torture memo -- it wasn't a memo, it was a report done by the senate intelligence committee five years ago where number one it was first given the lengthy document, 6,000 pages, 500 page summary was given to the c.i.a. in advance so they could respond to it. >> because the information was so sensitive. >> exactly. >> and classified they needed to sign off on it. >> and we wanted to get their point of view on the conclusions. so i remember having meetings with individual c.i.a. -- groups of people with the c.i.a. saying we disagree with this conclusion and here is a fact that's off. so that went through about a six-month period. >> okay. the fact that the house intel committee is not doing th

will the security threat threaten intel sales? y struggles to crack the smart phone market. companies are working on their own chips. in the six months that intel was stealthily trying to work on a fix for the flaw, the ceo sold millions of shares. to fix atime intel had big chip problem like this was in 1994. that cost them $475 million. that kind of problem might not fly with investors. emily: our bloomberg editor at large, cory johnson. well, the nyse's biggest ipo since snap made its public debut. pagsegura raised about $2.7 billion in its ipo and raise -- rose more than 4% on its first trading day. of ipo's, coming up, one of the most successful public offerings of 2017, okta. this is bloomberg. ♪ emily: a stock we are watching, electronic arts, fell a little more than 2% in the session, its worst performance in a month. ea may delay the release of its highly anticipated anthem game to early next year. okta is out with its annual businesses at work report. it's an in-depth look into how organizations and people work today, exp

the justice department and the intel community says it would be extraordinarily reckless to do so. they say it would shed light on this investigation despite the fact everybody else says that this is misleading as getting information from, oh, i don't know, 1 million russian bots on twitter. congratulations on your story, by the way. that was a great story yesterday. >> yeah, that was incredible. >> but this is such a hand fisted setup to undermine rod rosenstein so they can fire him so he can appoint somebody who can fire mueller. >> it's all about treating the justice department as an extension of the trump tower security force, right? that's how the president views the nation's law enforcement agency. what we have been seeing here for the past few months is an effort to wind up and prepare to disengage from whatever the mueller probe finds, to discredit it and give the party its own set of reasons for backing away from it. we see that everywhere. by the way, chairman nunes i believe was taken off this investigation and made to recuse himself. what is he still doing out there? doi

remember how the intel committee was created. was going on in the executive branch where there wasn't a check and balance, what's happening in the cia, fbi and others. that's how the intel committee was created. >> i know but it was also created with the understanding and the culture that it is a bipartisanship. it's not like that anymore. >> i can go tit for tat with adam schiff every day, saying things that aren't even there. that's not my place. i think what the intel committee has responsibility to do, if they have knowledge, transparency to move it out. i think it is an open and honest process. the democrats had nothing before. they were voting to not let anybody see anything. and i think that was wrong. that's why the republicans are the ones who made the motion so members now could read what the democrats have. i don't see -- i don't want to predetermine what the committee will do. seems to me they're treating them very openly and honest and much different than reciprocal. >> there was an unusual moment you whispered somet

the latest intel on spectre and meltdown chip vulnerability. the boss says fixes will be rolled at by the end of the month. live from london, that's our top story on tuesday the ninth of january. brian krzanich reassures customers there's no evidence the chip issues have been exploited as the world waits for the problem to be resolved, but how did his speech go down at ces in las vegas? we'll be getting an expert view. also in the programme — apple could be facing legal action in france, the iphone‘s under the microscope there over intentionally shortening the life span of smartphones. and the european trading day has just got under way — in london, better than expected news from morrisons bodes well for retailers. we'll tell you all you need to know. catching the copycats — we meet the woman behind a service that lets small firms track down and stop others stealing their ideas, without using expensive lawyers. and with all that new tech and latest gadgets on show at this year's ces, we want to know, what would you like technology to do for you?

as we expand to be more than intel inside the pc and intel inside the data center, we also want to beel inside everything and have more intel products going to each one of those verticals. iot is a classic example of that. the business is a $3.2 billion business that grew 20% in 2017 and continues to grow as we proliferate the capabilities we have. not only in the cloud, but around the edge, as well. cory: what do you know about what your customers are doing in terms of their own design? it seems amazing that customers could think about designing their own chips. you have google, apple, facebook, amazon, looking at designing their own chips. i wonder what do you know about those efforts? bob: what we know about the relative importance of chips in terms of their infrastructure, we know they absolutely want us to continue to innovate and deliver more and more power, more and more performance. the criticality is extremely important for all of our customers. what they want from us is to continue to deliver higher performance. and that is what we are focused on. as long as we continue to d

bug fix could significantly slow down the performance of p.c.'s with an intel microprocessor well the tech giant is yet to release more details about the flaw which experts say could affect millions of computers around the world operating systems running on in tow chips like those by apple and microsoft must install the fix to avoid security issues but could then end up running thirty five percent slower well let's get more on this now with our financial correspondent yens quarter in new york yes we've already seen those intel shares down look at this design flaw mean for the company in the long run. there could be charges but most still fall they could lose some market share to competitors like nvidia or advanced micro devices and those two stocks they had some substantial gains here in the trading session while the stock of intel at some point lost the most in almost two years said during the trading session by the way intel disagreed at least partially they're not saying that nothing happens but that there's but they're saying that they're processors are not

on the side of the republican intel chair man. n justice department is saying don't do it. >> that's the problem. you can't raise, these days, you can't raise this issue without being put in the box of attacking the president. there's all sorts of evidence. just this week also senator feinstein and schiff noticed that russian bots were pushing this release the memo thing. they wrote a letter saying we should take a look at that. we don't want outsiders, paid operatives trying to fan the flames of the division in the country. they also do it on left with immigration and dreamers. just trying to get americans angry at each other. you would think that raising that everybody on a bipartisan basis would say that's not good, we should take a look at that and try to protect ourselves from it. but immediately there's pushback. you're going after the president. that's what it comes down to in the end. the president himself, he won't accept the premise because every time someone suggests that russia is attacking this country, he says you're

glenn simpson testified for a long time in front of your committee, the house intel committee a while ago. he's the founder of fusion gps that commissioned this dossier by christopher steel by the president and russia ties. it raises questions about potential money laundering between potential trump associates, et cetera, and russian associates. no clear answers. we're wondering have you seen in your house on the house intel committee any direct evidence of money laundering involving anyone in the trump orbit? >> i've seen a lot of evidence, poppy of money laundering, but it can't be tested or compared without subpoena power and third party validation. as you said, glenn symptom testified about leads he had about money laundering. one of the favorite parts of my committee, it shows all the flaws this committee has had by the way republicans have been leading it. at one point a republican asked glenn simpson, how would we find out what has been alleged on money laundering? simpson curiously looked at the republican and said, well, you would have to subpoena that. the republican was act

the latest intel on spectre and meltdown chip vulnerability — the boss says fixes will be rolled at byhe end of the month and there are no signs customer data has been put at risk. despite having its boss behind bars, samsung electronics goes from strength to strength, predicting record profits in the months ahead. we will be live at the ces show. you can see the markets are all higher. if you love tech news, you will love this programme. the boss of intel has made his first major public appearance since the security scandal that has potentially left millions — possibly billions — of machines vulnerable. called meltdown and spectre, they could allow hackers to steal sensitive data, including passwords and banking information. the uk security services say the chip vulnerabilities have not been exploited. and structurally there is nothing wrong with the hardware. it's like having doors and windows in a house — that need to be there — but that burglars are able to exploit. adding to intel's image challenges, the compa ny‘s chief executive brian krzanich sold about $24 million in intel sha

can you talk about to us just how plainly corrupted the house intel committee process appears from the outside? >> well, certainly isn't going to build credibility with president trump's critics that it's a party-line vote and a memo written by republicans that the minority doesn't agree with. that's, unfortunately, the state of affairs in congress these days where both parties take the same set of facts then see them through a completely different lens. it makes you wonder, okay, what are these facts, how should we evaluate them? we don't know because we haven't seen the memo yet. but are they presented in a dispassionate and objective fashion or are they presented selectively in a way that's intended to achieve a political goal? is it possible the fbi, in fact, ba acted badly? the inspector general report hinted at in the last 24 hours suggests there may be some issues there that are worth investigating and worth evaluating. the problem is if it becomes a partisan thing, party-line thing, where one party is focused on it for its own goal, the other party is not focused on it, focused

defects could affect billions of computers and other devices fitted with chips supplied by the major manufacturers intel a.m.d. and a r m security researchers discovered this problem some time ago but the news has only just been made public and intel is still being hush about here's what we know so far the intel security flaw could allow hackers to obtain access to passwords encryption keys and other sensitive data the newly announced vulnerability could affect every processor released since one thousand nine hundred ninety five of the moment there's no way for users to detect a breach which leaves no trace in traditional log files some security experts are calling it the worst floor ever phone by the computer industry. this problem and a problem with the security gaps is that the processor is the core of the computer it's what the operating system runs on and that means when the processor is affected and the hacker takes advantage of that flow they have access to everything . desktops notebooks tablets smartphones they all run on intel chips and they're all affected the problem may be even bigger than

the release of that classified fisa memo. an intel committee member peter king is here to react. plus, as the president's eyes, he is ready to talk with bob mueller under oath. on time from confidant roger stone says speaking with mueller would be a trap for the president. he joins us to explain why. but first, accountability in the special counsel's office and a press that just doesn't care. that's the focus of tonight's angle. as soon as robert mueller was appointed special counsel in the russia investigation, politicians rushed to cover him with a blanket of invincibility. >> have you seen anything in this investigation that would suggest he has a conflict? >> i haven't. i sit on the judiciary committee along with senator , and i have not seen any evidence to suggest that. >> i do not at all believe that mr. mueller has been compromised for his investigation. i think he's beyond reproach. >> i have a lot of admiration and respect for director mueller. >> you've got somebody who, by all accounts, is an independent person. somebody w

officer before the revelation raises questions as well. intel.e.o. brian cresent sold thirty nine million dollars in company stocks and options in november months after learning about the flaw and well before the problem was reported publicly intel says the stock sale was unrelated to the chip problem it said it planned on going public with the flaw soon and it was working in the meantime to find a fix the bug is a nightmare for the u.s. tech giant but also for consumers millions of computers and devices are affected and one basic fix for the issue the so-called kaiser patch comes with the caviar as one of its developers explains. it might have economic impact. for cloud providers because now they with the kaiser patches they might have higher energy costs. also. for regular customers and they will also have higher energy costs because of these patches daniel groups was among those who informed intel of the design flaw in its chips he thinks intel was right not to disclose the problem immediately. i think it's a good idea to not publicly disclos

it's not the biggest but probably the most important line of intel business. still sell tons and ton of cpu's for personal computers. they are the only game in town moment.r chips at the amazon, microsoft, apple, all these companies that buy a lot chips, dell, hewlett-packard. they can't break with this company. one of those flaws is patchable sort of. going to really slow down the chips. other flaw is not really patchable. case, the only way that we're beginning to sort of get pass this with a full chip redesign. that's going to take a long time. it's not the kind of thing that can just fix overnight. that's why you're seeing these providers, publicly try to put on great face, maybe saying, whoa, this is bad.y julia: on the look out for bitcoin bubble. giving highook out school and college a bad grade. this is "bloomberg businessweek" ♪ chatterley.ulia chatter bitcoin question. 20,000.rom 900 to >> you seen incredible price movement in bit coin in the last year. a year ago it was under a thousand dollars. brieflyto over $20,000 last month. now it's back to $1

. ♪ >> i am emily chang and this is bloomberg technology, coming out on up on the intel chip saga, how design flaw could impact almost every computer, smartphone, and server. we will tell you what you need to know and one startup is looking to take up the likes of tesla, google, and uber and autonomous driving, how is startup is already testing systems on audi suvs. industry watchers are closely following apple next step but it's future iphone batteries across the company billions that could cause the coming billions. intel stocks under pressure as fallout continues from the chip design, the company and other chipmakers and software companies are coming to grips with the vulnerability that leaves than a comparably massive --ber of devices acceptable susceptible to hacking and slowdowns with google discovering it could give hackers unauthorized access to sensitive data and the remedy .ould drag device performance intel says fixes are coming over the next few weeks and no material impact to its business and microsoft says it has issued a security fix for intel and armed ships. joining us

as we expand to be more than just intel inside the pc and intel inside the data center, we want to beerything with more intel products going to each protocol. the -- a business is a $3.2 billion business that grew 20% as2017 and continues to grow we parade rate the capabilities we have, not only in the cloud but around the edges. whatat do you know about some of your customers are doing in terms of their own design? amazing that customers can think about designing their own chips, and apple, facebook, google, looking at designing their own ships -- chips. what do you know about those efforts? >> we know about the relative importance of chips in terms of their infrastructure. we know they want us to continue to innovate and deliver more and more power and performance. the criticality is extremely important for all of our customers. what they want from us is continue to deliver higher performance and that is what we are focused on. as long as we continue to do what we have been doing, we are confident we will continue to lead the industry and deliver products our customers need at the p

this could well involve everyone security researchers discovered the problem affecting computer progress in process is rather built by intel and other chip makers some time ago now but the news is only just surfaced intel is still hush hush about old i'll be joined in a moment by someone who knows exactly why but first here's what we know so far. the intel security flow could allow hackers to obtain access to passwords encryption keys and other sensitive data the newly announced vulnerability could affect every processor released since one nine hundred ninety five at the moment there's no way for users to detect a breach which leaves no trace in traditional log files some security experts are calling it the worst flaw ever found by the computer industry is probably much of a problem with the security gaps is that the processor is the core of the computer it's what the operating system runs on and that means when the processor is affected and the hacker takes advantage of that flow as always they have access to everything. desktops notebooks tablets smartphones running on intel chips are affected the problem may be even big

fallout continues from the intel chip saga. mpany says it is working with hardware makers and operating systems on the issue and will design future chips to avoid this problem. tech giants like microsoft, google, and amazon say they have issued updates for their cloud and software systems. we are still waiting to hear from apple on this flaw. we reached out for comment from apple. joining us now is brian white and bob o'donnell. bob, as you say, this story has more nuanced than intel did not tell us something. how so? >> what we are talking about is a future, feature that has been a processes for over 10 years and nobody discovered it until now and it is used in intel, arm , amd designs, and arm licenses to apple, qualcomm, everybody is impacted. what i find fascinating about this whole story is that i was brought in a couple of weeks ago by the companies to get a sense, because they knew it was a big deal, and in 20 years as an industry analyst, i have never seen companies come together in three a briefing to talk about the iss

the house intel committee. fox news maz just acquired a memorandum delivered from the department of justice to the house intel committee. it attacks the very thought that the committee would release that memo to the american public. the letter reads in part, we believe it would be extraordinarily reckless for the committee to discloses such information publicly without giving the department and the fbi the opportunity to review the memorandum. my, my, my. the justice department doesn't want us to read that memo. let's move on if we could, please. harvard law profes fer, a demeanorprofes are, ademocrat w. joining us greg jarrett. thanks for being here. let's start with first the justice department trying to deny the public's right to know. >> well they've lost all credibility having lost integrity and they don't want the public to see their own wrongdoing, which is why they're trying to cover it up. fortunately it's not up to the doj. as long as the intel committee votes in committee to release it, the president

they are coming on strong despite the chip problems we are seeing from intel. was some problems with tesla. once again, the car production number in focus and they are down. the this down a key production product. are they going to have to raise more cash? that is a question a lot of the critics are going to have to focus on. betty: they are burning a lot of money. oil is surging here at the highest level since 2015. sue: a lot of focus on energy trading. will also flying. up above 62. flying.also go into the bloomberg. there is a view that one to give barrel,$65 and $61 a there will be an increase in oil rig count. betty: let's talk about the thunder snow. how are the airlines calving? -- coping? sue: we are hearing all these strong terms. let's take a look at the pictures. -- heavy snow coming down on the eastern seaboard. thousands of airline cancellations and forecast for frigidaire going into friday is goingsing -- frigid air is increasing the risk for more cancellations. airlines are seeing greater income going into 2015. betty: have you guys all bundle of

tom, give us the state of play in what has been billed alternately as a white house versus house intel equation with mr. bannon in the middle. >> yeah, that really came to a head this week here with bannon yesterday giving us a pretty good window into how the white house sees executive privilege. and the exertion of that. and whether this whole question of whether or not you even need to exert it explicitly. i was talking with a white house official earlier today who told me that they see it as executive privilege is in play unless the president explicitly waives it. which seems to be an inverted reading of it, as opposed to some previous administrations. so now the question here is, all right, yesterday we had steve bannon, today we had rick deer bore, another top white house official. later we're expecting to have hope hicks, communications director, close trump confidant. what's going to happen there? do we see a pattern? we didn't see that today with rick dearborn, where he did answer questions. sources tell me that the answers weren't terribly substantive, so maybe that was the re

the two laws were discovered in june 2017. intel sold off as many shares as he could in november 2017, a move which saw him gain some $25 million in profits. of course, the majority of the shareholders did not find out about the flaws until yesterday. it certainly raises some questions there. let's put this question to our financial correspondent who is following this story for us. could they ceo of intel face charges of trading on insider knowledge here? >> it certainly is an interesting timing when he sold his shares, because that was obviously after the company got aware of the flaws, but before the news broke to the public. i cannot imagine it's a case of insider trading, because that would be the most obvious case we have seen in wall street history, but that doesn't mean that the sbc won't have a closer look at it. on top of that, the ceo of intel sold all but 250,000 of his shares, not a lot of confidence of the ceo into his own firm. that's pretty much the minimum that a ceo is supposed to hold of his own company's stoxx. --

the latest intel on spectre and meltdown chip vulnerability — the boss says fixes will be rolled outy the end of the month and there are no signs customer data has been put at risk. we'll be live at the ces tech show in las vegas where our correspondent rory cellanjones has been following the intel story. a warm welcome to the programme, briefing you on all you need to know in global news, business and sport. and you can be part of the conversation. with so many gadgets on offer at the ces show that say they will solve all sorts of problems, we are asking what would you like technology to do for you? do get in touch, just use the hashtag bbc the briefing. there's optimism at the start of the first talks between north and south korea in more than two years. the discussions are limited in scope, but north korea has agreed to send a delegation of high—ranking officials, athletes, and a cheering squad, to the winter olympics next month. tensions on the korean peninsular are at their highest in decades, following a series of nuclear and missile tests by pyongyang, and not forgetting the w

the members of that house intel committee. well, we're -- what we're asking for is for the american public to get the facts so that they can form the judgment for themselves. of this fisa abuse. i too applaud the leadership of mr. nunes and the house intel committee for their work to restore faith with the american people. as a former army intelligence officer and j.a.g. officer my sembings i understand the importance of giving our intelligence agencies the critical tools they need to protect our homeland, assist our troops on the front lines, and surveil our enemies. however, it's critical that we strike a balance between national security and civil liberty, to prevent any gross violation of individual liberties under the guise of national security. congress has the responsibility of ensuring an appropriate balance is struck and when it is not, the release of information we feel is in the national interest and of public importance must get out. today congress took an important step in making this possible. americans deserve th

a democrat on the house intel committee asked nunes that question. he's going to join me in a moment to talk about what nunes said. plus the white house said the president's first state of the union address would be unifying and bipartisan. so why did he bash obamacare, paint immigrants as criminals and take a veiled shot at nfl prote protesters? we will discuss. growls at man) he's looking at me right now, isn't he? yup. (butch barks at man) butch is like an old soul that just hates my guts. (laughs) (vo) you can never have too many faithful companions. that's why i got a subaru crosstrek. love is out there. find it in a subaru crosstrek. waysthe roasted core wrap. fat. (robotic voice) 3, 2, 1... not cool. freezing away fat cell with coolsculpting? now that's cool! only coolsculpting is fda-cleared to treat and freeze fat cells, non-surgically. diet and exercise alone just shrink those cells. coolsculpting gradually eliminates them, with little or no downtime. visit coolsculpting.com today... for a chance to win a free treatment. i'm trying to manage