he is destroying the morale of the intel community. we screwed up a lot on the way, for decades, we have gotten things wrong. cataclysmic intel failures, but a lot of successes, too. that is just the way it is. >> sure, mistakes are going to be made, you are going to have people who are better at their jobs than others in the intel community, just as you do in any profession. at the end of the day, most intel professionals, they move forward, they know their job, they do it right, whatever happened in the world politics, they put that behind them because they've seen it before. >> laura: the heads of the intel agencies, the things that people like brennan are saying, traitor, treasonous. when a former cia chief is going to that level of rhetoric about the current president of the united states, no wonder president trump thinks when he was running for president, this guy was working to try to prevent him from being president. we are going to treason? honestly, my old friend, george will, had a very unfortunate column today. it was called

not his intel, the ones before him.ve been out to destroy him since day one, since they left, since before he got elected, and after he got elected. watch what we mean. >> he is aiding and abetting our arch adversary, and has failed, in my mind, to live up to his constitutional obligations and responsibilities. >> what mr. trump did yesterday was to to betray the men and women of the fbi, cia, and others, and betray the american public. that's why i use the term that this is nothing short of treasonous. it is a betrayal of the nation. he is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. >> when will we see a shadow government come out and say, we cannot side with the government. that's the biggest question. >> this president basically coddled mr. putin. it was clear that he was intimidated by that situation. whether the russians have something on this president or not, no one really knows. but the way he behaves, there is a clear signal that the russians have something on him. >> that is where families were separated. look, i kno

the president taking to twitter undoing a week of support for the intel community. >>> and a driver for uber and lyft is off the road after live streaming passengers. he was not breaking the law. good morning. welcome to "early start." i'm dave briggs. >> is there privacy anywhere? i'm christine romans. it is monday, july 23rd. it is 4:00 a.m. in the east. tensions between the united states and iran escalating overnight. it started early sunday when iranian president hassan rouhani cautioned president trump about pursuing hostile policies. rouhani said america should know peace with iran is the mother of all peace. and war with iran is the mother of all wars. he got a response last night via tweet. >> president trump warning rouhani in all caps, never threaten the united states ever again or you will suffer consequences in which few throughout history have suffered before. we are not a country that will stand for your dmeemented violee and threats. we have nick paton walsh with the latest. good morning, nick. >> reporter: all of this plays conveniently into the president who likes to di

how far can the intel community go in speaking out against the president. >>> and cyber war warning. just how vulnerable are the midterm elections to foreign meddling? this is "mtp daily" and it starts right now. >>> good evening, i'm katy tur in new york in for chuck todd. welcome to "mtp daily."

the iphone. then as pc sales began to slip, intel had to lay off thousands rsr the but today intel says it's determinedbe ready for whatever comes next. the company is investing in self-driving cars, artificial intelligence, and other futuristic tech. like drones. that's aneel's division. his team specializes in making elaborate automated flying light shows like this one at the winter olympics in south korea. >> what we're seeing is hundreds or thousands of this actual drone, right? >> this is the exact drone that flew at the olympics in pyeongchang. thers g else. it only has a light. >> reporter: a week ago in honor of intel's big birthday, his team set a guinness world record. over 2,000 drones flying simultaneously, forming these images in the night sky. and every single one of them contains a tiny rectangle of etched silicon like the ones designed by bob noyce and gordon >>> finally this half hour, if you could, would you fly like a superhero? say superman or iron man. well an inventor in london has come up with an iron man-style suit. it will get you off the ground, but it doesn't come cheap. char

he had a chance to show loyalty toy the men and women of uniform of america's military and intel community, and instead he betrayed them. time and again. and instead he said that he trusted vladimir putin's word, and by extension, the word of russia's spy community which attacked the united states of america. so many things were said yesterday, jon. so many concerns, not only by the usual suspects in the democratic party but also by an awful lot of people and what is now the trump party, the republican party. i know there's no way to ask you for a parallel, because there is no parallel. fdr, after pearl harbor, didn't deny there was an attack. george w. bush didn't deny al qaeda's attack on september 11th, but vladimir putin attacked american democracy. we've got the forensic evidence. it's there for all the world to see. every reasonable, rational person looks at that material just like they can see the dna on a gun and they know who did it, when they did it, how they did it, why they did it. you could actually take judicial notice in every court in america that vladimir putin's russian s

jeremy, let's go back to the senate intel report. the house intel report was sort of unbelievable, they shut that investigation down before they had finished interviewing and hadn't really done a comprehensive report on this. the senate intel report is what most americans are hoping a congressional inquiry looks like. >> yeah, ali, it's a republican-led investigation conducted thoroughly and in a bipartisan way. and the conclusions were pretty striking, not really surprising, but striking in that they were a rebuke to the president's prevailing narrative. number one, the senate intelligence committee found definitively that the intelligence community's assessment was well-supported by the evidence, well-founded by intelligence, that not just there was meddling in the 2016 election, but that in fact putin directed it and he directed it to favor donald trump. and secondly, importantly, they concluded that the steele dossier played no role in the intelligence community's assessment. the intelligence community's assessment was based on a

the senate panel says the intel community was correct in its assessment. russia tried to boost president trump's election by meddling in the election. they said there was no reason to dispute the conclusion that putin tried to help the election chances. that confirmed by the entire national security team even though the president himself has repeatedly refused to say russia was meddling to help him. >>> meantime, the lawyer for peter strzok says he may not comply with a house judiciary committee subpoena ordering him to appear early next week. >> my client will testify publicly soon, somewhere, sometime. this is not a search for truth. this is a chance for republican members of the house to posture before their most radical conspiracy-minded constituents. >> strzok was interviewed behind closed doors last week for 11 hours. they have been pounding for strzok for months over text messages he wrote disparaging trump during the campaign snmplt>snmpl. >> we're told scott pruitt is inching toward the tipping poinpoin point. pruitt proposed temporarily replacing

i think what we need to look at is the way that trump has been gas lighting the intel community ever since before he became president. look back at the tweet he wrote when he was president-elect saying that when news reports were coming out saying that intel officers were looking at contacts between the trump campaign and russia, he issued a tweet that said that this was evidence we were living in nazi germany. that is a tweet that launched a million conspiracy theories that, yes, a lot of republicans love. from there he continued to gas light the intel community. look at how he treated james comey and his firing saying he was fired allegedly because of his mistreatment of hillary clinton. this yarn that he unfurled out sieg supposedly showing his malfeasance. there has been so many narrative that is they've spun out to distract from the fundamental conflict that we are witnessing that is between donald trump and what he doesn't want the intelligence community to uncover, and so this war that we're seeing, i think we're witnessing a cold war of sorts between donald trump and the intel

how far can the intel community go in speaking out against the president. >>> and cyber war warning. just how vulnerable are the midterm elections to foreign meddling? this is "mtp daily" and it starts right now. >>> good evening, i'm katy tur in new york in for chuck todd. welcome to "mtp daily." as i said earlier today and moments ago, we'll probably keep saying, lordy, there are tapes. at least it looks very likely that there are tapes because there is a tape from someone who was known for making a lot of tapes. everything we've learned points t there being more tapes. the president's personal lawyer and fixer, michael cohen, secretly recorded president trump during the campaign on at least one occasion. a person familiar with the legal strategy said trump had no idea he was being recorded. as "the washington post" reported back in april after the fbi raided cohen's hotel room, business and home, people close to the president were worried about federal investigators seizing recordings made boy his attorney. we heard he had some proclivity to make tapes, said one trump advisor. but

and isn't the only chipmaker whose boss left for conduct reasons. last month, intel's ceo resigned due to a, quote, past consensual relationship with an employee. >>> goldman sachs officially named its next ceo, kicking off a new era for the bank. president david solomon will take over in october. he is a traditional pick. he's been at goldman almost 20 years, leading its investment banking unit for a decade, but solomon also has some nontraditional extracurricular activities, working part time as an electronic deejay under the name d.j. d.sol. he led the bank through the financial crisis and heightened financial regulation afterwards. >> can we sample those tunes next hour? i want to hear his deejay work. all right, "early start" continues right now with the art of the cleanup. >>> president putin, he just said it's not russia. i will say this, i don't see any reason why it would be. the sentence should have been, i don't see any reason why i wouldn't, or why it wouldn't be russia. >> president trump trying to correct the record and end this barrage of criticism over

contradicts the president's doubts about russia's election meddling, making the case in a new report that the intel agencies have been right all along. why is the senate intelligence committee releasing this information now? >>> conspiracies and attacks. the president heads into the fourth of july holiday by launching new fireworks on twitter from harley davidson to iran, who he's targeting tonight. >>> and survival. the rescue of a dozen trapped boys could take months as crews scrambling to form an escape plan. will the boys be forced to make a dangerous dive to save their own lives? >>> we want to welcome our guests in the united states and around the world. wolf blitzer is off tonight. i'm jim acosta and you're in "the situation room." >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >>> and we are following breaking news in the scandal-plagued epa chief, scott pruitt. how he brazenly angled for a promotion and potentially tried to insert himself in the russia investigation. cnn has learned that scott pruitt directly asked president trump to fire attorney general jeff sessions and temporarily name him a

the house intel chairman is here exclusively to react. in a major twist in the case of maria butina, the obama administration is being swept up in the saga of the alleged russian agent. butina's attorney will join us. plus the escalating war of words between president trump and iran. will rising tensions lead to an actual military conflict? first the benefits and risks of trump, the disruptor. that is the focus of tonight's angle. whether he's dealing with foreign relations or our own int intel agencies, donald trump is living up to the promise made on the campaign trail. he's a disruptor. he's not afraid to challenge old alliances. and sometimes he will opt toward building bridges to old adversaries for the greater good. as he has on so many issues, trump has ditched the playbook of the bipartisan establishment and the conventional wisdom that goes along with it. let's face it. this has driven the old guard and their cheerleaders positively bonkers. >> i personally think it's an incredibly depressing moment in our time coming in our histo

that is 2018 drones forming things like the intel logo or the guys in the space suites from the intelials. the company released video that happened sunday, part of intel's 50-year celebration and the company plans to fly the drones again at the santa clara headquarters soon. so this is such cool technology and it just keeps getting more impressive. >> it really does. >>> your morning money report. appears glitches and website outages didn't hurt amazon's bottom line for prime day. >> not at all. the company says it was the biggest shopping event in its history. no word yet on the dollar amount but the on-line retailer says prime members bought more than 100 million products. the popular purchases in the u.s. were instapots, personal water filters and 23 and me dna tests. >> taking a live look at the new york stock exchange today, it is down 90 points as trading gets under way this morning. financial companies and makers of consumer products are taking the biggest hits so far. >>> mcdonald's offering free french fries for the rest of the year, but there is some fine print. the offer on

now the senate intel committee, of course they agree. there is evidence that they meddled, and they didn't want hillary clinton to win, and the idea that john bolten and president trump are taking the word of a russian interpreter or vladimir putin over the intel committee? >> i sat through a classified briefing in 2017 and they said that the russians meddled and they were trying to harm hillary clinton's campaign. the intel report reinforces what the committee told us. i can't understand why the spth so defiant in this regard. he just has to deal with it, he should push back throughout russia and other european countries. >> he is not, he hasn't, and he never has. david gregory, great to see you here. this doesn't quite consider the house intelligence committee in glory, does it, david? they put out a report and put out the bare minimum. i mean it is striking and it undercuts the government in congress and shows two interpretations of what happened. anyone that followed can see that the intelligence knee has had a more bipartisan approac

, our ongoing conversation about the bottom line of diversity. intellans to increase its diversity by starting at the top. ian king has some news on the countries divert -- companies diversity efforts. and you wrote about how when intel was searching for the ceo replacement, they considered very few qualified female candidates, regardless of their gender. walk us through the three candidates? >> you have lisa hsu, who is the ceo of amd. intel's only real rival out there as we saw yesterday. she did a pretty good job, at least the market thinks so. she has turned that company around and has all the credentials in the market. then you have rene james, who was a cohort of krzanich, someone who is running a chip company and understands intel's culture, the chip market, and the third candidate is diane , and thato ran intel businesses on an absolute tear. that business grew and grew while she was there. three candidates, regardless, as we said, of their gender, who should be on the list. lisa: so you wrote the story about how intel has a chance of the ceo d

later this hour, we will talk with the intel interim ceo, he takes on their latest earnings. markets,ck in on the european equities trading in the green. imap, up .4%. higher by energy. plenty of action in the oil sector. the big deal from bp. materials up .3%. financials up .6%. concerns in retail. down by a significant amount. retailers bringing us down in europe. let's look at the individual movers. a top performer driving us is a frenchtail retailer, finally a turnaround from the chief executive and a new ceo and new rebound from this company with signs of progress. progress rose more than expected. the market likes. 2%.eal down almost they disappointed in terms of its mass-market products. kering, talking luxury, gucci, down almost 8%, gucci 40% sales growth not good enough. france even more, the economics of france, the important u.s. gdp data, france has flatlined interim of gdp data. earth comes back down to in terms of the economy with strikes and poor weather. the british pound, we have to watch it. over the last week, a volatile ride. strength versus the u.s. dollar

i and the entire intel community are committed to providing the best intelligence to inform and support president trump's on going efforts to prevent russian meddling in our upcoming

the intel is wrong. e chorus is so strong that i would just assume it's going to give extra protection. >> that would be logical and by the same token it was just today is mono. it was just on friday when president trump's own justice department deputy attorney general rod rosenstein said there's 12 military intelligence officers from russia who were trying to interfere in the election, who cyberattacked the united states of america. here they are. here's what they did and how they did it and the information we have and still with that information president trump denigrating the mueller investigation, attacking the mueller investigation. hold on. we have heard from several republicans and democrats expressing outrage. up next, talking to a senator who's called president trump's trip, quote, a giant middle finger from president trump to his own country. stay with us. i'm 85 years old in a job where. i have to wear a giant hot dog suit. what? where's that coming from? i don't know. i started my 401k early,

the light show told the story of intel's past, present and future. we spoke to employees who were excited to see it for the first time. >> i'm going to feel like a kid in a candy store, to be honest. i love technology. and to see it fly over my head, it will be breathtaking. >> it's like nothing you have ever seen before. >> i get to see it all the time. but now i get to bring my parents and my daug have put thison at contact to this contact. >> just like that.

the market is expanding in total. intelrow with that market, how at lower than the market may be. ad will gain disproportionate amount granted -- given that they were absent for a long time. we a bloomberg intelligence think we like all three companies, the love trying though between amd, nvidia, and intel. we like all three for different reasons. this as usok at trading above the rising to day moving average. tech earnings have been great, the market is healthy, and you will want and the over intel and a market where it is relatively risky. scarlet: in terms of the stocks, abigail was talking about how the semiconductor index has been very volatile this year. how have the estimates looked for all of the chipmakers? have they been moving as well? leigh: we are actually not in one secular cycle here. point int at the same each cyclical cycle for each name. they are offset at this point. that is really interesting. you look at stuff like amarilla berella. they have interesting chips going and where we start to see estimates f

we should always be looking at how the intel community operates. but what we've seen so far is desperate attempts by the republicans in the house trying to protect the president politically and legally. nothing in all the wild allegations they've made for over a year and a half now has been found to be true. so we can only expect this to continue. as, again, i think this investigation -- >> would you urge democrats to shutdown these lines of inquiry if they take back control of the committee in >> look, if there is a reasonable line of inquiry, we'll follow-up on it. what is more important than all that, the most important investigation of our lifetime, i would say more important than watergate, especially to our democratic process, was shutdown unilaterally by the republicans on this committee. that would reopen. >> i want to show you something that the president had to say about his upcoming meeting with vladimir putin and then get your take. let's take a look. >> i'm meeting with president putin next week, and getting along -- let me tell you, ge

while he shakes the old global order, trump is also rattling the cages of the intel community. cages that no one has ever dared to rattle. remember during the campaign when trump spoke about reforming and ending the corruption of the fbi and cia? even his political nemesis sounded a warning. >> you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from sunday of getting back at you. so even for a practical supposedly hard-nosed businessman come he's being really dumb to do this. >> laura: and boy, have they worked to get back. we know the unverified research used to secure the fisa warrant and the pfizer judges weren't told hillary specifically funded it. then of course we know rogue fbi investigators used their powers as an insurance policy should trump actually be elected. meanwhile, some obama era intel officials responsible for so much of the deep state mischief have become the critics in chief. and today the white house announced the president's intention to strip them of their security clearances. including former cia chief john brennan. last week he called the presid

now the ex-intel chief says i wonder if the russians have something on him. i'm wolf blitzer. you are in the situation room. >>> this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking news, the white house says discussions are now underway for a second summit and that president trump is taking steps to invite russian president vladimir putin to washington this fall. that comes as there is still lots of confusion about the first summit three days ago. the director of national intelligence says even he doesn't know what happened behind closed doors and the u.s. senate votes 98-0 to reject a russian proposal to interrogate americans. i'll speak with congressman of the intelligence and judiciary committees. our correspondents and specialists are standing by with full coverage. let's begin with jeff zeleny. there are plans for a second summit even amid the mass rush to clean up the president's comments from the first vsummit >> that announcement is the biggest sign yet that the president is doubling down on his new relationship with the russian president not acknowledging mistakes made earlier in

we have the forensic evidence. our intel community knows exactly what the russians did. we know who did it, why they did it, when they did it and how they did it and yet you still have donald trump trying to blame the united states for vladimir putin's attempt to sub merit american democracy. how do we digest all this on the eve of this meeting? >> joe, i put it together this way. i thought trump's comments over the weekend in his interview with cbs calling the european union a foe was a bizarre end to one of the least successful trips to europe by an american president that i can remember in my life time. every stop he was making trouble for others but really making trouble for himself. he arrived in helsinki with an image of alliance in disarray. vladimir putin, many people said the most successful world cup ever, something that gave joy to the russians and the whole world. mueller did with the blessing of our intelligence community on friday in releasing this indictment is an extraordinary step. people talk about the deep state. this isn't the deep state. this is just

we have the former intel chiefs of the biggest agencies in the government, and the biggest apparatusn the planet that are trying to undermine the sitting president of the united states and they were the intel chief ten or 20 years ago, butes the most recent one, that means every time you have clapper brennan, others, talking about the russia collusion case, there is at least some perception, and some of them have tried to enhance this with what they have said, they dance around that they are drawing upon their classified knowledge to make some of these assumptions. they have extra gravitas. they should be paying attention more. that is insidious. this is deeply destructive to the fate that any future president could have in the previous administration appointee at that level. that is something that does not get talked about enough at allet here. >> tucker: no, that is a veryh wise point. remind us again the point of having all of these agencies the intel apparatus, existing only to serve the executive and to help him or her or make wise foreign policy decisions correct? is there some

the event. a special show was part of intel's 50-year celebration. company plans to fly drones in formation at its santa clara headquarters as well. these just keep getting more impressive. >> they do. was gaga the first one to do it? >> she wasn't the first one, but i think the super bowl was the first kind of like major stage. >> everyone saw it. >> how cool is that. could be an alternative to fireworks. >>> talk about what's happening across the state. there is the chance of an isolated shower popping up. the thunderstorm threat toward ours east and really over the sierra. if there is a shower that pops up in the green shaded area, lightning and hail would be the biggest threat. it's all about the dense fog early on. 7:00 in the morning on your 12-hour day planner, brighter skies, by 4:00 we'll see sunshine mixing with high clouds from time to time so veil cloud cover overhead. inland going into the 90s. download the accuweather app and track temperatures hour by hour. let's see how the roads are doing. >> one issue to talk about on the counter com

the truth is former intel officials have retained their security clearances for decades. not as a prize for service but to benefit the government, maybe consulting work and so forth. the cia is working on a case involving something a former intel official had worked on, he can use his continued access to act as a reference. maybe give some insight. has it all gotten out of hand? roughly 4.2 million americans had security access or were eligible for access since 2015 according to the office of the director of national intelligence. the general account of italy office calls it a high risk for national interest. it's perfectly legitimate for the president to recall the clearances of retirees in the interest of national security, isn't it? if the government needs retired officials to help on cases, the government can insist they go through the normal clearance process again. when we are talking about individuals like brennan, it's a wonder how he maintain clearance at all. let's look at the brennan recor record. before he became their favorite trump basher, the democrats in th

president trump doesn't trust the intel community. he made that abundantly clear. we've known that. he showed in helsinki he trusts the word of vladimir putin who strongly denied any interference over his own intel community. so, revoking the clearance of the previous intel chiefs who he feels that he's at war with, he wasn't going to them for advice any way. i mean, other than of course this breaks with norms, of course this is punitive, of course it's political. it's not like he was relying on these folks for any sort of intelligence. >> well, he may not have personally but -- >> that doesn't mean -- >> hold on, joe. >> yes. that's what i was going to say is that, you know, his -- he has many agencies and national security staff who may be relying on these people because remember their expertise is not just about this one russia investigation. james clapper, james comey, these people saw investigations on all fronts concerning national security including things like terrorism. especially for an administration that has so little prior government or national security experience, bein

you're the intel expert. what is the threshold? what is the process even in revoking one's security clearance? can you just walk me through that? >> well, typically there would be a formal notification, not by this means, that clearance is being suspended, for example. you're under investigation because of allegations because of something that would merit revocation or at least suspension. there is a formal process for doing this, but i guess legally the president has that progre prerogati prerogative. he can suspend or revoke clearances as he sees fit, and if he chooses to do it for political reasons, well, that's -- i think that's a terrible precedent and a sad commentary. and it's an abuse of the system. >> james clapper, thank you for calling in. i appreciate you weighing in now that you are learning the use as we all are that you're apparently on this new list from the white house of folks whose security clearance the white house would like to revoke. i was talking to mark. listening to james clapper saying how could it be any

if you're dan coats, if you're -- i mean, if you're gina haspel, if you're in the intel community, whato you do? just keep putting out statements letting the world know what the world already knows that the president of the united states is lying? >> i think that's true for almost everybody, but i'm going to say senator, former ambassador dan coats for whom i have a lot of respect, i've worked with him for over a decade, known him a long time, but i think he's in a special category. he's the head of that intelligence community. that's what the director of national intelligence was established to do, was to kind of be the leader of the band. and when the president goes after that entire community, i think that ambassador coats, senator coats, director coats, ought to be thinking quite seriously about resigning. that's a personal decision for him. i know he's in it to serve the country. but he's been undermined at every turn. you have to ask yourself, when does yourself respect light go on? >> again, the president lied repeatedly over the past week. he then reversed his lie when he got ca

. >> congressman, you're on the intel committee. i wonder what you think of the fact that this lethal russian nerve agent has now poisoned another two brits who apparently came in contact with it at a public park in a small town of amesbury, england. do you think the president will bring that up, and should he, with putin? >> of course. when i was in london a little over a year ago it's the first thing they raised. they said you know your president is close to a man who kills journalists. when he says oh, he's kgb, he's fine. he's not fine, these are folks we've been at war with on the intel side for some time. it's a very scary proposition. we are attacking our closest allies and embracing someone who made our world less safe. >> the fact of the matter is those allies won't trust us when it matters and it does matter for at least two reasons. those are allies who fought and died with our troops in numerous conflicts, we're going to need them they also share critical intelligence information that keeps us safe on a daily basis so eve

just shows such a fundamental dysfuction in the white house among the intel community that serves. >>et's get into the politics on this. the walk back from the director of national intelligence. what is the response from democrats, we will see a chuck shumer statement? >> i think this whole thing will probably, the reaction of dan coats, i should focus on, will be put to bed over this. what the democrats will focus is, and i can understand, how is donald trump running his shop? that is a fair question. democrats, republicans respect dan coats, they don't want to see him get fired. that is the last thing this country needs. we will probably see the issue move on to putin and what the relationship that donald trump has with him. >> maybe, maybe not. i can see that video running over and over again. in democratic ads for the mid terms to show incompetent, takes russia seriously or not. with the mueller investigation, and collusion between the president and russia, all that comes alongside with that 30 people have been indicted, including russian officials, i think we will see that video

it is an uncertain future for the chip sector overall. where does intel fit? ine: it is interesting. there is a little bit of an busy -- a little bit of enthusiasm for the chip sector as a whole. think about today when you had the nasdaq down 1%, the philadelphia semiconductor up 1.8%. of the stocks in the index, you only had seven or eight stocks down and intel was one of the companies. that tells you about how people view the chip sector now. people are looking for growth and see it in a the and to a certain extent in nvidia. intel is not growing as fast. maybe it is not fair to put that on their shoulders given the size they are, but that is where investors are looking now. they want to find the next big thing, see it in these companies, and they don't necessarily see it in intel. intel will move along and dominate certain sectors, but going forward, if you want to see a pop in the stock higher than what it is, it is up 13% this year, but that is lacking compared to its competitors. emily: we had to talk about facebook, the huge plunge right after earnings i

they will open it again in 2043. >> let's talk about the history of intel. first product released, right? >> correct. it was 1969, and it is a 64-bit memory chip. >> intel is a pioneer, creating the first microprocessor chip in 1971. it has helped to lead the way to our modern personal computers. liz jones is intel's museum and archives manager, and gave us a special tour. >> so, this looks like a very old computer. >> that is a very old computer, it is from 1978, it was the first ibm personal computer and it featured an intel 886 microprocessor. >> children often ask why is it so big? what are these things on the front? they have never seen a floppy drive. they have never used a floppy drive. >> what do kids say when you tell them that this was an old video game? >> they say you can't take it with you like you can take games on your phone. they are shocked by the size of it and that there were actually game cartridges. >> from products in the past to present today, this is the augmented reality photo booth. i can choose wrinkled here as our virtual prop brad

to highly classified information including leaks from former colleagues who are still working in the intelgencies. today the white house announced it is seeking to revoke those clearances and we will have that in just a moment. but finally we have a copy of the pfizer warrant application that allowed the obama administration to spy on the truck campaign in 2016. the document is heavily redacted but certain facts are clear. the obama administration argued with the straight face that carter page was a secret agent working for the russians. this is absurd and yet it was widely believed in washington. watch this. >> there is a very clear belief that carter page was conspiring with russia in ways that were nefarious. >> there was overwhelming evidence to have probable cause to do surveillance. as you see, it makes a compelling case that there is probable cause to believe that he was acting as a foreign power. >> a compelling case, really. if it so compelling why are we not hearing that in court at carter page's treason trial? the fisa application doesn't even begin to prove that carter page beg

i serve on the intel committee. congressional republicans are in desperate need of an intervention to get over there addiction to donald trump. this is gone beyond norm-shattering. we are at risk of being at peril. we can take the president aside. lord knows i would like to be able to take the president aside . who knows, is he willfully ignorant on a magnitude of the scale or has he been completely putin, theadimir deal-maker completely duped. or has been increasingly possible, who has got the goods on trump? whatever the case, it is at the doorstep of congressional republicans who can and should act. some have spoken up. not enough. some of those who have spoken out have been tempered. actthey can and should protecting the mueller investigation. increase election securities. increase sanctions. the list is long and readily available. if ever there were a clarion above party,ountry it occurred in helsinki, finland, and it is at the doorstep of congressional republicans. brian, your question is an important one. wat

national interest and that doesn't seem like he was getting ready to resign and they are many and the intel community people such as. for example the former cia director and secretary of defense in the obama administration urging coats to stay saying that now it is more important than ever to have if you say in voices around the president was not a phenomena reporting from washington thank you well donald trump's predecessor of barack obama is in south africa right now where he's been giving his highest profile speech since leaving the white house obama was asked to give the keynote address marking the one hundredth anniversary of the birth of apartheid leader nelson mandela thousands are attending the official celebrations and obama got a huge applause he called mandela quote one of history's giants he urged people around the world to stand up for the values of tolerance and respect that were so dear to mandela. while obama did not mention donald trump by name but he talked at length about the current times in which we live calling them quote disturbing even the strange and uncertain terms

amazon is up by little more than 3% after the quarter profit beat estimates. but intel, even notes top and bottom lines of the, that is ahead is for a slowdown. let's take a look at what happened on the averages here. the dow up .4%, but it wasn't messy picture, all over the place here. , with no00 down .3% surprise, information technology being the biggest sector weighting that down. down, as youourse can see at the bottom of your screen, 19%. wiping away $120 billion in just this one trading session. also the biggest one-day deterioration in individual well as well. not a great way to make history there. take a look at the set up here in asia, tech blows aside, we're looking at a mixed picture, trading in using an is underway with a little bit of negativity there. -- kiwi and the aussie dollar the biggest losers against the dollar index overnight. the biggest advance in about two weeks. sessioning the sydney of about .7%. profit for 2018 up to 500 million aussie dollar's including the first half potential remediation underway. heading over to the rest of the market pi

he may find himself at odds with the bipartisan assessment of the senate intel committee. in the last hour, they released their report on the intelligence community assessment that russia interfered in the 2016 election in order to help trump and hurt clinton. did you get that? they agreed that the intelligence community assessment to help trump and hurt clinton is true, writing the conclusions of the assessment are sound. here to discuss the day's surreal developments, some of our favorite reporters and friends. joining me now is hans nichols, and with us at the table, jason johnson, politics editor, and jonathan capehart. most msnbc contributors. i have to start with you, malcolm. let me read you this list. who says russia meddled to help trump? the cia, fbi, dni, senate republicans, senate democrats, house democrats and trey gowdy, who doubts that russia meddled to help trump? vladamir putin, donald trump, and devin nunez. did i miss anybody? >> you can throw in there everybody that voted for trump, because whatever he says goes. and whatever vladamir putin says goes for

national interest and that doesn't seem like he was getting ready to resign and they are many in the intel community urging coats to this day saying that now it is more important than ever to have a say in voices around the president. on a phenomena reporting from washington thank you well donald trump's a purpose to serve barack obama is in south africa right now where he's been there paying tribute to former anti apartheid leader nelson mandela obama was asked to give the keynote address marking the one hundredth anniversary of mandela's birth it was his highest profile speech since leaving the white house thousands attended the official celebrations and obama got huge applause when he called mandela quote one of history's true giants urged people around the world to stand up for the values of tolerance and respect that were so dear to south africa's former president and obama said there was still plenty of work to do to fulfill mandela's vision. it is a plain fact that racial discrimination still exists in both the united states and south africa. and it is also a fact that the accumulat

the white house says the former intel chiefs have, quote, politicized and in some cases monetized their public service. >> so is what we are seeing here from president trump really the art of the distraction? in some ways it's very, very small and other ways it's potentially pretty big. senior white house official tells cnn the president is more than comfortable with how this debate is playing out and is in no rush to actually decide on revoking those security clearances, so is this just a distraction from the whole russia news conference? or as maggie haberman suggested to us a short time ago, is this perhaps a distraction from the news about michael cohen, his personal attorney? in the tapes we now know exist of conversations between the two. >> there she is, aforementioned political analyst and white house correspondent for the new york times, maggie, great to have you. >> thanks for having me. >> so what took him so long to attempt to revoke these security clearances? president trump doesn't like people going on television like james clapper has, like john brennan has and criticizin

. >>> joining me now is republican congressman mike turner of ohio, a member of the intel committee. thank you for being with us, sir. let me begin with the words of your fellow republican senator john mccain in response to the press conference. he says it's disgraceful. do you agree? >> it's deeply damaging. i serve on the arms services committee and the intelligence committee and i'm the liaison of the nato parliamentary assembly so let's talk about how damaging it is because i don't think the president understands that. we could lose it in the dialogue here. how can we ask poland, romania, hungary, to stand up to russia meddling in their own countries if the president of the united states, leader of the free world, can't do it. how do we say to the baltics, estonia, latvia, lithuania, who have meddling and hacking going on from the russians that we don't believe the russians are doing it? how do we say to the netherlands who are concluding their investigation on the downing of the malaysian airliner where russia murdered innocent civilians in a commercial airliner and came out and