he was more about the interplay between men and women. i thought if he felt he might get too political, it would get him in trouble. it was not his thing. that is one of the reasons why his friendship with malcolm x diverged because he started to take a political path. redd foxx wanted to make people laugh curious they stayed in touch vaguely with each other through the years but never got close. tavis: gary shandling -- the last time he was here we got in a conversation about how he started as a writer. i was joking with him about all of these jewish guys on sanford and son made the show a work. we got into a conversation about that. what i did not know is that sanford and son tried an italian cast. they ended up settling on a black cast because it was a british show. i will let you tell the story. they were not the first one stop. >> the producers of the show had had a lot of success the year before with all in the family which was borrowed from a british show. they took a british show called -- about a junkman and his son. they tried it

if nothing else, to bring some clarity around the fbi, their role, the interplay, and how we can convey adequately to the public the distinction of the role, you know, some education on it. we need to grapple with this issue more. and not necessarily with a deadline around taking action, but a deadline soon in terms of the calendaring a discussion around this so that we can discuss what types of action we should be considering. commissioner turman: my comments are not directed towards the jttf. i agree with commissioner kingsley. for us to have a further discussion amongst ourselves and particularly with a question and answer session, we should be thinking about what we currently have. is there a way to improve that? have a question and answer session with the chief, with the attorneys from the aclu, and at some particular questions to think if we can improve what we have in place. that may be the case, that may not be the case. i disagree with the statement was made by one of the members of the public. although i respect what she had to say, that last week no one here demonstrated that

and so i was interested in the interplay of that as well in the way that, you know, you have cultural rituals but they're also kind of then become this biological experience as well. and when i started research way back in the '90s on this project, people were talking -- it was right when antidepressants were coming out in a whole new way. it was a psychotropic revolution. and i thought wouldn't it be interested in another psychotropic revolution, europe that had no experience of stimulant beverages or tobacco and then happened once it got there? i want to tell people that chocolate was the first stimulant beverage. it actually preceded coffee or tea in europe and i found that really interesting to think about. >> were they ever used as political tools or was there such a demand for these two products at some point in europe that there were political consequences? >> absolutely. chocolate among european elite just as it had been among native meso-american elite becomes a diplomatic tool. it becomes very similar -- if you were meeting someone -- actually, a good way to bribe an officia

you know, different tax experts will say that the interplay works out so that you could, you know, that kind of person would get a huge tax cut and the people that are currently paying virtually no income tax but they pay payroll taxes, their taxes are going to increase dramatically. >> so with no payroll taxes, how does social security get funded under the cain plan? >> you know, he hasn't provided those details but there is a flow of money. i mean, i think the revenue question is very unclear. i mean, you could stipulate that for the sake of argument he gets exactly the same amount of revenue we get now. >> there is an argument. you feel like financially there is an argument that that part of it is correct. >> yeah. you could make that case. that's what they've tried to make. i think that you shouldn't look at that because you could turn the dials on a computer to come up with whatever assumptions you want and maybe he's right that the growth expands so much under his plan that we get more revenue but the real thing to do is look at what the impact is on individual people. and right n

it is interesting to watch the interplay of movements and the interplay of single issue groups that vie for supremacy of this issue in the 19th century. one man was able to make the senate sit up and beg. it was the most powerful lobbying organization. people began to say through propaganda and education and through decades of working on it that we think we can solve all society's problems if we give them the drink. the husband won't squander the project and, all meant beat the wife or the kids. there'll be no crime and the slums will clear. i think they went very naively. progressives wanted it. in-a west as long as the workers -- industrialists as well as workers. we woke up with it as the law of the land. we realized it was an big uh- oh. because there were some gaps. we raised questions about should the government be telling us how to live our lives. were we going to use the government as punishment to change the way people behave? the we celebrate marriages and when we take communion. host: was the impact that laid the groundwork for the 18th amendment? guest: we began to see the c

it is interesting to watch the interplay of movements and the interplay of single issue groups that vie for supremacy of this issue in the 19th century. one man was able to make the senate sit up and beg. it was the most powerful lobbying organization. people began to say through propaganda and education and through decades of working on it that we think we can solve all society's problems if we give them the drink. the husband won't squander the project and, all meant beat the wife or the kids. there'll be no crime and the slums will clear. i think they went very naively. progressives wanted it. in-a west as long as the workers -- industrialists as well as workers. we woke up with it as the law of the land. we realized it was an big uh- oh. because there were some gaps. we raised questions about should the government be telling us how to live our lives. were we going to use the government as punishment to change the way people behave? the we celebrate marriages and when we take communion. host: was the impact that laid the groundwork for the 18th amendment? guest: we began to see the c

. >> you write a lot in the book about the interplay. i said earlier, these well-intentioned politically correct progressives and that the empowering bad behavior make it more difficult to have an honest dialogue, when the rate in to do with take that leap of faith to have an honest conversation. >> i'm glad to see leap of faith because that's the right phrase. have faith in what? when you challenge me as a non-muslim, if you challenge me about my spiritual or religious police, my take is that you actually have faith in my capacity to take credit way. you are treating me as an equal. you are treating me as a. you are not treating me as a child. at this respect. whereas on so many university campuses today, it's the very year of being challenged that has corrupted this notion of respect. so the wall goes up, the hand goes out. you're not even allowed to ask me a question and i will define that as respecting me. that's reducing me to something much less than in actually capable of. >> said in that spirit, let's bring that back to the 10th a

it is interesting to watch the interplay of movements and the interplay of single issue groups that vie for supremacy of this issue in the 19th century. one man was able to make the senate sit up and beg. it was the most powerful lobbying organization. people began to say through propaganda and education and through decades of working on it that we think we can solve all society's problems if we give them the drink. the husband won't squander the project and, all meant beat the wife or the kids. there'll be no crime and the slums will clear. i think they went very naively. progressives wanted it. in-a west as long as the workers -- industrialists as well as workers. we woke up with it as the law of the land. we realized it was an big uh- oh. because there were some gaps. we raised questions about should the government be telling us how to live our lives. were we going to use the government as punishment to change the way people behave? the we celebrate marriages and when we take communion. host: was the impact that laid the groundwork for the 18th amendment? guest: we began to see the c

the n.p.c. faced resistance interplay for. first time since the capital was taken in august several were injured in gun battles with khadafi supporters after an attempt to raise the ousted the green flag on a city rooftop and in the town of sderot khadafi loyalists mounted a fierce counterattack forcing them back to revolutionary fighters the m.d.c. says it will only declare full liberation once syria falls but investigative journalist simon asafa told r.t. that pursuing that goal means ignoring the high human costs. i think what's happening inside is really quite shocking i mean if you remove yourself from saying i support one side or support the other side what we're seeing in is a full scale assault on. you know a very densely populated area in which civilians are paying a very very heavy price now the reason why this is important is because the whole basis on which nato imposed the no fly zone at the beginning of this conflict was precisely to defend civilians against military attacks and now we have if you like the allies

. >> what is the interplay between the department of homeland security and gsa in terms of assurancef a cyber security as we move to the cloud? dhs appears to be the point agency -- i don't want to say looking over the shoulder, but looking at other government agencies and departments to make sure they are taking cyber security seriously. we have built office at the white house which i would suggest is my definition, sort of the focal point for policy, but dhs is the apparition appointed. how do you interface with gsa on something like this with respect to their responsibilities in the areas where they have authority? >> let me provide an answer. first, i should state that ibm t cio for the park -- i am the cio for dhs. there is another department that has its mission to provide cyber security for the nation, in particular for the civilian government agencies. >> and hopefully you talk to one another. >> we talked to one another all the time. we're the biggest getting paid for what they want to do next, and i think we should be. we work very closely with them. they have the operation

the red winged blackbirds are back you know. this has been my favorite place i've ever lived in my life i'd say. you're. called interplay every regulatory senate house the legislation today directing president. reserved the world cup race or creed or thirty six billion dollars or twenty dollars a barrel dollars and. there she is. we call it our near neighbor neighbor. we are in a split a state situation where the surface and someone else owns the mineral rights and what happens in colorado and i think in most western. it says the mineral rights. are dominant. long on mineral extraction goes back hundreds of years that says the mineral. has a right to extract that mineral and to a certain extent can extract. the surface without compensation. seventy acres here and i can't convince them that they need to drill. two hundred feet from our. policy has been to drill drill drill drill some more era very strong industry they've got a tremendous amount. of an awful lot of money. as a civil servant i spoke out. but it's difficult to do because you feel constant you're risking your job and your family's future. as i sat there and

the red winged blackbirds are back you know. this has been my favorite place i've ever lived in my life to say representatives is one your you have called interplay for every regular senate house the legislation today directing president goodness to grant resampled countries a clean one thirty six billion dollars are going on six twenty dollars a barrel dollars a month little comfortable seats. and there she is. we call it our new neighbor neighbor nine o seven. we are in a spy. state situation where we on the surface and someone else on some mineral rights and what happens in colorado and i think in most western states is the mineral rights. are dominant he law and mineral extraction goes back hundreds of years that says the mineral owner has a right to extract that mineral and to a certain extent can extract it and impact the surface without compensation. we have seventy acres here and i can't convince them that they need to drill somewhere besides two hundred feet from our house. to be energy policy has been to drill drill drill drill civil war era very strong industry they've got a tremendous amount of political influence and an awful lot of

the red wing black birds are back you know. this has been my favorite place i've ever lived in my life i must say representatives is there in your heart you have called interplay in every regulatory some senate house the legislation of the day direct from the president the days of goodness the birth reserved world countries are created were thirty six billion dollars or clinton's twenty dollars a barrel not always enough to kill comfortable seats. and there she is what we call it our new neighbor neighbor i know seven. of them. we are innocent. the state situation where we are on the surface and someone else owns the mineral rights and what happens in colorado and i think in most western states is the mineral rights. are dominant the law of mineral extraction goes back hundreds of years that says the mineral owner has a right to extract that mineral and to a certain extent can extract it any impact the surface without compensation. on the. seventy acres here and i can't convince them that they need to drill some more sides two hundred feet from our house. be energy policy has been to drill drill drill drill some more you're a very strong industry but they've g

the market will not go back to sleep again. let me stress that these three types of pressures, to induce responsible behavior, to reinforce each other. they are already -- there already is a powerful interplay. the political pressure within the european council does not undo the institution of our market pressure. it strengthens their impact the president of the commission and i both have this experience. we all work in the same place. sound but it cannot would debts, sustainable growth. that is the result of sound but it, -- sound budgets, sustainable debts, sustainable growth. my reasoning is simple, it is natural that those who share a common currency take some decisions together. in fact, one of the origins of the current crisis that everyone underestimated the extent to which the economies are linked. we are now remedying. monetary policy is at the heart of economic policy. we have a common monetary policy. we need a policy. monetary policy is not enough to deal with the situation. we cannot have a current -- a common currency and leave everything else to the states. that is why we will have to go further. let me be clear, the eurozone is not a derivation of from the european union, it

you know at the same at the same time and i'm speaking now as an independent journalist who was also at one point a network journalist you know i see an interplay here you know i don't think we want just to talk to ourselves i think we want to talk to the whole society and the media started off by ignoring it then after the police attack people here in new york they started covering it then they started ridiculing it and making fun of it now they seem to be reporting it in a much more serious way and public opinion is showing itself to be very supportive which is a good thing it's the movement's power it adds to the movement's appeal and i think we want that to happen to the same time the social media service that the mainstream will hear is really is a cleaning lady a happens at manipulating them. as i think people are just people i'm sorry in the mainstream media they can look late rep and certain that manipulates them or that's what's most clever about this and if you go down to any of the big occupations in london in new york in matricular find at the center of paper weapon propelling our press releases you know speaking to the mainstream p

and he doesn't show us the face, so there's this amazing interplay of--in a museum of one type of sensibility vs. another. c-span: where do you live now? >> guest: in brooklyn. c-span: how many children do you have? >> guest: four. c-span: four? >> guest: four. c-span: at what age? >> guest: various ages. and i have to admit, two i inherited from my marriage, two from my own loins--16-year-old, 18-year-old, 24-year-old, 27-year-old. c-span: and what's your husband do? >> guest: he was in the entertainment--in the music industry, and he is now with an israeli high-tech company that--that's--it's an american stations in new york city. c-span: and do you have another book in mind? >> guest: i do. c-span: what is it? >> guest: i can't tell you. c-span: why not? >> guest: because i want to make 100 percent sure that it's the one i should do. c-span: is it a biography? >> guest: it is a biography, but i'm trying to think of an exciting new way to take the idea of a biography, not what edmund morris did with "dutch," but--but--and expand it into being about something else as well. how's that for obl