it's not unusual to be able, for example, to tell a short story that came out of the university of iowa writers' workshop. because there's certain hallmarks of it. and, you know, there's great value in having creative work come from all segments of the society. so, but that -- and i do think that copyright right now does provide the incentive that it's supposed to. i think if there were no copyright, there would be a whole lot of people who would write anyway. but they would not as eagerly write the second and the third and the fourth book when they discovered that there was to reward in it. no reward in it. i mean, this is an argument back and forth on where you, and be where you should strike the balance. but i have to say that, um, you know, if "clueless" were to be written during jane austen's lifetime, i think that's, that's much different than, you know, i saw a production of "invisible man." a performance of "invisible man" down at the court theater in hyde park. and i can criticize the production, but it had been many years that the ellison estate resisted having "invisible man "dramatized. and i