mary's pub it is also an applicant that is present tonight for the hearing regarding an l.l.p. permit. i did just want to bring it to your attention that there has been a lot of mediation that occurred between the neighbors and the owner of the club. so i think that is important to highlight here. i did work with both of the neighbors and the applicant. on page 6, you will see that we had halcion on the enforcement report. we did issue a notice of violation. the inspector responded to a neighbor's complaint from the night prior, and when he went, they were out of compliance with their sound limit. miss milano was out of town at the time and the inspector was working with the manager that evening. the director did speak with miss milano and we did issue and an ob and they did bring their volume down to come into compliance that evening. and then skipping all the way to page 14 of the report, you will see all job is highlighted. this is a location that we currently do not permit, however , it was brought to our attention that they were having entertainment on the roof by a neighbo

they are family owned and operated at her coming into compliance by applying for the l.l.p. permit. f granted, they hope to continue having live entertainment for the guests to enjoy. the reason they are on the regular calendar and not consent is because we have received some sound complaints, however, upon investigation of the complaints, the inspector has waited that most of them were made while the business was closed. they received 186 signatures of support from neighbors and patrons and no opposition with -- was submitted. richman station approve this permit with one condition which was lifted below on the staff memo. here to tell you more is the owner. >> hello, everybody. i will speak from the heart because i don't know howells to speak. when we have had orson's belly for almost three years now and we are located on balboa between 18th and 19th avenue, right by quan. when we chose that location, everyone said, are you kidding me, you are not going to do anything over there, that place is dead, there is no one there, and that is why we chose it because that area needed somethin

the next item. >> clerk: yes. recommending awarding three-year professional services contracts with an option to extend for two additional one-year periods, to nossaman l.l.p., meyers nave riback silver & wilson, and wendel, rosen, black & dean, l.l.p., in a combined amount not to exceed $150,000 for on-call general legal counsel services. >> supervisor walton: thank you. do we have any comment before considering the item? >> the firms are nossaman, wendel, rosen, black & dean, and meyers nave riback silver & wilson. meyers nave riback silver & wilson have been working with aztc and other entities. our c.a.c. board heard this item. we have a unanimous motion and will be supporting it with prop c sales tax fund. >> supervisor walton: any other questions or comments? no comments, we will take public comment on this item. seeing no public comment, public comment is closed. can we move this item forward without any objection? item is moved forward without any objection, and with that, mr. clerk, please call the next item. >> clerk: update on yerba buena island updates. this is a presentation. >> good morning, eric cordova here to discuss the leadership update,

however, as recently as novembes profile on the kirkland and ellis l.l.p. website listed him as an attorney working exclusively in the firm's washington, d.c., office. his profile page, likewise, provided contact information, phone and fax, only for the washington, d.c., office. just before he was nominated, mr. bress's kirkland and ellis profile was revised to list him as an attorney in both the washington, d.c., and san francisco, california offices of the firm. in addition, according to a review conducted by my staff, every public legal filing signed by mr. bress lists his office as washington, d.c. this includes legal filings submitted in california courts. mr. bress has never had an oral argument before the ninth circuit -- never had an oral argument before the ninth circuit. the chairman of the judiciary committee entered a letter into the record at mr. bress's hearing identifying 26 cases in california courts that mr. bress has been involved in, however, according to mr. bress's senate judiciary questionnaire, 11 of these 26 cases were asbestos lawsui