so, i'm not sure the site, the water front land use plan reviews this particular project or particular site in greater detail. >> can you also just let the public know how long everyone has to county comment -- comment on the direct view? >> the water land use plan we are asking for written comments through november 30th. we have stakeholders who have been good to point out that practically means sending comments before the thanksgiving holiday is appropriate and that won't be the end of public review but after we receive the formal or written comments we will try to assemble that into a final review with some action items and we'll present that to the port commission without knowing the magnitude of the number of comments and the extent of the comments because the water front has many many issues to deal with. we don't know exactly when with that second round if you will to come before the hearings. >> one more question, do you have any information about the contractual relationship between pacific water front partners and the private owners of the swim and tennis club site? >> i do n

evicted and actually, the justice had ruled that was unconstitutional his arguments have like the land use issues making sure there's a nexus between the impact of the project and the fee that is charged it should be responsible for mitigating it's part of the impact on the problem on the types of things that the new project does but no to remedial problems in full causes for most of high percentage of other regions not commenting on the decision itself but i find an interesting particularly on appeal whether the parallels is upheld or overturned on the third item is in regards to an item in the chronicle i believe it's before the board of supervisors for their brawl the article was written out mention of what we did in our actions but talked about the proposal before the supervisors which i think is a win-win and almost everybody is supporting it it allows the building of many more units and small you make out of unit people are lucky to get and they have to be built in the transbay within the transbay project and day later there were or there's an editorial in the paper it sounded like t

arcadia commissions as game arcades to be permitted this commission voted to productive that and the last land use we voted unanimously to remedy the item to the full board and at the land use committee where the amendments to the heath and building codes for the flifrt and establishing of fees sponsored by supervisor cohen is it so related to the amendments to the advanced 1i7b9lation and this commission heard the item and recommended approval to the board supervisor cohen was the introduceer that required the dph fire and staff to elevate policies that meet the performance standards and the committee voted pneumatophore the events and other significant comments related to future effort to protect the residents through air pollution excuse me. this pass tuesday two significant event happen in san francisco the giant win over the national to the national championship series and the board of supervisors on the supervisor chiu's short-term rental ordinance and the latter the presentation commissioners you may recall you heard that on august 7th and recommended approval with 16 amendments to be made

of the amending to insure sro unit can't be converted to student housing that move forward from the land use the moratorium on selma was put forward spord by supervisor kim that moved forward and at the full board the night life larger than 25 square feet in the western selma you saw move forward the supervisor incorporated our and it passed on final regretting supervisor breed's requested a hearing that the woemd reports on the housingic group and evaluate the relationship if that affordable housing and you've talked about this obviously gearing up to do that we'll get that hearing on collapsed and supervisor mar introduced an ordinance african-american the police code to ask for formula retail use to put work steldz e schedules in advance and so on i can't tell you why it's in the police code because it is not currently schedule for a planning constriction hearing it does rely on the information of the formula retails by otherwise not going come to the perhaps because of work contemplation o compensation schedules at any rate sorry for the rushed recorded hopefully more daily next week. >>

and it assumed that the existing development does not pay and that the tax based and the taxes based on land use, consistent with the value is described in the transit center district plan and based on that evaluation performed by the group and the land use category and residential, and looking at those for sale and rental and the office and hotel, retail, and the initial maximum special rates for each property, based on a fiscal year of 13, 14, base rates and the base rate increases by an annual infrastructure cost inflation estimate each year and which is consistent with the impact fees and there is a gap and a floor of a 4 percent change. and after project receives its certificate of occupancy and then there will be a maximum rate of 2 percent each year. there are exemptions and the affordable housing is exempt and child care space for instance. >> and so here is a map showing the cfd boundary along with the transbay redevelopment boundary, if you can see the outline in red is the cfd boundary and then, you can see sort of the gray lines within that of the transbay plan, and zone one, which a

many districts residents have written to me and called and come out to testify as the mrabs and the land use commission i have similar concerns as those expressed by some of the constituents that you have all heard from i'd like to propose as many of my constituents have requested that we exclude short-term rentals in rh1 and rhd d zoning districts so that's any first request for amendment and . >> supervisor yee would i like us to move on that first. >> so supervisor yee has a motion that on the floor of rh1 and rhd seeing none, that amendment will not be adapted necklaces motion. >> so this second amendment i'm asking for would be again trying to address some of the issues of any compluts at the same time providing compromises so that we can move forward with the legislation in an effort to will this single-family home neighborhoods i'd like to see colleagues if you could support an amendment that limits short-term rentals in rh1 d neighborhood to 90 days of hosted rentals only for 50 percent of the bedrooms with the 90 cap applying to the entire property and not single bedrooms this is a

and it assumed that the existing development does not pay and that the tax based and the taxes based on land usetent with the value is described in the transit center district plan and based on that evaluation performed by the group and the land use category and residential, and looking at those for sale and rental and the office and hotel, retail, and the initial maximum special rates for each property, based on a fiscal year of 13, 14, base rates and the base rate increases by an annual infrastructure cost inflation estimate each year and which is consistent with the impact fees and there is a gap and a floor of a 4 percent change. and after project receives its certificate of occupancy and then there will be a

and welcome to the san francisco land use & economic development committee i'm supervisor wiener the chairman thought it committee to my right is supervisor jane kim and vice chair to my setting is supervisor malia cohen and our clerk is andrea ashbury and i want to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting today's hearing specifically jonathan madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. please silence all electronic devices. all files and documents to be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the october 28, 2014, board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> okay. thank you madam clerk please call item one. >> a resolution imposing zoning control for the ground floor office uses. >> supervisor kim is the author. >> today is a interim between king and fulsome to support and promote an actual retail frontage along second street and south of market and support our neighborhood small businesses our out of those works with the south beach corporation members are here today over the past couple of months a few interim controls ♪ market in hot real estate market were in

and i keep referring to the water front plan as though it is all land use but as we were acutely aware, while the original water front plan was called the water front land use plan, it is about the maritime as well as the land use, and i think that it is important that people refocus on the role of maritime and we made several suggestions including what is deal with be the cruise ship lines and we understand that the port's position, and that efforts to do something with the cruise ship lines and opening it to up the foreign vessels, and it did not suck seize when it was brought up before which was in 1998. but it is a long time ago. and a lot has happened since then including an american flag vessels and so really is comes down to a question of either little, and it was a pilot program and something along that nature. the american flag vessels of which there are actually done. and so, i would that this calls for a stronger effort, by the port, and rather than just, be part of a coalition, and that had spans the whole coast including what the people who are competitors. we also, and in

to the san francisco land use & economic development committee i'm supervisor wiener the chairman of committee our committee vice chair supervisor kim was unable to join us today so supervisor mar is sitting in place the of supervisor kim and supervisor cohen a member of the committee we're also joined by the president of the board of supervisors supervisor chiu

to the san francisco land use & economic development committee i'm supervisor wiener the chairman of the committee our committee vice chair supervisor kim was unable to join us today so supervisor mar is sitting in place the of supervisor kim and supervisor cohen a member of the committee we're also joined by the president of the board of supervisors supervisor chiu sfgovtv is broovtd toys be hearing i want to thank jessie larson and derrick our clerk is announcements? >> yes. please silence all electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be smoimentd to the clerk and items acted upon today will appear on the on september 4th agenda your madam clerk call one. >> a vacation of an area between twin peaks boulevard. >> i'm the author of item number one colleagues speak proposal vacancies an embankment and the construction of a stairway and installation a permanent landscaping by the adjacent property owner curling you're going u during any rains we'll eventually have rain the dirt slides down the hill it will stabilize the hill and provides paul mccar

item 3 at this point hearing the water use of san francisco we're now in a very brief recess. >> okay. that was a 3 minute recess brief as promised after reconvening the land use commission and madam clerk call item 3. >> item 3 is the hearing on the reduction of water usage. >> okay. i i'm the author of the hearing request about the watering usage by the cities and steps to take lyricsly and otherwise to improve water conservation in san francisco colleagues as you recall our current brought is a crisis we must contestant with the strategy policies to make sure we're maintaining our city awhile skooefrp water this is sacrifices like not being able to water everything we want to water and today, we'll hear with the current operational usage by the city departments and the individual city departments are doing to respond for example, the puc will address us as well as the rec and park to be sure we're striking the right balance for the open space parks in our city and being responsible with the long responsibility for the entire region we're pushing ourselves to have better water conservation policy even if we get blasted we water this b will not be the las

our districts most of the use consolidations impact south of market district and i've idle those this is extremely large over 4 hundred pages and not making is changes to the land use committee that have not been voted the goals to reorganize article 2 it is easier to use and putting them into one section of the code and in the last few days the department has received several memos i think this is a misunderstanding such south of market and pdr districts and they can take the form of dwelling or group housing yet if you don't read the definition of student housing you won't know this now you can look at the district and see what is and not pilot without having guesswork all the uses in the code are accounted for in the district before they were not that concludes my remarks i'm happy to take our questions. >> thank you we'll open for. when your name is called, please step forward and line up on the screen side of the room (calling names) >> the first speaker can come to the podium. >> i'm going to opening the discussion. >> can you speak up, please. >> sorry in 1972 when i entered the from a of the planning commission the planning department i was admonished b

will have to stick to the policies to protect our homeowner stock we don't have this power in the land use committee but i'll proveer it for the future i'll make a statement we're about to push this out of the committee i'm glad the airbnb has maiden their taxes and i encourage them to work with the treasurers office with the back tax issues i like the registry with the note having the names but having a numerical registration that's helpful with enforcement the landlord we know that ultimately a lot of the liability something goes wrong goes to the prove or disprove and the landlord notification addresses that it's not as strong as landlord a consent but i'm happy to support that measure i mean, i'm glad we're excluding below market rates to be affordable i should be able to live in the units without average and i'm glad we've discussed the airbnb code and the insurance i'm happy to stick with the amendments that commissioner lee as proffered i'm not sure about the insurance to come up with a dollar amount but a 90 day hosted or non-hosted is a nice balance people continue to get the shor

opportunity to jaement our residents bay area has been exposed to toxins we want to rethink the way we use the land in our city and create a culture to prevent protect the future of our community thank you to the time and the department of environment and special supervisor cohen your awesome thank you very much. next speaker. >> good morning my name is mr. hernandez i'm the organer and i'm here on the on behalf of the 5 thousand men and women in the industry many of whom will be employed at pierce 96 when it's built and thanks supervisor cohen for calling this hearing it gave us a chance to talk to the members about this project and it's proposed policy just several years ago we asked our members to support the new power plants to replace the plants we asked our members if they're interested to build a facility that could one day be used for coal our members are excited to build piers 96 but no to building power plants they say no to sorry i lost my place they said no to a facility that could one day be used to handle coal our members are very excited to - sorry for local 61 we'll not support mate

it is a look back to see what has been accomplished since the land use plan was adopted and taking about the projects that were built and some that were not, and what are the lessons that we drew from that, and what are the preliminary recommendations and on this document, and then, we will want to engage, with our subareas, or in different areas along the water front and with, the other departments, and city wide, and a discussion about how to update the water front plan. and so, i just want to make clear, and i am sorry, if we didn't communicate that well enough. and in the pier lot, and the south pier and had the development and there is controversy in both areas and at the commission's direction, the subarea planning effort and in those areas and coupled, and how the port is responding to the sea levels. >> and so, there were a number of other recommendations that i am not going to go into each of them, but i do list them here. and if the commission has any question about the staff response to any one of these, we will be happy to answer, and but mostly we want wanted to appreciate t

helping to preserve the pdr space another reason we have the opportunity to take a careful look at the land use in the smentd and i'm excited about the mary's has committed to make sure we build 33 percent in the housing plan something we couldn't have done with the redevelopment tool to make sure we get that without redevelopment and we also want to make sure we're considering land use in the selma carefully and not want to be approving proemgz and there's a lot of pressure in the neighborhood as real estate it look at in the area to fast pace some of their projects so what does this moratorium do the ordinances prevents the planning department to issue an approval to replace pdr by a non-pdr in the selma area it exempts the zoning district and proposed projects that comprise one hundred percent of the housing 415.1 and properties containing any of the pdr uses gas stations mrartsz are self-storage and properties subject to a development code under chapter 6 and the california government code and projects that have submitted an environmental plan where pdr conversions is allowed or in or green

lighting up across the city of san francisco and every neighborhood and hash tag, sf wi-fi, please use it and thanks again for being here. >> good morning. welcome to the san francisco land use commission to my right is supervisor kim and our left is supervisor malia cohen our clerk is andrea and thank you to sfgovtv for broadcasting disguise here jennifer lowe madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. please silence all electronic devices. employment speaker cards to be completed should be submitted to the clerk and all will appear on the agenda unless otherwise stayed. >> madam clerk call item one. >> is an ordinances african-american this 34i6k code for the city transportation planning and design projects and programs i'm the author of item one an ordinance 3 will adapt the national association of city transportation officials urban street design and bike way design guide as part of our official street design this is a continuing effort to improve street designs standards in san francisco to improve the street safety for all user and we're a multiple transit first city and our policies and ordinances needs to reflect that national association of city transportation offi