by the mid-1800s, the russians ability to make a profit from their colonies in alaska was undermined by the world economy. they started looking seriously --selling out the american selling out, the americans were interested in acquiring alaska as part of their manifest destiny that they considered it their god-given duty and right to acquire land from the atlantic all the way to the pacific. they saw a chance to acquire a russian america, as they called it, alaska, and get a huge increase of their shoreline on the pacific coast. very interested. william seward was the secretary of state at the time under abraham lincoln. he was a prime mover of america's effort to purchase alaska. eward atnting depicts s his desk, debating with a russian minister, the sovereign -- the final price. the critics at the time really felt the united states was being taken advantage of because the russians had harvested all the furs and got the resources out there were the easiest to take it manage of their they felt that was too much money. the sculpture is one of william seward and alaskans celebrate day

a key from the very good -- the red pandemic, remarks, and the mid 1800s. and 1930s, where they were growing and bringing life into their ideas and carelessness and so forth. briefly, we were allies in world war ii, just another big threat. germany, italy, and so forth. there was the rise of the reds, both in china, russia, and china falls, nato is created. the nuclear forces are created and the doctrine of massive retaliation initially. to make up for our forces, flexible response later, containment, collective defense are formulated. and other places take place, as the expansion proceeds. then there's a red spread, i call it, when the red continues to grow, but splits. the chinese and russians fall apart over the russian expansion mainly, the chinese, opening to up. terms such as the time, discretions are controlled, soviet moves in various countries, so, communism is continuing to spread, but at the same time, it was broken up a little bit by the moves of richard nixon in going to china in 1969, and kissinger. then there was when i got more involved and

of the drugstore he comes in and immediately goes to quinn harrison they are great names from the mid- 1800s and a fight sues and eventually peach quinn harrison is out tonight have him and his brother and becomes a key witness the prosecution to say that peach quinn harrison did not have to pull out the night that was a little argument that people set out another witnesses testified otherwise the most important for lincoln is a perception he had everything to lose. 1859. nine before he gets the public and nomination can you imagine a political candidate taking on a controversial case where the public once a conviction in the case? the community wanted a conviction in springfield illinois. and he took the case with everything to lose and we tell the story of this trial and we filled out the edges keeping the transcript as a yoke of the storm. >> we will come back but being in pursuit of a hot trial is nothing new even though you went back to the 19th to do it. what got you on the path to be illegal journalists that i should point out at the time it was a hot thing to do in the '90s with tria

sven put together about the red minutes, i call it the red pandemic which began with mark's in the mid 1800's, stalin, 1930s, where they were growing and breathing life into their movement and their i'ds, carelessness, and terrors. briefly we were allies, world war ii, another big threat, fascist germany and so forth. after that, the rise of the reds, both in china, russia, and china falls, nato is created, the u.s. strategic nuclear forces are created and the doctrine promulgated of massive retaliation initially, to make up for our weak conventional forces, flexible response later, containment, collective defense are formulated, proxy wars and vietnam takes place as the expansion proceeds. then there is a red spread i call it, and red schism, when the red menace continues to grow and splits. the chinese and russians are-- fall apart over the russian expansion mainly, the chinese opening to us, terms such as detaunt, discussions, armed control free, soviet moves and afghanistan, nicaragua, so forth. comnenism continued-- communism continued to spread, but broken up a bit by richard nixon in

took the key from the tone put together about the red menace, the red pandemic, which began in the mid-1800s, 1930's, where they were growing and breathing life into their ideas, carelessness, and so forth. briefly we were allies in world war ii, fascist germany, italy, and so forth. there was after that the rise of , andeds in china, russia china falls, nato is created, and the doctrine is promulgated of massive retaliation initially to make up for our week conventional forces, response, containment, defense are formulated. proxy wars in vietnam and other places as expansion proceeds. then there is the red spread and red schism when the red menace continues to grow, but splits. ,he chinese and russians are fall apart over the russian expansion mainly, the chinese as the to us, terms such , sovietrms control moves in afghanistan, angola, nicaragua, and so forth. communism continues to spread, but at the same time broken up by the moves of richard nixon going to china in 1969, and kissinger. ,hen there was red rollback when i got more involved with all these fine people who have done so much

the castle was built in the mid-1800s with more than 15 bedrooms and ten bathrooms. ny people remember there was a particularly bloody scene in one of the ends of one of the seasons of "game of thrones". >> i bet the heating bill is a killer. >> that's true. >> cbs news partnered with linked in for the series, "work in progress" looking at issues facing the american work force. this morning, we focus on how millennials are reinventing the traditional concept of employment. they are estimated to make up more than a third of the work force. a recent survey found 43% plan to quit their jobs within two years. only 28% of millennials plan to stay in their current role for more than five years. we spoke to a number of millennials who left jobs in order to travel. they are living in places like hawaii, france, and washington state. >> i was working at a luxury travel company. >> i was a magazine editor. >> top sales guy in the company. >> just always behind a computer. all the work's done through e-mail, and that's when i got the idea, i can do this from anywhere. >> times a

by the mid-1800s, the russians ability to make a profit from their colonies in alaska was underminedthe world economy. they started looking seriously at selling out the american -- selling out, the americans were interested in acquiring alaska as part of their manifest destiny that they considered it their god-given duty and right to acquire land from the atlantic all the way to the pacific. they saw a chance to acquire a russian america, as they called it, alaska, and get a huge increase of their shoreline on the pacific coast. they were very interested. william seward was the secretary of state at the time under abraham lincoln. he was a prime mover of america's effort to purchase alaska. this painting depicts seward at his desk, debating with a russian minister, the final price at $7.2 million. the critics at the time really felt the united states was being taken advantage of because the russians had harvested all the furs and got the resources out there were the easiest to take it manage of their they felt that was too much money. the sculpture is one of william seward and alaska

for american products that were just starting as this country became a trade powerhouse in the mid and early 1800s. so i think we have to think about that idea of the border not simply as a place that where security happens. because if we were talking about border security on its own terms of those two words, this would be a very important discussion for folks at about 28 congressional districts. it would not be something somebody in orlando would have their entire primary based upon what they would do on the border. because there isn't a border there. what it's become is a way to talk about those other issues. whether it's culture. whether it's the future of the country. a place for folks to put those anxieties. and i think there are some risks that i'll highlight. and there's also some opportunities that result from those. in the late 1990s -- excuse me. the late 1980s when i was going to law school and becoming a prosecutor. everything was about gangs and not ms-13. but the crips and the bloods. all the things that now look very archaic. a lot of folks on the other side rode their way into cong

the victims of brother is in the back of the drugstore, comes in, goes to harrison him and he's a great names, pt queen harrison. just great names in mid-1800s. a fight ensues. pt pulls out the knife, stabs the two. john becomes the key witness for the prosecution because he is basically saying pt didn't need to plot the knife it was a little brawl, a little argument et cetera. pt pulls up the knife right away, other witnesses testified otherwise but the bottom line is, most important for linking in perspective to this case, is it everything to lose by taking this. we are in 1859, nine months before he gets the republican nomination. can you imagine to do a political candidate taking on a controversial case where the public wants a conviction in the case? the committee wanted a conviction. >> in illinois? >> springfield, illinois. and he took the case with everything to lose, and we tell the story of this trial and we really sort of buildout the edges using the transcript as kind of the yoke of the story. >> will come back to the dynamic nature of this trial but you being in pursuit of a hot trial is nothing you know you're going back to the

back of the drugstore, greek crafton victim comes in, immediately goes to peachy quinn harrison, and is a great names, right? greek crafton, peachy quinn harrison, just great names in mid-1800s. and a fight ensues. pg peachy principles up a knife, stabs greek crafton and stabs his brother, john. john becomes the key witness for the prosecution because he's basically saying that peachy did need to pull out the knife. it was just a little brawl, a little argument, et cetera. peachy pulls up the knife right away, other witnesses testified otherwise. the bottom line is, most important for lincoln in perspective to this case, if he had everything to lose by taking this. we are in 1859, nine months before he gets the republican nomination. can you imagine today a political candidate taking on a controversial case where the public wants a conviction in the case, the community wanted a conviction. >> this is an illinois? >> springfield, illinois. and he took the case with everything to lose, and we tell the story of this trial and really sort of build out the edges using the transcript as the yoke of the story. >> we will come back to the dynamic nature of this trial, but you being