the mta has applied the t p.s. tool kit. the tool kits consisted of installing pedestrian lights and transit only lanes and one example is the pilot on church street between 16th street. the corridor is identified includes the routes that care of the ridership for the city. the planning department analyzed all the sequa tops u topics and many were covered in the report and the focus of the eir is on noise impacts. the other thing i'll say about the project it is intended to address the transit service harassing as stated in the eir prescription. the c e p is not proposed to address the adequate service for san francisco that's one of the projects that the mta is phacfor the best transit service in the city. the eir is a program level analysis and it's appropriate for the service policy framework that's appropriate for the t e p paroles proposals and mta will apply the t p.s. tool kit along the coordinates and once the design details are known they're under go subsequent environmental review for example, the t pr l wags was a

we can forward it electronically to the board right now. we understand from mta staff that they would like to move forward with the allocation today and they are here to answer questions that you may have about the potential impact of moving this forward today versus moving it forward in january. >> and chair avalos i would like to recommend that we move this forward today. given that the mta has met the condition to get the maintenance plan but my hope is that staff can look at the plan and i think that would be good to forward to all of us electronically as well. >> okay. thank you commissioner mar. with no other public comment on this item, number 8. >> and seeing no one come forward we'll close -- are you coming to the podium? >> good morning commissioners avalos i'm a member of the cac i was at the program's committee last week when i heard this item. unfortunately i didn't get there in time for commissioner mar to hear me but regarding this item, doesn't muni have a budget that deals with maintenance this sort of thing and maintenance and operations -- shou

does the eir get to that level of approving everything the small and board when the mta takes action tomorrow it's approving the budget outs and such >> in the calendar i don't know we've prepared for them we've made the distinction we've given them the environmental documents they'll consider. the - >> okay. so that's - because it gets from the board to the small. obviously we've heard about jackson you've made changes but the small thing the makayla stare bus stop. there's a bus bulk so they'll be widening the sidewalk. into the parking lane so it would not conflict for example, with any trees. is a specific go proposal that the among other things board will be looking at to legislate and we'll have a presentation for that. they'll also be looking at the overall environmental document and approving the other considerations >> okay. thanks. >> commissioner moore. >> it is not part of an eir review but i believe that in order to make the transit effectiveness project work we have to have public education and a complete reunderstanding of how all traffic needs work together by the way,

the mta pcos are not able to get citation so the work they're doing is moving the traffic but not doing anything to lead to effective changes of behavior we want to work with the pd and start experiencing things issuing sizing for the parking in that section. and those are some of the intersections we're looking at. this diagram is a summary of a lot of things we're we've heard the purple dots are on mission bay association it was delivered to supervisor kim in november of 2013. owe those are the intersections they think needs to have pcos in them all the time we had a meeting with the warriors on february 19th and the yellow intersections are the intersections that role arose that is important during the meeting. we took that information back to the agency and worked with our enforcement division to understand where we might best add new enforcement to three or four intersections to test this pilot. again in the same status we're developing measurements for step forward the pilot. we're now working closely with our colleagues at the mta that implement pilots to help us design that and

good afternoon directors i'm a cycle employee with the assignment with the mta. i'm the project manager for the vehicle overnight oversized parking restriction. i want to give you a few comments. you know that for decades there's been problems are over sized vehicles parked in the streets of san francisco noise and blight and, of course, as with anywhere in the city competition for parking. we use none of tools because they're not adequate to address the offer sized parking in the neighborhood. so a few years ago the board of supervisors look at the problem and recommend options. so the mta carried surveys and a policy research brought forward a recommendation that resulted in the board of supervisors adapting a new section of the transportation code in the fall of 2012 that's section 2.54 that same side where duly posted vehicles longer than than 22 feet or taller than 7 photo or retailers in combination thereof so vehicle objects may not be parked between midnight and 6:00 a.m. again where the sign it's location specific and the board adapted the tool and this b

we're now working closely with our colleagues at the mta that implement pilots to help us design that and will be coming back to the community i think on april 30th to talk about this more. the timeline this is excuse me. that is an overview of the different steps we're in this back one right now. we're planning on the before the pilot begin collecting data to compare to the final outcome of the pilot and anticipating the pilots 4 to 6 weeks. we're going to design that as we move further along with the metric and finally analyzing the pilot data for or against operations. so this is sort of an overall timeline phase one is complete and twaes phase two is anticipated to run through the summer and one of the benchmarks is thriving of the warriors project they're anticipating august right now. so in phase two again, we're looking at the two pieces the longer bar is the sf they're doing is an in debt regional network to understand how the big picture is going to be causing demand we noetd need to meet and below the pilots the red line developing the pilots and implement that and be done w

i'll reiterate what we said at the board of supervisors hearing and the mta meeting. there are unique unique circumstances in the panhandle the park is frequented by bicyclists and dog-walkers and pedestrian see. the path is often overflowing and there's discussions about creating an additional park. large vehicles parked on the street are a safety harassed to people of the park and supervisor breed supports the issues in the panel. there are other issues like the homelessness and panhandleers. i think there are special circumstances on the panhandle and for that reason the supervisor asks for your support there >> thank you very much. (calling names). good afternoon. >> hello. in our neighborhood we have another set of circumstances we don't have a lot of trailers ours are mainly the big moving vans that are full of graffiti. we have people parking big trucks and vans of garbage and come up with a little truck and a load those are people running their businesses on the street we are taxpayers we live in a nice neighborhood. yesterday we were walking and there were 40

so the mta should develop the system in the long-term. basically to continue to have the funding and the business plan that kind of idea but same thing maintain the recreational definition it might be more down the line the goals will make sense for synergy purposes. we recommend the region has a hybrid model to spin-off a nonprofit that's strongly supported by a public entity; right like with the 501 program and for jurisdictions that don't want to to do their own presumed to be innocent and programs that meet the programs that want to go ahead and make efforts on their own to make sure the region is supporting those efforts as well. and just finally >> so that means you can have other jurisdictions that can run the regions. >> yes. along with the capital matter just you making sure their speaking to one another and complimenting each other that's the goal. the other considerations mentioned i realize that in the back felt s ar we'll make sure their sprinklers better but how to achieve the social equality. we saw a presentation around no

. >> you don't think that the data that was given by the mta is relevant? the fact that you have 50 percent decrease in a number of disable passengered that have been serviced in you don't think that is relevant? >> i think that one of you asked kaoshi if the demand and why is that reduction there in the first place? do we know? >> well, did you ask that question of the mta? >> the mta did not give us that answer then. >> but do you think that it is the role of the puc to ask the information. >> it is the role of the puc and like i said we gave our best shot, at coming up with a set of requirements to promote public safety and we are open to modifying our rules and we are not saying that they are final, we are open to modifying based on the data. >> what is the message to the disabled individual who has seen a decrease in cab service who has an industry that is not required to have vehicles that actually are accessible to them? what is the puc say to that individual? >> my message is that when we open phase two and if there is indeed discrimination, we will

and the program continued on after that but we had data we got from mta staff to make an assessment. we assumed the estimate number of youth between the ages of 5 and 17 of which 240 thousand had signed up for the program as of may 31st, 2013. we got some updated information inform and that number is 78 percent of the eligible youth in san francisco. i'll run through the numbers because they're not showing up on the screen. the costs we came up with the current pilot program for t 5 to 17 years old is 5.7 plus million dollars. for the current program we objected the cost information it's the lost revenue of $2.5 million and we assumed temple percent participation looking at the first 3 months and assumed the program would expand as more people became familiar with it. to add all 5 to 17 years old the second number is it adds another 2 point three or four million dollars a year. it's a big jump it represents fewer youth but youth have been riding more so the revenue loss to mta would be greater so all the 5 to 17 years old is a $5.29 million. to include 18 years old in place is 1.1 mil

good afternoon supervisors i'm director of the strategy planning for the mta. first of all, i want to acknowledge of the hard work with the staff has done they've developed a pretty good snapshot of what we're working on and spent two years where they've prison brought the strategies that will work and make sense. we've been integral to that one we were the head of the mta from the city side we're a large consumer of the diesel and electrical but from the transportation prospective the way we get around the city affected ore carbon footprint. mta has been working hard on trying to lead by example by marking buses the best and reducing your waste reduction and recycling and those have been a lot of effort but it pails in xoorn comparison to the real issue people are driving a lot and getting around the city and we set our goal to reduce this 50 percent by 2018. we have to as cal was mentioning there are are behavioral changes that need to happen supervisor wiener mentioned things happening in city hall we need to act on street changes that are los low-cost. most

we at the mta are the largest recipient of those funds. there's a few other local sources, including our own mta revenue bonds that i referenced and we get a little bit of money from the state, too. you can see how this breaks down in terms of uses. the central subway is federally funded program that as i think everybody knows is expanding the t third service up through the most densely populated part of the city. there's a chunk that go to streets, chunk that go to -- that's called transit optimization which is really making those changes in the right-of-way making muni work better. and then again the core, these are five-year numbers. this is the five-year crp number, 3 billion over five years. the core of that is state of good repair, that $250 million a year, we need to continually invest to bring the system into good condition. but the good news is that from the last time we did this exercise, the five-year picture is looking better. where it's going up from 2-1/2 to over 3, the central subway portion is actually shrinking a little bit

so the mta should develop the system in the long-term. basically to continue to have the funding and the business plan that kind of idea but same thing maintain the recreational definition it might be more down the line the goals will make sense for synergy purposes. we recommend the region has a hybrid model to spin-off a nonprofit that's strongly supported by a public entity; right li

i've really dedicated the staff and transportation authorized to work closely that the mta and the public works and the department of pubt and the controller's office to do everything we can of new because of business. we've established a new committee to look at how to expedite our 24 projects in 24 months to make sure we're putting an infrastructure in place where it's noted to protect pedestrians but we're focusing only neighborhoods that are impacted. i can't say enough the south of tenderloin needs our help and port to make their neighborhoods safer. mayor ed lee committed new resources for the pedestrian safety in the transportation authority we'll be k34i789d up to $10 million to improve the outcomes. i represent a neighborhood of san francisco south of 280 that not a week goes by you don't hear from several people asking for traffic coming. this is necessary to hone in to make the improvements in place and radical dozen. i want to thank the controller's office bringing forward the planning for walk first. i think it's significant that behind the scenes the controller's office this

we've had a lot of which the smarter mind but last but not least the staff of the mta the sustainable street staff a lot of the bright minds in the city working together to analyze this data that will help us use our resources enforcement and education and when it comes time to pitting things in the ground the department of public works and mayor's office on disability and carmen johnson and tom from our building inspector we're working he together to put this stuff in the ground and that finally at the sfmta we're led had by a board of directors they've identified safety as the number one priority so i want to acknowledge sheryl bringing man here strongest voice advocating for bicycle and pedestrian safety and all the road users with all the folks standing behind me and all the staff work and everybody in san francisco a taking on the challenge and responsibility to slow down and be aware and get around the city safer we can make this a great place so thanks to the folks behind me >> all of you looking forward to marking this a safer city. thank . >> golden gate parks largest body of

we've had a lot of which the smarter mind but last but not least the staff of the mta the sustainable street staff a lot of the bright minds in the city working together to analyze this data that will help us use our

we've had a lot of which the smarter mind but last but not least the staff of the mta the sustainable street staff a lot of the bright minds in the city working together to analyze this data that will help us use our resources enforcement and education and when it comes time to pitting things in the ground the department of public works and mayor's office on

expensive asset so we strongly support this study and look forward to working with the c, d, and a the mta as this study goes forward >> thank you. next speaker. >> howard wong good morning. i'm a lifelong muni rider. we object to the $573 for the motion to strike for the subway study. it's been very secretly put b.a. before you. the neighborhood groups have no knowledge there was money available for the study. we urge that neighborhood organizations and transit advocates be allowed to weigh in what to study in terms of the improving transit. the central subway projects is not in the mayors transportation task force recommendation proprietor projects and for good reason. given it's ridership low new ridership numbers and it's taking away so moved so much money from muni and the decrease of the transit in north city because of the expensive costs many people in the northeast and throughout the quadrant have opposed the center project but certainly any extension forward. san francisco's total vehicle split is already pretty bad 17 percent only on public transit much better promotions can lea

the mta budget is what we - the things are on the table for muni. there's two things that are big things are i think an earlier public comment the first is the structural deficit & those are the supporting services to keep the vehicles clean and maintained to train our operators, to reduce overtime or to adequately budget overtime we need to staff up in order to deliver the service plan we have today we've made a big dent adding $25,000 for the funding that brought our unanimous deficit down from 70 million down to 45. we want to keep dwindling that. and the most significant one and we'll hear about this on miracle 14 to add more service. the t e p will be recommending a 10 percent service increase based on the changes we've been contemplating as a result of the public feedback from the t pe meetings maybe a little bit larger than 10 percent. we'll be contemplating that as we look at expenditure changes and closing the deficit as well as putting more muni service on the streets. our two big things within muni. we have similar issues throughout the r

this report has been given to the mta board and planners. why did this finding the proposed elimination to the elderly as well as the disabled. instead of making changes and deletions on bus routes on the basis of supply and demand, the proposal should be based on the actual needs for transportation services. police and fire do not operate on the basis of supply and demand but actual need. so should mta. i had time to compliment you on the time to made but you still have a long way to go. thank you. >> next speaker? ga wah. >> good morning commissioners and mr. riskin and congratulations on mostly pronouncing my name correctly. that's rarely done. my name is am an jawa a conservation representative. i'm very excited for this proposal to move ahead and become part of the mta's actual plan as opposed to plan. this is a systemic change. when you make systemic changes it is