the nafgs has always existed shows that michael slager has told the truth since day one. >> let's talk rest of the information. your documents show key information in the tazer and the officer's uniform. what can you tell me about that? >> well, don, i'm not going to characterize what the state's evidence is. but the easiest way to describe it is michael slager told a very simple story. that he stopped the vehicle. once stopping the vehicle, the individual ran from the vehicle. and after running from the vehicle, this individual took his taser, tried to shoot him with the taser several times. an altercation occurred between the two individuals and that's what happened. our belief is the evidence that has been provided by the state laud enforcement division, that they've had since day one, has always shown michael's story to be accurate. the entire time. >> so as you're talking there -- >> and that's something that anyone can look at. it's not something i've made up. it's not something that we've created. it's evidence that's always existed. >> this video, we've obtained this from the f

at the same time, the nafgs we used to keep in our homes are more and more on our electronic devices. and the same goes for bad guys. in trying to prevent those threats from happening or to bring those people to justice. that's where we live as a society. we also have the foreign intelligence surveillance act. it does the same thing with national security investigations. search warrants. all of those orders signed by a judge that enables us to get access or at least authorizes us to get access. unfortunately, unable to execute more and more because of increasing problems and issue. not proposing a solution to that. from the government's pore spektive, we really need the companies to try to come up with a solution. to try to build the most secure systems. yet, at the same and present an ord i with the search warnt or signed by a judge that we're able to get the information that we're seeking. the evidence, the data in readable texts. to start, let's go with encrimination. so strong, they say the company itself can't get access to the data. let's distill what we're talking about. that's

at the same time, the nafgs we used to keep in our homes are more and more on our electronic devices. and the same goes for bad guys. in trying to prevent those threats from happening or to bring those people to justice. that's where we live as a society. we also have the foreign intelligence surveillance act. it does the same thing with national security investigations. search warrants. all of those orders signed by a judge that enables us to get access or at least authorizes us to get access. unfortunately, unable to execute more and more because of increasing problems and issue. not proposing a solution to that. from the government's pore spektive, we really need the companies to try to come up with a solution. to try to build the most secure systems. yet, at the same and present an ord i with the search warnt or signed by a judge that we're able to get the information that we're seeking. the evidence, the data in readable texts. to start, let's go with encrimination. so strong, they say the company itself can't get access to the data. let's distill what we're talking about. that's

at the same time, the nafgs we used to keep in our homes are more and more on our electronic devices. and the same goes for bad guys. in trying to prevent those threats from happening or to bring those people to justice. that's where we live as a society. we also have the foreign intelligence surveillance act. it does the same thing with national security investigations. search warrants. all of those orders signed by a judge that enables us to get access or at least authorizes us to get access. unfortunately, unable to execute more and more because of increasing problems and issue. not proposing a solution to that. from the government's pore spektive, we really need the companies to try to come up with a solution. to try to build the most secure systems. yet, at the same and present an ord i with the search warnt or signed by a judge that we're able to get the information that we're seeking. the evidence, the data in readable texts. to start, let's go with encrimination. so strong, they say the company itself can't get access to the data. let's distill what we're talking about. that's