as, mentioned earlier i work for noaa, the national ocean schick atmospheric administration. with one good thing working for know noaa, we are not the epa. we have little regulatory role outside of fisheries. i don't work in that field as much. i think it is really important that the united states continue from a government organizational perspective that the science agency doing a lot of the work to understand how our climate is changing, why it is changing and impacts of those changes is separate from the discussion about what to do with that information. so science has a seat at the table, whether you're republican or democrat or a moderate, the information that those different political parties work with should be the same. now what they choose to do with that information can vary greatly. they may have different economic models that they trust. they may have different values, what they think is important to society. they may have different beliefs on the best way to grow our economy. understanding what things may or may not hurt our economy. i think we heard, you know, it