that is the question. >> why is it significant that the "new york times" publisher felt the need to announce that "new york times" is not for sale? >> i have been wondering about that all day long. i have taken it at face value. there has been so much speculation based on nothing other than the sale of "the post " to make people wonder about whether the family could stay the course. i tend to believe that the "new york times" is not for sale because the company has worked to get rid of all the other assets. it had small, regional newspapers in florida and even one in california. now gotten rid of "the boston globe." the whole company is focused on publishing the "new york times." i tend to believe that it is not for sale, but the speculation that it could or should be is logical in light of what we have seen in the last few weeks. i guess he thought that the statement would silence speculation. but being an old-time journalist , we could rip off that and turn it into a bunch of new speculations. question.r last does this portend anything for the future of journalism, and the news industry in

we weren't willing to doublecross the new york times. we thought a deal is a deal. >> smith: the guardian shared a copy of the cables with the times. so, on the evening of november 28, 2010, the new york times, the guardian, and der spiegel published. ( news reports overlapping ) >> smith: it touched every country. it was the biggest story on the planet. of all the files manning is alleged to have leaked, this was the mother lode. >> whoever leaked that information is guilty of treason, and i think anything less than execution is too kind. >> question-- do you believe that actually capturing mr. assange and prosecuting him will send the right kind of signal? >> mr. assange has disclosed this material without regard to the risk that it does generate to real people... >> smith: is there anything good to come out of this in your view? >> no. >> smith: nothing? >> the unauthorized release of 251,000 cables that covers every relationship the united states has with countries around the world has done damage to the national interest of the unite

the last time it sold, it went for a symbolic $1. the "boston globe" which the "new yorkrs ago sold for $70 million. the "washington post" which took down a president sold for $250 million. so that means that the "washington post" is worth $25 million less than disgraced yankee alex rodriguez. and then there's this. news reports that reruns of the simpsons may catch a full $1 billion, more than all of those three publication put

the last time it sold, it went for a symbolic $1. the "boston globe" which the "new yorkrs ago sold for $70 million. the "washington post" which took down a president sold for $250 million. so that means that the "washington post" is worth $25 million less than disgraced yankee alex rodriguez. and then there's this. news reports that reruns of the simpsons may catch a full $1 billion, more than all of those three publication put together. then again, bart and homer are a lot more popular these days than a-rod. something to think about. that's it for this edition of "reliable sources". if you have questions or comments, tweet me or use #reliable. i'll be chatting on twitter after the show. and if you missed any of today's show, you can find us on itunes or online at cnn.com/reliable sources. thanks for joining us. state of the union with candy crowley begins right now. >>> the story of egypt takes a dark turn, and the nsa story takes another turn. today -- >> we want egypt to succeed. we want a peaceful, democratic, prosperous egypt. that's our interest. >> american values

has bipartisan support and it's interesting i worked for the new york times for fifteen years that the only established news organization that responsibly covered the case was the new york times and when judge forrest issued a ruling the new york times ran an editorial supporting our decision because the times still i mean it's an elitist organizations and i have my critiques of the times but nevertheless it still understands what is news and what is not. but that for me was a kind of frightening moment because i realized how deteriorated our systems of information become absolutely yeah i love how people say oh there is there's no bipartisan support well look at things like the end of the erosion of civil liberties it seems like it's all the uniform across the board but speaking in storage you mentioned this is the way it's kind of been of except in these illegalities in terms of. looking at when civil liberties have been repealed and in the historical narrative of america in the short brief history of our nation lincoln f.d.r. you know when he authorized. the brief interminably happe

society that's supposed to be transparent leslie it's important or many did try to reach out to the new york times with this information other news outlets have the new york times been on this in taken some of this information would we be here talking about about this trial would manning a face these sort of consequences were i mean what does that say about journalism in general the whole wiki leaks angle in julian assange engine things i think if he i think the new york times that sounds like they blew him off i mean he did reach out to the new york times and no one responded given the new york times coverage of this trial a spin abysmal all they haven't shown up during much of it i'm in terms of whether they would cover it i don't know i don't know if they would have covered his disclosures i'm not sure what they would have done with that but in general there is a war on whistleblowers and a war on journalism and in general a crackdown on information if it happens to embarrass the government or even worse expose its crime colonel morris davis professor of law at howard university just erratic na

the red. today, rush limbaugh previewed how karl rove's impact and many others will be using "the times" report and distorting it when hillary clinton's campaign gets under way. >> the new yorkreason done an expose on the foundation. they have ripped the charity in the new york times. i'm telling you, not to make a big deal out of these things, but there are a lot of little things starting to align. is rush limbaugh editing this piece, that is in the new york times essentially points out that you know, this thing is losing money left and right. it raises money out the wazoo. it is running deficits and the clintons are getting rich. >> joining me now, one of the new york times reporters who co-wrote this story. nick, the article points out -- and by the way, most of the findings in the article were from this report, this report was commissioned by the clinton foundation itself. but it points out this loss of money that i'm having trouble understanding how they can have such a big cash flow and then end up with a deficit at the end of the year. and one of the people at the foundation seems to suggest, that is normal in these kinds of foundations. is that a normal kind of outco

the british government having to destroy computers in their offices, they have partnered with the "new york timesmplementer on snowden's leak changes the dynamic in terms of how the administration responds or doesn't? >> right. playing an important role in this. it's important. it's been a little bit of an embarrassment we had a british newspaper being the one to tell us about our sort of dirty laundry. it's going to be an interesting moment to see what exactly "the new york times" is able to come out with. >> but you know, i also want to know how much this changes things. we hear about changes with the fisa court and transparency there and the court has released more of its decision making -- >> a page -- >> yeah. the court's next to to be on instagram. bob corker on fox news said i would imagine there's members of the intelligence committee themselves don't that don't fully understand the gamut of things taking place. >> one thing we've seen, the apparatus built for spying on punitively terrorists is so much bigger and more powerful than any terrorism network that it could possibly dream of tar

and "the new york times" going down yesterday. and it looks as though, at this point, it's assad supporters that have targeted both twitter and "the new york times." this is what the syrian electronic army says in this statement, but let me tell what you "the times" said. our website was unable to use for a time on tuesday. the result was an attack on the domain registrar. we're at work and fully regret if this caused you any inconvenience. still seems to be having problems this morning, by the way. >> we'll keep an eye on both of these? >> yes. >> twitter back up and running or just aspects of twitter affected? >> for some of us, they were not affected. this is the new era. hacking, especially hacking for political purposes or to make a statement. >> absolutely. >> something that all the major companies, not just media companies, but everybody who's got a business. and they've got a business, percepti perception online, spending an awful lot of money trying to protect their computers and access. >> christine, thank you for the upd

strong on for decades, remains to be seen. >> the story you wrote about the "post" sale was "the new york times." let's explain to the viewers at home why "the new york times" ownership came up immediately once this happened. >> because "the new york times" is essentially the last man standing. a family own, family controlled newspaper that is still independent. can they make a go of it? can they remain a public company without the kind of, you know, wealthy backer that "the washington post" is now getting. so far so good for "the new york times," but can they remain independent is the question. >> in fact the family met -- at least talked afterwards and put out a statement saying they don't intend to have any change. what do you make of that? >> well, they say that and if someone shows up like jeff bezos and says i'm going to give you a whole lot of money for this enterprise, maybe they would be for sale. the family seems adamant. we have to take them at their word, obviously. they think they have a plan to go in the future, but "the washington post" wasn't for sale necessarily until a few mon

what health is preferred month for invasion is mulch and this weapon of choice is the new york times and almost white house official tells the times iraq supplying w m d to mainstream media repeat without question it was a total lie on the second anniversary of syria anonymous white house official says iran is blowing the rings even though all thinks the us intelligence agencies admit iran does not have a nuclear weapons program nor the most white house official tells the times iraq's about to use chemical weapons it was a law i don't know the most white house official told the times syria's about to use chemical weapons mainstream repeating it without question we're even told things that don't exist iraq supposedly had some chemical agent fifteen it was a lawyer in twenty thirteenth e.i.a. claims a quote compelling case syria is using the same thing now the only problem is there's no such thing as agent fifteen leaked emails as america is trying to plant a chemical weapon which washington says would justify invasion we've got a new offer it's about syria again qatar is proposing the

cybersecurity experts telecom pan knees to buy more software but what we saw with the new york times is an attack the times said in particular was done by the syrian electronic army or somebody trying to appear like the syrian electr electronic army. that's a group loosely affiliate idea the with bashar al-assad which raises questions for companies and institutions trying to defend against cyber attacks. will they reap blow back for foreign u.s. policy decisions as hackers respond by targeting american companies? that's something new that we haven't seen before. >> this has to hit them in the pocketbook. what kind of lopses are we talking about? >> "the new york times" website was down for certain people trying to access it, not necessarily for everybody. they were trying to get it up quickly. the revenues lost probably not significant. what the problem will be is if the hackers are able to get beyond just the public facing website and get into the guts of some companies and get credit card information and material operations of the company, that's where you see significant losses. >>

>> the "new york times." sorry. ew york times" site brought down again and the "new york times" confirmed this because of some sort of malicious attack. they have nothing else to add right now. but they say the initial assessment is that the result of a malicious external attack. yes, the "new york times" dotcom website, down again. >> amazing. hearing this more and more now, too. julia, thank you very much. >>> kelly? >> thanks, bill. >>> continuing our week-long "school days" series on the changes face of college. today's question, how to pay for college? financial aid? scholarshipsance grants or something else entirely? with us now, kim clark a senior writer in "money" magazine. and paying for college without were going broke, author, and mark cant witowits joining us shortly. >>> kim, first start with you. what should parents and students know before filing for the fafsa. >> two basic kinds of financial aid. there's loans, which you have to pay back, and there's grants, which is what everybody wants. grants or sc

problem of the our initial assessment this is most likely the result of a malicious external attack, this would be the second time the times, "the new yorkimes", had problems with its website this month. "the washington post" experienced this quite of a problem with their web site as well. one more time, "the new york times" now saying that their assessment of the problems at their website, are, quote, the result of a malicious external attack. in english, they're getting hacked. back to you. cheryl: adam shapiro that was the perfect english for this type of attack. adam shapiro with breaking news on "the new york times" website. we'll follow that with you. >>> back to the discussion, we're looking at wells fargo, we're talking about mortgage rates, interest rates, wells fargo, layoffs in the mortgage division. i was surprised by that. that is one of the most profitable divisions for them. what do you make of that? >> rising 10-year. we saw the long end of the curve rise. that means mortgage rates rise. the 30-year mortgage tends to be priced off the 10-year. when that is the case. sure you get a boom of mortgages. people say this is my

new york is very different from washington. the new york timess very different from the washington post. and the new york times has enough challenges as it is. here's what interests me most, though, jeff bezos is a great innovator in technology. that's terrific. he has vastly more money than the grahams, which is important to invest in the newspaper. but will he run a newspaper that puts pressure on power. that's what interests us most. that's not a value, that's a universal among anyone, much less -- >> some have suggested the opposite. perhaps he's buying protection for his business. >> precisely. >> cory johnson, you cover jeff bezos. you've covered -- and as i talk about his motives, george will says it's the intellectual challenge. >> you talk to people who know jeff bezos, the first thing out of everyone's mouth is he's smart. it's interesting in a world of smart people, hedge fund managers, entrepreneurs and technology. he's the guy they say is smart. he's quick and he's thoughtful. one of the interesting things is he built his business in

new york is very different from washington. the new york timesvery different from the washington post. and the new york times has ough challenges as it is. here's what interests me most, though, jeff bezos is a great innovator in technology. that's terrific. he has vastly more money than the grahams, which is important to invest in the newspaper. but will he run a newspaper that puts pressure on power. that's what interests us most. that's not a value, that's a universal among anyone, much less -- >> some have suggested the on, perhaps he's buying protection for his business. >> precisely. >> you cover jeff bezos. you've covered -- and as i talk about his motives, george will says it's the intellectual challenge. >> you talk to people who know jeff bezos, the first thing out of everyone's mouth is he's smart. it's interesting in a world of smart people, hedge fund managers, entrepreneurs and technology. he's smart and thoughtful. one of the interesting things is he built it on books. of all the things he could have sold, he close books. he chose

in case the media was so mad, that the "new york times" wrote a scathing article about it. they just ask them all sorts of nice things. it kind of read like the conversations i imagine they have. but it's actually on tape. >> i just think it's beautiful to keep a relationship so fresh for so long. they can just spice it up every year. it's a beautiful marriage. >> they could write a self help book on how to stay married. >> what was his name, robert putnam? an amazing moment between the press and the president. >> it probably says more about me than it does about them. the reporter says you know, robert put familinam. president obama says, well, yes, bob and i are very close. as if to say, i'm a little bit closer to the new york professor than you are. he went to harvard too. but he doesn't act or talk like these guys. i'm surprised at some of the questions that were asked, it seems that they were so afraid of president's obama's notorious thin skin for bad news coverage. ine tabably, the president would say, it wasn't as bad as i said it was going to be. >> i think it's rea

the news story. the front page "new york times" reporting from e.w. 63 and what happened tonight at maddowblog.com. check it out. here's the thing you need to know for tomorrow. if you can watch tv during the day, watch from 1:00 p.m. eastern on. that's going it be the official let freedom ring event on the national mall. after 1:00 p.m. is when there are going to be speeches and everything by president clinton and president carter. at about 2:45 eastern time, that is when president obama is going to give his big address. then at 3:00 p.m., they tell us, bells will toll. at that moment 50 years ago when dr. king reached that point in his speech, let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops in new hampshire. he goes through the long list of everywhere he wants to hear freedom ring. every mole and mole hill of mississippi. you know that portion of the speech, right? at the 50-year anniversary of that moment at 3:00 p.m. tomorrow, bells are going to ring in d.c. and across the country and even apparently in places as far away as switzerland and japan. th

eric schmitt of the "new york times." and cbs news state department correspondent margaret brennan. and we'll look at another story that rocked washington, the sale of the "washington post". we'll talk about the future of newspapers with former "washington post" editor len downie. former "new york times" editor bill keller. and john harris, editor in chief of politico. there's a lot to cover, but this is "face the nation." captioning sponsored by cbs from cbs news in washington, "face the nation" with bob schieffer. >> schieffer: and good morning again, michael hayden who served as both the c.i.a. and n.s.a. director now consulted for the cherdov group here in washington, joins us as our lead guest this morning. general, the president made that news conference on friday, and he said the american people need to know more about what the national security agency is doing because there are a growing number of people in the congress who are wondering is the n.s.a. infringing on americans' right to privacy? what do you think-- you ran the place. what do you think is is the most significant

there's been a flurry of recent reporting, "the san francisco chronicle," the "new york times" and mostuingly today in reuters about the fact that tips derived from nsome a surveillance are tips that are being handed over to domestic american law enforcement through agencies like the dea, for things like regular old nonterrorist american crimes committed by americans. according to reuters, a secret dea unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of americans. reuters also reporting that law enforcement officials are getting trained that once they get these tips from nsa surveillance and other places, they should cover up that the information that they got came from any of those surveillance programs. they should, instead, pretend that they got the information through traditional legal law enforcement means. they should launder the source of the information. these guys did not get the information through traditional law enforcement means, they got it from the thing we've all been thinking they're

what "the new york times" dug up on the family foundation ahead on "fox news watch." -- on "the five." ♪ [ male announcer ] when the a.c. goes out in a heat wave, it's nuccio heating and air conditioning that comes to the rescue. at&t helped nuccio put a complete mobile solution to work. mobile routing to send the closest technician and mobile payments to invoice on the spot. where do you want to take your business? call us. we can show you how at&t solutions can help you do what you do... even better. ♪ ♪ >>> september 11th is a sacred kay in america. next month will mark 12 years since muslim terrorists killed almost 3,000 people innocent people. a day of reflection and remembrance for most americans. not everyone. this year the american muslim political action committee picked 9/11 to organize a million muslim march in d.c. to demand civil rights protections from our government. their press release says this, quote, we as muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains. our government either sits idly by and does nothing to protect our freedoms or exacer

the "new york times" under cyber attack. ite shuts down and e-mails returned. a down day for stocks. jpmorgan is the biggest bull on wall street. the top wealth advisors told him something that has him screaming by. when loan collateral means to cheat, or chanel, china's take on a loan. ♪ adam: welcome back to market now. this hour, the fifth biggest bull on wall street. tom leaf, his ear and target on the s&p is the highest on wall street. the undivided guest keeping the party going. apple shares top $500. whether or not the meddling is good for the tech giant. plus, the very latest on the ups plane crash. egypt's vice president resigns as violent turns

we're watching what is happening with the "new york times." e website is down and has been for a little bit right now. what we do know, a "new york times" spokesman says they believe this is a hacking related incident only affecting some users and they can't say how widespread it is. they're working to restore the problem right now. we just checked it again, the "new york times" website is still down, so no real trade in the after hours but "new york times" stock may be one you want to pay attention to into tomorrow's trade if this is not resolved. nyt shares certainly in focus. >> the twitter account of eileen murphy, vp of communication of the "new york times" says initial assessment issue most likely result of a malicious external attack. that coming from the vp of communication at the "new york times" as reported by the "wall street journal." the "new york times" itself reporting a possible hack attack. meantime it's not just the so called fed tapering hanging over investor's heads. now we're just 34 days away from a possible government shu

a hack at the "new york times." ect and why it could be a disturbing sign of things to come. plus 50 years ago today, he told the world he had a dream and now half a century later, america remembers dr. martin luther king, junior's pivotal speech. jamie: we're covering all aspects of that. we're waiting to see whether that military action on syria starts. the white house and the pentagon are now weighing their options. and the fallout is already being felt around the world. welcome to brand new hour of "happening now." jon: mounting evidence that the syrian regime did use chemical weapons against its own people. we have video showing u.n. inspectors heading back to the scene of the deadly poison gas attack as the united nations gets ready for its own showdown with syria with five permanent members of the security council now reviewing the british resolution condemning the asad government for the attack and pushing for authorization of military action. jamie: secretary general is pleading for more time for diplomacy.

the u.s. open is a great time of year here in new york, dylan. r will cooperate. >> it should. today maybe a couple of showers later on this afternoon, but it actually looks okay in the northeast. the show is on across parts of the midwest. it's getting better. instead of the upper 90s, we're in the lower 90s. 80 degrees in chicago. we have heat advisories and warnings posted again across especially southern minnesota where it will feel like it's up around 100 degrees especially this afternoon where you factor in the humidity. it will be in the mid 90s. most of the midwest will see the heat all the way until sunday. that's when we are going to see some improvements. we are keeping an eye on rain. it does look like for all the activities in washington, d.c., it looks like after 3:00, 4:00 we could see scattered showers and storms. in 1963, brian, it was so hot that they had all of these heat emergencies and first responders were out to deal with some of the heat that was going on. >> i think obama is supposed to speak before the rain comes in. >>>

hundreds of thousands of these stops in new york have ended up just with the question. >> i got to ask you this as a republican, do you think "the new york timesdorsement helps you or hurts you? >> i believe all endorsements help me. i'm running for both the republican primary. i received "the new york post" endorsement today. i'm expecting more endorsements as the week goes on. i feel very comfortable and very happy that "the new york times" is endorsing. >> are you comfortable endorsing if you don't win the primary and the opponent does, are you comfortable endorsing him for mayor or is that not a given? >> that's a hypothetical. it's not going to happen. i'm going to win this primary fair and square. >> but you're not automatically saying you'll endoers the republican -- >> i'm already on the conservative party line and the education first line. i'm prepared to run all the way through. >> even if you do not get the republican line but get one of the other ones? >> it's not going to happen, chuck. >> all right. joe loda. thanks for coming on the show. it's going to meet you. stay safe on the campaign trail. up next, we're going live to chica

>> a lot of things were done in the reporting of "the new york times" and "the washington post". there was a travel log component to some of it. a lot of the interviews were taped. sometimes when i was at an event, i would take notes afterwards. it's a real hybrid of different forms. >> when did you start? when did you know you had a book? >> when it was done. >> i mean, when was the first mention that hey, you got a book here. >> the book officially i guess did the deal to write the book i think in april or may of 2010. it was right after new york time's magazines mike allen who was a widely read and individual columnist for politico. he writes for playbook. and that seemed to get the attention of some people who wandered, is that how washington really works today. is that how it looks. is that the news cycle through today's ecology of washington looks like. some people have an idea of fleshing it to a larger picture. >> you pointed out on "the new york times", no one knows where mike allen lives and you tell a story about a friend taking it home. he said let me off here, got ou

but honestly that "the new york times" story, for example, about the clinton foundation, the media mattersd an objection to this, to "the new york times" demanding a retraction on certain parts of it because there were clearly misleading paragraphs in there about the finances of the clinton foundation and all of that. the bottom line is, chris, she is going to make her decision in due time. there is clearly going to be a lot of pursuit of her by the media. people have to find something to report on, "the new york times" has said they are going to put a person on her now. there is a reporter that has been dedicated to hillary clinton, even though she hasn't decided to run. you know they have to find something. and that is what is exactly what is going on. in the meantime -- >> i'm not in a position to defend "the new york times," although, you know, to your on point saying she is just waiting, the mantle is there waiting for her. so it's understandable why people are curious about it. when does she have to make a decision fairly? not just for herself but, obviously, for the other people who

"the new york times" libby rosenthal is here with her piece on patients being priced out of the u.s. [ male announcer ] this is bob, a regular guy with an irregular heartbeat. the usual, bob? not today. [ male announcer ] bob has afib: atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem, a condition that puts him at greater risk for a stroke.

what "the new york times" dug up on the family foundation ahead on "fox news watch." -- on "the five." what are you doing back there? ow! that hurt! no, no, no, no. you can't go to school like this, c'mon. don't do it! no! (mom vo) you never know what life's gonna throw at you. if i gotta wear clothes, you gotta wear clothes. (mom vo) that's why i got a subaru. i just pulled up. he did what now? no he's never done that before! oh really? i might have some clothes in the car. (announcer) love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. and this park is the inside of your body. you see t special psyllium fiber in metamucil aually gels to trap and remove some waste. and that gelling also helps to lower some cholesterol. it evetraps some carbs to hp maintain healthy blood sugar levels as part of your diet. now that's one super hard working fiber. metamucil. 3 amazing benefit in 1 super fiber. ♪ vietnam in 1972. [ all ] fort benning, georgia in 1999. [ male announcer ] usaa auto insurance is often handed down from generation to generation. because it offers a superior level of protection and beca

the "new york times" demanding they retract some of the comments. that. >> ridiculous and classless. i think the "new york times" has a real problem sometimes, other people get scoops and recognizing the contributions of other journalists. if they bothered to read the report she would see what she put out there was factually inaccurate. i feel strongly they should have a retraction, clearly the "new york times" management can't step up to the plate and admit they made a mistake. >> shocking behavior by the "new york times." you were right, they were wrong. turning to the general news agenda since michael's death, he loved all this, wouldn't he? the nsa, edward snowden, the chatter, right up his wheelhouse? >> no, i mean, absolutely. there isn't a more contiguous time for national security reporters than right now. a crackdown on national security reporters. they're risking going to prison if they don't reveal their sources. they have launched investigations on war whistle-blowers in the previous three administrations combined. definitely there was a