and is a former pentagon correspondent for the new york times. he's the author of counter strike, the untold story of america, secret campaign against al qaeda. gentleman, thank you so much for joining us. this is truly an explosive report as i read it in david, why don't you describe to our audience what the underlying incident was that led to issues which we'll get into, but tell us about the underlying incident. right, so like you said, this is at the very end, i years long war against isis. and what was left of the caliphate fighters were basically trapped, corralled into a area, maybe a square mile against a river. and it was just a chaotic seam with, with lots of vehicles and makes shift tents and the hand dug bunkers. and there were thousands and thousands of people in there, certainly many fighters, but also lots of women and children there. and we have to remember that some of them were probably there willingly, but a lot of them probably were not. so at the very end of this chaotic situation, and there's some sort of skirmish going on, w

attorneys or the fbi tipping off the "new york times" to the raids of project veritas current and formermes" were the own ones that knew about it and published this hit piece today. all it proves is that project veritas is an honest and thoughtful journalistic organization that sought legal advice before making various publications. that's what fox news does. i don't know what they think they were doing there. they criticized project veritas for their tactics and yet they sink so low. >> tucker: the biden administration leaks information. they did it to me personally.io any way to catch them in the act of doing this? which i think would be a crime. >> the first thing we did with seizing our client's telephone, with confidential source information in the biden administration and in corporate america and donor information protected by the first amendment. we asked the court to order a master to review this information and not let the prosecutors and fbi look at it. the government would not do that voluntarily. but we went to court and the judge ordered them to stop looking at these phones.

the new york times identify the mass of with lives on the ground, united say troops on the ground who can circumvent the, the ordinary chain of command, and ordered the strong truck that the officers that saw all of this happened. they immediately, i flagged the incident as a potential walk, rob, and try to get it investigated. unfortunately, that is where it all ended. senior rankin u. s. military officials intentionally and systematically circumvented the deliberate strike process, clearly seeking to cover up the incidence at nearly every tourney. neocons report since 2019 the in the pentagon has impeded any potential review of this of this incident. so for example, the death toll was, was downplayed, any reports were but delayed, they were watered down. they were, they were sense at this task, force it the ease, very secret of the new york times reports. and it has a lot of power on the ground. so they ordered this air strike circumventing the u. s. air force command and qatar that was in charge over the whole mission and syria ariel mission at they ordered this air strike. and the

what he talked about is the lead story in the new york times. rge companies have until january 4 to require shots, the new rule applying to companies with 100 or more employees is considered to cover workers who are vaccinated. it lays out details of a plan president biden announced in september invoking emergency powers over workplace safety's -- workplace safety. -- that receive medicare and medicaid funds must ensure that all employees are vaccinated january 4 with no option for testing. the president previously imposed vaccine requirements on federal workers, a group that includes or than 4 million people and companies that have federal contracts. that is a little bit from the new york times. charlotte, north carolina, republican line. what do you want to talk about? caller: i want to talk about how things are going here in the country. we just have different ethnic groups running things, things would be that way. we just have people running everything. this is a diverse country. we need african-americans, chinese, mexican, puerto rican, what

today's "washington journal," we'll talk about the biden administration's economic policy with the "new york times then the aspen institute on that organization's new report on digital misinformation and disinformation.

returns were stolen, did the doj go and the fbi go barging through the doors of journalists at "the new york timesurse they didn't. what the southern district of new york, the department of justice has done to james o'keefe and his fellowey journalists is outrageous and its lawlessness. and i laughed a moment ago and they said in the search warrants the crime was identified as this prison a felony, which is a dusty old law that is a joke that is not enforced anymore. it says you have a duty to notify law enforcement. today that only applies to public officials. first of all, this isn't a federal case. this is a state case. i've diary, for god sakes. why are the feds in this? yes, there are nine federal statutes on theft, they all deal with theft of government property. this isn't government property. second of all, merrick garland's dirty finger prints are all over this because under doj rules, he has to sign off on a warrant or a subpoena for a news organization. third, this is his order four months ago. merrick garland, there's his signature. prohibiting warrants and subpoenas on news organizati

so then on february 12th, "the new york times" the weekend before the senate trial for trump's secondal, "the new york times" retracts the story, says never mind, that's not what happened to him based on anonymous accounts and so oops, and that was the extent of it. but nothing else has been retracted, just that story. >> tucker: in the meantime, his body light and stayed in the u.s. capital. >> yes it did. >> tucker: it implies no disrespect for the officer or his sad death to note that his passing was used as a political weapon by the left. >> it created so many objects right after "the new york times" published that article. so you had a procession of police cars through washington, d.c., silence throughout washington, d.c., as they are carrying his body and then of course he lied in state for two days. he was eulogized by nancy pelosi and chuck schumer. joe biden and jill biden showed up to give up their respects. you can see joe biden walking away shaking his head. he is then transported to another formal ceremony to arlington national cemetery where he's buried. so these are all

that's what the "new york times" did with stalin in the 1930s and castro in the early 1960s. this tradition of lying about the left is nothing new. it has a deep lineage in places like the "new york times." it's spread. it used to be a handful of newsroom is the entire journalistic enterprise. the average american doesn't know what is going on unless they watch fox or listen to talk radio. >> they tell us they care so much more. their intentions wharmatter. -- are what matter. now it's activism. mr. speaker, thank you very much. up next tonight cost of thanksgiving will be higher than of this year thanks to joe-flation. joe biden doesn't want to hear you complain because he left for nantucket. we will discuss. stay with us. qunol is the number one cardiologist recommended form of coq10. qunol has 3 times better absorption than regular coq10. the brand i trust is qunol. - [narrator] modern life, different schedules, different meals, different times. how do you keep everyone happy? with five cooking options, the cuisinart griddler is the ultimate in versatility. it has a full gr

biden's daughter ashley.fo according to o'keefe, within an hour of the first raid last week, "the new york timesached out for comment. how did the times know about the search warrant so quickly? i don't know, it's just one of those many unanswered questions, kind of sounds like that predawn raid on roger stone, fake news cnn cameras just happened to be there at 5:00 in the morning. anyway, here to explain more, first interview, the ceo and founder of project veritas, james o'keefe, along with his attorney. welcome both of you. i think it's important to establish other media -- and i'm not comparing it to other media but other media use undercover cameras and have for many years, even 60 minutes and nbc's "to catch a predator." this is not a new form of journalism.. you acknowledge that. >> well, sean, on saturday morning, i acknowledged that but i woke up to a predawn raid. banging on my door, i went to the door to answer the door and there were ten fbi agents with a battering ram become a white blinding lights, they turned me around, handcuffed me and threw me against the hallway, partially clo

nikole hannah-jones cover civil rights and racial justice for the new york times magazine. reator of the 1619 project for, which she won a pulitzer prize in 2020. and the new book called the 1619 project, a new origin story. nicole, it's great to have you. on congratulations on publication. this has become such a part of the american discourse. i think to a degree that i imagine you didn't necessarily anticipate becoming quite the central axis of the national debate. i wonder if someone comes up to you and says i've heard about it, i've heard about the 1619 project, what is it? what is your summary to someone who may? what is the project? what does it mean? >> thank you for having me on. your absolutely right. i couldn't have predicted any of this. what the 1619 project does is the year 1619's the year that the first africans were sold into the colony of virginia. that marks the beginning of american slavery. what we argue in the project, which commemorated the 400th anniversary of that moment, was that slavery is so foundational to the united states that its legacy can be s

the new york times as identified, the task force 9. they have a lot of leeway. they can sidestep all or circumvent almost any, you know, the normal process by which ash rugs are approved. so they could order an air strike from the ground, cutting out the chain of command, and the people they said to investigate the scene of this bombing were the same. people had ordered it and they came in and they reported that it was all awful by rules of the law because most of those who would be killed had been competence. and that only a small number of civilians had died. they bulldozed the site, they bulldoze the site, all evidence is, is gone. there was no official reprimand. those nobody was, are held accountable for this. it was basically ended there. and what they argued laser death told by the way, was revised from the 50 that the initial shocked officer reported to 60, to 70 to 80. now we're hearing from the pentagon respond in response to the new york times am. and what they're saying is that this was self defense. so bombing a crowd, a crowd of mostly women and ch

the some of the new york times accidentally did the real reporting this past weekend. not sure what happened, but i can tell you, someone's going to lose their job. bruce's, when new york times revealed that the us hidden errors strike that kill dozens of civilians in syria in 2019. but guys in is intentionally kind of a chevron, d 70. they killed 70 n as in pe paul in syria with just a few bombs. but at least our military took full accountability and let everyone know they did it. they, they sent out emails they went on late night, showed like calling in and jimmy kimmel to talk about it. top pentagon brass even did that. other car pool carry. okay. with james gordon, where they sang whole areas off k, about massacre in children. they told merge on the pentagon website like mugs and shirts and stuff. they even a beer co, he's dead, said shari about killing. they'll do this in people in syria country. we shouldn't even have been involved in, but we were because they're outside our central banking system. so therefore our government wants to kill as many people as possib

she's contributed to the new yorker, the "new york times" and many others. and so without further ado please join me in welcoming mike and alexis to the stage. hooks well high. >> hello. kirk's first of all congratulations for this new book. i know all of you have picked up because you are here tonight. but if i can encourage you to overspend i would recommend buying a second copy or getting it from your library

you wrote another piece called the big lie and was about "the new york times" book review. what was that about? >> guest: this wasn't a new story for the insiders on the book publishing world but unfortunately, it is used to most that are consumers of both's on the bestseller list. they've actually claimed that as an editorial product. for a given week it should pretty straightforwardly be the number one duck. number one best-selling book and sometimes it didn't appear at all on the list and that is one of unfortunately many, many examples, increasing numbers of examples in the media irresponsibly in my opinion. >> host: when it comes to conservative books and awards, how were they treated, pulitzer prizes, national book awards, book of the year et cetera flex. >> guest: they are largely ignored and marginalized. it's very rare that you will see a conservative book when any sort of award where there is, you know, editorial discretion and judgment as opposed to simply looking at the sales members or the quality of the work. when i say editorial discretion, i mean, when somebo

it was about the "new york times" book review what was that about this is a story that's not a new story the insiders on the conservative book publishing world. but unfortunately it's news to most people who are just consumers of books. that is that that "new york times" bestseller list is an editorial process. they claim that as an editorial product. the problem i have at that is that is supposed to be simply a data-driven lift and it is not. and so that sold the most copies of sea number when the book, the number one best-selling book did not appear as the number one best-selling book on the "new york times" list. and sometimes did not appear at all onid the list. and that is one of unfortunately many, many examples, increasing numbers of examples of the media irresponsibly in my opinion, distorting the news. >> so margie when it comes to conservative book and award, how are they treated? pulitzer prize is, book of the year, et cetera. >> they are ignored. they are largely ignored. they are marginalized. it is very, very rare you will see a a conservative book when any sort of awardaw

time. host: hers is the chapter where craig claiborne does play a part. how did he affect her trajectory? mayukh sen: he was someone who championed her in the pages of the new yorkimes. he positioned her as america's authority on mexican cooking. he put so much praise on her cookbooks in the new york times. he did the same for another figure in mexican cooking who now reigns supreme in the american mind. some american home cooks 90 familiar with the name diana kennedy. she went to mexico and was so fascinated with the food wave of that country that she started to document them. i think her first cookbook came out in 1972. that was around the time that elena passed away. that allowed kennedy to serve the previous decade. when you look at the story, i think you can see quite clearly how american memory functions. there is usually only room for one figure when it comes to certain cuisine. especially if that cuisine is not part of continental europe. in this case, diana kennedy has the right portion of being that person for mexican cooking. host: this happened after the car crash that killed her husband. it shows her determination. she and her son started a frozen f

look at this tweet from the "new york times": consider the source. i guess, according to the "new york times," that suv just drove itself. the media mal practice doesn't stop there. imagine if m it's the other way around. after a wave of shoplifting by criminals in northern california, members of the media don't want us to use the term looting anymore. look at this headline from an abc 7 article in the bay area: don't believe your lying eyes. it's mostly peaceful shoplifting after all. this is all the natural consequence of the left normalization of criminality and property damage. what is next? calling statue destruction community revitlization? former president trump warned this would happen. removing statues of thomas jefferson happened in new york city this week and statues across america. he said it would not stop. it would go to the founders. he was right. this is fruit from the same poisonous tree and part of them plan to destroy america as we know it and tear down our most sacred institutions and sense of patriotism and sovereignties and tear

holocaust but "new york times" in particular. she has written about how theimes" failed in its coverage of fate of european jews from 1939 to 1942. she asked what was it about prevailing press san stards, and policies and personalities at the times. a damning disclosure, the times judgment, that murder of millions of jews was a relatively unimportant story reverberated among other journalists trying to assess the news. times publisher, intentionally buried news about the holocaust, deep within his paper or ignored it all together, and she writes: appeared on page 5. to the bottom of a column of stories. less research mound found they buried much of what they knew about the holocaust from the american public. and continues to write: a story about that possible bureaucratic snafu appears on front page, the same day last voice from the abyss was relegated to page 4 it goes on and on, it was just not holocaust but also stalin. duranty for 12 years was bureau chief in moscow, he was bureau chief what stalin was reigning and 1932 when stalin ordered extermination o

the "new york times" was a liberal and has been for decades. the problem is liberals didn't have the courage in saying to the radicals we have may agree with you on a lot of these policies but you don't get to destroy individual rights and individual freedoms and freedom of the press and the ability to think broadly. you don't get to destroy that in the name of your agenda but liberals are embarrassed. they have gone along with the woke because they decide the woke have a point which is ie are the beneficiaries systems of power. i did inherit this newspaper, i am privileged so how can i a privileged white person safe to nikole hannah-jones that my standards of individual rights are correct while she's arguing those standards are merely be enshrinement of hierarchy that keeping might vanish in the first place. there is this deep level of guilt. it is linked to white guilt that has pervaded so much of our institutional life and it means there's almost a waiting and ready surrender caucus inside these institutions the woke up taking advantage of. >

even "the new york times" saying how did so much of the media get the steele dossier so wrong? d said hillary's steele dossier was quote garbage. "the new york times" op-ed calls out the media reporting it at fact. for all of trump's many and grave sins he was victim of gigantic slander abetted by the fbi. when we read through the durham indictments, a speaking indictments, road map to the potential future charges a lot of lawyers say it looks like he might be zeroing in on the clinton campaign. what do you think? >> very well might be. there might be an allegation of corruption and conspiracy that they bring forward. look it is not against the law to lie in a political campaign. what i think they should focus their efforts on adam schiff and eric swalwell. adam schiff was the chairman of the intel committee. he would walk into the meetings. would walk out of them. i have classified information. i have seen it first-hand. the evidence is there. that was an absolute total and complete lie. it was misreading, misrepresentation of classified information which is against the law. so

c, on the new york times, the washington post light was every day. and i'm not saying that they are disseminating only fake news. of course, i read the new york times, i read the work, and of course i must be informed. i want to know what you're saying. the problem is that they so correct information. these are correct. sometimes 50 percent of what really crucial to understand an issue. that being the case, you are b like to those media organizations and say for purposes a space and they reply to a criticism like you just made by saying no, the faith can use problem stems from people who defend juliana such well, the fact is that if it was only great news generate big history. i were dealing with fake law because b, u. s. president, department of state ok, downing street burly. they make the law, i think all along. and then they a book principle, which actually are not hard law as if they were. and that leads of course, to a clash when you have a representative of the european union. but who is it with the foreign minister or the president of poland o

the weirdest and most surprising news story of the day. this is a story that michael schmidt broke in the new york times, and when i read this in the new yorkes today, every single word of it was completely new to me. completely out of the blue. it was like a newspaper visiting from another planet. who did what, there's an investigation, a raid, investigation into who for what's got stolen? this was all completely news to me. here's the headline today, in the times, quote, people tied to project very toss scrutinized in theft of diary from biden's daughter. what? you see the sum head there, the fbi carried out search warrants in new york as part of a justice department investigation, into how pages from actually biden's journal came to be published by a right-wing website. the theft of a diary from the daughter of president biden? we here is how michael schmidt in the times, today, explained what happened here. a week and a half before they 2020 election on october 24th, apparently, some random right-wing website published images, publish pictures handwritten pages of what appeared to be the personal diary of prized and biden's daughter, ac

the paper is back pedaling, admitting that it's possible he was never even hit at all. new york times retracted the story. they moved to a different story. khater is seen spraying bear spray into the face of officer bryan sicknick. it was bear spray. it was bear spray that killed officer sicknick. revolver news found the video shows no spray coming out of the container. it's a lie. sure enough, eventually, the media admits that revolver news was right. the dc medical examiners today ruled that capitol hill police officer brian sicknick died of natural causes. officer sicknick died of natural causes. he did not die at the hands of the maga mob. and yet you still see in the mainstream media this reporting that it was a deadly mob. a murderous mob. murderous mob. the murderous mob. deadly january 6th attack on the capitol by a mob of trump supporters. they got the word deadly, from this false reporting on sicknick. it was a blood libel. and again, the national security state was operationalized on the basis of that narrative. just as non existent

"the new york times" reporter that prompted the law school to change its name. >>> thanks for joining us. this is nbc bay area news tonight. i'm raj mathai. we want to start with developing news in the east bay. a beloved politician has died. not just a politician but a guiding light really in the asian-american community across the bay area. she was hit and killed by a car. alameda county supervisor wilma khan was walking her dog when she was struck by a car crossing the street. it happened this morning at shoreline drive and grand street in alameda. our sky ranger was overhead late this afternoon. paramedics rushed khan to highland hospital where she later died. right there is the intersection she was hit by that car. the driver of the car stayed on the scene and is cooperating. it's still unclear what led to the crash. governor newsom releasing this statement. quote, we are deeply saddened by the tragic loss of wilma khan. her decades of service to the community championing health care, affordable housing and support for families touched the lives of many. our thoughts are with her

so that's a real limit for the reporting that if you think about "the new york times" it is a positionnd the place and at theat port authority that is beautiful and very clearly at "the new york times" and that is the ultimate example of the chicago tribune. but my students don't realize now that is historical and you can go in mean that is the chicago tribune. but i think that loss of the symbol and that loss of being a monolith really undermines some degree the organization in places that people see the building disappear and i think there's no news or newspaper anymore. that out of sight outt, of mind. and then in the center of downtown. it is a wrecking ball. and it is a real thing that doesn't send journalists into their communities. you would hope so. because 91 them out and about in the community. that my worry is to get even more. you don't have to go downtown to go into the newsroom. so those people outside of your daily routine that really, i worry about that. because in certain situations those are not used to being. so i would be curious and when you come up t to san franci

a reporter at "the new york times" health and science styles gender and culture among others in the income medical students she focuses nurses and students and a lawyer best new journalist award and then the masters cambridge university joining the conversation tonight joining "the new york times" editorial board 2018 where she covers politics. she also msnbc political analyst to discuss national politics like mayor bill de blasio at the daily news and then the wall street journal. 2011 to 2013 and national features reporter at the daily and was a staff editor at her first job in washington dc and began her career as a writer for the michigan daily at the university of michigan ann arbor. so please welcome emma goldberg to the stage. >> hi everybody. i am lucky enough to be a colleague of emma goldberg and a dear friend. i am so proud she is here at the hometown bookstore to talk about her first book with you life on the line i want to dive right in because she is the star. so bear with me this is my first time moderating anything. so apologies in advance. and so excited for you. can you j

to have the "new york times" call a spade a spade, i'm stunned. but we need to say, now we need to change. we admitted we have a problem. it's not working. we need to change the policies because they are hurting the people we purport to help. steve: what we need to do is change the leadership and the political control of these places. we had a fantastic conversation on the podcast with someone who has been broadcasting to the -- as a conservative latino, the only show on univision that was a conservative commentary show taken off the air explaining how the latino community in california and across the country moving in droves to republican. that's the reality. that's where we should be optimistic. great to see you as always. if you want to see more of the if you want to see more of the possible if you want to see more of the possible i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. watch: serena williams... wonder woman.... serena... wonder

the year 1619 marks -- virginia. from a little about water amy: nikole hannah-jones on her new book "the 1619 project: a new origin story." it is based on the groundbreaking new york times series about legacy of slavery in united states. we will talk about the project -- it symbolized -- all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. a jury in brunswick, georgia, is set to determine the fate of three white men charged with hunting down and murdering 25-year-old black jogger ahmaud arbery. lawyers for the defense made closing arguments monday. a nearly all-white panel of 12 jurors and three alternates is set to hear a rebuttal from prosecutors today before beginning deliberations. defense attorney laura hogue, who represents greg mcmichael, the former police officer, blamed arbery's own actions for his death. and she drew outrage over these comments. >> turning ahmaud arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought ahmaud arbery to satilla shores. in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long dirty toenails. amy: hogue's comment drew audible gasps

the president in the white house who in 2020 the headline in the "new york times" that biden is walkingine line in defunding the police rhetoric. 62% of the american people believe the democrat party is out of touch and doesn't represent them. they pretend to be the party of the people. most people in this country don't know what planet they are living. -- on. people have had it. >> sean: they have the january 6th committee. i have been outspoken about it. what about the peaceful protests that killed dozen of americans and resulted in billion dollars of damages between arson and looting. not a single investigation. all of this video, they are not prosecuting. they only like the one riot that impacted washington. all riots are wrong. they have all of this evidence and they are not arresting anybody. >> well, that will be crime and pun remint. -- punishment. the woke crowd wants crime without punishment. every major city run by blue politicians you will find criminals terrorizing communities. the radical democrats have worked to do several things. . to defund police. to dismantle the pris

news looking at that issue. it's barry white, the former "new york times" correspondent, former new york mag correspondent andrew sullivan who are also asking the questions about what is fair when it comes to accusations of racism and how crt is biden instilled. >> let me ask you about this and tell me if you agree. it seems like an obvious issue and every parent knows it about school and they are the pandemic. real issues about learning loss, real issues about school boards in particular. but there's also an apocalyptic narrative that comes from ride wing media, including fox, that is out of proportion and seems exaggerated. it seems to me, natasha, that both are true but it's redefined. crt is a real thing, academic studying for a living but now the phrase has come to mean something different in our political atmosphere. >> yes, and what's interesting is so many of these debates are old. >> oh? >> they're just rehashed. when i was a local news reporter, some of the most intense stories were school board meetings and they were about busing kids from the city into the suburbs. these are america's issues with rac

you wrote another piece called the big lie and was about "the new york times" book review. was that about? >> guest: this wasn't a new story for the insiders on the book publishing world but unfortunately, it is used to most that are consumers of both's on the bestseller list. they've actually claimed that as an editorial product. for a given week it should pretty straightforwardly be the number one duck. number one best-selling book and sometimes it didn't appear at all on the list and that is one of unfortunately many, many examples, increasing numbers of examples in the media irresponsibly in my opinion. >> host: when it comes to conservative books and awards, how were they treated, pulitzer prizes, national book awards, book of the year et cetera flex. >> guest: they are largely ignored and marginalized. it's very rare that you will see a conservative book when any sort of award where there is, you know, editorial discretion and judgment as opposed to simply looking at the sales members or the quality of the work. when i say editorial discretion, i mean, when somebody c

first published in a special edition of the "new york times" magazine in 2019, it was a sensation. celebrated its message of inclusivity and diversity. the magazine now selling on ebay for $500. hanna jones won the highly esteemed pulitzer prize. but as her star rocketed, controversy followed closely behind. her social media became a magnet for outrage and ire. hanna jones fired back. >> when people try to discredit my work, i felt like i had to be out there doing battle. i regret that, absolutely. >> reporter: in 2020 came her most high-profile detractor of all, the president of the united states. >> the left has warped, distorted, and defiled the american story. there is no better example than "the new york times" totally discredited "1619 project." >> reporter: trump even signed an executive order creating a 1776 commission with the goal of teaching patriotic education. >> frankly, that commission was just doubling up on the education that most of our kids recei receive, which is a fairly whitewashed education that is not really telling us an accurate depiction of our country. >

existent weapons of mass destruction was used to justify violence in the first war on terror. a false new story, published by the new york times, became the pretext for a national crack down. ali alexander organized the january 6th rally. after

the new york times and bloomberg and stanford university, he also published those reports. you can find them online, they're not buying. so it has been the case that they have been supporting surplus . lemme and that today. that's what elections mean. elections don't mean only a serious test of public opinion as what they meant in 2011. they mean are online movements that can be manipulated in social and political sentiment that can be manipulated, manufactured the idea that popularity is something that you can hold in your hand and put in your pocket is a myth. it's something that is curated, it's wipe and, and it's fashioned. and that's what, that's why over the last 24 hours, we can see our social media end of year, a massive, massive uptick in unorganized traffic and things trickling down through civil society and to libya, trying to get traction for civil lamb and trying to push his agenda on to live in people just the iconography alone. i can also just the final asked about what he chose to were. it wasn't one that was the only thing left in his closet had a bit more s

it wasjust i recently announced that the new york times — recently announced that the new york times in _ york times is working on an audio only app in some i york times is working on an audio only app in some kindj york times is working on an i audio only app in some kind of like the — audio only app in some kind of like the room _ audio only app in some kind of like the room podcasts - audio only app in some kind of like the room podcasts playerl like the room podcasts player where — like the room podcasts player where presumably _ like the room podcasts player where presumably they're i like the room podcasts player. where presumably they're going to distribute _ where presumably they're going to distribute their— where presumably they're going to distribute their shows - where presumably they're going to distribute their shows and i to distribute their shows and may— to distribute their shows and may be — to distribute their shows and may be expended _ to distribute their shows and may be expended with - to distribute their shows and i may be expended with exclusives and may— may

castro over throws the government there and he was a communist, and an enemy of the united states even castro thanked "new york timeshelp it received. and modern day, new york times and russia collision, the. pushing a story that we know as a lie from beginning to end, planted by hillary clinton campaign and the dnc, by person ins -- a democrat law firm, one of whose lawyers since been indicted, and another lawyer, has dark money, millions, to influence 2020 campaign and future campaigns, and the obama administration. with fbi and intelligence agents and the lies they used to try to destroy the trump candidacy and presidency. president. >> antisemitic, i say major news platforms in this country are also racist. , the marxist left likes to throw that word around racist. that is someone who loves this country. u.s. military, police officers. the marxist -- they like to call everyone else racism. there is systemic racism. there is not a damn thing you could do about it other than over throw the country, jonathan capehart talking about newly elected soon to be governor of virginia, she is a naturalize american citizen w