yet from the o.c.c. i see no diversity in terms of the number of complaints made based on racial qualifications or background. recently over the last two to three months, i looked at the 10 most wanted list of the city. if you look at the background, you'll see the racial background of the criminals at large today. this isn't to pinpoint anyone's racial background. the facts are well known. the public at large is that looking at the murder rate, that it is african-americans killing african-americans. only 3.5% of the city but 95% of the murder rate. i don't get it. i had an incident here at the o.c.c., filled out a complaint three times in 2010. having an altercation with officer woods who is an african-american. he harassed me. slandered me in front of a caucasian female police officer. i complained and i also did my own interviews. i've been an investigative reporter also for various newspapers for a number of years only the find out that officer woods has multiple complaint against him. he was investig

it is another item that the o.c.c. uses to put an added allegation on any of their investigations and sustain it because maybe it did occur and maybe it didn't. but the real important matter here is whether or not the officer is purposely forgetting or made a mistake or forgot the document the traffic stop. a lot of times when officers address the o.c.c. said i did put the information in the computer and the computer maybe didn't take it because i remember doing it so that is more o a matter for the police department to deal with instead of the o.c.c.. we could certainly cut some of their workload down by moving some of the issues over to the police department where they belong. thank you very much. >>> thank you mr. johnson. my further public comments? >> good evening. commissioners, thank you. chief, sir, congratulations. i'm looking forward to working with you for a long time. everything i have heard from all the officers in the station, nothing but praise. one of the things that you were addressing that seems to be

where do you see the o.c.c.'s role in this and/or the police commission, particularly in the exercise of their 8.10 duties? >> as you said, a commissioner's assigned to the log of all police department activities with regard to the first amendment and since the director of o.c.c. works for the police commission, it seems that it would be a natural chain of command and flow there. commissioner chan: i think so. would you be amenable to amending the draft that would explicitly enable the -- and permit disclosure to the police commission and the o.c.c.? >> anything that makes the order more clear and ex plit and makes people more comfortable. as long as it's within the rules , i'm happy to do it. commissioner chan: do you have any idea what the budget outlays for the department have been with respect to funding or financing the department's participation in the jttf? as a fiscal matter? >> in my first 11 days it's alluded me. but i can find that information out, it's been a little busy. commissioner chan: out of fur

i filed a complaint with the o.c.c. against the san francisco police department. in the complaint i state that over an extended period of time, the san francisco police department has harassed me in an effort me to get me to leave the city of san francisco. i know that was the goal of the harassment because i was told to do so on two different occasions. and the reason why they want me to be gone is that i know the identity of one of the confidential informants in the jackson street gang racketeering case. the case was dismissed by the judge because prosecution refused to reveal the identity of the two confidential informants and felt they could not protect them. i know who one of them is, so that's the basis of the harassment. i know one of the commissioners here was at the department of justice when they tried the case, so i wonder if they're familiar with it. when this all began it was done by plain clothes police officers and i knew i was in over my head so i went to the san francisco police department for help and i was punished for that, really. so i was lef

i have read the 2003 report from o.c.c. to the board of supervisors, which talked about officers who showed up with weapons and threatened the investigating officers. officers who refused to show up. that is why i objected to mediation. one of the terms of mediation is if one of officers doesn't want to show up, your case is closed. that's the end of it. well, that would be a pretty stupid for me to do, to say yeah, if you don't want to come in, i will give up all my further rights. there are things that can be released about this without identifying specific officers. but the citizens of this city have absolutely no option but to simply blindly trust that the seven of you and the others that are sitting in those secret hearings are doing the right thing. i have seen enough of the disagreements between you guys over different things that you say out here in the open that i know there are disagreements. as a result, i don't know whether officers are being disciplined appropriately, just like this. what was the basis of the de

i filed a complaint with the o.c.c. against the san francisco police department. in the complaint i state that over an extended period of time, the san francisco police department has harassed me in an effort me to get me to leave

information only and they also said that the complaint raised matters outside the jurisdiction of the o.c.c. i tried to get clarification -- well, if you read the definition of information only, it says, the evidence proved that the action complained of did not involve a sworn member of the department or -- and this is a big or -- that the action described was so obviously imaginary that their occurrence is not admissible by any competent -- >> if you could wrap it up. >> i need to get an explanation of what they mean by explanation only. also regarding the statement that it raised matters odds the jurisdiction of the o.c.c., one of the investigators told me that one of the cops that i named in the complaint had retired so therefore, they don't have jurisdiction over him. what the other investigator told me was someone else was behind the harassment. i need clarification please. and i would like to note on this report it says my complaint was withdrawn and i never withdrew it. >> thank you, sir. thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> am i go go to get clarification on -- am i go go t

department to deal with instead of the o.c.c.. we could certainly cut some of their workload down by moving some of the issues over to the police department where they belong. thank you very much. >>> thank you mr. johnson. my further public comments? >> good evening. commissioners, thank you. chief, sir, congratulations. i'm looking forward to working with you for a long time. everything i have heard from all the officers in the station, nothing but praise. one of the things that you were addressing that seems to be on everybody's mind is a lack of qualification -- i would like to see something of this written into our rules and regulations holding us to the same standards that you hold the police department to. if the officer cannot -- he should not be out on the street. i concur with you 100%. and as far as lieutenant pera, i have talked with him many times over the past couple of days. i will continue to work with him. i will continue to hunt down our officers and speak to them in person and i will even offer to bring you that

yet from the o.c.c. i see no diversity in terms of the number of complaints made based on racial qualifications or

have a plan that would enable the securing of a security clearance, for example, of the head of the o.c.c. or other complaint personnel in order to do their job in such a case? >> i don't -- it's not my province to pass out security clearances but i can certainly speak with the special agent in charge fp dr. hicks would seek such a clearance. i don't -- commissioner chan: i think what i'm getting at here is we could very well have officers or the o.c.c. between a rock and a hard place where they are -- because of the explicit terms of the m.o.u. and federal statute, in essence prohibited from getting to the bottom of charges in the event a complaint is made about particular officer misconduct while engaged in jttf activities. that isn't a question but i think that would probably need to be flushed out in subsequent drafts of the bureau order. >> i'm trying to think of an instance where the information that they would be sworn to keep private would actually come into play versus their conduct. i think their conduct would be subject to the complaint which would be outside of whatever the pr

the office of comptroller of the currency o.c.c. the fed the f.c.c. and the justice department that's five major regulatory or law enforcement bodies that should have got to do this before the senate had put the justice work i put the justice moore on the very top of that list the s. and p. recently said standard and poor's recently came out with a report and so that there is more of a risk in the market there is more risk in the market today than there was before two thousand and eight you know obviously these guys are partly responsible for the crash of the bad credit ratings and so you know taking s. and poor and p. seriously dangerous thing but it seems that they're right in this case are we headed for another great crash or what some refer to as a double dip well you know i hear varying things about that and you know here i should admit i'm not an economist you know what i'm going to let me rephrase that. are there cure him in olds who crashed the economy by their crimes still committing the same crimes which could crash the economy again. i thin

>> no, the finding by the o.c.c. does not suggest that they were dishonest. >> reporter: well, the actions of 14 undercover officers are now under investigation. that investigation tonight, allen, continues. >> linda yee in san francisco. thank you. >>> one of three people injured in an apartment explosion has died. 35-year-old paul lom from san jose died of those injuries yesterday. ar saturday's explosion destroyed one unit at a complex in livermore. two other people are in critical condition till. the cause of the explosion still being investigated but it is believed to be drug related. >>> it is a problem we have been reporting on for years. now some action by the state of california. how many instances of handycapped abuse they found in one day. >>> already a huge tourist draw. what's behind a new tragedy to sell california wine? >>> do you love fish? if so now is your chance to help them out a little. the rare opportunity for wildlife lovers to join forces with the fish & game. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, >>> save up to $1

the speakers shall address their remark to the commission of the whole and not to individual commissioners or department or o.c.c. personnel. under police commission rules of order during public comment, neither police or o.c.t. personnel nor commissioners are rird to respond to questions presented by the public but may provide a brief response. individual commissioners and police and o.c.c. personnel should refrain from entering debates or discussion with speaker during public comment. public comment is limited to three minutes. >> good evening. how are you? >> commissioners, good evening. once again, my name is emil lauren for the record. i've been a resident of the city and county of san francisco for 41 years. i would like to thank ms. kingsley for the kind letter she sent in response to the letter he sent to in commission to help it get greater attendance. i think that letter is pretty valid in terms of adding, coordinating and bringing more people to these meetings. so i thank you very highly for that letter. the first one i've ever gotten from the commission. secondly, the move -- to move on quickly a cou

the speakers shall address their remark to the commission of the whole and not to individual commissioners or department or o.c.c. personnel. under police commission rules of order during public comment,