albert lake but when the uniformed officers people are were no longer intimidated and able to use the park etc. we had to come up with a tactic when there was no illegal activity but people were still intimidated. we moved that to the panhandle so we're moving that detail around a little bit and it's been effective. our beat officers when i got to the park station we had two beat officers. now we have 8 and they walk or ride bicycles. they're required everyday to pushing pick out one business and talk about to whoever is working at the business. donates not practical to having them go into every business on the beat they wouldn't be able to deal with the bad guys on the street but i get tired of hearing people never see the beat people so they would go in and talk to the merchants everyday. again twice a month in buena vista park our homeless support officers they spend all day clearing out encampments entreshd at buena vista park they take three or four truck loads of folks out. that's been hey with the cooperation of rec and park department, of course, by bus i have to say this i tend to not

because that determines the standards under which the site should be cleaned up the end result is a warehouse or public park, etc. and each one surveys or carries its own standards for clear up. obviously, the highest standards are for residential use and ironically that's the standard that city has petitions the regional water board to do but this is ludicrous and waste taxpayers' money that site will never have residential uses it's not zoned nor that but it's been study to do residential studies. the current estimates are over 10 millions plus to those standards. we believe that you can clean up that site and still have recreational uses regardless of the recreational uses include the gun club but half that cost that's a waste of money and secondly under the planning department uses of environmental review there are two standards there are no alternatives so you couldn't study another alternative and secondly no analysis being done of the significance of the historic right away that's there the club has been there over 80 years and every building in san francisco requires an analysis if it's over a southern a

the amendments to 9 p district they apply to all p zone properties whether or not it's a park or has a police station, etc. those changes apply. it really optional modifies the temporary controls for the p zone it has other go modifications but their clear up it's a lot of moving around of words but at the end of the day it's only single. i'm going to walk you through the scenarios. we have the existing codes what's proposed in the ordinance and what the staff proposed lots a and b. their technical difficulty with the power point presentations you're getting the shorter version. so lot a and b they're both zoned p. currently in the zone lot a is a quarter of a mile within the area. so the to limgsdz are for the adjacent commercial district. if the neighborhood districts prohibits restaurants on the p zone lot. lot b is not within a quarter of a mile so the only controls are the policies in the general plan nothing to limit any huge in the planning code. so the proposed ordinance lot a is one quarter of a mile within the district and the general uses are limited. and tyler limited by the commercial distric

the full employment making all sorts of armaments etc. but after if we can have full employment we can certainly have a freaking schools, parks, hospitals, all of the roads. from a technical reason if you have unemployed people and things that need to be done, you can do that and there's unemployed construction workers and potholes in the road. the above resources are there to do it and it's wasteful to not do it. but then again, there might be other political reasons why these policies are not pursued. it's not a law of nature that we have to have on employment. it's a failure of our institutions and we can do better. >> we are going to switch from one installation to another. you are in a field where just listening to what training you have had in the field is quite extraordinary and better prepared for dealing for about that is almost as bad as the economics profession so affected by people of political or views of which many people don't like to be confused by that fact. so i wonder if you can talk about some of the challenges of dealing with this highly politically charged field and making people understand things in an analytical wa

intervention we can have full etc., but, armaments, after the war, if we can have full employment by making tanks and guns and bombs, we can have it by making schools and parks hospitals, roads. from a technical reason if you have unemployed people and things that need to be done, you can do that. unemployed construction workers. we have potholes in the road, then they can go fix them. to dosources are there it. it's wasteful not to do it. then again, there might be underlying political reasons why these policies aren't pursued. not a law of nature we have to have unemployment. if a failure of our institutions -- it's a failure of our institutions, and we can do better. fromw that i have switched one inspiration to another stephanie, you are in a field where just listening to the training, it's really quite extraordinary. i don't think there is a person better prepared for dealing with it. it's so affected by people who it inolitical views of which people don't like to be confused by the facts. i wonder if you can talk about some of the change -- challenges of dealing with this highly and makingield people understand things in an analytical way. >> i work fo