the plaintiff's witness showed toup the total and fraternizing and the plaintiff arrived and immediatelyation. >> judge mathis: between the twov them mr. #2: absolutely. the aggression she had toward him for whatever reason became my issue. >> judge mathis: what do you mean. >> defendant: she start tod verbally attack me . i told her to shut her mouth in a choice way and she flew across the hotel room and started hitting and scratching and spit you name it. i got up and went to the balcony and she continued to strike me and i grabbed her by the wrist and put her in a bear cut with her back to my chest and took a few steps from the balony and threw us on the bed with my body wet on top of her to subdue her wild flailing around and yelling for the plaintiff's witness to come out of the bathroom and when he did. i left off of her and went to th [ female announcer ] get to pizza pleasing faster than kenny can dodge a question. honey, how'd that test go? [ female announcer ] in just 60 seconds, you've got snack defying, satisfying mmm. totino's pizza rolls. mm-hmm. hmm. [ female announcer ] z

the plaintiff may not be a professional plaintiff. that does not make any difference. the defense has been tried in court. is a civil rights statute. -- it is a civil rights statute. they can be a perfectly legitimate plaintiffs to bring a lawsuit, and there are a number of people who belong to disability organizations that actually, that is what their livelihood is, bringing these lawsuits. the gentleman over here, who was also a lawyer knows of at least one case involving two lawsuits. they started all neighborhoods. the target places like san francisco because this is an old city with old buildings, virtually none of which comply. we only have new construction that would be billed to 1988 compliance standards, usually. whatever kind of business you have, the building part does not enforce ada compliance. you have your architect look at the ada if you are going to make a major revision anyway. is very expensive to do that. the demand letter is a requirment for the state -- is a requirement for the state laws to be brought. for civil rights cases, you are expected to k

the owner? >> judge mathis: why? >> plaintiff> judge mathis: what hold on, sir. i am confused by the things. >> plaintiff: i fired him. >> judge mathis: and that's why they banned you. >> plaintiff: they banned for me for what happened in cedar rapids. >> judge mathis: let's try this one more time. why weren't you able to get the last seven lesssons >> plaintiff: after i got all of jail. i fired them. i had it. >> judge mathis: because you were banned >> plaintiff: i also got banned. >> judge mathis: when did you fired him. >> plaintiff: i fired him after you jail. >> judge mathis: before you were banned you fired him. >> plaintiff: it all happened in the same time. >> judge mathis: ma'am! it did not happened in the same time. at the same time the owner said you are banned and you said you are fired. at the same second. is that what you are telling me. >> plaintiff: no. i am saying what. >> judge mathis: ma'am, your testimony is very consistent >> plaintiff: she didn't let me come back. >> judge mathis: you have changed your stor

really great deal of to the people who work so hard on the doma case and the people who were the plaintiffs in the cases and await us both working together we have this two part victory so we should celebrate both. thank you (clapping) >> we have, you know, we're blessed no san francisco to have amazing leadership. our mayor and former mayor and city attorney and the people in the city attorney's office office and then the leadership in this city on the board of supervisors level per we're going to hear from 3 of our members of the board of supervisors we need to thank them for making san francisco this amazing place to live. ground zero in which so much energy comes and for them to obviously tell us congratulate on this city and statewide and a country you wide vicious. please welcome president chiu (clapping) >> what is great day. (clapping) i am honored to help represent the board of supervisors that included a man who was looking upon us today. at the top of those stairs is a statute a bust of a man named harvey milks (clapping) and harvey milk told us we had to have hope and that hope

process did the appellate court say that because no one had been threatened with arrest that the plaintiffs in the case had no credible fear but i mean is not the hypothetical nature of the possibility of indefinite detention the whole point of the loss in the first place. it's actually a hope on a law suit is that they're not going to give you a warning with where they come take you once they take you it's all done in secret you have no possibility for legal redress and that's the issue and they base the appellant court base their decision on. amnesty international versus clapper case or i was also kind of in that case where they said that we. couldn't show evidence that we were in fact being monitored and surveilled what we now know from the leaks that were provided to the guardian by the courts that were all being monitored and surveilled and all of our information is being stored in perpetuity in supercomputers in places like utah so. you know we're hopeful we've all we will file in a couple weeks and asked the supreme court to take the case to the supreme court does not take a case the

and you should be clear that they don't rule on the law itself they ruled on the standing of the plaintiffs they said that we just. didn't have credibility to bring the case to the court so they sort of ducked the issue of actually dealing with the section ten twenty one of the n.d.a. which i think by any reading news of agree just violation of our most basic constitutional rights to due process did the appellate court say that because no one had been threatened with arrest that the plaintiffs in the case had no credible fear but i mean is not the hypothetical nature of the possibility of indefinite detention the whole point of the last in the first place. it's actually a hope on a law suit is that they're not going to give you a warning or they come to take you once they take you it's all done in secret you have no possibility for legal redress that's the issue and they base the appellant court base their decision on. amnesty international versus clapper case or i was also kind of in that case where they said that we. couldn't show evidence that we were in fact being monitored and serving

. >> judge perez has ruled in favor of the plaintiff. e defendant is ordered to pay $1,040. >> i'm sorry it had to come to this but you didn't follow up on my request and i think i got what i deserved. >> i'm sorry you feel like that because honestly if you followed protocol and the rules laid out clearly in the contract we wouldn't be here. >> later, you know what i am getting a headache because you are yelling. i don't know why you are yelling. >> because i'm upset. >> i'm upset, too. i'm upset, too. for aches and pains trust bufferin, the only non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pain reliever formulated with special buffers so it's gentler to your stomach. you are watching with "justice for all" with judge cristina perez. victoria ra shell is suing alicia siturnus in the amount of $212 for the amount of concert tickets that she says she agreed to pay for. >> all rise. the court is now in session. the honorable judgeristina perez presiding. please be seated. all parties have been sworn in, your honor. >> thank you. >> so, ms. rochelle. you

andxd he was0d:ñjd involved in t >>on# the dui arrest2÷ was the thing for the$<9 plaintiffs tha couldappened because they need to show that aldon smith was out of control on the night/iañ of the party and that premises were out of control on exhibit a in the plaintiff's 7:00 in the morning.í% >> police say the 23-year-old was#rzÑ in the truck by himself not injured. coming up being we'll hear from people in that.$=ñ neighborhood saw smith> i'm disappointed andl1 felt andñ know, soldier through it. >> he's got his head on straight. appens. if everybody went looking through everybody's owopast, y find some stuff on d so, you know, not concerned. it's not a distraction. the media tries toq+h make everything, oh, you know, it's not. coming here, you go to work, you go play the

the plaintiff and another person were shot while smith suffered minor stab wounds. >> time 4:55. surprised to see a little hollywood on the streets for a couple months. looking, about the lives of three gay friends is being filmed in the city. producers and cast say it's important to get the feel of what is happening in san francisco now. they add the best way to do that is to shoot on location instead of a studio. scott wiener helps get be on stereotypes. >> in the show they're living in the mission and lgbt people live throughout san francisco. instead of showing trials of gay people, it's great. >> and also great for the city's economy. the production will bring in $2 million, estimated, while its here. >> coming up next in our 5:00-hour, a string of attacks has drivers in the south bay under information. ten cars had their windows shattered by a mystery attacker. >> and team new zealand, one win away of taking the cup, and how the american team is acting coming up. >> good morning we still have a serious crash on the sonol grade. 24 looks good between walnut creek and oakland

judgement for the plaintiff. >> he is my brother at the end plaintiff lisa abraham dated the defendante has an addiction to strip clubs and he brings the strippers home with him. after the defendant blamed her for robbing his house, he put peanuts in her food knowing she was allergic. christopher jackson says he likes going to strip clubs but denies bringing them home and says he wouldn't have been able to do that anyway because he was living with lisa. he says he never put any type of peanuts in lisa's food and he doesn't owe her for anything. >> judge mathis: what happened? >> it started in 2009, me and chris were together, 2010 we started the relationship. the relationship was good, no problems, everything was great, and then, you know, three or four months later, he wants to go to the strip club with his friends. he has a horrible, horrible problem with strip clubs. >> judge mathis: does he have enough money to go there and make it rain? throwing the money in the air? >> or do youu put your hand in your pocket and stand in the back, and hope the girls don't want tips. >> i just lik

. >> so four hours today by the plaintiff. hours tomorrow by the defendants and then time allotted to the plaintiffs. that's the defense's argue. you heard it. he has been involved in these drugs way before we were involved with mike music, -- michael jackson, and you only need nine of the 12 jurors to agree one way or the other, who hired him, aeg or michael jackson? and then the judge did rule that jackson's mom was financially dependent on michael jackson so she is entitled to money in addition to the children. >> you mentioned nine of 12. the fascinating thing they can pick the amount of the award. so they're looking for like a billion dollars, the jury says, well, aeg was 50% responsible or 10% responsible, they can give them 10% of the award. >> they are going to -- the plaintiff is going to -- they have hired experts talk about he would have lived x amount of years, his income would have been y amount of dollars. i don't know if witness be bills but i wouldn't bed shocked if the plaintiff asked for $1 billion. >> which

clearly, the landlord -- the lease does not stop the plaintiff from suing the landlord. therefore, the attorney for the plaintiff is going to target the person they are getting the money from. it does not let the tenant of the hot. the tenants in their lease is contractually responsible to the landlord. there are ways that can be dealt with between the landlord and the tenant. i have represented landlords. i have represented tenants. at some point, i represented both because they have a common interest even in that. obviously, they both have to make the space accessible either now or later, so it is best that they work together if they can. and work together to save us -- to hire a single lawyer. they can make repairs or what ever is in their agreement. sometimes, when the tenant is the small business and does not have much cash flow, one way to do is to renegotiate the lease, where the cost is amortized over a longer period time. it is another way to spread the payments back to the less financially available person. would you do if you get one of these notices? if you h

you lost your job. >>> and now enter the courtroom of judge mathis. plaintiff mom asking her to pick up her sister because there was a group of girls outside the home taunting her. one of whom was the defendant's sister. talina claims after she rescued her sister the defendant attacked her with a bat so she's suing. defendant jesse lewis says on the day of the incident he pulled up to see what was happening between talina and his sister and talina hit him in the face with a bat and a few days later she vandalized his car. he's suing for the property damage and pain and suffering. >> i'm here today suing the defendant due to the fact of the matter that i really don't know him personally at all up until this incident, we've never seen each other before at all. and i do believe that if this incident didn't occur, we could possibly be friends. long story short, i get a phone call early in the morning around 10:00 in the morning from my stepmother explaining to me to come down the street and pick up my little sister. due to the fact that there's about ten girls in f

for the latest i was joined earlier by the founder of revolution truth and a plaintiff in this ndaa case. i started by asking how effective this measure could be if signed into law at curtailing the indefinite detention powers. >> it is a great question. it is all of these groups coming together and congress is taking it seriously. i think that helps move us down to the end goal a little closer to nullifying the ndaa. it is also full of loopholes. the most significant one was an overreliance on habeas corpus. it is a measure of last resort. somebody could be held a long time before the government actually honors habeas corpus. 10, 20 years. it is kind of meaningless. the suspension of due process, all of our rights. it is good and bad. >> let's move on to the other avenue. asking the supreme court, what are you hoping to hear in response? >> they don't have to. it is a little bit worries some. the judiciary, all the way to the supreme court has tended to deferred to the executives in this endless war on terror. they do not have to take the case. this is what congress decided. we hope the

the plaintiff attorneys got a lot of money out of this. dnfl is insulated, and it it by exploiting the fact that these people are hurting and wanted a quick settlement, and it was threatening six or seven years of litigation. >> it also threatens the "frontline" documentary at the past. >> absolutely. upn has pulled out. we -- espn has pulled out. we will now have to see if it impacts contract. >> the judge did not have to buy it at iop will not. i am with you, throw it out. >> the story is not complete. >> 2-wood be the first ever to stand up to the nfl. >> -- he would be the first person to stand up to the nfl. >> last word. see you next week. ♪ >>> from washington, the mclaughlin group, the american original, for over three decades, the sharpest minds, best sources, hardest talk. >> issue one, labor pains. much of president obama's focus has been on the middle class and quote/unquote, better bargain. in terms of education, living standards and most notably, jobs. president obama chose an amazon.com warehouse as his venue. amazon announce

the plaintiff attorneys got a lot of money out of this. dnfl is insulated, and it it by exploiting the fact that these people are hurting and wanted a quick settlement, and it was threatening six or seven years of litigation. >> it also threatens the "frontline" documentary at the past. >> absolutely. upn has pulled out. we -- espn has pulled out. we will now have to see if it impacts contract. >> the judge did not have to buy it at iop will not. i am with you, throw it out. >> the story is not complete. >> 2-wood be the first ever to stand up to the nfl. >> -- he would be the first person to stand up to the nfl. >> last word. see you next week. ♪ ♪ >> a very warm welcome to the european journal, coming to you from dw studios in brussels. here is what we have for you today. how i controversial blogger -- a controversial blogger. protesting against mining. italy, no more fun on the piazza at night. russia's capit

. >> the dui arrest was the best thing for the plaintiffs that could have ever happened because they that aldon smith was out of control on the night of the party and that the premises were out of control on the night of the party. and exhibit a in the plaintiff's case, is going to be a dui at 7:00 in the morning. >> smith is scheduled to be in court on november 4th. live in san jose i'm cheryl heard, nbc 5 bay area news. >>> the arrest comes as high school football kicks off on this friday. aldon smith and all the talk around the bay area and nbc bay year jeanne is live in san jose where she talked to football fans. >> terry, high school football players say he let his team down and tonight, parents say if he's convicted the league should punish him so young players learn there's a price to pay. friday night high school football hits the field in the bay area. players are talking about san francisco 49er's star aldon smith trip to jail. he was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence and possession of marijuana. >> little disappointing. >> move over. >> reporter: this mi

in this case could you tell us a little bit about the plaintiff and what is the case absolutely thank you peter and it's a pleasure to be on my client is an iraqi woman an iraqi single mother who fled from iraq you know in the aftermath of the war in two thousand five hundred refugees now in jordan where she's supporting her dependents essentially. by herself and what she's alleging in her complaint against six defendants six bush administration officials including george w. bush dick cheney don.

that helps the plaintiffs in this case, the family. that's been established by a court.have to say who's responsible for dr. conrad murray. >> because this is a civil court and we learned from the o.j. simpson trial, another high profile civil cases, the threshold or the bar is very different here. >> yes, it's lower. >> it's just preponderance of the evidence. we hear about proof beyond a reasonable doubt and it's much easier in 51% of the evidence favors the plaintiff and 49% goes to aeg, the plaintiffs can win and the dollar amount can be huge because michael jackson was a high earner, one of heightest earners in the entertainment industry. >> incredible, lisa bloom. we appreciate you back on with us. still ahead on "news nation." >> mr. president -- i'll tell you i would be perfectly happy if not a single story coming out of this never mentioned my name. >> more on senator cruz's background and what led to this all nighter. what about his past? what are the clues that could have led us to really not be surprised by what went down last night. guys, i'm driving. hey, y

court of appeals ruled last year that the plaintiffs a lacked standing to challenge the law for the latest on this fight i was joined earlier by tangerine bolen founder of revolution truth and a plaintiff in this and d.a. case and i started off by asking her how effective this measure in california could be if signed into law curtailing the government's indefinite detention powers. well it's a great question and i have a two part answer the first says it's effective just in that all these groups have come together and congress is taking it seriously so. you know i think about how to move move us down to that and go a little closer to really know looking at the n.b.a. it's also got a full of loopholes and most significantly loophole that i thought was an over reliance on hideous corpus you get programs as a measure of last resort so much can be indefinitely detained and held for a long time before the government actually honors p.b.'s corpus that could be kind fifteen twenty years so it's kind of meaningless and the issue with the n.p.a. is the suspension of due process all of our rights no

i think it's okay. >> the plaintiffs in the case maintain that google is violating the california's privacy acquiring the e- mails, it scans messages received by gmail users and nongmail users who never used the company's terms. they'll be watching this court battle closely. that federal court hearing will happen later in san jose. >>> we have continuing coverage of the "rim" fire burning around yosemite national park. investigators say the fire was not caused by an illegal marijuana proceeding operation. it could take months to determine a cause, however. the fear is now 80% contained. full con tapement expected by september 20th. air quality is starting to improve near yosemite. concerns about air pollution for schools in the yosemite area to cancel classes force a year after children complained of respiratory problems. >> it's been a cabin fever type thing. >> it's kind of fun, sometimes i'm like okay, i wish i was in school right now. >> the "rim" fire is creating concerns about air quality in nevada. some students are being kept inside for recess. >>> a landlord attacked in front of hi

in this case could you tell us a little bit about the plaintiff and what is the case. absolutely thank you peter and it's a pleasure to be on my client is an iraqi woman an iraqi single mother who fled from iraq you know in the aftermath of the war in two thousand five hundred refugees now in jordan where she's supporting her dependents essentially. by herself and what she's alleging in her complaint against six defendants six bush administration officials including george w. bush dick cheney donald rumsfeld connelly's or rice colin powell and paul wolfowitz is that these six defendants planned and waged a war in violation of the nuremberg principle against aggression so she's alleging that the war was planned starting in one thousand nine hundred eighty eight small nonprofit called the project for the new american century which donald rumsfeld dick cheney and paul wolfowitz were members of and that after they planned the war they these people use nine eleven as a cover as an excuse to scare and mislead the american public and the international community to support a w

. >> for the plaintiffs, the fact that this case has even come to trial so long after the end of communism is in itself a triumph. >> for 23 years, there was no political will to resolve this issue. the people who took over power in the 1990's stifled any kind of discussion, and this communist elite carried on in politics even after the 1990's. >> he is referring to people like rudy, once a member of the feared romanian security apparatus. he was also romanian justice minister from 2000 through 2004. he has always dismissed the idea of pushing crimes committed under communism -- punishing crimes committed under communism. >> the statute of limitations has long expired. from a judicial point of view, classifying these cases as genocide will not wash. they were not murders committed on ethnic or religious grounds. this was about political affiliation. >> from a legal standpoint, she may be right. until recently, there was a statute of limitations in cases of murder, meeting the perpetrators could be off the hook. this former prison guard is the only one to speak publicly about his crimes. he

it says in god we trust, that is a religious statement. >> the plaintiffs on the case have argued that this violates the constitution but technically the constitution doesn't mandate that church and state be separate, that wording comes from a thomas jefferson letter. how does this violate the right to practice your religion? >> that argument that the constitution doesn't say separation of church and state, it doesn't say a lot of things. it doesn't say separation of powers but we certainly have a tripartite government. the fact wording is that congress shall make no law establishing religion. if you look at what they were talking about, they were talking about exactly things like this where the government takes a view and advocates for that view. >> of course, the motto, in god we trust, is not just in currency. it is written in the chambers of the house of representatives. why focus just on currency? >> you need standing to bring a case. we don't have standing to challenge what congress does unless it personally affects us. if it personally affects us that says something completely c

the supreme court has not yesterday decided to hear a rerecent case in which the plaintiffs seek to ban the nsa from collecting phone call records. it was prompted by disclosures for nsa leaker edward snowden. >>> we have our first look tonight at one of the new proposals to bring a casino to national harbor. and already the neighbors are upset with the plan. tracee wilkins shows us why. >> what make sense in las vegas does not make sense in your state. we know that. >> and with that in mind, mgm unveiled the proposed casino for national harbor. the entertainment and casino giant says it was inspired by d.c.'s monuments. >> we wanted this architecture to have its own meaning. it will fit on a 1,600-foot long pedestal, opening to evoke the feeling of a grand monument. it will span 1 million and 7 square feet. including the hotel tower, expected to have 400 rooms. >> we know we have to have something that fits in the community. >> that's what it's going to look like. >> wow. we showed some folks at national harbor the plans. and got rar varied reactions. >> it's like a space shift. >> it'