ambassador had to lie about meeting with the plo. i don't tell you that to scare you, i tell you that to excite you. there is a window of opportunity with some of our best growth, potential has swung so far. we look at it putting together and working. that pro-growth agenda, we should not wait until the next election. should run that agenda today and have it put in the debate for whomever becomes the nominee on either side, where we make america grow. >> i think we have time for us to couple of questions. one question? a really good one. >> i have a question, what are your thoughts about education? this country has come down in terms of ranking for quality. clearly, a major issue for us in the decades ahead. having a highly competitive workforce, what are your views on governments role in improving education, how to tackle that issue? kevin mccarthy: i did not make education one of my five because a believe it is a state issue. i would drive it. i have a son who will be a senior at georgetown and a daughter who graduated high school.

or the plo in the west bank. i always thought al qaeda had an inherent weakness with its attack there was no real support there is no support in the arab world either. so i always compared al qaeda ed to the anarchist of the 19th century to me it is the closest parallel to what al qaeda was really it is of a billion not a state the anarchist of the 19th century basically were rebeling against the industrial revolution. and they used assassination and small bombings in europe and the united states to make the point they had and the problem is they never really had a point of al qaeda did not really have a point unless you want to believe it was the global caliphate. but it is such a fantasy world they have lived in that i think it is fair to say they did not have real political strategic aim in anything they we're doing. so in those terms and makes it easier to understand all they were trying to do was prove rocca said and they did a good job of that. that is why i think the response we have had to this is far wor

or the plo in the west bank or whatever. and so i always thought al-qaeda had this inherent weakness in its attacks on the west. there was no real support in the west for what they were doing there is no real support in the arab world for what they're doing either. and so i always compared al-qaeda to the and artists of the 19th century. to me that's the closest parallel in history to what al-qaeda was a -- and august. it's a rebellion against modernism. it's not only are you against a state in any sense. and artists ofe 19th century basically rebelling against the industrial revolution -- and artists. and the used assassination and small bombings in europe and united states to make whatever point they had and the problem was they did not have a what they were doing. al-qaeda didn't really have a point. unless you want to believe that they want a global caliphate. but it's such a fantasy world that they have lived in that they didn't, i think it's fair to say they didn't have a real political strategic aim in anything that t

to lower seven is impossible to conceive the coast in the upper 50s to 60 today the south of and the plo santa clara and lost battles san jose getting a high of 78 degrees today triple digit heat for thursday also for friday as well. rebecca: you'll see about a 15 minute drive times as you make your way into downtown san francisco traffic backed up into the macarthur maze still in is a lot of cars getting into san francisco this morning san mateo bridge also much busier was about 92 from 880 in hayward wrecking a way to foster city that is not a 17 minute drive times it is increased by a couple of minutes definitely some action type if you're heading up the door this morning and about to take the stand headed over to the golden gate bridge that is a problem for all morning long five minutes from sausalito down to the south in a span on top 1 01 richmond san rafael bridge bridge is getting a little bit busy at the toll the the drive time from into and is still about seven minutes checking the east of a commute across the livermore valley your at about 39 minutes now westbound 580 getting

or the plo in the west bank or whatever.so i always thought al qaeda have this inherent weakness in its attacks on the west. there was no real support in the west. there is no real support in the arab world. and so i always compare al qaeda to the anarchists in the 19th century. to me that's the closest parallel industry to what al qaeda was. al qaeda is really a rebellion against modernism. it's not a rebellion against the state. the anarchists of the 19th century basically were rebelling against the industrial revolution. and they used assassination and small bombings in europe and the united states to make whatever point they had been their problem was they didn't really have a point. al qaeda didn't really have a point and unless you want to believe that they wanted global caliphate but it's such a fantasy world that they have lived in that i think it's fair to say they didn't have a real political strategic aim and anything that they were doing. and so i think to look at it in those terms it makes it easier to understan

maintaining our loyalty to a foreign policy that is based on a lie that is based on the lie that the plo hamas, the arab world as a partner in peace and that there is a peace process today. that is a lie. the palestinians are not partners. the plo was not a partner. mahmoud abbas is not a moderate and you know this. we are in complete agreement. this man has never accepted any compromise with israel, has never agreed to any compromise and will never agree to any compromise. he is not a partner in peace and yet the entire two state solution is based upon the notion we have a peace process is based upon the lie we have a partner. as a result, our foreign policy is based on the line. what is the basic assumption? it is the assumption of israeli guilt and culpability for the absence of peace. that is the basis that the two state solution. you can't peace if you give up land. you will get peace so long as you hold onto it. it is your fault. you are greedy jews. you walk. you won't get afterwards someone. until you do you won't get peace and tell you deeply will continue to blame you and conti

it is based on a lie that the plo, hamas, and the arab world is a partner in peace, and that there is a peace process. that is a lie. the palestinians are not partners. the plo is not a partner in peace. you know this. we are in agreement, complete agreement. this man has never accepted any compromise with israel. we will never agree to any compromise. he is not a partner in peace. and yet, the entire two state solution for a policy is based on the lie that he is. the whole notion that we have a peace process is based on the vibe that we have a partner. we have no partner. as a result, our foreign policy is based on a lie. what is the basic assumption of islam? it is the assumption of israeli guilt. that is the basis of the two state solution. you get peace if you give up land. you will not get peace as long as you hold onto it. it is your fault. you are greedy jews. he will not give up jerusalem. and until you do, you will not get police -- peace. we will continue to blame you that you did not abrogate property rights, you do not abrogate civil rights. it is all your fault. the reaso

that is based on a lie that the plo, that hamas that the arab world is a partner in peace and that there is a peace process today. that is a lie. the palestinians are not partners. the plo is not a partner in peace. abbas is not a moderate. you know this. you have -- >> we're in agreement. >> we're in agreement, complete agreement. this man has never accepted any compromise with israel. has never agreed to any compromise and will never agree to any compromise. he is not a partner in peace. and yet the entire two state solution formula for policy making is based upon the lie that he is. the whole notion that we have a peace process is based upon the lie that we have a partner. we have no partner. and as a result, our foreign policy is based on the lie. now, what is the basic assumption of this lie? it is the assumption of israeli guilt. it is the assumption of israeli culpability for the absence of peace. that is the basis of the two state solution. land for peace. you get peace if you give up land. you won't get peace so long as you hold on to it. it's your fault. you're greedy jews. >>

and beyond elsewhere we are maintaining our loyalty to a foreign-policy's is based on a lie that the plo, hamas the arab world is a partner there is a piece process today. that is a lie. my mood of us is not a moderate. and you know this. we are in agreement, complete agreement. this man has never accepted any compromise with israel, israel, has never agreed to any compromise and will never agree to any compromise. he is not a partner in peace, and yet the entire two state solution formula for policymaking is based upon the lie that he is. the whole notion that we have a piece process is based upon the life that we have a partner. we we have no partner. as a result, foreign-policy is based on life. it's israeli culpability for the absence of piece. you get peace if you give up land. it's your fault. until you do you don't get peace and we will continue to blame you, continue to say that you didn't freeze jewish property rights, uterine aggregate rights uterine aggregate jewish property rights, you didn't area jewish civil rights and did not let palestinian murderers at a prison. it's it'

and it's not by accident that a year after the war ended, in 1968, the plo under yasser arafat emerges as this powerful force in the arab world. and we've been living with that, as well. the '67 war was also -- also inaugurated the strategic relationship between the united states and israel. people forget that israel fought the '67 war not with american arms but with french weaponry. france was israel's principal ally before that. before 1967, only one israeli prime minister one time for one hour had visited the white house, and it wasn't israel's founder, david ben gurion. it was levi eshkol -- one time june, 1964. today ariel sharon or any israeli prime minister comes to washington, it's obvious that he's going to march right into the white house. that began -- that very, very close relationship, that cooperation, began in the aftermath of 1967, not before that. c-span: as you acknowledge, one more book on the six-day war - there have been a lot of them. >> guest: yes. c-span: what do you have new? what kind of things do you have... >> guest: well, if you look at my bibliography, you

in an hies get into low to mid '80s everyone else should fall just short of that by the bay where the plo overview of the entire forecast for today temperatures as i said in the low to mid 50 for most of the bank. >>james: a couple of exceptions, but the 60 degree mark in santa rosa the have dense fog and all the talk about that more and a complete check of the weather coming up a 545 was set to the traffic center. >>robin winston: the last time i checked in on this it was delayed free and now we have a backup that is growing by the minute the lights are still off in the currency is stretches under the 880 of a crossing in said slowly pushing out for the west brand now we have heavy traffic approaching the pecos instead of ride on the bridge into downtown san francisco better news for those of you that have to travel combination of traffic alerts on 780 east of second street the multicar crash and had both lanes blocked you only have two lines there traffic is up one. getting by on the shoulder you're looking good between 680 and a slow traffic come through the out to month and a slot on

i mean we did it with the ira back when the plo was becoming more politicized. neil: well, that was a clear swap. >> it was a direct swap. neil: how is that semantically different from what the administration is out lining today that the government don't do this, but they're got an punish individuals or families that do. >> well, it is exactly what you said. it is confusing because we have dob it in the past. it's not been a case where we've held to this consistently. , and i think the government contributing factor a policy in this respect, but may find themselves where there's exceptions, overriding exceptions. all policies have exceptions to it, and anything that is hard and fast, i think we're going to find ourselves trapped by a policy that can't be adhered to in every situation. neil: you know what i worry about, general, is that any u.s. citizen traveling abroad, not just in the middle east, not in just dangerous areas, like, syria or libya or iraq could be fair game here. the dirty little secret on isis is it gets a lot of money from ransom. second only t

after the revolution, they took the israeli embassy and they gave it to the plo. iranians believe that we as a country favor the jewish state over the muslim state. therefore, muslim states, we are anti-islamic. there are arguments against that. jerrold green: this is what iranians believe that we do not like muslims. a guy was murdered because someone thought he was a muslim. we are trying to strangle iran economically. we have reasons -- iran is indeed strangled. economic sanctions have worked. the iranians were strangled. they regard as an emotional type of strangling rather than one that resulted in geopolitics. if the u.s. is trying to expel it, isolate iran, we are. there is a reason for it. iranians believe that iran is a great nation, an ancient nation with global interest. they deeply resent what they think we are trying to do. this is all they knew. there are things about them that they don't like and so forth. it is certainly not going to change. they have their narrative. we have hours. -- ours. what is ours? they took over our embassy. we have all seen

in the midst we were talking about t n d c and the violence i've been here for a willie awhile but i'll share a good police story i do karaoke i saw a plo policeman and in the song that is called loving you is wrong i don't want to be right. >> right. >> that's my first acceptance of a police besides military was it the military but it was a policeman in 1970 to the idea he give me and my sister it was a father that made me appreciate policemen i know who you are and where your service and what i responsibility to the world and the community so i definitely want to nominate the president who is here and the vice president as the commissioners and vice chair of the san francisco police commission thank you and i even met the guy in oakland that is in baltimore i met him in oakland that officer so i get around. >> thank you jew i didn't so any other public comment public comment is closed. so let's go to the first motion by sandra let's take a vote inspector monroe. >> the first nominated by commissioner president loftus and second by commissioner dejesus a roll call vote commissioner turman commissioner marshall commissioner dejesus comm

the combined come would be worth her than dollars 30 billion with total of 6500 stores and nearly 370 am em plo yachts in the sups and europe. they have been known for low prices but not high wall ty. industry analysts say by merging the two companies they hold to build the best of both worlds. i think it is fret idea. lower price would be good for everybody. >> i am concerned the quality will continue to go down because food is a lower qualitier to. the two companies propose the merger says bigger well be better. grocery store chains say it is harder to negotiate the prices from suppliers no they have to compete against walmart and big bulk stores like costco. >> if you can go like once a week or so, you can get look a lot of things for the-ny we pay. >> you like bulk. >> yeah. >> rebecca cooper, abc 7 new. >> americans eating more food than ever before and letting more food if to waste am they foon the average american throws away each year. wasted food is the season gel biggest item in landfills where they predus a green house gas. the survey fines more people are were up set the money loss

plo skril x. sound more familiar? no. okay, but they are together. they are called jack u. take you there, they enlisted kisa for themusic video incorporates stunning effects. chris connelly has more ♪ tell me now that i need you ♪ >> it's a most anticipated video debut. featuring bieber on the sort of soulful vocal that first made him a star. ♪ where are you now? a remix from producers deejay supreme diplo and skrilx joining sonic forces under the name jack u. >> i gave you the shirt off my back what you saying to keep you warm ♪ >> the visuals are intertwined in a spectacular array of hand drawn elements from scores of contributors. >> done in the background so actually taken each frame and giving them to an artist and they're all doing their painting. >> art gallery and from there, we took all of the frames from the video and invited different artists, fans, whoever wanted to come and draw on the different frames. >> collaborating with brotherly directing duo alex and ben called brewer. the result a multimedia barrage that perhaps seeks to vault bieber past his bad boy behavior and into a recording artist of grea

the phone records. i have this achievement. i did this by myself. there is no doubt he is using this to help his campaign. he is saying look what i have done donating plothinks young people will like this his dad's old libertarian wing likes this give us numbers in a minute. how much does it help versus how much it hurts if you get into the tradition of the republican party. here is marco rubio, allowing any of these programs to exspire is a mistake. that is what is hang at a consequence of here's where it gets interesting of the reckless spreading of political posturing. our country is now poised to be less safe. americans have greater risks. marco rubio is saying rand paul is grossly exaggerating what these people do. >> his chief goal is to revise that libertarian network to lift him in the iowa caucuses. he knows in a crowded field, he has to find some way to get momentum. he has been struggling to to do so. at the same time the iowa hawks, the conservatives are wary of paul's stand, they the party seems to be turning towards the right. >> number one the president wants the policy. he thinks he needs his policy. they understand you have this drama

or the plo in the west bank or whatever. and so i always thought al-qaeda had this inherent weakness in its attacks on the west. there was no real support in the west for what they were doing there is no real support in the arab world for what they're doing either. and so i always compared al-qaeda to the and artists of the 19th century. to me that's the closest parallel in history to what al-qaeda was a -- and august. it's a rebellion against modernism. it's not only are you against a state in any sense. and artists ofe 19th century basically rebelling against the industrial revolution -- and artists.