while the ports days as the dominant cargo port in the days of mega-container ships and 500-acre container terminals -- we have given way to that activity. we leave california with a number of passengers being transported across our docks either by excursion or cruise ship. we owned the largest commercial tried loading dock dedicated to ship repair and are home to a number of the region's harbor services, including the san francisco bar private, a tug and barge and they built the maritime. -- and delta maritime. the new draft policy includes seven points. note that three of the points have been revised from the original draft. 0.2 has been amended to remove the requirement the vessels leave at least once per week, and instead states they must be deemed sir worthy -- seaworthy. also 0.3 add wording on seeking alternative sources of financing for needed improvements, including linkages to non-maritime generating rigid revenue-generating development. 0.5 contemplated the creation of an industry preservation fund. this has been changed in favor of the goal of 50% of operating revenue being ded

those lands could be sold by the port. they could be leased to private owners and they could be used for any purpose presidential, commercial, office, thing that you are typically prohibited from doing on trust land. the green is maintain the existing ship facility, series of waterfront parks, along with a couple of key street access ways that allows the public to get to the waterfront under this proposal, the trust actually comes out ahead in terms of acreage. i just wanted to point out one other aspect of the bill that makes ab 418 important. there are some major historic buildings close to this site. normally, buildings on trust lands are subject to the same use restrictions as other trust lands. so the state has been a bit more flexible. those buildings are pre- existing, and they do not want the space to go to waste, but they are still reluctant to allow uses other than trust uses, even though the cost of restoring those buildings are often astronomical. what we have done here, the red buildings are the historic buildi

i am the port project director of the cruise project. what a great project following jim's presentation. this is a true maritime project and a good one for the fourth. in june of this year the port commission authorized stock to word the construction manager general contractor contract to turner construction company with the direction that the contract not commit the port commission to approval of the project or grant any entitlements. since that time, turner has made recommendations on construct ability, verify the phase one cost estimate and developed a detailed phase one construction schedule. i am pleased to advise the project is tracking well to the project budget of a phase one -- of phase one, which is torn -- shown in the memorandum. just to refresh your memory, we are looking at the project in two phases. the first phase is subject to completion and certification of the final eir for the cruise project and approval of the project by the city. in that case the event authority would demolish pier 27, the entire said, which is show

special projects manager for the port. dianne is passing out to you some maps of pier 70, which will be used in the presentation. just bear with me while i get this launched. i am here representing the port team that has been working on pure 70 for many years, the master planning process. many others in the planning development group. there was a key component of the master plan that looked at realigning the public trust designation at pir 70 in a way that will help promote the master plan. the core of the master plan is to have revenue-generating uses on the waterfront development site. commission has awarded an exclusive negotiating rights to the force city development team for that right. that will be the economic engine to save a lot of historic buildings, build the parks, do the other thing that we all hope peer 70 can be. assemblymember ammiano has come to the port's aid again this year. he has offered ab418, and today's presentation goes over how this will facilitate the trust exchange and also how we can facilitate

my thanks to the port staff who have been working night and day to accommodate the ships and for many years to market our great port. my congratulations to the team on the success of the shore power system. many thanks to everyone. bad as it. -- that is it. >> thank you. i am the general manager from bae shipyard in san francisco. quick comment and credit where credit is due. we did win the henry j. kaiser military sale of command tanker. it is 50,000 man hours and about 150 men are going to be working it. it comes in the art monday next week. what she did not mention is that contract could not have been awarded had we not completed central base and -- central basin dredging. one of the big issues that we had with military sale of command was we did not have the draft to bring the ships in. we completed central basin dredging september 1 and literally, military seal of command one of the final draft before they could award the contract. a lot of hard work went in to getting central basin dredging done, and i got to thank the port for efforts and support in making that happen. the exec

the port conducted seven meetings and three public workshops. the cause of design was reviewed at joint meetings by bcdc review board and the port's waterfront advisory committee three times. the design was concluded on december 9, 2002, andaugust 12,t commission approved the concept design. the concept design was again reviewed on july 6 and september 14, 2009, becoming the basis for the project described in the environmental analysis, located in the south beach waterfront. this is an image of the original concept design that was put forward in 2002. the wharf will be a new open space, connected to the prominent on the south edge of 32. an area that is currently characterized by dilapidated and failing whorf sections. the new war will have a light shade, adding a 10. section in widening to about 140 feet at the south and the pier 36. the major project components are too rigid include a major neighborhood green. think of it as a new waterfront commons for the south beach area. two, afloat for small craft. third, interpretive elements that interac

the port is working with the districts and the epa.

the port is working with the districts and the epa. the appropriate mitigation jedd be reviewed in the eir document. we can also continue the elevator and escalator, $800,000, and other construction costs, $5.67 million. we would need to pursue a structural steel and other preparation of other packages. let me just explain why we need to pursue structural steel now. the total cost of that is $6 million. if the america's cup project is approved, we have an extremely compressed schedule to deliver the project in time for the event. in order to meet the timing in the agreement, we need to begin the process for purchase of the steel, fabrication, and installation of the early work related to the still packages and other packages is about $3 million. this would take place prior to the ceqa decision, which we would anticipate in february. the port commission discussed this yesterday, the city may disapprove the america's cup event or the cruise terminal above project. we had to place the order now prior to project approval, and we know that

in the port share proceeds from sale of the watermark condominiums. the availability and use of the watermark condominium proceeds are subject to the release of 17,000,700 $900,635 reserve by the board of supervisors' budget and finance committee. it is anticipated the item will be heard by the board finance committee. in conclusion, for staff request for commission of an approval to the construction manager, general contractor contract, with turner construction company to provide funding for the subcontractor bid package for structural steel subject to city certification of the final eir, approval undersea sequa. >> so moved. >> second. >>commissioner woo ho: when you mentioned under option 2, how much money would be expended? you mentioned you could cancel at so -- as some point, but how much money would have been invested? to go i do not have the table, but i think the last part would be installation, which i believe was $2.7 million. the first part of the shop drawings, which is basically engineering time of 225,000. after that the steel would be

the port of san francisco is asking for release of the reserve are in the amount of $17,907,635. by way of background, these were originally appropriated in 2003 by ordinance, which acted as a supplemental appropriation with the intended use being the wharf project and the cruise terminal project. the source of funds are from the sale of seawell lot 330 and deferred land sale proceeds from the water mark. since that time in 2003, the land lease proposal for the mixed use cruise terminal project is no longer being pursued, and a blue ribbon crewuise terminal proposed pier 27. as you know, the america's cup event is a link to this pier 27 at project, and those projects are under environmental review. if approved, the cruise terminal building will be used as a special event for the america's cup for races, a team basis, and the pier will be the starting an end point of the match. this relationship requires a two-phased project. phase one is estimated to begin march 1 through january 2013. the development of the shell. phase two will be done after the event for interior improvements,

why did the port direct offenses on the north side to limit public access as well? another question i have is why the port has done absolutely nothing about safety problems in a timely matter. most of it is easy to fix. the original report came out on august 16, 2011. town hall meetings took place september 11. notice of repairs came out on to the 212011 but the report patrician started to install on a september 26. why did it take 40 days, media attention? those immediate problems needed to be addressed. my question is, are we tenants on the waterfront a casualty of the legal problem that the port has? those are the questions that come up when i speak to petitioners' spirit it would be nice to have those questions answered. >> thank you. is there any other public comment? ok, no more public comment. can i have a motion to adjourn? >> motion to adjourn. >> second. >> all in favor? aye. meeting adjourned at 4:26 p.m. there is really, only one boy... one girl... one tree... one forest... one deep, dancing ocean... one mountain calling... one handful of sand through ou

we're willing to take care of all of the concerns of the port, thank you very much. president chiu: thank you. next speaker. >> hello, i have been conducting marine-related business in pier 38 for well over a decade. also, i live in the neighborhood, so i'm pretty much around this area all the time. the pier 38 has been functioning very well and i happen to notice that a lot of people that are speaking here today used a lot of words like revenue and jobs. and when we are going to close a perfectly well functioning pier for repairs that need to be made, and turn it into pier 36. i'm not sure who is familiar with. there is no doubt in my mind that they're going to create number pir 36 which is fenced off, rundown building attracting drug users and so on. it's my neighborhood and also i'm one of the tenants. i am being evicted. i'm not the biggest revenue generator in the pier 38. however, it's mind boggling that we can get a man on the moon and we can bring back "apollo 13" and save lives when we need to, but we cannot fix a pier that generates perfectly good revenue an

the san francisco bay qualifies as a highest risk status as a port. the three different fiscal year grants for a total of $237,000, the 2008 grant is for $7.9 million, and the 2010 grant is approximately $650,000. it is good news in the current economic climate. there are no matching funds required by the department for any of these projects. the largest project is in the 2008 fiscal year both in scope and financial size, a new type to fireboat. currently, there are two fireboats and they're both over 15 years old. this would allow the department to purchase a new fire boat. the department is not actually receiving the money from. a fiduciary agent has been set up and we will be working with them for reimbursement. the department is very excited about these upcoming projects, more so in light of america's cup coming to san francisco. we request you move these to the full board for approval. on the fourth item, an additional grant from, a resolution to have the department approved a grant for the purchase of installation of several wash extractors for t

apartment building construction, recreation and parks department, the san francisco public libraries, the port of san francisco, there is also one member of the public that is part of our task force. i look forward to successful adoption of this policy. we will continue to work with all departments to continually improve our building environment. i would be glad to entertain any questions you might have. supervisor mar: if a project is below 5000 square feet like a clubhouse being renovated in the parks department, you utilize maximum leed strategies but it may not be bold. >> that is well put. we're trying to keep from greeting to the different clauses of construction. certification is an important and strenuous exercise, but we're not putting a requirement on our smaller projects. we do expect them to select the leed strategies appropriate for the projects and carry them through design and construction. actual certification would not be required for less than 5000 square feet. supervisor mar: thank you. ms. parton, did you want to wrap up? >> i neglected to thank the department for working c

the contract was awarded by the port commission in july of this year. that is one of the first major construction projects that included the 20% local requirements. we are in the pre-construction phase right now. in addition to the construction contract, i want to mention the design is being done by san francisco-based firms. and they also have a contract for all of that a and these services. they are working with sap on that as well they have doubled participation on that contract. it is up 45%, one of the highest on the construction side we have roughly $60 million. if we were to use a percentage of what we expect to go towards materials and supplies and labor, we would estimate in this contract 60% of those

they think the port is just fine, but the port of san francisco thinks differently, and red tagged the building, saying it's unsafe. saying the problems at pier 38 are so serious, the 20 or so businesses here must move out this month, officials would not go on camera, but tell ktvu, there are serious electrical, and plumbing issues, and that city inspectors found fire code violations. he's been running a boat repair shop here for about 12 years. >> i ask, does it mean we can't go to our office? they said we don't know. >> reporter: they trying to find them new locations. chris is working with an agent to find a place for his software company and 15 employees. >> it's not going to happen before october 1. that terrifies me, i need to keep my business going. >> reporter: tenants say the pier has passed previous inspections and is no no worse shape than other piers. rob works with dog patch labs, representing about 40 companies. >> it's strange for all of these spaces to be red tagsed when there hasn't been concern with structure in the past. >> i saw the report, it seems to me, repairs c