look at the post election united states. he women's march which was large was organized starting with a facebook post to a million people in the streets in a couple months. of course the organizers did a lot of work. here's the butt, there's a misleading sense of this empowerment. it's not that it doesn't empower in some ways. change the conversation. get around censorship. technology can really help do this. to understand that's why my book also introduces some weaknesses. there are weaknesses to doing things this fast, i mean, think about climbing mount everest. a lot of people want to climb out everest because it's in their list of things they would like to do and there's an industry to help you mount everest. for local mountaineer people they know how to climb out at first and they will carry your stuff for you. they will care your backpack, extraction. about 8000 feet, thin areas dangerous, so they will are oxygen. so you are empowered to climb mount everest, but the problem is you haven't really had the time to learn ho

you can, look at the post-election united states, right? the women's march, which wases a really large march, was organized starting with a facebook post. you know, it went from facebook post to a million people in the streets, a couple months. of course, the organizers did a lot of work. but, and here's the but, there's a misleading sense to this empowerment. it's not that it doesn't empower in some ways. change the conversation, get around censorship, organize a large march, right? technology can really help, social media can really help do this. but to understand what it, that that's why my book title is also the fragilities, it introduces some weaknesses. let me put it this way, there are weaknesses to doing things this fast. and, i mean, think about climbing mount everest, right? a lot of people want to climb mount everest because it's in their list of things they would like to do. and there's an industry that helps you climb mount everest. there are sherpas who are local mountaineer people. they know how to climb mount everest, and the

posting this video? >> jesse: jon stewart made fun of republicans for years and cnn kissed his. >> juan: the president of the united states post this video. you have the special electionidate who -- >> dana: what you're saying is that cnn should basically have taken it seriously. but in order to take it seriously because to play the game and the new modern presidential, you have to flip around. keep it funny and make that person on their heels trying to claim something. if the president says he actually wants to talk about policy and he's frustrated that the media won't cover it, yes he's giving them things to do, but turnaround time and make him answer the following questions. >> juan: if they took it seriously, they don't like being the target of that kind of -- >> dana: we work at fox news. and we are no stranger of being -- >> kimberly: imagine if we did that and behave like that. everyone takes shots at us all day long. guess what, fantastic. cnn stepping on the throw and the neck of the first amendment. >> juan: i did not see present obama throwing us on the ground. >> dana: that he wasn't trying to be funny about it. >> kimberly: he was throwing shade at us lef

the pond. this is my first opportunity to visit the united states after our recent election. let me reassure you that post election, the government remains strong and we remain committed to delivering stronger defense. who have taken a look at britain in the past few months, after an unpredictable election, not sure if there is another kind of election these days. we have looked at the negotiations over exit, seeing the series of appalling terrorist incidents in manchester and london, and wondered whether written is getting distracted -- britain is getting distracted from our international rub. that would not be the first time critics have been wrong. i remember that first visitors defense secretary back in 2015. that was before, rather than after, the general election of that year. yet, some of the concerns expressed were all-too-familiar. they said we were not committed to the 2%. noted parliament's refusal to endorse strikes against assad chemical weapons. they said we would not be committing to two aircraft carriers. they said we would not act in the face of trouble. so it is worth reminding ourselves

the pond. this is my first opportunity to visit the united states officer our recent election, and let me reassure you that post election, government remains strong and we remain committed to delivering stronger defense. now there are some who have taken a look at britain in the past few months after an unpredictable election, and i am not sure there's another kind of election these days, have looked at the negotiations over brexit and have seen the series of appalling terrorists incidents in manchester and london, and have wondered whether britain is getting distracted in any way from our international row, and that would not be the first time. critics have been wrong. i remember that first visitors defense secretary back in 2015. that was before rather than after the general election of that year, yet some of the concerns expressed were all too familiar. they said we weren't committed to the 2%. they noted parliament's refuse annual to endorse strikes against assad's chemical weapons. they said we wouldn't be committing to two aircraft carriers. they said we wouldn't act in the face of trouble. so it's worth

the name to remember. >>> i remember when barack obama was elected president of the united states. it was said we were entering a post and many of us knew that was fantasy even before trehp von martin and murgson made it clear, many of us understood we had achieved something that was tremendous. but racism had not ended. we heard this week michelle obama talk about while she was fist lady, she still had to deal with the problems of racem, and how people would never see her any differently or see her in a way they saw the first lady because of the color of her skin. i thought it was important she brought that out so that we don't think we've come further than we have, not to condemn people but to challenge them that we must still go forward. and when michelle obama with all of her popularity says there are still people who won't see me for what i am because of my skin color, it brings an issue back in front of this nation that we need to deal with that has even been prevalent while a woman of color lived in the white house as the first lady. that's why some of us will continue to move. that's why we're having 1,000 mi

the terminally ill baby charlie gard. donald trump bee son—in—law and senior adviserjared kushner denies colluding with russia during the election campaign. liam fox begins post—brexit trade deal talks with the united statesingboard to advance the women's game around the world. the team coach says the sport is now getting the respect it deserves. london want to hold the world's para athletics again after the event ended yesterday. they hope to host the event in 2019. benjamin mendy has become the world's most expensive defender. manchester city have confirmed his tra nsfer manchester city have confirmed his transfer from monaco at £52 million. i will be back in a moment for a full update. see you then. in the weeks since iraqi forces recaptured of mosul from the self—styled islamic state, a grim picture has emerged of life under the militant group. much of the city has been reduced to rubble, and the civilian population has spoken of atrocities carried out on a daily basis. it's a small town about thirty kilometres to the south of the centre of mosul, and stands on the western bank of the tigris river. it was the scene of a massacre of civilians at the hands of islamic state as iraqi forces were fighting

every time he put out a blog post about donald trump, every republican in the united states whose in electiveffice down the county commissioner had to be called out. what do you think of david duke? has anyone asked chuck schumer about the sky? >> tucker: i don't remember do give her threatening violence, physical violence against barack obama. >> no. what would happen, if a republican state rep to matter how obscure her head said something like this about barack obama? his political career would be over. there is a guy in the northern part of maine, he was a state republican a couple years ago, he made some bad comments about barack obama when he was to president, and that was a major story and all of the main newspapers for weeks. they tried to strip him of his committee assignments, they tried to get them to resign from the legislator. now again, the silence is deafening. >> tucker: this guy is threatening violence, it says a lot about the wackos. thanks a lot for joining. >> thank you, thanks tucker. >> tucker: good to see you tonight. the proud author of three books, or is she? we'll tel

anmb the jesse: on november 9th 2016 baffle post dollars and academics and members of thehe mainstream media both thede reality that donald trump had oe been elected president of the united states. many of his votes coming from white working-class americans a phenomenon so foreign to liberals that last week democrats appointed illinois congressman sherry as the chair of quote heartland engagement and effort to help the left connect voters of middle america. now, a professor is proposing a new college course to study white americans who don't havect college degrees and understand cour the strong feeling of despairgr. and hopelessness which caused so many to vote for trump. really pushed mark here to discuss his proposal, john, professor of the george washington university law school.e stre professor, can you just walk the to streets to find out what white working-class americans think? work.arently it doesn't work because so many of these people who have four-year degrees, the pundits and politicians, professors and the politicians didn't understand the white working class and that's why everyone was so surprised the day after election day. they really don't understand it and si

the old post office here in washington dc. the reason why is that there is a clause in the lease that says be a public official of the united states of america, and elected official cannot share any benefit from that lease. that's a lease agreement clause is in keeping with the and clause of our constitution. electedrump, being an official the united states of america when he took office, rendered himself in violation of that we. of thehat time, members house committee on transportation and infrastructure have sent a total of five letters to the general services administration requesting critical information related to the apparent breach of the terms of the old post office lease with the trump organization. and a potential conflict of interest raised by president trump's role as both landlord and tenant as in the old post office building. or agency has either ignored sent inadequate responses to each of those letters. the trump old post office is a corporation completely owned and controlled by president trump and his three oldest children who have very minor interests. /releas -- the lease agreement prevents from serving as a benefitt and paying any th

post in today's washington it says that russia signaled they will retaliate if the united states does not release two properties seized as a sanction for election meddling. they said it is "ready to take reciprocal measures." in the seats in december as part of the obama administration's response to foreign meddling. interferencens of and other accusations were an obvious lie. what was your reaction to that? guest: this is an interest in development to goes directly to how russia's general motors tend to work -- general motives tend to work. the obama administration expelled about 35 diplomats they accused of engaging in spying in the united states. a closed down the russian properties in the d.c. area that were used allegedly, according to the obama administration, to carry out spying activities. the russian government at the time did not retaliate. the russian president, president putin specifically said we will take no actions. i think the desire and the hope was that relations would normalize and stabilize under the new administration. we have not quite seen that come to fruition yet, but i think now the russians are realizing that maybe th

united states ever interfered in a foreign election? is infamousd states for interfering in foreign elections, the washington post, -- everyage organizationnder the sun puts together these conspiracy from supposedly neutral or unbiased newspapers. they don't even exist anymore. journalism in this country has become a joke. yourself about the 17 until agencies. we have heard that 1000 times. that was debunked months ago because i watch a lot of the stuff on tv and i saw james say no.come out and he did that months ago. watchingr sitting here him say it on tv. and then you continue with that lie. those things matter. journalists in this country need to clean up their act. nobody trusts you anymore. host: is that why you don't believe this question about whether russia interfered? because of the media? you question the intelligence in this country as well? caller: i think the intelligence in this country is tried to overthrow the president of united states. they will get you. look what's happened. fbi going to a friend and leaking information to the newspaper -- what kind of integrity does somebody like that have? that is a disgrace. he's a

election in the united states. >> joining me now is greg miller reporter for the "washington post" who is i acoauthor of that piece. greg, is there something about the words that jeff sessions used that that testimony that could make the "washington post" reporting correct despite jeff sessions want you to believe he's had nothing to do with the russians. >> i guess you could get into debates about the definition of campaign related discussions. i mean, the indications are that they certainly held substantive discussions about important policy related questions that were central to the campaign and central to the idea of trump administration and account for why the russia ambassador was so sing laterally interested in meeting with jeff sessions at the time. i mean, sessions keeps saying that it was only in his capacity as a senator that he was meeting with the russian ambassador. >> right. >> but no other members of his committee had such meetings with the ambassador. it was sessions alone who had very early on endorsed trump and that's what made him so important to sergey kislyak. >> now, the "washington post," y

the united states calling russia to end destabilizing hacks in ukraine. technology and at least subtly of russia's interference in the united -- in the election last year. over in europe, deutsche bank is fromg postrexit plans london to frankfurt. frankfurt isw from stephen from bloomberg news. what have we learned and how significant is it? >> it is pretty significant i think. it is not going to concern people right away, but it is a clear -- there thinking about moving of hundreds of people europe.ontinental areas are we talking about? also, is fine emerging as the toce for many of these banks get that certainty within the european union? >> terms of deutsche bank, we're mostly talking about back-office in the eu. they're looking to implement these things over the next 18 months. frankfurt is deathly emerging as the brexit winner. we are talking about a couple thousand jobs moving to frankfurt. some other names have announced they want to make it a hub. that is deathly a thing we are observing us the moment. >> staggering numbers coming out of the latest ecb report. north of 40%. north of 40% takes place in london. when you look at the city of london, there are still big things going forward th

the washington post," with selected. steve: or the "new york times." >> or any publication with selected parts of the conversation, to humiliate x or his boss, the president-elect of the united statesight to know if she did it we have the right to know if she admitted it. we have the right to know if she is going to be prosecuted for it we have the right to know what congress will do about it when all of this is behind doors. we don't know what happened. brian: we know what james comey thinks and senator sessions thinks. >> democracy dies in darkness. this is democracy in darkness. ainsley: who decides if it's going to be held in secret? >> the chair of the committee. these were republican chairs. steve: it was probably a request her attorney. she doesn't want to be on camera saying stuff. >> she has not been subpoenaed. she has been invited. she could stand up and leave any time she wants. they should slap her with a subpoena which changes the rules dramatically. brian: does she take the oath? >> yes she takes the oath. if even if she doesn't take the oath. misleading the roger clemmons case they forgot to give him the oath. you could still be tried for misleading congress. you ar

election in the united states. >> as i mentioned, president trump went on a tweet storm earlier this morning, denouncing what he called illegal leaks. he said, "a new intelligence leak from the amazon "washington post," this time against ag jeff sessions, these illegal leaks like comey's must stop." this as nbc news reports that jared kushner, paul manafort, and donald trump jr. will be interviewed next week. joining me from colorado is nbc's ken and former clinton campaign foreign policy adviser laura rosenberger. ken, i want to start with you. on its face, this sounds like a very big deal. the russian ambassador reporting back to the kremlin that he and one of donald trump's most prominent earliest supporters, the man who becomes attorney general, discussed the campaign. but you have been cautioning to us that it is important to take this with a grain of salt. how come? >> oh, it is a big deal, jacob, no question about that, but it is important to remember that just because kislyak reported these conversations back to moscow, doesn't mean they took place. and sessions is adamantly denyi denying them. this isn't the same as the flynn conversations with kislyak which were directly overheard. this i

the election of president trump. this is wage growth and benefits in 2006. here is the trend post crisis. we have barely got it going. tepid wage growth. it is the agony in the united statesit certainly is. this is what i have done. i don't do this very often. i'm looking at etf's and gold. on the one hand, you have the s&p 500 the top line is in blue. holdings in etf white. this shows the faith in the middle is being put to the test as we have fresh records in equities. gold goes back to inflation. it is also a bet when there is a risk off mood. tom: interesting. francine: something we are looking at. bets on the flow of money out of bonds and into stocks have misfire this year as low yields have kept the global debt party going. there are some signs that markets maybe on because of the post crisis -- maybe on the cusp of a post crisis shift. you will be like 105, and we will still say you are chief of staff. you look at politics in a different way compared to everyone else. what is going on in the markets? they are focusing on central banks. >> the big news yesterday was mario draghi. we were all focused on this 1.15 level. he has come in in the past and talk it down. t