soil at the lake merced site is $22 million plus to date 5 hundred plus is appropriated from the puc revenues as shown on the table the remaining $90,000 plus and the puc's water enterprise revenues will allow them to complete the construction management and the construction to clean up the soil and comply with the regal control bodies clean up on page 5 we note that the total of $22 million $500000 plus the construction contract is $180 million $500,000 e.r. approximately 84 percent of the total cost so over the construction bids will not be received until february 5th, 2015 so it should be those estimates are not based on actual bids the total bids received the actual costs to complete the bid is not known until the bids are received so we report on page 6 of our report the activities of the club clearly resulted in the soil contamination on the lake merced property the city should be responsible for the clean up on the cities property and you'll efforts to recover the payment to offset the city's cost to clean up at the city of lake merced as we note the puc is subtract is to the

it's always great to be here with the puc commissioners. i wanted to thank jeremy and the enernex report. we already had some discussion at the lafco meeting, but i wanted to reiterate the point by commissioner vietor that a clear timeline for the puc commission and lafco from the puc would be really helpful with concrete dates and hopefully more aggressive goals as people have said. i also wanted to say that i also support as a few other commissioners mentioned expediting this as soon as possible and i understand what was laid out and the environmental groups, there is strong support and the coalition for clean energy. supervisors breed and kelly and thank you for what you have done on moving our city forward. i want to say in education outreach, i don't think we have to wait to start raising awareness in communities and low income and community of color as well. i know there is a backup of pieces hopefully in the timeline where we can think creatively about how we are building this as quickly as possible and as mr. kelly said of course we

i want to thank the sf puc staff. we were at the hearing on tuesday and it's so gratifying to see this and to be able to see this a second time. it's like a movie that you want to see again. i would come here everyday to look at this timeline. we did hear from commissioner avalos and mr. fried that both hearings there seems to be like 1-2 months that we can shave on this. i guess without even getting too outside of the box. the piece i would like to talk about on page two, we are at row no. 3 in february and row no. 6 when pg & e files their green tariff with the rates. as i said at the puc, we basically have a two 1/2 month period here to get this major step that we want them to take. we want them to take to publicity for that and we want there to be publicity for that but we don't want them to take away all the excitement and momentum that this great san francisco is making with our power program. so i would just hope that between now and may 10th we can do as much public work as possible and i think a great catalyst

jurisdiction, the land under the puc jurisdiction and originally looked at a couple of different sites for this farm but for competing uses we quickly settled on developing the southeast portion currently undeveloped land and what's interesting about this, it shows actually the way that the pilot program like the urban agriculture pilot program can actually serve to benefit broader puc work and through this process working closely with the real estate division and came to understand that there was actually a jurisdictional boundary dispute rec and park build it was under their jurisdiction when indeed it's under puc jurisdiction so we spent a good deal of time clarifying legally and making sure it was clear it was puc land and clear going forward. but so that's just one of the benefits that comes along with these kinds of pilots. we got some really great data and over 93 percent of the residents said they would like to have a space to grow food and more importantly come together to grow food and exchange their cultural traditions and heritage and have a place of pride for this com

. >> so currently do we said what the puc so planning to provide for lap co-for the next fiscal year $149,000 is that the request. >> the one hundred and 49 the general fund request for lap co-the agreement with the puc with 9 fund through the end of this fiscal year i know that mr. freed has been working with the puc to extend beyond that point. >> so the $149,000 will replace what comes from the puc or this augments it. >> well, it wouldn't i can speak to the details it is separate so the dpa funding it separate this is additional fund to support lap 'coz general operation that are not able to be paid by the puc. >> jason freed lap co-staff the way we work is two sprat fund it don't minimal the general fund that comes from the city and county of san francisco and then the special fund for cca activities on the other hand they don't minimal we determine is it billed to the cca or the lap co-fund the mou with the puc is scheduled to end at the current fiscal year a joint meeting between lap co-and the puc where that item is on the agenda to continue to get access about when i made ag

we do believe that the puc commissioners should set the not to exceed rates as soon as possible. there is no reason we were #r5ed -- ready to do this, the puc commission was ready to do this when they set the breaks on it. there is no reason to wait for pg & e to come out before it's going to charge. there are ways do that as people have said. we are living at a time when not only is this a good year right now because of the energy prices to start a program that we may not have in a year 1/2 from now, but it is a time of climate crisis and we read about this in the newspaper everyday. a new york times poll that just came out today said that two-thirds of americans, not two-thirds of americans want their government to act to fix climate change. it is our obligation to do this. so we need to do this as soon as possible and to do it now while we can, while we still the climate to save. this is the most important thing on climate change that the city of san francisco can do is to get cleanpowersf up and running this year. thank you. >> mr. chairman, can i just ask mr. rizzo a questio

the if sf puc rate could have set the rate not to exceed today. what i'm going to call on the commission is to set the not to exceed rate at the next meeting at the pg & e rate and after that then we develop the program. we need to set the rate immediately. >> public speaker: thank you. my name is rebecca evans. i would like to thank you all for this. i'm not an energy expert. i have been a san franciscan for almost 50 years and over 10 of those years i have watched this process. i hope you get aggressive about it. i have read that scotland is now clean energy. we heard from enernex that there are more jobs for this project than there are for the keystone pipeline. i think that's good news for the city and for the region. i think it's really important that you do that. the climate crisis is here. we can look at what's happening in the east with the snowstorms and the tides. san francisco is supposed to be the city that knows how. we need take that mantra and make it real. thank you very much. >>supervisor london breed: thank you. next speaker. >>

so folks are aware the puc has a resolution. lafco would do it by a motion. lafco would need a motion to instruct staff to sign an amendment. >>supervisor london breed: okay. seeing no names on the roster. i will open this item up to public comment. are there any other members of the public who would like to provide public comment on item no. 7. please lineup to my left. mr. brooks. >> public speaker: yes, eric brooks again. first of all speaking strongly in favor of this motion. there is still a budget left crucial. i know the history of this that the relation between the sf puc and the lack of moving this is crucial. this mou needs to continue. now i want to get to the specific work that needs to be covered by one or both agencies. either one or both agencies and that is the enernex report is great. the plan that it lays out or the framework that it lays out is excellent and itd would be great if we passed that. however, i was quoted in the examiner today and other people were spoken to about that examiner about cleanpowersf and we need to make sure that we

we are very much looking forward to working with the puc and contractors in designing programs and i appreciate wanting to get the program up and running on the purchasing side and stabilizing a cash flow and your customer base and there are also opportunities for us to get out in front right away with customers and provide them the kinds of services that are going to excite them about staying in the cleanpowersf and expanding the utilitization of the program. thank you and if you have any questions and i will be here to answer necessity -- any questions in the future. >>supervisor john avalos: thank you. we appreciate that. weem look forward to that effort. mr. fried? >> thank you. jason fried. while this was going on, there was a period where we were getting questions from enernex and about something and they were always very good and requestic to respond back to those questions so the report can keep moving forward and we thank them for their efforts and thank the advocates for the comments when the drafts were put out there and getting those incorporated into the report as well. m

chairman and madam president and to the commissioners of puc. it's good to be here in this chambers in this joint meeting. i want to begin by thanking our chair of lafco, chair avalos for the leadership he has shown and all the work he's done in the last few years and i want to thank president breed who has been working to reach across the aisle and to get to an understanding with the mayor as we move forward and i also want to thank mayor lee for his support for this program. what i would say is that it is an historic moment, but those of us who have been working on this for many years know that community choice aggregation has had many historic moments along the way and every time that those moments happen it's very exciting because you think of the possibilities, but i think that as i said at the earlier press conference, i think the devil really is in the detail and the work that we do in the next few months will show whether or not this historic moment is truly as historic as we hope it is. and i think that it really comes down to having ver

in the past 3 years in working with the puc is an organization that's deeply committed to the community but also has a very deep commitment to scientific analysis and trying to answer questions in a scientific way in order to plan for the long-term. and having someone who not only runs one of the preeminent organizations not only in san francisco but in the country that is based on science and that plus his community background really bodes extremely well for this position. i hope that you all support him. thank you. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> hello, supervisors, my name is alex costanzo i want to tell you ike kwan is a man of extraordinary character and integrity. he is a brilliant and creative problem-solver and he's fun. i have 30 years of data because ike and i met in college. we were both a little skinnier then especially him -- just saying -- but i have had the pleasure of watching this man become a devoted husband and father, i have watched him work hard to arrive in his career to lead world class organizations and i have had the pleasure of watching him rem

on the commission it should be possible for the sf puc to fulfill that role that was initially envisioned to be supplied by shell energy. the next question was the timing and economic benefits of local build-out and some of these tasks really were related to each other. so this also relates to one of the later tasks. you have the potential to realize the benefits, the economic benefit of the local build-out and this translates to how much, how many dollars per cost of mega watt. on the chart here is down to dollars per watt so what will reflect what customers will see. you also have the build-out construction pay jobs. i understand the jobs were one of the questions raised for what kind of economic development and using the nrel. the development impact tool that we use to refine and estimate the construction phase jobs in terms of dollars or jobs per million dollars spent per construction as well as the assumed operational jobs after the generation station is up and running. and we'll go into more depth into some of these on a later task. so this is a high level s

the sf puc commission, you are in charge of moving this thing forward. i know there is a vacancy on your board and that's for the members of the board of supervisors can exercise that goal and make sure the next person in that seat is a community activist and that seat is supposed to be reserved. there is the possibility there. it's up to you folks to do what's needed for the people of san francisco and the bay area. thanks much, in advance for exercising that political will. >> thank you. i'm going to call a few names. willie rat cliff something commissioner campos says which resonates with many of us is to stop using cleanpowersf as football. i want to emphasize with puc in the community advisory community support for supporting clean power for that voice for puc. the renovation. it's clear they have the ability and experience to do this for this program post haste. we know the pg & e at this moment with it's object. we knew that was coming almost a year ago. based on shawn marshall's statement that opportunity to get the ball rolling now. they should i

because this system enter contexts with the puc system we is to execute an energy connection agreement that puc and the connection owner needs to also participate in the past we've been the owner as we will now we have a third party owner this is a similar agreement to the one you've approved but because of that difference in ownership that we have this additional agreement a generate agreement this is a no cost jaerment and will last in perpetuity we ask you recommend this item to the full board so that the solar project can be enter connected to the grade i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. thank you colleagues any questions okay we'll on this up for public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. motion to send this item our forward with with recommendation we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk 6. >> a resolution paufl u approving the agreements for long term mental health services for the facilities between the department of puncturing and the behavorial health services to r68. >> g

i'd say the puc is an outreach oriented institution but we really have to get that word out because all the measures we are putting togethering with accumulate over time and judging by what our scientists say the environment is going to get more challenging for us. so i think that is probably no. 1 on our list. i also have concerned about emergency preparedness which i think ties into the drought as well. i think the city has done a lot but we need to do much more in terms of preparing our city for a major disaster. >> just this past week there was an article in the san jose mercury news about opening up the watershed along crystal springs and currently people are allowed access with docent tours to look at the area around the watershed. it's along 280 and 92 goes through this as well. what are your thoughts about how we can, a little bit more the public utility commission can do to open land in that area? >> i think it has to be done very carefully. that is a beautiful space. my youngest daughter used to think sasquatch lives there. >> they just haven't seen him yet. >> that is a prist

the creek and create a water entry nor the city of san francisco and, of course, san francisco and the pucas been critical to the couldn't the san mateo we're the beneficiaries of the remarkable hetch hetchy system which was first brought water here 80 years ago that in and of itself was a remarkable piece of engineering a gravity system over $155 million and serves tremendously well, for 80 years but today is an open tun time to talk about the upgrades that have occurred and celebrate the accomplishment of the molestation that tunnel as was mentioned the trying anniversary of the loma prieta earthquake and we read in the paper the u s is seeing movement in the soils and the geography it suggests another quarter could come sometime soon so this work is done ahead of that it is not often that you know government can get ahead of that problem it could have he'll seen an earthquake and seen an off water supply but thanks to the foresight of the puc the investments have been made at that strengthen the system to when the earthquake is caring we'll be better off the peninsula is a tremendous be