second, the reds louises seek to condemn property without having a valid offer been made and the license agreement that the city provided in connection with it's offer didn't have time recollections those restrictions were not perfect but better than no longer. by contrast the licensed text contained in the resolutions a to the resolutions have no time limits at all by not having made a valid offer, the purported offer and therefore the resolutions are not valid, this is a violation of government code serks section 7.62. and third violation of the license as contrasted with what was proposed in the license agreement viewedded to the property owners are not planned in a manner that reflects the greatest public good and the least private injury and without any kind of time limits the licensed in the resolution purport to be perpetual easiment and is thews a far broader right than what is required by this project we know this because the licenses that were offered to us, did have time limit and is so we know that the city that the agency does not require perpetual easements and again by pro