i want to thank the s.r.o. and everyone who has been involved in this because the policy piece is important as we move forward. i may have to leave this hearing early because i do have public safety and neighborhood services , supervisor safai will be subbing for me on the committee if i have to leave early. i do have some recommendations that i will respectfully like to submit to the district about what we can do to tighten up the m.o.u. and talk about next steps that we can take one something like this may occur, and some of the protocols that sfpd could maybe put in place as well because they have protocols for when shootings happen, et cetera , so we could have some type of protocol and a conversation with the law enforcement as well after this. lastly, i want to say that i did have an opportunity to personally apologize to the family as a member of the board of education. we didn't make it happen as a district, but i do want to say that any time we put young people in a position where they can be paraded by

know again, that the situation with balboa has created a training opportunity for us and, through the s.r.o. program, we now have weekly meetings with our school resource officers and we also have monthly meetings. we focus on the best methods of communication. we are speaking about things that we have learned in previous trainings that we had to enhance our communication and we also had discussed the appropriate measures that we would take at all times to protect our young people. i'm sorry. i had to get down quickly. and the last slide that i do want to talk about is the know your rights. we have made sure that we are in the process of updating that no your rights brochure that we made sure that any young person that would come in contact with this, we added the language which is 96 c. we've also added language per d.p.a. about language access, and we are also in the process of developing and working with the recommendations, which is to make sure that the language that is in the miranda warning is in such a way that young people will be able to understand what we are speaking about. beca

as a matter of disclosure, i'm on the s.r.o. board. this is my first appearance since my 21-day hunger strike over h.s.h. housing, which may not have been necessary if h.s.h. had made sure the underlying issue got worked out. i want to thank supervisor haney for working on this issue and supervisors ronen and walton for helping out. last year, h.s.h. introduced a wellness check policy for housing that although there's a lot of different opinions on that. the complaints by so many boot legers about this measure have no merit. on every other commission in this city, 90% of matters get approved, and the others have so many issues that will bite us in the ass later, the make decisions really lie because of this network of different committees. from my perspective, we think with of an h.s.h. commission. we think it makes a lot of sense that the our city, our home commission will be reporting to the commission the status of our unhoused neighbors, and the people who work closely with the department of homelessness. there is strong support, an

one to have training for the s.r.o., the school resource officers, two, for the individuals who are detained and arrested to have access to an attorney, three to have clear definitions defining what exited circumstances are, which outline when the police departments take action, and then four, suggestions about data collection and reporting for custodial incidents at the school. so that was last week. we also got, a lot has been happening in the past few weeks. we had a permanent injunction, a temporary injunction was granted on some of the cases that had been in front of the commission related to the text cases, you know, that has been just under 300 hours. it is just one, but i presume that some other cases may try and join, even though they will have to file their own motions for it. we have put a lot of work into those cases so i will keep you guys updated, but for now, that injunction is likely. the indicated that at the ruling they probably should indicate a ruling. i think that is what is likely to happen. also, we had a really good meeting with captain steve ford and with commander f

the question about the s.r.o. in terms of when they work, and can they work after hours, i leave that up to the board of education and the police department to negotiate and negotiate hours of when they work and the work schedules i would just say that the board of education and the sfusd and the police department can come together on that, it makes sense to me that if you have things after hours and on weekends, like football games or sporting events, or whatever they might be that draws people, having presence there, if you look at the statistics -- again, if that is what the community wants. i don't want to make that assumption, but i heard that today, and -- and what accountability is built into the m.o.u. if the m.o.u. is not followed? what consequences are there, if any? those are a number of things that we heard today along with a whole host of things, but all i would say is there a reason we would want to continue this item to the call of the chairs we want to have a public setting where the board of educat

the s.r.o. task force has had to get involved in a lot of things around the s.h. portion of the h.s.h. i would say it took 14 days into my hunger strike for them to actually admit that the rent issue was a problem. i also had to bring h.s.h. before the task force when this controversial wellness check approximately happened in november, and it's just really -- we really, really, really need this oversight. and i've also just found out that that protocols around adult protective services and the h.s.h. buildings are kind of a very mixed, kind of very -- depends on from agency to agency, so there's just a lot of issues that need to be addressed here, and i'm glad the commission will do this. i'm okay with the amendments but i did bring this before the democratic socialists of america homelessness working group, and i will say they are kind of concerned that seven seats are going to be flipped from the board of education to the controller because the controller is also appointed by the mayor, and it's just -- while i'm still going to, like, support this, i'm still go

it's very possible that we have the worst s.r.o. stock in the country. now, the other situation is i'm in support of this legislation, but i feel like the cause about emergencies should be removed. you might have removed it because somebody can just declare an emergency and override the rules and regulations. we're having a major problem where you will open a navigation center but call it a safe navigation center or call it something else, and right now, the san francisco administrative code 2400 is being violated basically across the board in that no one is monitoring it from the city and county of san francisco. the navigation centers, they're getting a free pass to violate the 2400 -- no one in the city is monitoring it. they shove it off on the shelter monitoring team committee, and they don't have enough authority or resources to investigate when we're getting abused. so it's a perfect storm. the contractors will hire felons and drug users, and then, they go work at the shelter with no type of bedding. and then, when we go abused, we go to the shelt

the fire-rated walls at property lines. this fire did spread to an adjacent building, and several people were displaced from an s.r.o. dings did not have the firewalls that we see in buildings that are -- modern buildings that are constructed today. so the benefits of these blind-wall upgrades: homes are healthier, more energy-efficient, and safer. new walls are better able to support greater loads. they'll have fire protection, allowing more time for firefighters to stop the spread and residents to escape. at this point, i'm going to turn it over to my colleague, cyril yu from d.b.i.. >> i'm not cyril yu. going into the first thing this ord nan wil ordinance -- when we talk about noticing and permits, these are the amendments to section 311. throughout the presentation, you can see this format, and on the right-hand side, the way that the ord na ordinance is currently written, will change the procedures. i won't focus too much on the way it is. i will highlight the major points about the way it will be. for neighborhood notification, known as section 311, the legislation generally would expand the items that would re

one who god was caught up with the internet or that s.r.o. machine. so far i know already that i'm going to go by train when asked and he and i and that will be are. we what about who are you. going to meet it is so odd well that it wouldn't buy only to go home because. what the failure only of all the fallen come inside. come sit on offer we have us here i know how the center should be no wind. men because of our. well ok who isn't any for that little bit don't want to harvest. the food. but. i mean if he focused on what. i was saying was on my feet. but i think it is behind it let me see humphrey come out go i know i've got some more yes this is a hurry or. we'll see them on. t.v. . i don't need a job or money already a one term good answer my daughters in law only if i want to be able. to have contact the police will not sit a fag would come to knock with a view on me but i know what i said was oh i sure as. been argued for for. all you are on these. if i feel more for you when i actually like what they are going to involve i do what the people of

the difference between an s.r.o. and a nested bedroom is about 250 to 350 square feet.is kind of like an amalgam, as it were where it is taking unit that is not fully one-bedroom, but it is definitely code compliant, and creating a modest sized unit. >> sure. >> sorry for the long answer. >> i appreciate it. if i walk in the apartment, let's talk about the nested bedroom. to the left would be my bedroom, then there would be a wall, or it would be glass or an opening. can you explain it to us? >> we use sliding glass doors to enclose the nested bedroom so that the sliding -- if you look at the drawing that is part of the package, i think it is towards the end, you will see that we have diagrams. our typical nested bedrooms -- anyway. we use a sliding -- sliding glass door, floor to ceiling, so that it actually helps the nested bedroom become a separate space when it is closed and it conjoint -- and a conjoint space with the living room when opened their people who want to have that space open to the living room, not as a separate room enclosed unless they prefer it. it g

importantly i want to thank you for implementing legislation for the prop c repurpose dollars that is allowing us to acquire those s.r.o. hotels that toured with president yee. thank you for the commitment to the s.r.o.s. >> president yee: okay, now kate hartley, director hartley, i have to say that a few more times, director hartley, would you like to say a few words? >> i would. supervisors, thank you so much. this is such an honor. i am incredibly grateful. i know it goes without saying, but i really take your commendations as a commendation for the most city team, who is hard-working, dedicated and so passionate about bringing affordable housing and community services to san francisco. and it's been my pleasure to be a part of that team and to work with them. i'm really going to miss everyone terribly. i also humbled by the work of our partners in san francisco and the community based service organizations who deliver services every day. their jobs are so hard. and they do amazing things. and so again it's been my privilege to work with them and provide the funding and the resources that they need to make san franc

be some further exceptions to these restrictions if the legislative action is taken to preserve existing affordable housing including mobile homes, s.r.o. and rent-controlled units. with regards to project review and approvals, there are a number of requirements in the bill. first of all, there are amendments the housing accountability act. what they would do is say that a project that proposes the number of units that is within the maximum allowable density at the zoning or the general plan for 2018 would have to be approved at that level if it is proposed unless there are overriding considerations that commissioner richards was talking about. this would include the reduction of density through conditions of approval, there's something like a conditional use permit, and the bill would also somewhat strengthen the enforceability of the housing accountability act by implying this reasonable standard, reasonable personal standard, meaning if there is a reasonable case to be made, the project is within the density allowed, that someone could claim that it was not in compliance. there is also a provision that essentially provides a vesting