makes clear that the sf puc cannot only serve that role but can make its own income from this so it can be beneficial to the sf public utilities commission 's budget. another thing that's nailed down really well in the report it shows a lot of actual projects can be built and it shows what advocates and consultants have been saying for almost a decade now, which is we can get a thousand or more jobs a year for the next 10 years by building a lot of stuff for a clean power program. the things that looked like, the thing that looked like it was most lacking in the report is that it emphasized building large solar and wind and hydro projects and things like that, but really seemed to deemphasize a lot the idea of small solar and behind the meter efficiency throughout businesses and residences throughout the city and clean energy is headed in that direction. we're not just trying to get clean energy, we're trying to get decentralized energy that's owned by the city and owned by the customers. even though that other stuff is low hanging fruit that's cost effective, we need this to be more ba

the sf puc is to report findings to the board of supervisors. we have received from interested events in the future and we are here to understand where things are. we would like to invite up sf puc to give us a report on where things stand. >> good afternoon, david briggs with the puc. are the slides triggered automatically? >> good afternoon. so with that introduction, this will go to getting into the heart of the matter, although i'm going up one slide here. to recap what the puc is in concert with other state departments. certainly developing these procedures in making it happen and making it become real and we've been do that for several months now, we have consulted with various city departments that are responsible for issuing the permits and have been very active and thankful for the sf and ports and sf mta and got a lot of information from the cites sites that are sponsoring. this data allows the charts moving forward with implementing getting this ordinance successfully implemented. the standards in play which are under our purview in me

we don't want to give the lead back to the sf puc even if they start saying good things. one little note on what will be the future report from staff on undergrounding is that we're not talking about planning out a broad band network, we're talking about when executive officer fried does this study work that it's taking into account these other things so how he lays out how we should do undergrounding takes into account chattanooga and the ammiano study, et cetera. >> thank you. any other members like to make public comment at this time? seeing none, public comment is closed. madam clerk, can you please call the next item? >> item no. 7, future agenda items. >> okay, any commissioners with any suggestions of any future agenda items? seeing none, we will open it up for public comment. are there any member s of the public who would like to make public comment at this time? seeing none, public comment is closed. madam clerk, please call the next item. >> item no. 8, adjournment. >> my favorite part. we are adjourned. go, giants. (meeting adjourned down. >> welcome i ask you a

think that a numb er of individuals in the public actually engage with that body more than the puc thank you. >> so the only thing which i kind of hit on was the sfe under chair aragon passed a resolution overwhelmly about getting a rate set and moving forward. we are grateful for the hard work of chair aragan there and hope that will be one more thing to help move the cca program forward, especially now we have a report when it becomes final that shows jobs can be created if we have a program created and have customers to sell energy to. and i will yeed to miss hale >> barbara hale, assistant manage for power at the sf puc we really don't be have much abdomen activity at the puc on the various issues i've been presenting to you over the last several issues. in particular the green tariff option has captured a lot of interest but we're still waiting for the california public utilities commission to propose a decision on the application

midst negative declaration for the sf soil remediation project at the gun club on john mirror drive the sf owns lake merced and the rod gun club leases this site the puc project seeks to clean up the soil at the rod gun site by a remedial action plan prepared that i the sf puc in response to an issue by the water control board the order was issued to the puc as the landowner of the site the project consist of an appropriate disposal of soil containing elevated concentrations of led and cashes and back filling the site the excavated areas with clean material you should have a packet with a motion to uphold the negative declaration our response to the appeal letter the appeal letter itself and additions of copies of the revised preliminary it was published on june 5th, 2014, and on july 5th, 2014, the department received an appeal from the pacific rod gun club as subscribed the issues include the concerns of peace male and female we inappropriately defined the action for the proposed project and concerns about the historical resources and holistic resources and the impacts warned the preparation of an environmental impact report the responses is provide

to look at this issue obviously from the port of san francisco but also significant impacts you the sf puc because of what runs along the perimeter of the bay and you can see it's chaired by mr. david be har with the puc. he was out sick today. we have the guidance. so the city has taken a look at guidance and the science kind of varies. they have looked at the least scenario and the possible scenario and we have the 2050 as the mid-horizon and 2100 horizon. they have suggested the half of the scales, but at least we now have general science agreement on what the potential sea level rises are for the bay area looking into future. if you look at our overall process we have taken a look at the science we then assess the vulnerability of the infrastructure that we have. once we understand where it is vulnerable with the sea level rise and we assess that refk to the facility whether it's a port harbor or our

and our hope is that once that report comes out and of course the puc staff reviews the report that there be a joint meeting of lafco and the sf puc and simply ask you that you remain committed that happens and move forward once that work is completed. whoo! -- when that report comes forward we'll discuss it fully. i'm still unclear whether that remains a challenge with hetch hetchy. as we look at the contract that expired this past june, the power industry has changed tremendously over the last five 5 years and we need to position ourselves to prosper in that new regulatory environment. we also need to make sure that we have as many high revenue opportunities for the power as we can. i think that the objective behind the cca and program itself will require some thinking. i'm clear about what my objectives are and you know what they are. what the ends are i don't know. >> thank you and again i appreciate the commitment to continue to work together with lafco. and just the last question related to that as you know the puc and lafco have a memorandum of understanding that will be expiring at the end of the fiscal year june 2015.

pg & e dominates the energy and when we, meaning the sf puc had to take a strong stand on power, we screwed up the people in the southeast. our sole arrests that -- solars that are reflected are people in the avenues. we need to know a realtime consumption and we need to take a holistic approach and have those that are need it. thank you very much. >> president ann moller caen: thank you. any other comments on the general manager's report, seeing none, next time no. 9 consent calendar. city clerk: 9 a-9 e will act upon by a single vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless the commission or the public request and it will be removed from the calendar and considered as a separate item. >> president ann moller caen: to the general public, dr. jackson, would you like the 9 e removed from the consent calendar? >> yes. >> okay. we'll do that and discuss it later. so we are going to be voting on -- may identify a motion. >> i will move everything except for 9 e. >> second. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? the motion carries. let's take item 9

the scheduling impacts for the unforeseen things at at dam that was confirmed by a firmer the conclusion is sf puc couldn't take additional measures for the cost overruns we've done we took the finding and recommended the corrective action as a consequence of the finding of that report the result of those corrective action will be evaluated in 2013-2014 but we want to say that or buck worked with the directors julie and current director to agree upon an assessment what or book has done is to evaluate the cost measures and operation and management costs as it relates to projects to insure that further budget revisions will not be needed that's for 2014-2015 in the past 9 months or buck they've helped or buck tharbok current report is in the final stages we can talk about the highlights but wait fill that report has been vested and the feedback from the stakeholders have been takes into account and release the report i anticipate we'll present to this body those lessons learned to help us help the commission and help the committee guide our program with the evaluations and oversight for the next few

i have questions before i accept this now i saw on the presentation from sf puc there's opportunities to ask questions but i think what got lost in the statement there's an opportunity to summit an appeal and there's an opportunity to appear before a hearing officer to state the appraisal appeal but no dialog and answering of questions this makes it frustrating also the statement that the director reviewed the appeal and will respond to you i went to the appeal hearing in march or april i still don't know how responsible i am i've not heard from dpw i understand the folks are under a staffed but if there's smou someway to help facilitate communication from the agency that's skuks to take the responsibility when we are trying to define that responsibility such as the organizations of other city that makes things easier and takes away some of the stress and i'm hoping you address some of our activities and encourage that conversation to the citizens who are trying to work with the program thank you. >> thank you, mr. wormer maybe after the hearing i'll talk with ms

the commission has gotten something i know you are going to really love. it's a [ gavel ]. so with this i would like to present you with this gavel, president courtney sf puc. the back story of this is that vince loves the gavel as i'm sure all of you have seen i jump every time he hits it and certainly andrew laughs at me. so moving along with the election of officers, i too would like to nominate vice-president francesca vietor. >> second. >> certainly she has served in this capacity before as well as chair of the commission and i look forward to your saying yes to the nomination and i would like to proceed on that. do you accept the nomination? >>commissioner francesca vietor: i do. >> is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? the motion carries. you can stay there. okay. >> can i just say a few words. it's a great opportunity to serve all of you. i must say vince, this year has been a very interesting year because we had a lot of challenges together and i think the one thing that we are both realizing that in city government nothing happens fast and i think that all o

2016 and by then we're sported to have no more bungalows and part of the playground should be subtracted we've applied for a sf puc without further ado, grant of $100,000 and won we were receive those the money will go to buy and snail a water and build one of the green areas obviously if we don't do this we won't be able to thank you very much. >> hi pier thank you for the opportunity to miss the giants game tonight (laughter) i wanted to sadly enough i want to frail start off by thooing brent stevens for that all the work in this difficult situation i know you guys have a lot to make decisions around a lot of rather difficult choices but we want you to make the right choice with with respect to this isaac issue not addressing bears the burden to this community we feel last week we're getting a world-class education our oldest is hayden working through the executive few minutes ago things and erecting had an this the fourth grade wants to talk about what is happening with his class to erecting than can you say. >> hello my name is erecting than i'm in mandarin and everyday in my class me and my friends also see m

the water is okay to drink or need to treat it. we have a number of twice get information from the puc through twitter and facebook and our website sfater.org. >> people should not drink water from pools or spas. but they could use it to flush their toilets if their source are not broken. let's look at those issues. >> sanitation is another issue and something people don't usually or like to think about it but it's the reality. very likely that without water you can't flush and the sewer system can be impeded or affected during an earthquake. you need to think about sanitation. the options are simple. we recommend a set up if you are able to stay in your building or house to make sure that you have heavy duty trash bags available. you can set this up within your existing toilet bowl and once it's used. you take a little bit of our bleach. we talked about it earlier from the water. you seal the bag completely. you make sure you mark the bag as human waste and set it aside and wait for instruction about how to dispose of it. be very aware of cleanliness and make sure you have wipes so folks are able to wash up when dealing with the sa