affirm or affirm that i will support and defend the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california against all enemies foreign and domestic, that i will bear true faith and allegiance to the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california, that i take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion and that i will and faithfully discharge the duties upon which i'm about to enter, and during such time as i hold the office as a member of the board of the code -- >> the board of examiners and whichever seek you are taking -- whichever seat your taking. ok. thank you. commissioner murphy: thank you, commissioners. >> ok, now those that are present that are here to be sworn in for the code advisory committee. you can tell this is the good group for showing up. [laughter] commissioner murphy: we will go from left to right on this one, code advisory. robert wong. wallace -- what is your name? maybe you should step up to the microphone as we do this. >> [inaudible] >> tony lau. >> jim reid. >> mark cunningham, a member at large

where is the tobacco money from the state of california? it was much larger amounts of money because it was a whole state. do any of you know? it is just part of the hole in the state's budget. it went into the general fund. what do we have because of luis? we have this beautiful building. [applause] >> unfortunately, those were my real words. i will tell you the aftermath of that story. it is even worse with the state of california. they securitized their tobacco money. it is already pissed away. there you go. today is a great celebration not only for the entire laguna honda community but for the city of san francisco. i know that many of you know from its very beginning laguna honda and san francisco have been intertwined. back in the days of the gold rush, it was started as an alms house and evolved over the years to where we are today. today, we have a new chapter where a quality of care will be constantly given as it has always been given so well in the past, and where community will be even more deeply engaged. it has been said that no

the rights of california. they're not the rights of the voters of california. their rights of citizens of the united states under the bill of rights and the 14th amendment. if california could insist that something to do with procreation be engraved on to the rights of marriage, it could take that aw. it could save that we're over populated and we do not want procreation and we will the nine people the right to marry. this is a fundamental coming individual right. the reason i am emphasizing this, judge reinhardt, is because of the look at this from the standpoint of the right of two particular individuals, maybe they were mr. and mrs. loving in the virginia case of interracial marriage, it was marriage. it was their right to get together. what the supreme court said in the griswold case is that we deal with the right to privacy, older than the bill of rights. marriage is a coming together, for better or worse, hopefully in during, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. it is is an association that promotes a way of life and so forth. from the griswold case, this is one of the -- >> mr. olson, i am no

the land itself we're getting is a land transfer from the state of california. the conditions tied to the land are the primary conditions. one, land transferred to the tjpa or city, which includes the redevelopment agency, must be sold with all the proceeds of that sale going toward the implementation of the project. second condition is a 20% affordability factor put on top of the 15% that already read it exists on any residential development in the zone itself. so all of this land that is

we are the only for -- the only port remarkably in the state of california that has done this. ne of only four in the world. we are going to see this done in l.a., we hope soon, but we aren't the only one in the state of california, and that fills us with pride. we put up about $1 million. epa put up about $1.2 million. they area quality put of $1.6 million or 11 $9 million, and we cobble the resources together to get to this point. we are proud to be the first. it is appropriate that san francisco be the first. we have always taken pride on being at the cutting edge of green technology. these are green collar jobs, and that is something that is important. if you believe in the environment, you believe in jobs, or if you believe in promoting jobs, you better believe in promoting environmental stewardship, and that is the spirit that brings me here. congratulations. job well done. let's keep leading by example, and let's get the job done completely rebuilding this pier, which hopefully, will get done very soon. thank you all for being here. >> thank you again for your leadership.

there are 100 countries that are more energy efficient than the united states of america. california stands out as the exception. this country has over 100 competitors doing more than we're doing. this is the low hanging fruit. we can deal with half of the greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 by getting serious about energy efficiency. we did energy watch in san francisco. we reached a three-year ago. we're halfway there in 10 months. we also created jobs. this is exactly where we need to go. this should bring everybody together in the state. this is the how, not who is to blame or what to do. i want to compliment, and team of labor and business. everyone recognizes this is where we need to make the investment. this is where arnold switch maker. t-- this is where on absorption maker -- this is where the governor's legacy is made real. we can reestablish california as a global leader in innovation and entrepreneurship. thank you all very much for being here. [applause] >> one of the really fun things about prop. 23 was meeting all the people in the coalition from around the state from bot

the rights of california. they're not the rights of the voters of california. their rights of citizens of the united states under the bill of rights and the 14th amendment. if california could insist that something to do with procreation be engraved on to the rights of marriage, it could take that away. it could save that we're over populated and we do not want procreation and we will the nine people the right to marry. this is a fundamental coming individual right. the reason i am emphasizing this, judge reinhardt, is because of the look at this from the standpoint of the right of two particular individuals, maybe they were mr. and mrs. loving in the virginia case of interracial marriage, it was marriage. it was their right to get together. what the supreme court said in the griswold case is that we deal with the right to privacy, older than the bill of rights. marriage is a coming together, for better or worse, hopefully in during, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. it is is an association that promotes a way of life and so forth. from the griswold case, this is one of the -- >> mr. olson, i am

mark my words, this is coming to the state of california. if it takes me four years just to get it killed in committee, we are just going to keep at it until the state of california leads the way in open data. we are going to bring some sort of legislation. get ready. thank you very much. with that, ed, come up and give us a sense of the more practical applications of why you really love this. >> i actually love this from the start. i was a believer -- one thing that i have told my staff, colleagues, what we're talking about is not our data. it is not the department heads, not the city's data, it is the public's data. we have an obligation, i would say, to push it out to the public to make it available and useful to the public. when you do that, it can help the department and city, but most importantly, it can help the public. it can be very empowering. a lot of what we do, whether it is abating graffiti, picking up trash, filling pot holes, improves someone's quality of life. when a neighborhood group is getting together to see how they can

the rights of california. they're not the rights of the voters of california. their rights of citizens of the united states under the bill of rights and the 14th amendment. if california could insist that something to do with procreation be engraved on to the rights of marriage, it could take that away. it could save that we're over populated and we do not want procreation and we will the nine people the right to marry. this is a fundamental coming individual right. the reason i am emphasizing this, judge reinhardt, is because of the look at this from the standpoint of the right of two particular individuals, maybe they were mr. and mrs. loving in the virginia case of interracial marriage, it was marriage. it was their right to get together. what the supreme court said in the griswold case is that we deal with the right to privacy, older than the bill of rights. marriage is a coming together, for better or worse, hopefully in during, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. it is is an association that promotes a way of life and so forth. from the griswold case, this is one of the -- >> mr. olson, i am

i do solemnly swear or affirm that i will support and defend the constitution of united states and the constitution of the state of california against all enemies foreign and domestic, that i will bear true faith and allegiance to the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california that i take this obligation freely and without mental reservation or purpose of evasion and that i will faithfully discharge the duties upon which i am about to enter and during such time as i hold the office as a member of the access appeals commission -- >> and whatever seed you are taking -- whatever seat you are taking. >> it is their oath, not your both. commissioner murphy: i know. i'm asking them. anyway, why don't you let me drive the cars here? that is it. can i hear aye? >> aye. commissioner murphy: congratulations. >> thanks. going to give these to you. now if we could have the members of the board of examiners that our present. we have some members that are not present, but i have let them know that since i have been duly sworn to be able to swear people in, that i will either go to a meeting or have t

he is also a member of the california international relations foundation. he provides assistance to the california statein furthering economic, environment, educational and cultural exchanges with foreign governments and citizens. president brooks also served as director of administrative services for the city of san francisco where he was responsible for policy and planning for 14 city departments, managing over 300 employees, and a budget of $100 million. please join me in welcoming president brooks. . >> thank you, susan leyall, and good morning, welcome here. before i start i want to thank our general manager leyall who has done an extraordinary job here at the san francisco puc and also i want to recognize two people that just walked in, our vice president commissioner ann (inaudible) and commissioner dennis nolan that just arrived. thank you very much. i want to echo what miss leyall said, welcome everyone to this historic summit here in san francisco. the next couple days we're going to tackle very tough issues, the issues of global warming, issues of waste water, hydropower, the electric power i

solemnly swear or affirm that i will support and defend the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california against all enemies foreign and domestic, that i will bear true faith and allegiance to the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california, that i take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion and that i will and faithfully discharge the duties upon which i am about to enter and during such time as i hold the office of a member of the board -- code advisory committee. >> thank you. commissioner murphy: congratulations. >> if you could all return your paperwork. >> is it possible for me to make a few comments? in the current chair of the code advisory committee, and i just wanted to thank the subcommittee because our committee's strength is based on having a full membership, some making sure all those positions are filled, and i know it is a lot of work, especially when there were not that many people that step forward. i also wanted to welcome the new board of examiners come to our meetings. just because they are o

giants fans on this day especially, and we are honored to have the number one giants fan in the state of california here to pay tribute to this ball club. please welcome the great governor of the great state of california, the honorable arnold schwarzenegger. >> thank you very much. i just wanted to say on behalf of the people in california, congratulations to the giants, the giants fans for this great victory. san francisco is not only known as the most beautiful city in the most beautiful state, in the most extraordinary country in the world, but now it is also the home of the world champion baseball team. so congratulations to the giants for this great performance for showing that the impossible can be made possible, for showing the fire in your belly. thank you also to everyone who got you here in the first place, your family members and so on. that may also say congratulations to the beard. now every team in baseball knows how to feear the beard. there is a machine in this team. congratulations. thank you very much. [applause] >> again, many thanks to governor schwarzenegger. there is much pre

the rights of california. they're not the rights of the voters of california. their rights of citizens of the united stateshe bill of rights and the 14th amendment. if california could insist that something to do with procreation be engraved on to the rights of marriage, it could take that away. it could save that we're over populated and we do not want procreation and we will the nine people the right to marry. this is a fundamental coming individual right. the reason i am emphasizing this, judge reinhardt, is because of the look at this from the standpoint of the right of two particular individuals, maybe they were mr. and mrs. loving in the virginia case of interracial marriage, it was marriage. it was their right to get together. what the supreme court said in the griswold case is that we deal with the right to privacy, older than the bill of rights. marriage is a coming together, for better or worse, hopefully in during, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. it is is an association that promotes a way of life and so forth. from the griswold case, this is one of the -- >> mr. olson, i am not tryi

issues. >> i stand before you today humbled to be chosen to be the next attorney general of the state of california. and i do pledge and make a pledge to work hard every day to make sure that the law of this state is on the side of the people of this state. >> reporter: harris says she is putting together a transition team. her staff says many unique programs she started in san francisco should be implemented statewide. now, her election to the state attorney general's office leaves her district attorney job here in san francisco open. and coming up at 6:00, we will hear from her how she thinks should be filled. reporting live in san francisco, jean elle you nbc bay area news. >> catch you then. thanks a lot, jean. >>> a piece of bay area history could soon be history itself. how budget cuts are hitting home in the east bay. >>> schools are having a tough time, too. the deadline some districts must meet or risk being taken over by the state. >>> new information about the hostage drama that unfolded at a midwest school. >>> and what is causing the delays at the dmv? why it is taking so long to get y