the private investment, i forget, what it stands for, but it is a function of the transportation secretary's office. and it was a committee that was supposed to review, proposals and make comments. secondarily, the state transportation commissionempowered to authorize a public private partnership in lease and contract. this bill, highens the ability to actually act as an initial hurtle and they have a binding, and the binding ability to reject the public, private partnership proposal before it goes to the transportation commission, we think that is not what the original framers of the particular p3 law intended and it does add an extra burden to the process and we are recommending oppose to that. ab 863 is another one that we are recommending oppose, it seems like it was a measure that we would support but page 7 details that this bill would allow for the delegation of nepa, the national, environmental act to caltransto administer for projects but that sounds like a stream lining but we had it approved for state highway programs and local highway programs and we found that the implementation of that was very unworkable, particularly for local projects. the state seemed to spend more energy on accelerating their projects at the

the metropolitan transportation commission in oakland. >> the fact that they are using jeopardy is a big deal. they statedhey discovered this they did not think it would impact the labor day opening. now they're saying that than mit may be in jeopardy of opening on time. it may have to be pushed back. they pay $6.2 billion for the stretch and you would think everything would be okay. it is something as simple as a crack, that is why we are here. take a look this video. it is very complicated but for people who do this day in and day out they stated that they should be able to fix this and they should know what to do. but back in 2008 when caltran notice that the ca contractor working on this it was a problem. they stated that it continued to the point to where they were recently installed and that is when they noticed that the cracks it took place. they only got done with about 96 of the all bolts. >> they stated that hydrogen may have got inside of the man that might have caused the metal to become brittle. they wanted these to be flexible like airplane parts. it became so brittle that they speculated th