the daily telegraph says officials are facing a nerve agent backlash. as gone by and public health information is only just week has gone by and public health information is onlyjust being issued. the information people need to wash clothes they are wearing if they are around salisbury, wipe down mobile phones with wet wipes if they have been exposed. it is a week after the incident. you can see people wearing suits, contamination suits. it is quite a juxtaposition. most people would think it is fine otherwise they would not tell us, but they are telling them now. it seems awfully late to do this. but don't panic. no alarm. 500 people would have visited the restaurant, pub, where the two or three victims of the attack visited. but if you lived in salisbury and saw military personnel and police officers on the front page of the telegraph, with these and —— anti—contamination suits, you'd think something was wrong. you would wonder what you are wearing, what you touched, and every cough and sneeze, you would think, in my contaminated? i can see people are

the telegraph suggests that we will dig it up. cause at the government in a bind because at the moment they have expelled 2s diplomats and there has been some tit—for—tat expulsion. at that point, if things start to escalate it is not clear what the british government can do that will not leave them looking weak and unable to respond to the russian government. moving on to look at facebook and, more widely technology firms to dig the guardian, firstly. pressure on facebook and data firm over a mass breach of personal data files. this is that cambridge analytica. and a reporter who has been looking at them for quite some time with some deep investigation, what is the suggestion here? the suggestion is that data was improperly obtained by cambridge analytica under the cover of being for research purposes. it was actually used to make advertisers and influence the american presidential election. alexander nix testified to the commons select committee in the past and he is now being accused of being economical with the truth. he and ma

and this story in the telegraph tomorrow is quite di5piriting, that there is this... le entrepreneurship should be a great thing that the government get5 behind but there is this funding gap preventing women from launching their own businesses and actually not all women have children but i know a lot of them have set up their own businesses because they have children and they want to juggle working from home. it is incredibly difficult to do that without money. without backing. we are in 2018 and beget 5torie5 without backing. we are in 2018 and beget stories like this, pretty pathetic? it is and the other thing we see, we talk about the glass ceiling being about women getting the vote and representation, but there are also issues around the gender pay gap, which is pervasive and in pretty much every walk of life you will find that women doing the same job as a man earns substantially less. it is disappointing but also it is very good that in this day and age we can see attention raised for these issues and the daily telegraph with the big strapline and dodging this. i

the telegraph love that, it is on the front page! that we find this out.sing has said that this year policy shows that policies —— they have no plans to fix the housing policy. it is a fault of whitehall not town halls. since 2010 ross lee ping has more than doubles, the number of new homes being built still has not recovered to prerecession levels. well, the independent. the headline. goodness me. so rude tonight. the tories quietly shelved benefit sanctions reform, yellow card plan prevent poorest being unfair, doctor says a positively by rob are pleased to see around his desk some nights. what are the reforms? this is being going on for a long time. it is like a catch—22, people do need this university credits and other benefits have been caught in this vicious, vicious trap, actually, they have to pass all these tests and then suddenly they fail one bit of them and there are these dreadful stories about somebody in hospital, somebody not being able to attend an interview, and then they are denied their basic living money. and you know, it was neverfict

the telegraph is also talking about some of the words putin was said to have used.dline on the front page of the telegraph, putin swore reve ng e front page of the telegraph, putin swore revenge on poisoned russian spy. swore revenge on poisoned russian spy. he said this in 2010. and this spy spy. he said this in 2010. and this spy swap involves the man now in hospital, mr skripal. he was part of that and this was the first russian swa p that and this was the first russian swap ever, apparently. it was the first russian swap ever and this is eight years later. but if you read the words of mr putin at the time of his release, he said, traitors will click the bucket, trust me, these people betrayed their friends, their brothers in arms. whatever they got in exchange for it, those 30 pieces of silver they were given, they will choke on them. quite extraordinary. the suggestion a delegation would not go to the world cup, if it is clear that russia was involved in this, and swilling cannot go now, can he? no, and it is interesting from perspective national prince william

turning to the telegraph... the paper goes into this a little deeper, and it is...hat the telegraph are talking about what could be done, and this isa about what could be done, and this is a sanctions regime, to do it alongside the us and canada, and the idea is to freeze assets, target people, very difficult to do things like that, i'm not sure how much vladimir putin would care if we did, but within london, about £90 billion of russian money comes through london. clearly, it would cost us quite a bit to lose it but when we get to a stage like this, yes, we must do so. one thing i don't understand why they don't do, chucked out a few russian spies, that seems to hurt them more. our spies would have to leave moscow, but it seems to me that is the way forward , but it seems to me that is the way forward, to show a bit of strength. also this act, which has been hovering around for a few years, magnitsky act, one of the people on your hip list —— hit list. bill browder got it brought in in america because it was his lawyer who died in prison on what they said were trum

maybe this is the one the telegraph has chosen to go with. h is that we don't know and there has beena that we don't know and there has been a wall of silence from the police and intelligence agency soufces police and intelligence agency sources about the detailed investigation in this particular circumstance. part of that is understandable because they want to identify exactly who the culprits are. they don't want publicity necessarily getting in the way of it. it makes it difficult to stand up exactly what has happened. the telegraph says intelligence agencies how telegraph says intelligence agencies now believe, it seems to have senior soufces now believe, it seems to have senior sources telling it that, it may turn out to be correct or may not be. does that, in some ways, just fired the apparent caution ofjeremy corbyn, picked up on the front of the guardian, and appears to have caused such pranksters among his mps? saying, yes, we can go for russia, but we need to follow where the evidence leads? —— caused such consternation. there seems

to the telegraph offices and newspaper row. so you can place yourself in all the significant spots part of the -- that are part of this story. the very first edition is the 2:00 a.m. addition, the regular edition of the "new york herald, the morning paper at that time. it covered essentially, it is the breaking news. it uses the word assassination in that paper because at that time went a -- because that meant silent attack on someone. it did not necessarily mean something that resulted in death. so the first paper, while you may see the word assassination, just reports the shooting. as well as some other tidbits of information. it reports that stewart had been -- seward had been attacked as well. it gives you the first blush of what had gone on that evening. the second edition is an hour later. you can see how swiftly the "new york herald" is working to get information to people. the main thing, new information it reveals is that they have identified john wilkes booth as the assassin. the next edition is an 8:45 a.m. edition, a

the telegraph have merged this into their story about what is happening with russia. ke when this is happening.- ask for more money. this was on the grid, but interesting where it has gone. to be fair to gavin williamson, last month, he said, russia is a huge threat. cyber plots all the time. everybody said, what is he on? but look what has happened. it does add to the feeling that as crises occur, what takes precedence is the internal machinations of the conservative party. the daily express, this is the headline, the case of nikolai glushkov, found dead in kingston, london, this week, so suggestion of foul play. but talking to people today, they say there is no evidence of that, but the counterterrorism police had been brought in to look at it which is quite significant. this goes to the idea of a hit list. we will get onto this with labour. the idea of the evidence. the nerve agent used as a calling card to say, if you mess with us, putin is saying, if you betray russia, you will come to a grisly end. now every death of a russian in england will be perhaps linked to

you mentioned the telegraph as being the other paper that gives it the lead here.han the approach of the ft, looking at the eurosceptic reaction, the talking about how the eu is responding to it, at least the message she is putting a cross? exactly. theresa may today is admitting that we are probably going to have less access to eu markets than currently. she is conceding that we cannot expect all the obligations that we would take on as well. she is seeing life will be different. i would disagree with you slightly, hard brexit could still happen. absolutely. that is not ruled out. perhaps not under theresa may. and she is wanting brussels to accept the hard facts. she has said from the beginning prison does not wa nt from the beginning prison does not want a norway style deal or a canada style deal. but the uses that is cherry picking. there is sort of an inevitable reaction. michel barnier if it is a relatively warm reception saying it provided some clarity. there were words such as conciliar to —— conciliatory and compromise. the weather is the other big talking

the telegraph says hundreds of people have been warned to wash their clothes and clean belongings withes. the i also leads on that story, saying the chief medical officer has told residents there is no cause for alarm over the advice. the times reports that the prime minister is on the verge of issuing sanctions against russia if it is proved that the country was behind the poisoning. meanwhile, the front page of the financial times features analysis that shows multi—national companies are paying significantly less in tax than they were before the 2008 financial crisis. not surprisingly, lots about the poisoning in salisbury. let's take out closer look at that story and in particular how the times is reporting it. theresa may set to hit back over spy death, it says, prepared to announce sanctions — but they haven't proved it yet? no, in fa ct they haven't proved it yet? no, in fact it takes ages to prove any of this stuff. what happened last time with the polonium poisoning? it took about ten or 12 years and we still haven't pinned it down on anybody. it was traced rack to russia, thou

no, but it does sound like that on the front page of the telegraph ‘stop russian spy fights for life oning double agent who sold secrets to britain found collapsed on bench in salisbury. the big worry is what kind of chemical, as with litvinenko, was potentially used to poison this man and his companion. a p pa re ntly poison this man and his companion. apparently a restaurant, late—breaking news this evening, a restau ra nt late—breaking news this evening, a restaurant in salisbury has been closed as a precaution because of all this. they are obviously concerned as to what the substances. obviously we haven't had any information as to what the substance is and whether they have established that not. it took some time with the litvinenko thing to establish exactly what would have been used. so it may be the case here. it is clear from all the pictures you can see, and the areas that had been cordoned off, that there is a great keel of concern about this. a major incident launched at the hospital where these people are being treated. sticking with the front page of the telegraph, trump

this revelation, and sourced, the telegraph is known for having very good military contacts to drive clusives. it adds a interesting twist, how do they know this? out of a note it was in the daughter ‘s suitcase? they seem to have a pretty good detail here, they are working on the theory that it was an item of clothing, cosmetics or something that was impregnated and it happened in moscow and when they got here it was open and we know what has happened is that the gift we follow that through, we don't know if it is right or wrong, denials from moscow. if this were the way every thing was done, denials will remain. the big development might be that if they survive, if they can be questioned, oi’ survive, if they can be questioned, or if every person that can to their room or whatever, serviced the apartment can be traced, then we might have more detail. for now, russia is saying prove it to us, it is all because you are having problems with exit and thing about vladimir putin is that he never apologises and was in tour doesn't show mother russia is weak. the telegraph, a conservative n

matt in the telegraph has a cartoon about the same subject. morning will stevens on the front page, to rhinos standing and looking at an ipad. one says to the other "is this a dating app for northern white rhinos. i haven't swiped right yet also. " we should say you have a tie with elephants. i do. species are here before us. and there is real danger to them. we can all but this is the last item on the news. i don't understand why, but at the end of the day these fellows, elephants, are the day these fellows, elephants, a re close the day these fellows, elephants, are close to extension and parts of the world simply because of human beings want in their ivory. and for no other reason. that right. we really have got to get on top of this. by the way, rhinos are close behind them. absolutely, only 35,000 left. they are wonderful creatures. and they are big guys,. there the second biggest mammal, land mammal. digby and henry, thank you very much indeed. that's it for the papers tonight. don't forget you can see the front pages of the papers onlin

the sunday telegraph, i like this picture, the cambridge women's team. henry.g is very fun but winning seems to be brilliant. cambridge won all four races this weekend. so huge, huge day for them. very disappointing for oxford. and then one last story before we go. this is a sad story for ant and deck. this is gossip rather than use but the suggestion is they will be axed from i'm a celebrity...get me out of here and they will be bringing in some new blood to increase ratings. i wa nt to new blood to increase ratings. i want to know, forget who the presenters are, i want to know who the contestants are going to be, will be get borisjohnson on? his father did it. i would watch that. asa father did it. i would watch that. as a presenter or contested? co ntesta nt! as a presenter or contested? contestant! it is some months until this comes to pass... this is a huge show, 10 million viewers, and it is like what happened with top gear, it isa like what happened with top gear, it is a show at its peak and it is reliant on a couple of individuals who may turn out to b

in the telegraph still, the eu threatens breakup over at google.p over at google. why are they so concerned about the power that google wields? the right concerns. —— there. there is a tax which is try to get 2.1 billion from google does not pay any tax in his europe. but as we are discovering, google, all these tech companies are where you put your stuff in like facebook, they know so much about us and it was something that most of us were vaguely aware of what are now very aware of and the eu are saying something must be done. i do not know what you can do with an american company where people are going voluntary into it. the eu does not likely the dear to have so much power. it is up to us, isn't it, as consumers to be wiser. is it a generational thing? it is up to us. this idea that people are wising up to the fact that these companies held as saviours. long, especially in the global financial crisis, have 110w in the global financial crisis, have now gotten too big. maybe, if you, for instance, use google to search for instance, use google to

rachel, take us to the telegraph, winter in control. it is called! eir is part of the country until i read this glory. it is very comprehensive, 1000 schools have closed, the cold spring on record, coldest temperature in 27 yea rs, on record, coldest temperature in 27 years, and if you want that figures on this, in terms of car accidents, in three days, it has already done £10 million worth of damage and 8000 car accidents. pappas in context. we have all been whether crazy over the last couple of days but you can see why, it is consumed everything, and you have got sheep there as well! henry, by all means add further fa cts henry, by all means add further facts and figures to back! there is this amazing disconnect between the amazing photos, not just this amazing disconnect between the amazing photos, notjust on newspaper front pages, but seems we have seen from our windows of snow carpeting the country, but it is actually quite serious. i know you mentioned on the times' front page the environment agency has put out a series of coastal flood warnings

the telegraph features a large picture of one of the invitations to prince harry's wedding to meghanarkle which were sent out today. the guardian continues with its coverage of the cambridge analytica scandal, revealing facebook shared information on 57 billion ‘friendships‘ from the social networking site. the i has a picture of detective sgt nick bailey, the police officer who was discharged from hospital today having recovered following exposure to the nerve agent used against former russian spy sergei skripal. the metro says that sergei skripal could face permanent brain damage. the times says the prime minister's bid to persuade eu countries to harden their stance against russia following the poisoning attack means at least five european allies were preparing to expel russian diplomats. the daily mail leads with an impassioned plea to ministers to ensure new passports issued after the uk leaves the eu are made by a british company, after it was disclosed a french company has won the contract. and finally, the sun claims that an easyjet pilot was caught out posing for pictures on

kevin, take us to the telegraph. at this point. yes, the deal that they have agreed is essentially that they have agreed is essentially that britain will remain to all intents and purposes within the eu's fishing rules, essentially, through the transition period, which runs until the end of 2020. now, this has caused a massive backlash, especially among scottish conservative mps. if you by the election last year, the did well in scotland. they got 13 mps in total. it is worth remembering that there are more scottish tory mps than there are do you —— dup mps. they do wield quite a lot of power if they are upset, which they clearly are, on this. one of the great slogans in scotla nd on this. one of the great slogans in scotland during the general election last year was, vote tory, get fish. the whole point was that they would go down to westminster and fight ha rd to go down to westminster and fight hard to make sure that after brexit scottish fishermen would get access to their own waters without eu fishermen coming in

we stay with the telegraph, eu threats of break—up over google. google wields these days? they are concerned, of course there isa they are concerned, of course there is a tax part of this. they are trying to get 2.1 billion from google, who don't pay any tax in europe and we now have a way of dealing with this. but of course as we are now discovering, google, all of these tech companies where you actually put your stuff in, like facebook, they know so much about us. facebook, they know so much about us. and it was something i think most of us were vaguely aware of, but are now very aware of. and the eu is saying something must be done. i don't know what you can do with an american company, where people are voluntarily going on there website and using it to keep in touch with relatives, to skype, to do also somethings. but the eu doesn't like the idea they have so much power.m is up to us, as consumers, isn't it, to bea is up to us, as consumers, isn't it, to be a bit wiser? it seems to be a very generational thing. bee it should be up to us. the e

meanwhile the telegraph says according to president trump the uk would also face a better prospect of avoiding us tariffs on steel and aluminium once britain had completed leaving the european union. the independent asks whether poisoned spy, sergei skripal, could have been working in a freelance capacity. the paper says the russian double agent may have become a target after working on behalf for private security firms. and finally also in the independent it's a question of not having your cake and eating it. uk health authorities want employers to consider swapping "cake days" for healthier alternatives, in a countrywide push aimed at tackling unhealthy habits at work. so let's begin. with me isjonathan charles, who's managing director of communications for the european bank for reconstruction and development. very good to see you. let's begin with this surprise announcement that president trump was invited to meet with kim jong—un. president trump was invited to meet with kim jong-un. no one could have seen this, i think even if you had said a few hours before. these are two people

the telegraph looking at the eu threats to break up over google.le, not ruling out it will rake it up. is google for it? we all know it is dominant, it is. it is over 9096 of european research and that is why the european commission is looking at this case and, you know, in the way that policymakers do, she is holding the sword of damocles over google. everything we heard about the other internet giant facebook, andi the other internet giant facebook, and i think she feels she has political licence to push this idea. when you look back, precedent tells us when you look back, precedent tells us that the europeans can go after these big corporate is, it did with microsoft went mario monti was the european commissioner and he kind of one and at the time we were reporting it and thinking they are not going to get anywhere but they did. europe tries to break it up in america tries to defend it in the trade for developing here. you could have two different google ‘s... trade for developing here. you could have two different google 's. .. or two alphabets

the daily telegraph starts with the story, warboys's victims accuse minister of disgusting attempt tot of most of the newspapers today —— worboys. it raises a lot of questions about how the entire system works. it does raise those kind of questions, the fa ct raise those kind of questions, the fact that victims have to take the pa role fact that victims have to take the parole board to court and had to crowdfu nd parole board to court and had to crowdfund to get justice parole board to court and had to crowdfund to getjustice when actually worboys is in prison and has been through all of the due process , has been through all of the due process, and yet the due process failed, failed these system, failed the victims, and both the parole board and the department ofjustice have coming for criticism. it has been confirmed they made errors at the parole hearing, basically what the parole hearing, basically what the high court have said, and there have been systemic failings at the pa role have been systemic failings at the parole board. so we will you do have a serious issue because the p

the telegraph says president putin swore reve ng e the telegraph says president putin swore revenge ond sergei skripal. the sun says, what is your poison? and the guardian leads on the same story, but gives over space to north korea's apparent willingness to discuss getting rid of its nuclear arsenal as part of direct talks with america. so a lot chew over, starting with the metro. camilla, porton down poison probe, a lot of alliteration in that headline. that is the metro for you! the key to this story is the toxicology report, when it comes out, and porton down are looking into what could have affected these people. the top-secret military facility in wiltshire at the heart of this and people are making comparisons to litvinenko, which was a radioactive substance and we'll concluded this morning when the bench where these two unfortunate people were found was not singled out or had a cordon around it and the hospital they tend it was not close down the radioactivity was insta ntly close down the radioactivity was instantly ruled out. so it begs the question, what is the modus operand

thejustice secretary on the front of the telegraph faces calls to resign, but he has told the telegraphe has not considered resigning. i think his position is probably 0k, much of the decision was taken by the previousjustice secretary anyway. it could be that pressure will continue to mount, but i think the fact that the whole of the parole —— the head of the parole board has gone... he was pushed, wasn't he? well, obviously, if there we re wasn't he? well, obviously, if there were failings in the board. according to thejustice secretary, david gauke ‘s's legal advice was that he would weaken the case for the victims of the government did intervene, which is why he said he didn't, and decided not to do so. clearly this is most unsatisfactory. you have to earn on the side of protecting the public, and the public must have confidence that our system works. we are in a position where the head of the parole board said he followed legal advice and was then told his position was untenable. the justice was then told his position was untenable. thejustice secretary followed legal advice but he

this is the back page of the daily telegraph, crying shame. eadline, the shame of australian cricket, and the main participants, the three cricketers involved, all very tearful and doing tea rful involved, all very tearful and doing tearful news conferences and involved, all very tearful and doing tearful new some erences and involved, all very tearful and doing tearful new some erences oni involved, all very tearful and doing tearful new some erences on social interviews. some people on social media were saying, where these genuine? —— were these for the i watched these yesterday liverpool and they looked *‘ , men, they mer what tlfl have - and to people i at people at 9:5 f" people at 91; f" of people at 91; f" ‘ much is on the question is, can individual. the question is, can they come back question not sponsors have been deserting them in droves. they were unequivocal in their remorse but you have to say, how did they think they were going to get away with it with cameras everywhere in the current environment? and they did not tell the truth

also in the sunday telegraph, russian tv sharing propaganda using uk bases. ng the salisbury incident and ways to stop money coming here, it turns out that quite a lot of russian tv stations broadcast in the uk and then across europe and there are several breaches of ofcom regulations, putting out material which is misleading orjust plain wrong. i think it comes as we know there have been calls for russia today and these programmes to perhaps not be allowed to air here, it has been left to ofcom but interestingly, it seems to go deeper than some of the ones we are seeing and when the government is trying to say we need to take strong action, they should probably leave so there are serious questions of the fact they are letting this happen. the sunday times, theresa may ordering a lot of extra spending to help the nhs, £4 billion, we are being told, asa nhs, £4 billion, we are being told, as a sort of boost and overruling the chancellor to sort of save the nhs must have more money.” the chancellor to sort of save the nhs must have more money. i mean, you know,

we begin with the telegraph. 25% tariff on steel imports in a move that could trigger a global trade war. the european union has hit back warning the us it will "react firmly to defend our interests" the independent leads with brexit and a vow from uk prime minister theresa may to secure the most comprehensive trade deal "anywhere in the world". this comes as she sets out five tests any brexit agreement must meet. the times world section reports on russian president vladimir putin who has boasted of a growing an arsenal of "menacing" super weapons which are invulnerable to western defences. he also warned russia's military build—up could not be contained. the new york times looks at china's interest in africa and building coal—fired power plants in places such as kenya to help meet the country and the wider continents fast—growing demand for electricity. and finally, on the vox website, a warning has been issued by plastic surgeons who say taking selfies will make our noses look 30% larger than they really are. a

it doesn't get much better in the daily telegraph. we do our best. it is in keeping with the rest. raf chief says they need more money to deal with russia. theresa may announced what was it £600 million for submarines. there have been questions since. raf now getting involved and asking for their share of the money. and why not? the russian threat in the previous papers, it shows that it needs a response, that is why services are keen on getting into the money for that. saying they need to modernise, not keeping up that. saying they need to modernise, normally we are hearing we need more money for those covert operations. cybercrime, as well, which is more difficult. and less glamorous. nothing like a bit of hardware to show off for a government minister. the daily telegraph is supportive of the services that's why they came to us the services that's why they came to us for the story. and no uniform is needed. it could be anybody. exactly. it is not light relief, but it is the best we can manage, with this final story. give teams a saturday job says

but germany has returned, livestock about the story in the telegraph, in the business pages of the telegraph very much in focus, under pressure, not just companies very much in focus, under pressure, notjust google, weaves and spending it at about facebook. clearly the focus is on the dominance of some of these companies in various areas, in this context it is the dominance of the search engine market, however many others use other research engines available but google dominates the market was more than 90%, historically they have used that to favour some of their own counterparts and that's caused uncertainty, difficulties and that's really what the eu is dry to push back against, the dominance of the market, forcing the break—up of the market, forcing the break—up of the company, who knows?” the market, forcing the break—up of the company, who knows? i read some more, facebook and google collectively enjoy about 60% of market share in terms of online advertising. it's actually a de! the numbers are quite stunning, it's a reflection of the success. perhaps we should be wary of pushing back

we are going to go to the telegraph and brexit bias. alleged! again. pping off my colleagues who work hard on rival newspapers, but the idea that the election, electoral commission is biased on the question of brexit is based on the fact that some of its members have said things about brexit in the past. that is not surprising, given that at least three of them are ex—mps, i checked them out. the chairman sirjohn holmes has said things about brexit before he became chairman. but the idea that it is biased, doesn't... there is not from what i have seen any evidence to suggest they acted other than any evidence to suggest they acted otherthan an any evidence to suggest they acted other than an independent way. but it is the comments they made outside the arena. yes. jacob rees mogg this it isa the arena. yes. jacob rees mogg this it is a serious situation and priti patel. and they don't have any bias on the question of brexit. now a proper newspaper! 0h, on the question of brexit. now a proper newspaper! oh, come on. now the times, i was shocked. back to

another story in the daily telegraph, it has in its front page, battled to raise cash holding it feelrepreneurs back. this is a letter sent to the uk government saying more needs to be done to support women who want to start a company. this is a really big story and i am delighted to see it on the front page. adventure capitalist do not fund women in the same level as men and that is a lot of time down to discrimination. maybe they feel more confident with people they relate to. and it is not regulated. one of the things that is really shocking, after women survey of had been told they needed a man to help them. interestingly, that does not surprise me at all. a lot of women in the bbc, especially in business programming, quite a few have started companies and in some instances they have had to hire a salesman. selling goods globally, just because when they have gone into the meeting that had not even been considered. you ask the women in this survey that the telegraph conducted and they were saying they we re conducted and they were saying they were being discriminated against and no

but the sunday telegraph obviously have found an angle on russian tv station showed propaganda using uk bases. henry did such a good job of explaining the convolutions of the other top story. will you have a go at this one? what are they doing? the interesting thing about this is britain, we know, is very anti—russia. what some of its allies have said is you are anti—russia but you are also letting the russians used london as a base and one of the ways they do that is that our tea, a kremlin finest channel, has a british licence to broadcast allowing it to broadcast anywhere around the eu. another european country cannot say that we are banning you because while we are in the eu it relies on a british licence —— rt. british latvians and others are saying we want ofcom, the communications regulator, to take a closer look and say this is propaganda, not something that should be broadcast on our channels or on any uk channels. it seems extraordinary that we allow this given the kind of fulmination we have appeared in the last few days from the foreign secretary. have appeared in the last

in the case of the telegraph that's a much longer, labor process but the essential elements are the same. the reason that is important is because you can use those essential elements to build better and faster coming occasions. >> host: who is rob goodman? >> guest: is an old friend of mine from duke and he's my co-author on this book and an earlier book and rob and i we had we drove to the chronicle, the newspaper, together and when the slanted in both part that's wanted to take an expert at writing together and rob is a phd candidate at columbia university and a friend and co-author on this book. >> host: jimmy is an editor at the new york observer in his day job, former managing editor at the huffington post. you mentioned earlier on mr. bush. he plays a significant role in your book. >> guest: he does. he is one of the 20th century leading figures in science and in claude shannon's life he is the most important mentor that claude shannon will ever have. when shannon is getting ready to graduate with his life and he is not something to has an extensive network of famous scientific con

so the telegraph operator asked him, what about the brigadier general?ln's reply was, i can make a brigadier general in five minutes, but it is hard to replace 100 horses. somebody gave that to me the day i made brigadier general. [laughter] >> and it has been by my desk ever since, to this day. it is there if you came to the house now. you would see it. it always reminded me that your job, powell, is always to take care of the horses. don't worry about being a brigadier general. take care of the horses, the soldiers, the employees, the clerks, the students, the faculty, whatever it takes to be successful in whatever it is you are trying to achieve. jeffrey: in 2011, the fukushima nuclear disaster took place. and a couple of the reactors were ours. it was, it was terrifying, i would say. so i was on a two hour teleconference. hey, we don't know what is going on. all we can see is the cnn helicopter feed, but if something happens to the reactor, this is horrible. two-hour teleconference. i am in perth, australia. click. i have to go do a town hall with 10

staying with the telegraph, let's look at a photo on the front page, strong and cradle it says.a baby. which used to be standard fare for politicians around election time but i don't remember seeing theresa may... because as andrea leadsom rather carelessly shall we say put out, theresa may has not had children of her own so therefore she is the age of having grandchildren and she has not got them for that very reason so it's an image we have not seen at any point before. maybe we happen to us on secretary but i cannot remember because it was not literally then so you are not looking for it. a lovely picture. the baby is only six days old, a fine head of hairfor a tiny baby. that is one for the family album, taking in walking them. very sweet. quite extraordinary when you think sharon national security council on monday for two hours, going to the house making a statement and answering questions, tuesday ultimatum for the russians, all that planning, wednesday morning another one hour or more with the attorney general, defence minister, foreign secretary, all of that going on, g

the telegraph operator asked him, what about the brigadier general?oln's reply was, i can make a brigadier general in five minutes, but it is hard to replace 100 horses. somebody gave that to me the day i made brigadier general. [laughter] colin: and it has been on my by my desk ever since, to this day. it is there if you came to the house now. you would see it. it always reminded me that your job, powell, is to take care of the horses. do not care about being a brigadier general. take care of the soldiers, the employees, the clerks, the students, the faculty, whatever it takes to be successful in whatever it is you are trying to achieve. ♪ ♪ started thehey company at a warehouse in san francisco. now, with their cofounder renaud visage, they have turned it into a global business. racking up $10 million in ticket sales. kevine first 10 years, served as ceo, now julia is driving the company towards an ipo. joining me today on "bloomberg studio 1.0," eventbrite's

now, in the case of the telegraph, that's a much more longer, labored process, but the essential elements are the same. and the reason that's important is because you can use those essential elements to build better and faster communication systems. >> host: now, who is rob goodman? >> guest: so rob goodman is an old friend of mine from duke. he is my co-author on this book as well as an earlier book called "rome's last citizen," and, you know, rob and i have basically -- we've been debate partners sense our days at duke, we wrote for "the chronicle" together, and when this project kind of landed in both of our laps, we wanted to take another effort at writing together. and rob is a ph.d. candidate in political theory at the university of -- at columbia university. and, you know, he's a friend and co-author on this book. >> host: and jimmy soni is an editor at the new york observer in his day job, former managing editor at the huffington post. you mentioned earlier on vanabar bush. he plays a significant role in your book. >> guest: he does. so bush is one of the 20th century's leading fi

we begin with the telegraph, who report the nerve agent that poisoned the russian spy sergei skripal news also leads with the russia spy poisoning affair and the show of support from the us, germany and france who have jointly called on russia yesterday to explain a military grade nerve toxin attack in the uk. the middle east eye looks at the latest in a string of high—profile white house departures as national security advisor h. r mcmaster is to be removed. according to reports, us president donald trump is taking his time in announcing the decision so as to not humiliate the army lieutenant general and ensure a smooth transition. and in the guardian, england rugby head coach eddiejones may have compromised his british lions future with his ill—judged, recent controversial remarks about ireland and wales according to an opinion writer. and finally on australia's channel 9 website, nasa has drawn up plans for a huge nuclear spacecraft capable of shunting or blowing up an asteroid if it was on course to wipe out life on earth. the us space agency published details of its hypervelocit

the telegraph claims the nerve agent used to poison sergei skripal and his daughter yulia may have beense me. it pictures a british nuclear—powered submarine, deployed in the arctic. the metro has the headline putin the pariah after britain gained the support of the us, france and germany for blaming russia on the poisoning of the former double agent and his daughter. the ft also has that story — it pictures theresa may who today visited the scene of the poisoning in salisbury. the express looks at the world cup in russia, questions being faced of a mass boycott. the guardian his talking about jeremy corbyn, fielding an article saying at his own mps are rushing ahead of the evidence over the poisoning. the mirror's front page has a picture of poppi worthington, the terrible case of a young child who died of a six—year. —— of asphyxiation. let's begin with the metro. i am trying to work out if it is terrible make—up on vladimir putin, and i presume he is not singing? serious story, but this is almost comical. it is almost like a flippant attempt to hit back by printing pictures of this n

nicola, sticking with that theme, the telegraph, the blue brexit passports might not be made in britainbe made in britain. they might not be made in britain. they might not be made by a british company, they might be made by a franco dutch company. the concern made by some brexiteers is that the reason for this is because european rules required the tender to be put out across the eu and it has been won not by a british company, and the symbolism of this is not what we're after during the brexit period i have to say, i think all concerned need to lift up their eyes and look at where we are trying to end up as an end goal, which is to come out of brexit with an economy that is strong and with the right results. i think michael gove put it quite well when he said, keep the eye on the prize. you want to have trade negotiations through the transition period and have a pragmatic result at the end where immigration rules are right, and the terms of transition give certainty to companies. some of these issues, it feels like they have some importance, they are perhaps not top priority. i will a

go to the sunday telegraph. anger as gibraltar is left out of brexit transition. s going on there and their views. we don't. i did actually look at the draft transitional agreement and gibraltar was not mentioned. but there is time. do not panic! there is plenty of time to actually come to a relationship for gibraltar. it is also interesting that spain is saying, what about us? actually, i am not sure that spanish position is very sound one because we are negotiating with the european union. but some deal will be done. you can understand them being edgy about all of this. now they have got this. and the eu gave spain the veto. now, that will have to be sorted out as well and i that will have to be sorted out as welland i am that will have to be sorted out as well and i am sure gibraltar do not see themselves in the whole mix. that is horrible. it is all very much of a mess. but whether it will actually use the veto is a different issue. but the habit on the table, and whether the user or not we do not know but they have it, and gibraltar knows they have got it, and