as you can see on the table, on page three, the u.h.c. city plan, we are recommending a contingency reserve of approximately 5.5 million. for the delta dental plan of california, active employee p.p.o. plan, about 3.1 million. and blue shield of california, about 13.3 million. for a total of just under $22 million as of june 30, 2017. this is a reduction in our contingency reserve calculations for each of the three programs, from what we had calculated as of june 30, 2016. now, all of these reserves are again currently fully funded, and we do account for the change in contingency reserve into the calculation of plain stablization. so in the next couple months i'll discuss the reserve status with you and how the contingency reserve impacts the claim stablization reserve. in particular on the change, you'll note the u.h.c. city plan overall stayed relatively stable. we had the reduction attributable to medical retirees, coming out of the need to be reserved for because of the change in the fully funded status effective january 1, 2017. we di

>> the 19 members that were referred from u.h.c. to best doctors had completed an interconsultation service. that's the second opinion service. >> all right. are there other members, other questions from members of the board? regarding this? >> yeah, i have some questions. so, appreciate this presentation. it's different than the presentation we had at month two. and in some ways. this focusses, i think, in terms of outcomes, focusses on member satisfaction with your three cases, which is encouraging, anecdotes of members being satisfied with this. it doesn't refer at all to any cost savings or additional costs, which i had some concerns about when i saw some of the initial cases. are you abandoning cost savings, don't really have access to that? we are spending a fair amount of money and the way it was sold, not only for member satisfaction but also to try to improve our overcharges and our over utilization. and get to that, i'll get to son of the cases. >> sure. to answer the first part of your question, commissioner, we are not mo