if you are example, the unemployed union pipefitter -- i am a welder -- and i go to an unemployment center and i apply for that job and i see the job posting -- here is a job paying a little bit more that is only two or three weeks, i would probably take that one over a production welder -- 10 months long at a lower wage. i am not going to apply for the job that is not what i'm used to working for in my standard of living. it is advertised as a pipefitter -- -- it might look that they might look at that and say i might want to take a job. >> you details some problems with advertising and wages that are not accurate or do not properly provide opportunities for american workers. it seems to me that one of the questions to wrestle with is something north carolina did a which is dealing with incentivizing people to not be on benefits but to go to work. i think that was a helpful trend. --it possible -- secondly most americans would like a permanent job and not a short-term job. there is no doubt about that. if you have a second job that's going to be a year, 10 years, as whered to one construc

if you are example, the unemployed union pipefitter -- i am a welder -- and i go to an unemployment center and i apply for that job and i see the job posting -- here is a job paying a little bit more that is only two or three weeks, i would probably take that one over a production welder -- 10 months long at a lower wage. i am not going to apply for the job that is not what i'm used to working for in my standard of living. it is advertised as a pipefitter -- -- it might look that they might look at that and say i might want to take a job. >> you details some problems with advertising and wages that are not accurate or do not properly provide opportunities for american workers. it seems to me that one of the questions to wrestle with is something north carolina did a which is dealing with incentivizing people to not be on benefits but to go to work. i think that was a helpful trend. --it possible -- secondly most americans would like a permanent job and not a short-term job. there is no doubt about that. if you have a second job that's going to be a year, 10 years, as whered to one construc

. >> we feel what is advertising a wage they might apply for the jobs the unemployed union pipefitter and i go into an employment here is a job that is paying a little bit more only to read three weeks here is the production welder makingng several dollars an hour lower than is now i'm used to working for as a pipefitter boulder job theyy may let that the right way and saddam will not take back that is is problem with advertising in wage rates to provide opportunities for american workers and then the north carolina did a great job is to incentivize people to not beyond benefits that was a helpful trend is that possible that anda most americans would like a permanent job and not a temporary job if it was per minute or six months to retake a permit if the short-term job should pay more if it is a short-term basis. but is it possible to use the incentive with welfare reform to make thatths incentivize people and that helps them experience a job in the future it is perfectly reasonable to argue but those people using welfare are doing work but they also collect benefits but if you want t

i said, if it is such a good thing, why are so many people unemployed across the european union, highouth unemployment, lives destroyed by the political project? not one of them answered that. anna: i'm sorry to interrupt you. we are just out of time. thank you for joining us, mr. smith. "on the move" is up next. ♪ okay, ready? whoa! [ explosion ] nothing should get in the way of the things you love. ♪ get america's fastest internet. only from xfinity. anna: welcome to "on the move." we are counting down to the european open. i am anna edwards alongside matt miller in berlin. here is what we are watching. japan's prime minister postpones a sales tax hike after having vowed only a lehman-like shock or a massive earthquake could prompt the delay. we look at the future of the financial services industry as hsbc and mcquarrie are said to count headcountsd

change are the unemployed people, who are more thahan 10%f the country and they are actually willing to change. so the paradox is that the people who are in the street and with the trade unions are those, most of them, who are actually having a job. peter: tell me more about the romantic view that you just talked about there of strikes and protests. specific to france, it appears. geraldine: well, i think the trade unions are very linked with the history of liberation and resistance during the second world war so this is where starts the romantic view of the trade unions. but if one looks -- gives a more precise look at the evolution in the 30 years is that the trade unions are less and less powerful because there are less and less members. even in bastions in the fields like energy, where the c.g.t., hich is leading the protests 14% of the as workers in this field were unionists and of the 30 last year, it was cut in two. so this gives an illustration and also, even if the polls say that almost half of the french are against this law, it doesn't mean they are actually supporting the trade unions. a very recent poll said that even from out of 10 french people are actually di

unemployed. there's people on the stage that do. the minimum wage that was done in california, it's a raise for unions and unemployment in the centralalley and other places where it's too high. >> scott, you were one of the panelists at the debate. how much will the competing messages resonate with the voters? >> they are competing with the presidential stuff, and the sharks and the warriors, it's not getting through at all, really. you see it in the polls where there's large numbers of undecided voters, they tend to be republican, and a third or more of the voters have not made up their mind. the republicans are not well known at all and their message is not getting through. >> there's no a-list for republicans. there's not been a republican holding statewide office in how many years? >> in 20 years. >> there's not any named candidates out there. the biggest names are in washington. mccarthy and royce, they have leadership positions that they worked decades to get, they are not going to work away from them. >> and because of that, they can't raise money. if you are not raising money, and you are not on tv, you are nowhere. >> anoth

when workers are unemployed who used to be members of such-and-such a local or such-and-such a union, they're now unemployed. they go get an unemployment check. supuppose thes are "no, there's something else we can do for you. we can help youou. we can bringn specialists. we can help you set up, under the auspices of the ununion, an enterpririse that wl serve this community in all kinds of ways. and we wiwill goo the community because we're based in it and urge people to buy from this co-op rather than from where they've been buying. we c can begin to develop a network." that's what mondragon did. that's how t they grew that way. everybody helped everybody else. i don't know what all the benefits would be, but let me make a suggestion. a labor movement that has been declining without interruption for 50 years better come up with something new because what it's been doing hasn't worked. i'm not being disrespectful. i mean, i don't have the numbers. the graph that i teach in my classes of what has happened to unions is unambmbiguous. ththe line goes m here and it keeps going down. it's long overduee to change te strategica, and here's an idea. and wouldn't i

the european union to record needs to evolve from a bureaucratic political union into being a trading union sot actually helps foster that the millions of young people across the eu who are currently unemployed we can get them back into work. this is an opportunity. people need to call down -- calm down and treat it as such. caroline: must david cameron go? partyd: the conservative will work all of that out. my expectation is that david cameron will stay for a while. that is for the conservative party. the much more important thing is the process of the negotiations. we need to ensure there is some senior business people involved in that. not just politicians. what is absolutely clear in the last people who should be anywhere near the negotiating team is the prime minister, the chancellor, and civil servants from the treasury. it needs to be a pro brexit business led team. hello? yes? it has been wonderful speaking to you, thank you very much indeed. we will keep that going. remember, we have been speaking to s&p they were talking but the potential cuts to the aaa rating. he will also speak to others. ♪ caroline: good morning, and welcome to "on the move." we are just moments away from the s

the engagement of state and local governments are california buildings trade council has ensured that utility scale renewable projects and highly skilled women and men through direct contractor engagement california buildings trades union and incumbent in unemployed workers are retained all to reap the benefits of the economic growth and job creation. these jobs in the energy sector put a noor underneath the middle class. through prevailing wage and project labor agreements we can guarentee our members rights are protected. the local community concerns are addressed and the safest most highly trained work force in the world is able to build a new generation on time and under budget. we support an energy policy in which the commitment to fwroe our economy and rebuild our middle class and protect our environment all go hand in hand. that means raising working standards. fostering common sense reforms and unlocking the trillions of dollars sitting on sidelines to build the energy infrastructure and it means taking advantage of all options. and to deliver affordable and reliable energy while reducing emissions and meeting the climate challenges. and over middle class jobs and practical shugss and stop taking options off the table. and leaves this wor

advertised -- what we feel if advertised at the right wage, more american workers with a higher wage might apply for those jobs. if your example -- if i was an unemployed union pipefitter and that's what i am, i'm a pipefitter, i'm a welder, and i go into an unemployment center and i apply for that job and i see one of the job postings in there, here's a job that's paying a little bit more but it's only two or three weeks, i'd probably take that because, see the other job, a production welder, ten months long and it's a lot lower wage, several dollars an hour lower and i'm not going to apply for the job the simple fact it's not used what i'm working for my standard of living and it's the wrong wage and if it's advertised as a pipefitter welder job, at the right wage, they might look at that wage and say i might want to take that job. >> mr. costa, you detailed some problems with advertising and wage rates that aren't really accurate or don't properly provide opportunities for american workers. and it seems to me that one of the questions we need to wrestle with is something north carolina did a great job i think in dealing with, which is incentivizing people

direct contractor engagement, california's building trade unions are making sure the local workers are recruited and trained an incumbent and unemployed workers are retained, all to reap the benefits of the economic growth and job creation. these jobs in the energy sector put a floor underneath the middle class. through prevailing wage and project labor agreements, we can guarantee our members rights are protected. the local community concerns are addressed, and the safest, most highly trained workforce in the world is able to build a new generation of energy projects on time and under budget. insupport an energy policy which the democratic party's commitment to grow our economy and rebuild our middle class, and protect our environment all go hand-in-hand. that means raising working standards, fostering common sense reform, and unlocking the trillions of dollars on wall street sidelines to build the energy infrastructure we will need to power 21st century economy. it means taking advantage of all options, from her doable new we are to natural gas and coal with carbon capture sequestration two of -- create affordable and reliable energ