and it doesn't seem like the united states possesses any of that. i mean, now decision is actually calling for a bold, responsible leadership. and the look at the, the track record, the floating in the united nations security council. there they, they don't seem to be able to do anything. and, you know, like, and my question here is actually, uh, is, this is the situation of demonstrating that the united states, even if it wants to be a leader. i mean, it can be a leader in a stations when you know if the participation is not necessary, but when it is calling for it, they don't seem to possess even the skills of approaching it as well. absolutely. absolutely. are you know, why didn't the continues to say the united states all the world together? i think the reality is just the quarter. i think that's in the middle east. the original powers, the global majority, or the world much, or the cap and what's the cap kept the situation together or avoiding escalation. whereas the united states is the reason for these to be licensed agent. and now we see just

the united states cannot be a fair and effective means either. so you have to add to it creates the participation of the world much your, that comprising of both global actors like russia, china, maybe brazil, you know, the brakes. uh, as a cool and the regional players, of course, including israel, but also including your on in the air of a major companies. i as the it as a, as an institutionalized ational collective literacy. so most american junior level one but collective literature by the world majority, i think, is necessary to resolve this crisis now. now, uh us bring our discussion a little bit closer to home because of where the last 2 or 3 years we have well been following the confrontation in an over ukraine between russia and the collective west. and i've heard many analysis on the list, including yourself, said that the next world order, the new composition of the international system will be based on the outcome of done by the battle. i wonder if what's happening in the middle east can change the prediction. do you see any implicatio

states and at the same time that the world is uniting without the united states. negative consequences of such politicized steps affect the entire global economy. now this has to be corrected, and of course it has to be done by those in charge market participants. it is in this logic that russia works with its partners within opec plus. we rely primarily on objective market dynamics of oil supply and demand, as well as investment programs. industry. that is why the opec+luc member countries fully fulfill their obligations and successfully cope with all challenges. i am sure that coordination of the actions of opec plus partners will continue. vladimir sergeevich, do you agree that indeed, opec plus will continue and that the world will continue to work without this dictatorial role of the united states in the field of global energy. of course, and the most important thing is that this is confirmed, you know, what with so to speak, the very fact that it is really possible to stabilize markets, despite all the destabilizing role of the united states and its partners

world war, the united states of america became a superpower. e question that europe, as the center of world politics, could no longer play a full role on the world stage. and the united states of america, after this massacre, really declared itself quite seriously at the world level, and wilson’s 14 points, which will subsequently be very seriously published and will be laid as the basis for the league of nations, they will also play their role precisely as a factor in increasing the role of the united states in world politics, that is, not only in economics in world politics. world war ii again. drained europe of blood and strengthened the absolutely gigantic capabilities of the united states america, after which even the new international organization and its center were moved to the territory of another continent. in general, it must be said that in american philosophy , in political science, they talk about this quite a lot, scientists, philosophers, researchers, they note the fact that indeed, military actions are bad, they bring death, but

well, the same time b as the united states needs to decide it's interest. still showing that it is, it has the assets to do so without further attacking ation, antagonist ation. but the person is also how far will the us actually go when it comes to supporting ease of alameda telling me, i mean, what does that consist of that support? right. and is the us already since the most amount of for an aide, and most of it is military age to his role than any other country in the world. it has now since the existence that israel has said do billions and billions and billions of dollars worth of mostly military israel. so that's that partnership that support for israel, especially as defense, is already there. we've already seen um you know, promises and actually deliveries of new munitions, especially when it comes to the iron. don't the iron down which is where it was famous for this missile defense isn't this highly effective against homos rocket attacks is actually a us weapon system, right. this was developed by racism by lockheed martin major american military

the israeli vested interests are deep seated in the united states they control the finances and and lot of the um the people the big guys on wall street connected with israel they are either of is israeli origin or the background exposely connect with it and then the lobby is extremely powerful no um political party in the united states can can afford israel and that's why you can see that there is such um and still a great deal of israel retoric um because they really control the leavers of power in the united states but of course even then as i was saying um joe biden is because of his backt lashh in in the middle east and then in the arab well and the rest of the world um against and mindless solder of women and children. so is going to to back fight on the united states, so the the biden is now trying very careful and trying to restrain israel or one hand, trying to appear to be fully supporter of of israel, but then the rate is is is is oversimplified because everybody is concentrating on on just the act of of terrorism committed by hamas without without without addressing the

no further escalation can be allowed, and in this speech the united states the united states of america or president biden, because he really said the words that we have been waiting for so long, but is it not too late, or is it now that the new president is elected ? exactly in the situation, he can not play on anticipating the situation, in any case, the conflict that has happened now in the middle east, and he characterizes it, i emphasize, we should pay attention to this, not as a war of palestine against israel, but as a war of hamas against israel, he is talking about putin , does not compare russia with hamas, he compares putin with hamas, and no, he does not completely identify russia with putin, this is already happening subconsciously , it must be read, that is, he is already drawing a structure where the world should fight terrorists, he outlined who these terrorists, because this is his passage to palesta. by the way, in this package, 10 billion dollars have been allocated for palestine from this aid , which will now be discussed in the congress, 14 billion dollars have been

with the support of the united nations with the participation of arab states. bloomberg reports this. while diss. the average idea at an early stage, as journalists note, will largely depend on the results of israel’s ground operation, however, for implementation it will also need the support of arab countries, whether it will be successful get a big question. ekaterina radaeva, news. a rally of thousands in support of palestine is taking place at this moment in malaysia. several thousand demonstrators gathered in the capital kualalumporie and protested against israeli aggression. rallies against the strikes took place in many countries, the main demand of the participants was to immediately stop military operations to protect civilians. in new york , several thousand people gathered on the streets, they carried palestinian flags in their hands and called on the government to stop the supply of weapons israel. at least 150 people were detained. the rally took place in washington, where protesters gathered near the giorgio washington monument and blocked traffic

it was camp david, the country retreat for the president of the united states. it is a place filled with trees, good weather, and also important secrets. of course, this was not the first time that the united states held itself accountable for israel. jimmy carter was not the only one who had this sense of responsibility in us government. the first and perhaps most responsible us president on the palestinian issue was harry s truwman. the most important place to express this sense of responsibility was in the united nations general assembly to divide palestine into two independent states. arab and jewish, it was possible to create nation with the vote of the majority and give them land in the same place. those are in favor will say yes, those are against will say no. afghanistan, now argentina, argentina, abstention, egypt. no, iraq, no, lebanon, no, soviet union, yes, united kingdom, abstain, united states, yes, paraguay, yes, the resolution of the duck committee for palistin was adopted by 33 votes, 13 against, 10 abstentions, israeli flag was hoisted outside t

me, but the rest of the united states it is — just me, but the rest of the united states. ower— states. it is not the example, our power example, it is honest is important _ power example, it is honest is important. the world is looking. israel_ important. the world is looking. israel has — important. the world is looking. israel has a _ important. the world is looking. israel has a value set the united states— israel has a value set the united states does and other democracies and they— states does and other democracies and they are looking to see what. the world — and they are looking to see what. the world as we can, says joe and they are looking to see what. the world as we can, saysjoe biden. the world as we can, sastoe biden. the world as we can, sastoe biden. the first us president said israel's prime minister during those press statements, to visit israel any time of war, and a time of escalating tensions in the wider region here. live now to our chief international correpsondent, lyse doucet, who's on the israel—gaza border. joe biden, after making those statements

like we've seen with the united states. it's got you imagined tina we've seen the with him run con claims and focused on happened to him and we've seen, nor the stream pipelines being destroyed by the, by the administration. so we've delegates fully understand that this conference in badging, the united states, the fed off the ukraine, china, that's what you grain is about. they'll destroy the infrastructure that everyone will be excitedly discussing tomorrow. well, i think the reason these patients have come to badging to turn this on tomorrow because they believe that this is an important aspect of the future economic development and which can also lead to peace if it actually, i don't believe that is indeed for us of the united states and europe, they use the destroyer, trying not to destroy the bells our own efforts in their interest to promote we say, sorry to interrupt. we're seeing the european union arguably act again since economic interest. repeatedly, as it followed the united states from one more into another, an

the bindings. i have to blame, change, and errors. united ever as china is involved in building that it has raised. a network in china is involved in the saudi land bridge projects. it's china build 2 major ports and these are out and 55 and i flew as the one i sold was. okay, but what about by then blinking is build back better world and partnership for global infrastructure investment is you're all these just pos, schemes by native nations have helped by that propaganda media to try and attempt to, to make out basically a compatriot building road. absolutely. they, you look, if you want to compete with the built around different build better foster railways, you should build better and more efficient power plants. you should build errors and more efficient ports and the airports united states, and you're unable to do these things anymore. they cannot finance them, they cannot bill, but they don't have the engineering as killed capacity with china. it has to be these things. so this is not the way it's gonna be. these are just propaganda th

the actual proof of this is that in the united states of america they still cannot form a goal, and why do they do it, and actually it affects the results of aid, the progress of aid to ukraine, and even more so at the time of the elections, however, i want here, after all , it is somewhat optimistic to say that in the united states of america, in fact... these mechanisms are all set up in congress. congress today has a strategic majority in answering this question. and what concerns the current tactics and fear of kevin mccartney as speaker of the house of representatives and fear for the fact that he will be ousted as speaker of the house of representatives and led to the adoption of this 45-day budget, but from my point of view. by november, the issue will be resolved, because, not yet, there is a lack of information , the fact is that as of now, and the funds that ukraine can receive, they are generally allocated in the amount of more than 3 million, it's just that these funds will be by the end of the year have already been allocated by the budget, it is another matter that we were

in short, if i want to say to you, if the united states of america comes to the conclusion today that the ground attack and the entry of the zionist regime's forces into the gaza strip will be successful, i think they will support it without the least doubt, but the events that happened recently we are witnessing it. well, as a guest of your program, i pointed out that in a realistic view , what happened to the third regime, finally , there was an image of the military talent of the army. more than it was before despite all the media efforts that have been made public. what we see today as the opposition of the united states, maybe there are reasons for it on the surface , such as the fact that they are aware of the weakness of the sahsti regime and its forces in the ground war. on the other hand, the soldiers of the zionist regime, who do not have the courage to fight outside their own camp, the americans know this well , and the c regime also knows it well, and to maintain appearances, perhaps this falsehood and this signal they are trying to communicate and it is america that has b

kakati is a small island state located next to the united states. an interesting history, it became the first french colony to gain independence and immediately fell into the orbit of us influence. there have been 23 coups d'etat in the entire history of haiti, a huge number, even in the newest modern history of us intervention, a very clear contrast with the dominican republic - it is a prosperous resort state. and haiti is the poorest country with a destroyed infrastructure and atrophy. institutions of public administration, with a non-functioning economy, from where refugees constantly strive to get to the united states of america, and the united states of america strives not to let these refugees in and deport them, and there was even a humanitarian catastrophe there during the years of the coronavirus pandemic, and when the united states, and those infected with coronavirus, were deported back with the understanding that the health care system there was destroyed, in general, no humanitarian considerations and love for humanity, humanity stoppe

then did the united states to the oregon country. in fact, the united states really held a very weak throughout the 1820s and 1830s. this begins to change, however, in part because ideas about american expansionism really had taken hold by the 1840s, the united states had annexed texas. in the 1840s went to war with mexico for the remainder of mexico's northern holdings. upon the defeat, mexico in 1848, the united takes possession of the lands that would become the american southwest states of of new mexico, arizona, southern california and so on. and moreover national politicians in united states took up western as a key campaign issue. the monroe doctrine, 1823, something you have encountered in other history courses. the monroe doctrine, a position that opposed any europe colonization or involvement by european nations in the western hemisphere and the 1840s. the idea of, manifest destiny has really taken among americans manage destiny. the idea that america had a god given right to settle the continental to expand all the way to

the united states has worked relentlessly to make real these premises. we continue to coordinate closely with egypt, israel and partners across the region as well as the united nations to build mechanisms that enable humanitarian assistance to flow to citizens of gaza without flowing to hamas or other terrorist group. david satterfield is going to lead our efforts on the ground. the united states has committed $100 million in humanitarian assistance in gaza and israel. and to more than 1.6 billion. that makes the united states the largest single country donor by far to the palestinian people. we call on all continue tries particularly those with the greatest capacity to give, to join us in meeting u.n.'s appeal for the humanitarian situation in gaza. at the heart of our efforts to save innocent lives in this conflict and every conflict is our core belief that every civilian life is equally valuable. there is no highering arcky when it comes to protecting civilian lives. a civilian is a civilian is a civilian no matter ethnicity, age, gender, faith. americ

look, uh, the united states. i think it is our use of put themselves in the very difficult position 1st they uh buy them, administration tries to build bridges with the world majority. i think the great and conflict that showed very explicitly of that the global majority is most at the side of the united states. the us is losing global in for us. and they tried to reverse it, white accommodating major countries in the global majority of the, including solve their area which they do not. once you know further a partnership with the, with china and dicing that actually one of the major reasons why the us for promoting this solid is really repre swung, is to try to at least limits the solid bottom if it was driving. so the states needs global majority. there's as far as point, but the other hand, uh easily, oh, is it possible american domestic politics, not just the of the us for as well as a bunch of the american domestic politics. these really question is, all you do was the last, you know, it is very difficult for

the kurds are supported by the israelis and the united states. nt to divide and destroy iraq, while they are doing a pretty good job of it. they do the same in syria. syria is like pizza with all kinds of ingredients. christians of different denominations, greek orthodox flock, catholics, other christians, sunnis, shiites, druze. american congressmen communicated with druze leaders in essuwayda, where they had an uprising in the south of the country. various. tribes and groups could be used to set each other against each other, this is what happens, usa they strive for disorder, because with order they have no control, but from the chaos in ukraine, israel, the middle east, and other regions of the world, the united states benefits, they can bribe people, they can say, do this, and i will give you in return i will give, then they may say that if you don’t do this , we will subject you to sanctions and you cannot... trade your grain, oil and other goods, in the case of syria, the united states captured its grain fields and oil fields, they transpor

the united states learn the hard way in the rock. the military force is good at destroying things, but not very good at creating desire political outcomes. so i think that israel right now is trying to figure out how to balance its desire justified in my mind. to dismantle a mouse with the reality that it's going to be a top floor and it has to play the long game and figure out what god will look like afterward. what is the relationship with palestinians and the broader middle east will be like when the dust settles? we have won you right now, is you and i are talking in washington, the foreign minister of china. he said he believes that israel's actions have now gone beyond the level of self defense and response, but is key as you just said, essentially making a play to the global south. and again, taking advantage of this moment to maximize china's position of looking like the good player in the world. you know, i think the china is that is somewhat ambivalent about the war and the brain. and now the word that we see in the middle

and uh, the united states. is it the syria way? precisely the same argument that russia was using to enter into the country and supported the government. now the united states calling is that it's there to destroy isis. but of course, it isn't the knowledge they have how many years, and they have at the store. and i says yet, and i think it's legitimate that russia, as an ally of the serial government, which is a legitimate government, it should be able to assist an ally of the united states on the other hand, uses the same argument, the terrors of marketing to justify ones is doing and i take a. ringback in both cases, you have to look very carefully get out legitimate. the argument really is, i know that a counter intelligence cooperation between most going to washington continued for some time, even after the bilateral relationship took a turn for the worse. as far as you know, is it still ongoing and do you think it's possible to revive it in any shape or form in the offensive way that will benefit the the security of both coun

if i'm president of the united states, i promise you we will. meg: to follow up on that specifically, that's a good idea, focusing on the domestic and foreign. even as evidenced today as we're seeing play out in the house of representatives with issues surrounding republican speaker kevin mccarthy, whether he's going to maintain that position, then when there's that level of division within the republican party, how do you really seek to unite some of those voices? you can accomplish what you say you'd like to do. vice president pence: i still believe the majority of republicans, a strong majority of americans, understand we're the leader of the free world. and want to see america continue to provide support for the military in ukraine with accountability. no blank checks. but to continue to give them the means to repel that russian aggression. but i don't know if what's happen on capitol hill suggests a great deal of division in the republican party. i think what you're witnessing is a handful of republicans, partnering with democrats in congres

but i use a same thing in the united states. but when, when they say we're at the bottom of barrel, what, what they mean at least in united states, is that we're at the bottom of what we can give to the ukrainians. to give you an example of, of chavel initials we've given above 40 percent of our javelin inventory to ukraine, the pentagon. so we looked at the given anymore because we would need to add 4 other possible conflicts, for example, in korea. so when you hear people say we're out of javelin, we're not out of javelins, we're either java is that we can give to ukraine without accepting risk. that the pentagon believes is unacceptable. how would they help in korea javelin miss? i was given that i know from the trump, from him was why you rushed if young and i have or these to meet with. kim jong, who in so quickly was when he heard the, as every president has do that, the north koreans can destroy los angeles. in 33 minutes, i'm showing javelin missiles are kinda useless. and so on the, on the north koreans have a very large

states veto at the united united nations security council, so the short answer again was impunity, israel can do what it wants because the united states is allowing it to do what it wants, and the international institutions that are supposed to protect the people from wild actors like the uh zionist state is uh doing in terms of mass murder of civilians, they are helpless to to stop it because of the way the uh operation of the... security council works, um, the only thing that's going to stop this is if the state of israel and or the united states is looking at it costing them more than it's worth, to israel, this is their opportunity, they they have wanted, if you have you talked, figure is now the left part of the ruling coalition, the the people that that help keep him in power, which by the way means help keep him out of prison, because the minute he's not prime minister, he's going to jail for the probably the rest of his life, that that party, they openly claim that god gave them the land all of that land, and then some, and they want it back, and they're in power. to acquire it, s

support for ukraine is quite strong in the united states congress, even among republicans. d only a small group of the most radical republicans who support trump do not want to support ukraine for reasons that i still do not understand, it is they who want the government to stop functioning, depriving it of money, and that to avoid this, then-speaker mccarthy had to compromise. he chose a compromise, which was that this budget would not include aid to ukraine, but another budget would be adopted in 45 days. and of course, everyone except radical republicans hope that money for ukraine will be found in it. but the most important thing now is who will be elected to replace speaker mccarthy. there are two main candidates, steve scalise, a senior republican from louisiana. he advocates greater support for ukraine, quoting biden, until as long as it is needed. and his opponent, jim jordan from ohio, opposes increased support for ukraine. so the newly elected speaker will decide which bills to introduce. to a vote and can block aid to ukraine if it so chooses. in this case, presid

the united states had actually never intended to divide korea. ey always thought that eventually the occupation would end and they would come up with a formula of reunifying the entire peninsula. then, of course, the cold war said sin and it becomes more and more difficult to come up with any kind of arrangement with the soviet union for a unified korean state. this is what leads, in 1948, to the creation of two separate and hostile korean states with the new north korean state saying that south korea has no legitimacy and is the puppet of american imperialism, and the south korean government saying that north korea hano legitimacy and is a puppet of the soviet union and communis these two states do not like each other. south korea wants to have a war with the north, but the united stat is firmly opposed. north korea wants to invade the south, but initially stalin is very opposed. and at the time, north korea is very dependent on soviet leadership. but stalin's calculations started to shift. >> let's not get too far along into stalin, i would like

but it wasn't just the united states that agreed on that. his day, when my discussions with the saudis, the crown prince, was he wants to see a reconciliation take place. it's overwhelmingly in his interest. it's in saudis' interest. the idea that you'd have the nations of the middle east cooperating economically and politically changes the dynamics significantly. and so, i just think that it is something that it's in everyone's interest -- including, long-term, in china's interest. reporter: i just had one for the prime minister as well. have you had a chance to speak to benjamin netanyahu? i know there's been efforts made. obviously, the president was -- was there in israel last week. are you still endeavoring to speak to the israeli prime minister? prime minister albanese: i am. i have spoken with the israeli ambassador on a number of occasions. we continue to -- we understand that, obviously, mr. netanyahu has pressures on, which at the top of the list is not -- is -- is not the discussion with the australian prime minister. we understand

you have labs in the united states. while we do not have information about that, the cost of producing fentanyl in the united states would be much lower. if you cannot produce them in mexico or south america, you can produce them in the united states because the demand is so important. it is just one idea. people in this country cannot of that happening because this is a country with laws, the rule of law is strong. but it is not that strong anymore either. this country suffering some issues also. >> brian, let me ask you this one. robert asks given the many gop presidential candidates more inclined toward restraint, is a purely to score political points? there was this discussion to repeal, one deal proposed was we will get rid of the one that had not greeted the global war on terrorism, but we will will place it with a mexico one. is this progress? what do you make of this? maybe we went to little bit bananas after 9/11 for a while. >> tens of thousands of troops deployed to iraq and afghanistan. most americans are in

but, answering your question, can the united states help ukraine and israel at the same time? john kirby. yes, he says that the united states is a powerful enough country, economically, that can help both countries, because both countries are important to the united states, to national security, and we must help them, let's listen to the comment, if not today's, and from yesterday briefing, ukraine is important. getting the help she needs, they're still on the counteroffensive, fighting russian aggression on their own soil, we don't want even one single break, so we 're continuing to work with congress to try to get additional funding, we have enough funds for a certain amount of time, but , as i said before, it is not infinite, that is why we made a request for additional funding, how this conversation is going and looks, i cannot say now, and ukraine and israel are important, both countries need american military aid, and it is important, both to their and our national security interests, that they receive that aid. and it's good that maria, we managed to show fragments from

the united states has begun to actively modernize its nuclear forces over the past few years. long process, and so far there are no prerequisites for, uh, i emphasize, technical prerequisites for washington or moscow to conduct nuclear tests, but politically, we can expect similar actions - demonstration ones from the united states, i emphasize that russia is only in this case will take retaliatory steps. yes, the fact of the matter is that the agreement is fulfilled, but the door remains open on the part of the united states, and how they know how to use these with doors and even cracks, and sometimes windows, unfortunately, we have learned this very well recently, thank you thank you very much, fedor, thank you very much for being in touch with us today, answering our questions, we continue to follow the news feed, the israeli defense forces claim that there was no direct hit on hospitals in the gas strip. the blow hit a nearby parking lot - says the press secretary, in fact, idf brigadier general, daniel hagari. i hope that anatoly viktorov, ambassador extraordinary plenipo

states, it seems to me, that’s it this is exactly what is happening, the united states is increasinglypening now in the house of representatives, uh, on the one hand, they are trying remove from his role as house republican majority leader kevin mccarthy, on the other hand, kevin mccarthy is considering the possibility that he will respond to this by making concessions to the democrats in order to get their votes. that is, it turns out to be some kind of, i don’t know what to call it, a mess, not a mess, a small pile, a fight , what do you think, well, there is an existential fight, in fact, but here we are watching, it seems to me, the last battle of the american globalist, traditional elite of the older generation, generation, to which includes biden , pilosi, mitch mccon, yes, these are the people of this environment who stand for the global leadership of the united states in the world, for their global involvement, for global dominance, and now they are giving the last battle. forces that advocate a more nationally oriented america, it is today represented by trump and the republic

but as i say nothing yet from the united states at the moment. the united states at the moment-— the ~' moment. we saw antony blinken in tel aviv _ moment. we saw antony blinken in tel aviv yesterday _ moment. we saw antony blinken in tel aviv yesterday pledging - in tel aviv yesterday pledging solidarity with israel. today he is injordan, meeting the king, also the palestinian leader. how would you describe the nature of his mission? what exactly is he trying to achieve?— exactly is he trying to achieve? ., , ., achieve? certainly, for the united states, _ achieve? certainly, for the united states, the - achieve? certainly, for the | united states, the massive concern — obviously they want to stand behind israel. they are israel's strongest ally but they also want to make sure that this does not burn into a wider regional conflagration and so that is why we have seen us warships sent into the mediterranean. they say to send a very strong signal to other actors in the region to not take advantage of this moment. they are concerned about, for example, has fuller in lebanon or iraq eng

ind the united states. a threat from a number of debtors, were very focused but were also focus on the threats across the board in the context and what she wouldn't describe in much better detail than i can, that was why we made the decision just on our record to stay focused on the china threat. >> are. right. you want to take over and give some of the audience time for questions. >> the revolution of technology has been able to keep up with the threat of communication? >> that's a really good question. i've had a law school class, how is technology and the law in our policy keep up with technology, something they can write about all the time, the terms of reality, our laws are always lagging behind technology, that is true. an example of congress coming together in a bipartisan fashion both in 2008 and prior with the sunset and understanding it was a necessary change to fisa in order for pfizer to keep. not just the internet but also overall service providers will provide services to the users in a way tha

something we cannot do the united states. toward the future and it remains substantial for the only regional between united states and israel strategic significance stitched's geopolitical landscape fostering bipartisan consensus on shared value and it will be pivotal. we do thank you for ongoing support and support going forward. seventy-five years celebration is changed. seventy-five years together is a clear message to get. [applause] >> thank you very much please send all greetings are phones in jerusalem. i like to begin our first panels israel security doing incredible work in the senate armed services committee, a distinguished member and is back from the first u.s. election official on the ground,. [applause] also welcome the director of the national defense, moderating our discussion and i will serve as your second panel. [applause] u.s. provided israel with 155 security domain and a lot of to address which it has been. the most preeminent capability and it's been tested many times and you all know it's been tested ag

there are only 6500 officers in the united states. they are so overwhelmed at the end of march the new york post reported aliens were waiting until 2032 in order to even show up at an ice office to get the charging document that will then put you into proceedings. >> that is not waiting for asylum. that is just to get to court. >> to quantify the number further, nbc news reported in february that there were 588,000 people who have been paroled into the united states who were part of that gigantic queue of people who were simply going to get the sheet of paper that were pretty -- that would put them into the proceedings. one of the things you hear a lot is the trump administration broke the asylum system. you know, i served under obama, mark served under obama and trump. trump didn't do anything that obama didn't do first. there are a couple of things that i can think of, not many. they certainly didn't do this. this is literally breaking the asylum system. if you believe in asylum, you believe in holding the torch of the nations this i

and this, in some ways hampers the ability of united states and its partners to anchor. this is an advocate of all turn this moment in which there is an inflection, wind, a shift in the distribution of power to a much more multi polar what you can call a poly centered world. so have these 2 things are combining to create a real sense of disorientation to within the is real, how mos conflict. now, president joe biden has refused to call for a ceasefire, refused to say he's going to intervene in any way and what the israelis are doing. we've also refused to call for a ceasefire in the ukraine, russia conflict, and i like americans to have a realistic sense of how that's perceived around the world and that there are other major powers. and i'll, you know, mentioned turkey and air to one. see the world differently, and are we in a situation where america is lost, the ability to be the great hedge, a monic benign power. and now other nations in the world are organizing against it as it picks one side of the other in these complex you know, i probably distinguish carefully betw

states, the government of the united states, or the administration of the united states goes throughn aid is allocated to ukraine, there is much more much easier. everything happens because there are clear legal mutual obligations that the united states, well , cannot but fulfill, so i don't think that their fulfillment of those obligations that they have to israel is in any way essential will affect the situation in ukraine, so that this will be the background, i do not argue , but that it will have some extremely negative consequence, well, it is unlikely, you are an optimist, then, let me, let me, then i will talk about other help, in particular from the european union in the european commission today. have already declared that the war in israel will in no way affect the military support of ukraine, but nevertheless there are certain so far very similar, perhaps insignificant signals, but they are there, well, for example, the italian ministry of defense has declared that military aid to ukraine cannot be unlimited, so was the statement from the newly elected leader of the death

to take steps inside the united states to stop it. could be knocking on the door of an american company and saying, we are seeing efforts to compromise your network, this is what you have to do to stop that. that is the fbi's job. we cannot stop them from doing their job. if we were to take them out of the ability to have access to this, i think it would be deeply flawed to remove the fbi. >> they have different recommendations. want to cut the fbi out. they did the -- want them to get a warrant at least when they were at the point of knowing there was something in the database that they wanted to see. i just did a podcast, for those of you who listen to my podcast, it will be distributed later today or tomorrow. we interviewed two of the five members of the board, talking about the recommendations. if you'd haven't heard enough on 72, you can listen to that. that recommendation was sort of split. two people said, apply the current statutory standards. one said, it has to be probable cause. how do you feel about those recommendations?

of such comparisons, can become a certain new starting point in, i don't know, relations between the united states, russia and ukraine between by them? i would like to start with the fact that the current ukrainian authorities, in particular the president of ukraine zelenskyi, have made considerable efforts to convince the world community that the current political regime in russia is terrorist in nature, and that this the regime, i mean putin's, it poses a threat not only to the existence of ukraine, that it poses a threat to the existence of the civilized world in principle, and in this respect it is really not much different from hamas, hezbollah, al-qaeda, the islamic state, well if we are talking about all terrorist groups and to the great regret of certain states, well, in particular the same iran or north korea, because these states and these organizations, they absolutely openly, without hiding, declare their unwillingness to put up with the existing world political order, and that they want to destroy it, and what's more, and just like these states and organizations... the putin re

also, iran's ambassador to the united nations announced the names of five prisoners released by the united... "the fact that those relations are likely to never improve at the rate we're going, is that we are in effect going to drive the iranians into the arms of the chinese? if you think about the world the way i do, right, you start thinking about chinese influence in the persian gulf, and from an american point of view, we want to minimize chinese influence in the persian gulf, but i think we're now pursuing policies that are going to have exactly." the opposite effect, especially with regard to iran. although mershammer clearly earmarked us administrations about their fundamental foreign policy blunder with respect to iran, the classic post-revolution policy of the washington administrators remained the same for decades, based on an article written recently in the foreign policy research institute, in the post iran revolution period, the white house authorities split iran's classic role in the middle east between saudi arabia, egypt, turkey and israel. the writing explains that now the

, the united states, and the united nations. we have a most distinguished panel. thank you very much for joining us on the inside story bus of the lady. molly, how can i ask you 1st about the general assembly because you served as pocket stones ambassador to the united nations? that will be people here who say the general assembly doesn't have any power. it doesn't do. and the thing you, during your time is the ambassador, you're actually one of the vice presidents of the general assembly. so tell me why the general assembly is important. and i think the general assembly is important because when there's a deadlock in the security council, as we saw when several resolutions didn't get through the ritual or theme that stopping or the bloodshed, or at least getting a humanity in phones, then the agenda. somebody kicks in, it's often to guard the parliament of the word with every country has one vote. and that's a, a body that really does reflect global opinions of the security council. dr. world has only made up a 15 members of the

what happened was provoked by the countries behind hamas, so that the united states of america would not have leadership in the middle east, and more so that the united states of america would also be attacked by people who support hamas, and in in this case, all over the world, that all this was simply played out and done for the sake of a large number of people, a large number of victims, in order to lower the influence of the united states of america on middle east? so, first of all, this attack looks like, again, it was a rocket that was fired by hamas, and we understand the magnitude of this tragedy. but we understand that this missile was just moving in the wrong way, in the wrong territory, and eventually it got into the hospital, and we can see that there were a lot of victims, they wanted, of course, maybe they wanted to show something to the world, yes, people died, but again, it's not israel that attacked, the gaza strip, we understand that, again, countries. arab countries, they hate the us, and they really do the reason is simple, because these countries, they are not eco

the united nations are doing nothing, they should put immediate seas fire. hundreds of people are dying there, hundreds of babies are dying, they are beheading the children, the hypocresy of west is clear, but the hypocracy of the muslim nations will be written by blood in the history that the palesty. brothers are dying and no muslim country has the guards to stand with palestinian brothers, what we are doing, the saudi brothers, what they are doing, they are doing nothing, the americans usa are visiting palestine, where are our muslim country's leaders? the protest in islamabad is the latest in a series of demonstrations that have taken place across pakistan in recent weeks as situation in gaza continues to escalate. the excessive use of force in gaza and subsequent palestinian casualties have prompted concerns among these pakistanis. they are questioning the world about the effectiveness of diplomatic efforts and role of international community in resolving the issue. nasir kazmie. press tv, islamabad. press tv has talked to pro palestine protesters in cen

some of it helps the united states and other allies. for example, a chunk of the package of age ukraine pays for us forces to deployed to eastern europe. united states begin those deployments right after the war began. they were at about 20000 troops down to about 10. they're there to reassure the europeans and improve the trends against the russians. but paying for that as part of this aid to ukraine, but that money, most of the most of it stays in the united states. another example is weapons. when we send weapons with united states and weapons to ukraine, there's money to replace those weapons. that money goes mostly to us, arms manufacturers, so the weapons themselves going to ukraine, helps with granted. and it's a fight against russia, but the replacement uh goes to us manufacturers. so when you consider agriculture, you actually, i mean people can read it online, but you mentioned agriculture as well. and that's right. uh, there's uh, a piece of the humanitarian, a that helps countries who are as are suffering as a result of the d

we've said the 11th archivist of the united states. she happens to be the first woman archives as well, thanks to president joe and the us senate. thank you, senator capito. she's a proud native of pittsburgh. she's a recognized. well being from detroit. i can relate to that prior to appointment, she was senior vice president, director of the david m rubinstein at the white historical white house historical association. she also served as legislative assistant in the united states senate, and she was a senior advisor and executive at the library congress in. she was vice chair of the women's centennial commission and is chair of the board directors of the women's suffrage national monument foundation. she brings to us, in essence, writing chapter in our history. and so now it's my honor to introduce the chief justice of the states, john roberts, jr and the 11th archivist of the united states of america dr. colleen shogan. please raise your right and repeat after me. i colleen shogan do solemnly swear. i colleen rogan, do solemnly swear

states, the countries of the region will unite among themselves, so to speak, fight israel with the in general, as a result of thoughtless policies the west, here a situation may arise that the west as a whole , the french and the british have already gone there, a very interesting situation may arise that all the countries of the region will unite again under the slogan that has already been, let’s throw israel into the sea, another phrase, very remarkable erdogan, he said: “ozrael, you can’t get away with such fraud, even if you are the united states, because...” america will also lose. this phrase by erdogan is fundamentally important. first, he explained to israel that it is necessary to work with the countries of the region, and not with those countries that are very far away. first of all, it is possible and necessary to conduct dialogue at the level of the regional subsystem of international relations. well, secondly, what came out of erdogan’s mouth especially clearly was that america will lose. the turkish republic understands that the world is moving towards a polycent. wil

and this as the united states has been accusing iran of involvement and the conflict of the united states has accused it one of helping the laws, a militant group to launch that october's. and i talked against these rarely towns and cities. and the united states now seems to be preparing itself for any possible scenario, given the fact that it is accusing it wrong of having a role in the conflict. the threat is real. there was a risk of an escalation of this conflict. the opening of the 2nd front in the north and of course the ron's involvement, that is a risk. lebanese has the law, a proxy for us to be run is conducting a raid on israel's northern border with considerable military capacity. and the history of attacking the state of israel. we can rule out that iran would choose to get directly engaged in some way. one has called for an international support for palestine. one does not believe in any of the initiatives proposed by the west to try to resolve the policy. and he's really complex. one says, the only way for palestinians is to remain steadfast and to resist against the occupat