going to give you the last word in the program what should the united states do the region in light of its official withdrawal from iraq. united states needs to stop igniting sectarian conflict throughout the region and stop hitting two different axes against one another right now the united states has developed an axis a washington riyadh tell of the ramallah axis against attack prime baghdad. beirut potentially damascus even maybe. because of my in the middle east we have to be we know together and instead of dividing the sectarian divide or break it together ok mind you we had twenty seconds go ahead in tel aviv. i think what we see in iraq was caused by the united states of course it opened up a pandora's box but the hatred between unfortunately has existed for many centuries it existed even before. you saw me on this program i want to thank my guests today in tel aviv london and in washington thanks to our viewers for watching if you are to see you next time remember. if you. want. rio's. touched by. paintings on display for. you. killed in syria's capital in the first suicide bom

position in the middle east it had a constellation of states in the middle east call american clearly pro-american states aligned with it the states that were not aligned with the united states were contained constrained relatively weak saddam hussein's iraq was in a box the islamic republic of iran was relatively weak hamas and hezbollah had not been legitimate elect coralie in their respective arenas the consolation for the power in the middle east for the united states was very much in america's favor back in two thousand and three on the eve of the invasion today clearly that is not the case unfortunately the united states is actually on the run we have actually been kicked out of iraq it's not just that we've drawn our troops we have been kicked out of the country which is really a very profound development for the united states i mean if i go to you in tel aviv it's quite interesting here is that we what kind of legitimacy does the iraqi government have because we're on the one hand. and we have they've really been quite american it's been quite constraining keeping troops there which they'd like to do the iraqi government saying no but they don't want them to l

and if a state of war promoted with democracy has become the standard foreign policy of the united states. hello and welcome to cross talk i'm peter lavelle with the american occupation of iraq officially coming to a close this week it's time to take stock was the war in occupation worth it are there any winners is a rock a better place and is war now the natural state of u.s. foreign policy. to cross-talk iraq's future i'm joined by sabri in london he's an exiled iraqi academic in tel aviv we have mayor javedanfar he's a middle east analyst and lecturer at the interdisciplinary center in herts lia and in washington we cross to hillary mann leverett she is a professor of u.s. foreign policy at the american university and a former white house and state department official all right folks this is crosstalk me that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it but first marcia is this a major milestone in american foreign policy you know i think as far as getting the troops out it is a milestone with only a few thousand troops waiting to depart from iraq by december thi

like the enemy of the united states but the problem is. with britain and in a very dim iraq and its collaborator the avenue the united states and britain have got to start. i mean and so the problem is our iranian position is really peculiar we don't know whether it's for example in public it's been very much a us policy but and. it has been collaborating with the united states in iraq collaborating in afghanistan so i think. they have only to blame themselves for a. mistake in politics and the region i think iran is being heavily involved in iraq has been heavily involved in syria and i think this is counterproductive productive i think iran should really take lessons from what's happened to iraq and i think the iraqi people has really if you go to the streets of baghdad goes through it or feel like they're. really weary of the intervention of the american intervention i think i mean diversion and internal affairs of countries is wrong. by the united nations the whole community what's happened in iraq was a. diversion by america and britai

how about the united states? i'm interested in a number comparison with 50. >> the u.s., having a longer history in space and a much larger budget, has probably put up something i think on the order of 500 satellites. >> who are -- are those satellites that china has in space, are they civilian or military or dual use? >> they're very much dual use. china's space program at this point is mostly oriented spacect recently, very recently. >> uh-huh. >> will you describe the spacecraft? accelerated from >> the manned capsule is probably capable to our gemini series. it's the second manned launch. it's longer, wider and heavier than the soyuz and it's in fact quite a bit more capable than the soyuz. >> is it as big as a standard public bus? >> it is about 25 feet long. so i have to admit, i'm not sure how long a bus is. >> what about the interior of the vessel? >> it's quite cramped. and some of the video we've seen so far put out by the chinese suggest that much accelerated from w module is crd indeed. last night they

>> well, i think you have to take religion seriously in the united states and i think that's the huge difference in united states and the netherlands. you've got the one most religious and secular countries in europe in the e netherlands. if you look at some basic and rntion kes do you believe the bible is the word of god or do you believe in heaven or do you believe in hell, do you believe in miracles? i think that matters when it comes to all these issues. >> the expansion of secular rights not only in the netherlands else why in europe that you speak of, and you see that expansion taking place in the united states. again going back to this core issue, what's cash dash is there any additional evidence of that? we have a church state wall between the two. doesn't that function pretty effectively to keep out influences which may diminish yew bumper sticker watty and force of our religious moraliub religious morality. but generally i think to look at a little bit of a paradox or a contribution what people believe and actual behavior. professing in religious values we also look what the

ok robert i'd like to go back to you and the war on terror that the united states has called over the last decade has had a really huge toll in pakistan and i think western audiences particularly the united states are not really aware of that or that how many people have died as this conflict goes on and the another issue is the radicalization of politics and in pakistan i mean it is it has to be one of the most anti-american countries in the world i mean this is the cost of fighting a war a war that is not that is certainly not winnable in afghanistan in the united states is going to leave i mean my goodness what a net loss all the way around for the united states in the region. it's hard to paint a pretty picture coming out of this there have been many unintended consequences of the large scale u.s. presence in afghanistan and as you point out one of those is the increasing islamic radicalization of pakistan and to the extent that the pakistan government is identified or is it is considered by many pakistani militants to be a part of the problem in fact to be allying itself in aidin

which is all throughout the united states and additionally has several oil refineries in the united states mainly in texas and louisiana it would have huge implications if the u.s. put venezuela on the list of state sponsors of terror which is an initiative that many right wing republicans in congress have been pushing for for several years now and what it would do is basically break relations between the two countries right now relations are frozen but commercial relations continue diplomatic relations are frozen but if if commercial relations were to be broken well imagine i mean if today the price of gasoline is over three dollars a gallon it would shoot up at probably over ten dollars a gallon if relations were broken with venezuela because you know it's one of the principal suppliers of of oil and gas to the country and again it would also cause a lot of regional discontent and rest when it will is not perceived by any other country in this region or around the world as any kind of threat it's only washington that's that's really been trying to portray venezuela in that kind of

they faced a lot of problems the united states just because the united states project cleared a few decadesater the united states was able to overcome some of the problems the french had faced read >> such as? >> the french didn't have as good of technological development as the u.s. had to read the had much more trouble in terms of disease by the time he and the united states project began in the early 20th century discovers had been made about what caused malaria fever in the united states was able to take action to eradicate those diseases. also the united states made the crucial decision to build a canal rather than the sea level canal. the sea level canal was much more difficult to accomplish. much more radical digging and structural free creation of the area had to be done for the sea level. so the canal was a brilliant decision. >> how long is the panama can now? >> it's about 40 miles. >> how long would it take to traverse? >> i took a trip through the tunnel several years ago and it is an all-day trip pretty much. the locks slow you down, you wait in line. there are often many ship

not the united states senate. i believe that the constitution does not authorize indefinite detention in the united states. some of my colleagues see it differently. they've claimed the hamdi decision upheld indefinite detention. it didn't. hamdi was captured in afghanistan, not in the united states. and justice o'connor, the author of the opinion, carefully stated in this hamdi decision -- and i quote -- "individuals who fought against the united states in afghanistan as part of the taliban" end of quote. some of my colleagues also cited the padilla case claiming its tkprepbts for indefinite -- precedent for decisions. padilla, a u.s. citizen, placed in military custody, the fourth circuit court of appeals, one of the most conservative in the land, upheld his military detention. but then before the supreme court had the chance to review the fourth circuit, george w. bush's administration transferred him out of military custody, prosecuting him in an article 3 criminal court. to this day the supreme court has never

two boys in the united states navy. m honored that they are willing to wear the uniform of the united states. two little adopted girls, one from china and one from india. every day, i look into their eyes and deal sort reminded of the world they are about to step into -- eyes and i am reminded of what they are about to step into. i will not contort myself into a pretzel. i will not going to sign those silly pledges. if we the only candidate on the debate stage who will not do that. [applause] i will not go to a donald trump debate either, by the way. [applause] but i do not want anyone leaving this great room without understanding why i am running for president of the united states. i am running for president of united states of america because i think it is absolutely unacceptable and we are passing down the greatest nation that ever was to the next generation for the first time in our nation's history in a condition that is less good, less productive, less competitive, more divided, and more saddled with debt than anyt

unfortunately it makes some forces in the united states like me will cause more aggressive. unfortunately the economy weaken this is dragging out the driving some people in the united states towards very dangerous military adventures like attack and get out for instance because they think of the control of oil completely they would control the energy and this would become control of the economy of. china many other countries in this war dr mustafa barghouti thank you very much for joining us here on r.t. thank you. twenty years ago i just country. began a journey. where did it take. he's . saying. to. susan to. six or six of them it's. coming.

unfortunately make some forces of the united states like new york homes more aggressive. unfortunately this economy we can this is dragging out the driving some people in the united states towards very dangerous military adventures like attack and get out for instance because they think of the control of oil completely they would control energy and this with we can control the economy of russia and china many other countries in this world dr mustafa barghouti thank you very much for joining us here on r.t. thank you. twenty years ago the largest country in the world to certain places of. what had been trying. to teach began a journey. where did it take the. world for the future science technology innovation all the latest developments from around russia we've got the future covered. emission free accreditation free transport charges free to make humans free is free. to type free. download free broadcast quality video for your media projects and free media and on to r.t. dot com you.

guest: more than about half of all the mexicans in the united states are here legally. is the largest source of legal immigration to the united states. about 20% of all legal immigrants living in united states come from mexico. host: what about english versus spanish? guest: the logger immigrants are here, the more likely they are to speak english. many of them do not speak english well. host: here is a tweet. bob, an independent in colorado, go ahead. caller: i lived in mexico for the last 10 years. my friends to come into the united states, as the gentleman mentioned earlier, use a coyote. that is a person who will get the more they want to go, usually a relative. it is a natural thing. they want to do well for their family. but they do not want to come here necessarily to live. some of them eventually do. but they really want to go back to mexico, as the gentleman knows, millions and millions of dollars back to their own families. host: do we know about money being sent back? guest: there are billions of dollars. the last number i saw was around the order of $11 bill

seems to also be anyone and everyone and you know i think that it would potentially come back to the united states and hit the u.s. in a way that again would be. not you know something that most people in the united states would really want to happen eva thank you so much for weighing in on this that was our lawyer and author eva golinger things. well still ahead on r.t. there is plenty of food to go around here in the u.s. so much of it many americans are throwing it out we take a look at how america's wastefulness is taking a toll on the world. on you do you believe the ref in. one of the protest nobody seems to know. the number of pepper sprayed the face but part of the argument that they're being overly dramatic . just. played. played. it just put a picture of me when i was like nine years old i just had a look through the leg. leg. i'm a confession i am a total get a friend that i love rap and hip hop music and pretty much. the way that he was kind of a big yesterday. i'm very proud of the world without you here it's a place. i. love playing . the lead. to the more likely. to lead. to the roc

on things going on here in the united states, and you have to remember it's not just the united states, it's the united states versus the world. we're starting to come out of our funk. slowly, but we're coming out of our funk. the rest of the world is just going into theirs. >> europe seems to dictate what happens in the u.s. do you think europe settles down in 2012? how does this play out? >> i think they will. it's not going to be a straight line. if there's anything 2011 taught us, nothing moves in a straight line. 2012 will be up and down, up and down. i think they will come to a solution. i honestly can't tell you what that would be, i wish i could, but it will move from the headlines. and i think what will come to the headlines will be emerging markets, and i think there will be more problems in the emerging markets in 2012. >> why? what do you mean? >> i think people thought the credit bubble was just a u.s. ooernt. i think people think it was the use use housing market and it's a big bubble. i think people realize, gee, you're a creditenciary markets. guess what's happening? un

game you know as the elections near well it's not a victory for the united states the the goal was to impose in baghdad. a pliable quiet regime in a country that had been pacified so the united states could not only dominate its oil but have a main client in this oil rich region that's clearly not the case most importantly though it's been a great national tragedy for the people of iraq not only have maybe more than a million died hundreds of thousands certainly but five million people were made into refugees almost every family has somebody they lost there's tons of widows and orphans in iraq and the country's been shredded along ethno sectarian lines previously unified country is now fighting itself as a consequence of the u.s. strategy was which was to divide and conquer joseph biden the vice president appointed by bush to be the point man for a record he himself was the advocate of the partition of iraq the breaking up of the country. and that appears to be what we are seeing today amid the bombings we're going to talk a little bit more about that in a little bit first i want to p

they face a lot of problems that the united states, just because the united states projects are a fewecades later, the united states was able to overcome some of the problems the french had faced. >> such as? >> the french didn't have as good as technological development as the u.s. had. they faced much more trouble in terms of disease. by the time the united states project began in the early 20th century, discoveries have been made about what caused malaria and yellow fever in the diocese was able to take action to eradicate those diseases. also the united states made the decision, crucial decision to build and lock it now rather than a sealevel canal. >> why was that crucial? >> a sealevel canal was just much more difficult to accomplish. much more radical digging and structural re- creation of the area had to be done for sealevel. so a lot of canal was a brilliant decision. >> how long is the panama canal? >> it's about 40 miles. >> how long would it take to traverse it? >> i took a ship through the canal several years ago, and it's an all day trip pretty much. you wake up -- >> be

also the united states. secondly in some of the emerging economies, the impact of the policy that was necessary because several of those countries were close to overheating. tightening and slow the economy's like brazil, india, the church to some extent, and perhaps in the coming months also china, much more than we earlier anticipated. with all these developments it was very difficult to interpret the short term dynamics. you mentioned good news, but i would not be too optimistic. you see, sometimes the rebound from a disappointment earlier, so you had the sharp decline in production in japan and then the yeah the states and the spring after the tsunami and earthquake . then use of a rebound. then in august the rebound stops because of the downgrade of the u.s. now it's coming back again little bit. as you look at the grass going toward those of really given what is happening in europe with the moment. >> to you what to say something? the effects of particular of the european and american uncertainties? >> t

up next for our viewers here in the united states, "fareed zakaria gps." >>> this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world, i'm fareed zakaria. we have a terrific show for you today. first up, the man who might have saved greece and the euro in the process. george papandreou led that troubled nation until just three weeks ago. did he do the right thing? what does he think is going to happen next in europe? an exclusive. >>> then, the man who set off a firestorm between pakistan and the united states. relations are now at an all-time low, and this pakistani american is at the center of it. hear his story for the first time. >>> next up, lots to talk about with our "gps" panel this week. from to egypt, iran to iraq, and of course asia. >>> finally, why egypt went way retro this week, back to the age of the pharaohs. i'll explain. >>> first, here's my take. you wouldn't have thought anti-americanism in pakistan could get any worse, but last week, nato attacked a pakistani army post, killing 24 pakistani soldiers. even before this

did make me smile a bit but they're desperate to make up with the united states but it's the pressures coming from the united states and it's crazy it's crazy because it's do you stabilising the one institution in that country which has held it together for good over bad largely for the but that's the pakistani military what they're trying to do are they're trying to instigate a civil war in pakistan prior to direct intervention and occupation i can't quite believe that because it's not going to be easy so it's a completely rational act whether that was alter ised who by washington or whether it was a local decision i don't know well who did it didn't do the united states any favors terry thank you so much for weighing in on all that that was author tariq ali and as we just discussed nato's recent delhi air strikes in pakistan have had some serious repercussions putting the u.s. ongoing mission in afghanistan in danger by cutting up a much needed supply routes into the country washington may have to shift gears and go into a different direction in order to reach the country mainly to r

i want that in the united states here in phoenix to help us with the economy. that brings me to the third point and that is the notion of dynamic talent is a tricky concept in the united states. we don't know in modern economies what helps an economy continue to grow and to remain strong and to prosper as it inknow vates, particularly as the economy and the culture and the society becomes relatively well off. it is a known phenomena that it is hard for individuals who are relatively well off to take outsized risk and put everything on the line. back to my original story, if you think about the swimmers in the contest, in order for the united states to prosper, we need lots of swimmers who are willing to get in the water and swim and save nothing for the trip back because they are the type of person who will do whatever it takes, work as hard as is needed and get to the other side without saving energy to get back. and this shows up in what we now have as the crystal clear data in the last several years largely funded by the kaufman foundation out of kansas city

to you professor lee listening to that i don't see that as a solution waiting until wages in the united states drop below china what do you see as the solution to the united states is jobs crisis. yes i think that you waiting a long time because all the economists know labor wages are very sticky and to date i don't know any american that's willing to work for three dollars a day let alone. what china is doing so for them to wait for labor wages to equalize is not the. right solution in my mind in fact if it came to that we would probably just have robots and other technology do all those of all the work that currently chinese people do right now so the more realistic way to address this is to retrain unemployed workers for a new knowledge economy to get them to. learn the sciences and learn math and all that and invest more talent in those areas because wrote an article recently that yes we could have solved the unemployment problem in so and have it anyway because we have three million jobs in the united states that we're going unfilled for six months or longer and that's because the c.e.o.'

of christmas for all the big winners at the top when manchester united on top no one should the city remain first with a five point advantage by the united states versus thirty seven points off the leaders with a game in town chelsea state and also fifth drew newcastle who as we had to go to the before on friday are sevens and lost twice and their travels. while at the bottom blackburn remain five points adrift of bolton state second bottom and wigan are also still in the drop zone and the wolves kept a lifeline with that one one draw at arsenal. figure skating now on russian's diag any pollution has talked up his chances at the sochi winter games in twenty fourteen the two thousand and six olympic champion spoke after winning the russian national championship for record ninth time on his much anticipated return after knee surgery when all the free time world champion was in second place after the opening short program inside as much as six hundred kilometers east of moscow but he is free program puts him firmly on top of the idea of how to get inside game one of the three will not work that next month's european championships in the english ci

that provides a lot of cover for the united states to do the things it does best in this part of the o provide economic wealth. >> the united states -- i don't think -- what ian said, the suds wanted by the world for the supply of lots of very important public goods. but nobody liked to acknowledge that, and nobody wants the united states to be all assertive and if your face and aggressive. so the best way to generate demand for america's world role is to pull back a little bit and say, you know what, you want us ought of your business, fine, we're out of your business. then no, no, please help us with europe, please help our currency, please help provide regional order, please protect us from the big, bad chinese dragon. so what you've seen, i think, is, you know, people fret about it, the united states turning away, walking away from the world, obama doing terrible things, pulling back. in fact, we're recalibrating the u.s. power to supply the good that's are necessary when the locals demand it. that's what you see here. it wasn't us pushing everybody to contain the chinese, it was

the map. they have stated they will use it against the united states of america. no further than the iranian constitution, which states unequivocally that their mission is to extend jihad across the world and eventually to set up a worldwide cal fate. we would be fools to ignore their purpose and their plan. >> obviously, i would like to see a lot less nuclear weapons. i don't want iran to have a nuclear weapon. i would like to reduce them because there would be less chance of war. but to declare war on 1.2 billion muslims and say all muslims are the same, this is dangerous talk. yeah, there are some radicals. but they don't come here to kill us because we are free and prosperous. do they go to switzerland and sweden? that's absurd! if you think that's the reason, we have no chance of winning this. they explained it to us, they come here and they want to do us harm because we are bombing them. what is the whole world about the drone being in iran? and we are begging and pleading and how it start a war to get the drone back? why were we flying a drone over iran? wh

the u.s. state department that the united states will not allow russia to veto or. u.s. plans. a.b.m. deployment in europe. that russia will not be able to change the plan itself and the schedule basically this was a no which was the answer to offer to resume negotiations addressing the federal council of the russian federation midriff once again stressed that we are ready for negotiations basically he once again hand. although as i said the united states have already given us a negative answer so now i think it's up to washington to decide whether they want to share quite a bit of or they want to let it hang in the air do you think that both with russia and the u.s. having presidential elections and twenty twelve do you think that there's going to be some sort of impact on bilateral relations with that outcome. by that relations especially such complicated relations as relations between russia and the united states and my feeling is that these elections will not be an exception and the effect will be negative. where is in calmer times i think. the reset of the reset would have been p

the map. and they stated they will use it against the united states of america. o further than the iranian constitution, which states unequivocally that their mission is to extend jihad across the world and eventually to set up for worldwide calworldwide caliphat. we would be fools to ignore their purpose and their plan. >> bret: congressman paul? >> obviously, i would like to see a lot less nuclear weapons. i don't want iran to have a nuclear weapon. i would like to reduce them because there would be less chance of war. but to declare war on 1.2 billion muslims and say all muslims are the same, this is dangerous talk. yeah, there are some radicals. but they don't come here to kill us because we're free and prosperous. do they go to switzerland and sweden? that is obsurd. -- absurd. they come here and explicitly explain it to us. the c.i.a. has explained it to us. it said they come here and they want to do us harm because we are bombing them. what is the whole world about the drone being in iran? we're begging and pleading and how are we going to start a war to ge

states i believe i believe so because united states is becoming weaker with the passage of. unfortunately it makes some forces in the united states like new york comes more aggressive unfortunately this economy we can this is dragging out a driving some people in the united states toward very dangerous military adventures like attacking iran for assistance. because they think of the control of oil completely they would control energy and this with we can control the economy of russia and china many other countries in this world with israel's isolation growing are you concerned that it could take an even more aggressive stance against the palestinians i think they are already aggressive enough. and there are acts of war crimes that took place in gaza beyond the scope of their policy in the occupied territories of sort of a system of apartheid that is much worse than the apartheid system that prevailed in south africa at one point of time it's shameful. if i was an israeli i would feel very shameful what about internal problems that the israeli government is facing

citizens in the united states. i have a problem with that. >> two quick questions. dn't al qaeda extend the battlefield the united states? we didn't do that. they did that when they declared war on america and hit is on 9/11. the second point ex, isn't there ademption between criminal acts and acts of war? we're not talking about holding up the seven 11. we're talking about engaging in war against the united states? >> right there definitely is, and particularly in a battle feel overseas. we can't reed miranda rights and can't have due process if you're captured on the battlefield in afghanistan. it's different iryou're accused of being associated with terrorism and you haven't left the united states, you're in the united states, and you're being accused because you're missing fingers or you have bright colored stains on your clothes or made internet communication with people. there should be a trial to decide whether you're a terrorist or not. we shouldn't be able to lock people up in the another and send them to guantanamo bay bay indifferent enoughly without a jur

he chose to represent his state in the united states senate, and the state twice chose him.to that role after he had served fewer years in congress than anyone ever elected to lead the president. he may have retired from the senate, but he'll never retire from service. through all the title changes in his career whether it's a physician, a politician, a businessman or a father, bill frist never has forgotten the importance of the individual in the work that he does. he never has forgotten that our nation's security, it's image and our solemn responsibility to the world hinges not only on how compellingly we can inflict pain, but how compassionately we can relieve it. though he was trained at our country's most prestigious schools and learned from its finest doctors, senator frist hasn't confined his skills to the comforts of the world class hospitals. he has bravely performed surgery on the front line of some of the world's most dangerous and desperate places. senator frist has saved lives hurt by human hands in places like the sudan and those devastated by disasters like la

wasted each year at the same time at the soup kitchen the lines are getting longer and longer what does this all have to say about the state of the united states today well i think it's a little bit of a poignant holiday reminder about some of the limitations and issues with a market economy you make food to make money and you want to sell it what people do with it after they purchased it is kind of a separate matter in an economy where growth is placed on a pedestal where there's a premium on growing you have to figure out a way to grow your profits grow your revenues by constantly selling more food but even with the obesity and the diabetes epidemic that you mentioned in your report it is there are limits on how much people can consume when it comes to food so there's a limitless need to sell more and grow your sales if you're in the food production or distribution business but there really are limits to what the population of the united states albeit a growing population can possibly consume and part of what happens with the overage of the excess is it ends up being an expensive problem that some people live off of in their dumpster

as far as they have been ready to have the united states engage. l the while the united states has been saying that the u.s. would not be engaging north korea on the so-called six-party talks in the nuclear issue unless the talks between the north and the south would improve. it would seem that the u.s. as it kind of pushed and prodded the south koreans in recent months, listen, we're going to engage, we'd like you to move a little closer to north korea. >> so i want to bring stan back in. stan, because when we see the relationship between south korea and the united states, and that tends to box china into a corner a bit, doesn't it? and it tends to really push them into north korea's corner. so you have the standpoint, the americans backing the south koreans and in a situation like this it makes for a tense time. >> yeah, it does. you know, i'd actually argue that the critical relationship here is really the relationship between the united states and china. the genius of the six-party talks was that it brought various foes together, to sit around t

citizens do not have immunity when they're at war with the united states." the president of the united states was right to target this u.s. citizen. so wouldn't it be absurd that you can kill him you about you can't detain him. and if he came here, you can't question him for military intellectual jns gathering. so this is a compromise between two forces that i think are well-intended but will take us into a bad policy position. the hard left who wants to say the military has no role in protecting us on the homeland and some people on my side who say that the law enforcement community can't be involved at all. so senator levin and senator mccain, you have constructed a concept that provides maximum flexibility, gives guidance to our law enforcement community, starts with the presumption that i like but can be waived, and it will not impede any ongoing investigation. that's the part of the bill that was changed. so to my good friend from california, we have got the balance that we've been seeking for five years, and to me this is what we should be doing as a na

here are paramilitary response from police agencies in the united states and as we said this is a movement that's really inspiring people it's putting front and center to the fundamental injustices in society in the united states and around the world and people are demanding change and that's when to change happens when you see huge numbers of people taking to the streets and refusing to take no for an answer the government is really going to have to look at decide how they can handle it or if they can handle it because people have demands right now moves demands are not going to go away. and that was a mar overhead and hillary executive director of the partnership for civil justice fund. and while the u.s. is quickly trying to quell the protests at home it's allegedly fanning the flames of protests in syria syria's opposition is divided over whether they need military help from outside to help fight against the government this after the country saw some of the fiercest battles in the nine month old crisis a reported one hundred sixty soldiers civilians and anti-government activists have b

military paramilitary response from police agencies in the united states and as i said this is a movement that's really inspiring people it's putting in front and center the fundamental injustices in society in the united states and around the world and people are demanding change and that's when change happens when you see huge numbers of people taking to the streets and refusing to take no for an answer the government is really going to have to look at that and decide how they can handle it or if they can handle it because people have demands right now in those demands are not going to go away. that was mayor of our haven heller executive director of the partnership for several justice fund and coming up on our t.v. they're taking a trip to the international space station and coming up we'll tell you the latest so use that lift up and the mission that lies ahead for it be cause minot's aboard safe havens. was the police the roughing it was one of the protest nobody seems to know. but never a pepper sprayed the face but part of the argument that they're being overly dramatic. welcome to