as you know, i love the united states very much and we want to make sure that the people of the united states are very well protected. express your feelings and your love for mexico. the united states and mexico , $500a 2000 mile border billion in annual trade, and one million illegal border crossings each and every day. united by our support for democracy, a great love for our contribution of millions of mexican americans to the united states. i happen to have a tremendous americans, mexican not only in terms of friendships, but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i am employed in the united states, and they are amazing people, amazing people. friends, so many friends, and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico, i am proud to say how many people i employ, and the united states first, second, and third-generation mexicans are ,ust beyond reproach spectacular, spectacular, hard-working people. i have such great respect for them and their strong values of family, faith, and community. common interest in keeping our hemisphere safe, prosperous, and free. no one wins in either

i think it's in the best interest of the united states, and the world as a whole that the united states negotiate rather than go back to the cold war relationship with the soviet union. i don't look at the picture as bleakly as you have indicated in your question, mr. trewhitt. i believe that the united states had many successes in recent years, in recent months, as far as the communist movement is concerned. we have been successful in portugal, where a year ago it looked like there was a very great possibility that the communists would take over in portugal. it didn't happen. we have a democracy in portugal today. a few months ago, or i should say, maybe two years ago, the soviet union looked like they had continued strength in the middle east. today, according to prime minister rabin, the soviet union is weaker in the middle east than they have been in many, many years. the facts are the soviet union relationship with egypt is at a low level. the soviet union relationship with syria is at a very low point. the united states today, according to prime minister rabin of israel, is at a p

as you know, i love the united states very much. and we want to make sure that the people of the united states are very well protected. you equally expressed your feelings and your love for mexico. the united states and mexico share a 2,000 mile border. a half a trillion dollars in annual trade, and one million legal border crossings each and every day. we're united by our support for democracy. a great love for our people, and the contributions of millions of mexican americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican-americans not only in terms of friendships, but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states and they are amazing people. amazing people. i have many friends, so many friends, and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico. i'm proud to say how many people i employ. and the united states, first, second, and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach. spectacular, spectacular, hard working people. i have such great respect for them, and their strong

united states leading two sets to one. and off the block and out of bounds. >> united states has two of its matt anderson skipped it off the tape. france breathes a sigh of relief. >> with this jump float, united states out to take it overhand. >> russell, what a dig by tillie. and saved. get back on the court, rouzier. and again with the dig. >> shades of 2000. put those two highlights side by side. what an effort. filling the stat sheet on one play. >> overhand pass into david lee. dug by tillie again. net violation called against ngapeth and france but they're going to challenge the call. given france's track record, just give it to them right now. they've been really good on challenges so far in this set. >> they is a good way to describe it. excellent way to talk about it. >> there's a net. it was ngapeth's hand. >> they have to communicate whether they did or in this case earvin ngapeth may have numb hand because it was in the net. aaron russell back to serve. if you're just joining us, the united states a stunning comeback in t

as you know, i love the united states very much and we want to make sure that the people of the united states are very well protected. you equally expressed your feelings and your love for mexico. the united states and mexico share a 2,000-mile border, a half trillion dollars in annual trade, and 1 million legal border crossings each and every day. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and the contributions of millions of mexican-americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican-americans, not only in terms of friendships, but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states, and they are amazing people, amazing people. i have many friends, so many friends and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico. i'm proud to say how many people i employ. and the united states first, second, and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach, spectacular, hard-working people. i have such great respect for them and their strong values of family, faith, and community. we all share a common interest

once the war is over, the united states and the soviet union decide to divide korea with the united states being in control of the southern part of korea and the soviet union is going to be administering the northern part of korea. eventually, both u.s. and ussr agree we will withdraw and allow the koreans to have some degree of self-determination. we're going to pull out, the soviet union is going to pull out. the koreans will be able to determine their future and their fate. and we both did. the difference is, when we pulled out, we took everything with us. when the soviet union pulled out, they left behind a stockpile of weapons. the most modern military technology that they had at the time. that's a temptation that was going to be used. the following summer, 1950, north korea with the use of soviet military armaments, they will invade south korea and try to take possession of the entire country. this is exactly what kennan had warned us about, truman says. soviet union is not content. they're going to expand now, you know, into other areas. this is a classic example of expansion and tr

as you know, i love the united states very much, and we want to make sure that the people of the united states are very well protected. you equally expressed your feelings and your love for mexico. the united states and mexico share a 2,000-mile border, a half a trillion dollars in annual trade, and 1 million legal border crossings each and every day. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and the contributions of millions of mexican americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican americans, not only in terms of friendships but in the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states. and they are amazing people. amazing people. i have many friends, so many friends and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico. i am proud to say how many people i employ. and the united states first, second and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach. spectacular, spectacular, hardworking people. i have such great respect for them. and their strong values of family, faith and community. we all share a common inter

as you know, i love the united states very much and we want to make sure that the people of the united states are very well protected. you equally expressed your feelings and your love for mexico. the united states and mexico share a 2,000--mile border. half a trillion dollars in annual trade, and one million legal border crossings each and every day. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and a contributions of millions of mexican-americans to the united states, and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican-americans, not only in terms of friendships but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states. and they are amazing people. amazing people. i have many friends, so many friends and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico, i'm proud to say how many people i employ, and the united states, first, second and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach. spectacular, spectacular, hard-working people. i have great respect for them and strong values of family, faith and community. we all share a common interest

it should be unacceptable to the united states, right. what the arab states are going to have to accept some day, let's say we can change iranian behavior so that they no longer want to dominate the region, let's say we can get to that point. iran is still going to be a powerful regional player because of its size, because of its economy, because of its western-- the western orientation of many of its people. i mean many, many iranians admire the united states. it is going to be a significant player. those sunni states are going to have to accept that kind of iran. >> rose: do they recognize that? >> i don't know. i don't know. but there is a fundamental difference between the two for me. >> back to the question, great question. so, so modern-- modern islamics-- islamic extremism began in 1979. and it began in 1979 in two places. it began in tehran with the takeover of the united states embassy, by a bunch of student thugs. and it also began at the very same time in saudi arabia with the takeover of the grand mosque by a bunch of terrorist

but, obviously, he realized that world war ii could not be won without the united states. i think the larger question though is why did it take him so long to accept that president roosevelt was not just the commander in chief of the armed forces of the united states, but basically the armed forces of the united nations? and i think, yes, there was a lot of hubris and a kind of british arrogance that, you know, here was this empire that had survived for hundreds of years, you know, rather like the rowen man empire and would continue -- roman empire and would continue for hundreds more years. hehe locked up gandhi, he was dd against independence for india. india, today the world's largest democracy, i explained in volume one how the poor president, you know, kept sending these gentle cables to winston saying, you know, shouldn't you really think about giving the indians independence so that they will fight with you? when singapore was conquered or overrun by the japanese in 1941 shortly after pearl harbor, over 40,000 indians elected to join the japanese. not because they li

that's effect from the united states, the role the united states expects taiwan to play in strategies. so i thought -- as long as the new federal government is doing it well in those democratic issues, that's the -- makes a good example for the united states to talk to people in mainland china and tell them that you see, can be a good combination, can be a good combination with markets. so that's kind of -- that's kind of the united states -- what united states is expects. that's what most of taiwan can do in order to keep practicing right now, yeah. you need to have different parties. >> hi, thank you. [inaudible] >> thank you so much for this very thorough presentation of the framework. i'm particularly fascinated by your description of the views relationalty between u.s. and china but there's different views about how the relationship and patients on taiwan's parts as well and building time to build mutuality. [inaudible] >> i look at how the neighbors in the region -- and what is the status of trust between china and its neighbors in the region? >> yeah. [inaudible] >> we also fou

and the story of this at the time would become a kind of wound to the united states. this was perceived at the moment as a calamity, as a mistake by many. and yet, there was a tremendous amount of resistance to accepting jewish people into the united states, something that often gets forgotten after the holocaust. and the story of the holocaust as it unfolded over time will be one that will shape u.s. refugee policy in some really important ways. for now, what i'd like you to do is just highlight that fdr at the time may have felt ambivalent about this but saw himself as bound by the law of the national origins act and did not take any execute action that he might have. and we'll come back to what role the president or the congress or judicial actors had in shaping refugee policy. so, as american soldiers uncovered the atrocities of the holocaust in april 1945, they are key actors in shaping the knowledge of refugees and are actually important sort of public opinion shapers. it is u.s. members of the 5th infantry who come to this sort of kingpin of germany's work camps

who don't like the united states very much. now, can we imagine why the united states is pretty concerned about what's going on in florida? now, this is a nice little map, fort dobson from the united states. this is where the fort is. these are from two newspapers. first one, florida indians helped build and there are rumors of a great number of indians and negros well supplied with everything necessary for war. rumors of indians and africans being allied against one another. but i'm not sure if there's a greater fear in early america than that. in the 1950s it was the fear of communists invading. in the 1750s and 1850s or at least 1830s, the fear was what would happen if africans who are 33% or so of the american south, allied themselves with native americans, and together more or less outnumbered free, white society and overran everything? and so for a long time they would use, what, indians as slave catchers in order to kind of -- and vice versa. they'd use indians -- or africans in indian wars and try to create artificial di

it can't be driven by the desire of the united states or other donors. it may be more than semantics, but where you say this can't be driven by the desire of the united states, i absolutely think it should be driven by proceeding pursuing our own values and national interest. no one else is going to do that for us. i asked these questions because many of us are trying to give this and whatever future administration the tools it needs to accomplish the goals that were set. i hope the administration has not reset inl goals to only work in the confines of relationships that aren't adversarial. what happens in many countries, certainly there are several in the 90 or so that fall into the orbit where the government or others in control don't want to help because that would interfere with our profiting, their profit take or other personal interests, are we seeing ourselves as barred from working with other institutions, the ngo and other in those country that could move to creating the type of systems we would want to see? >> senator, i think in a sense you and

it should be unacceptable to the united states. r states are going to have to except sunday -- let's say we can change iranian behavior so they no longer want to dominate the region. let's say we can get to that point. iran is still going to be a powerful regional player because of its size, its economy, because of the western orientation of many of its people. many iranians admire the united states. it is going to be a significant player. those suni states are going to have to accept that kind of iran. there is a fundamental difference between the two. back to the question, great question. islamicrn -- modern extremism again in 1979, and it began in 1979 in twi places. -- two places. an began in toronto -- terh with the takeover of the united states embassy by two thugs. and the takeover of the grand mosque by a bunch of terrorists. view,n extremist point of both of those were successful. so, in iran, the result was the strengthening of the ayatollah at the expense of the new secular government. actually, the central overthrow of t

who said, as scare tactics, that there could be hundreds of millions of chinese immigrants to the united states. one person said, i can't remember the exact date, but one witness testified that by 2000, there might be 479 million chinese in the united states. and in 1952, these sort of wild fears of racial invasion, 1943, 1882, these yellow peril arguments and foreign invasion arguments worked to structure some kind of restriction, some kind of quota. by 1955, they had failed do so. >> the question was, surely someone might have asked the proponents, you are pushing -- usually when you get new legislation the people are happy about, the proponents talk about all of the wonderful things that will result. so here you have a paradox of this major legislation that its proponents say, often with a straight face, really won't change anything substantially. prof. chin: well, even emanuel cellar and dean rusk and mike masaoka, they didn't say it is not going to change anything. they said in the context of a situation that is already changing, that the 1952 laws and efforts at restriction had come undon

once the war is over, the united states and the soviet union decide to divide korea with the united states being in control of the southern part of korea and the soviet union is going to be administering the northern part of korea. eventually, both u.s. and ussr agree we will withdraw and allow the koreans to have some degree of self-determination. we're going to pull out, the soviet union is going to pull out. the koreans will be able to determine their future and their fate. and we both did. the difference is, when we pulled out, we took everything with us. when the soviet union pulled out, they left behind a stockpile of weapons. the most modern military technology that they had at the time. that's a temptation that was going to be used. the following summer, 1950, north korea with the use of soviet military armaments, they will invade south korea and try to take possession of the entire country. this is exactly what kennan had warned us about, truman says. soviet union is not content. they're going to expand now, you know, into other areas. this is a classic example of expansion and tr

and the united states leading the medals. we said there were ten represented, one of them the united states for sure. we have a couple of u.s. supporters here. the medal, you know thing right now. just saying. >> are you cool with that? >> nice there. >> very cool that's mind- boggling. >> and we're trying to keep it. trying to keep it loose here watching the us that's right. live in gi ten languages, all in one room. >> yes. >> his socks though, nicely done. >> representing. >> on the tennis court no american will win a singles title. madison keys lost in the match today. >> but there is hope in mixed doubles, right, there give an american team will win the silver and gold. and advancing to the mixed rahm tomorrow at 9:30. >> that's exciting. we have the chance to medal a lot of people think the individuals and that's where it ends for them but the mixed doubles you forget, and especially with venus williams. >> she doesn't play them. it is good to see here alive and hopely one ofs williams will bring home a medal. she picked

as you know, i love the united states very much and we want to make sure that the people of the unitedtes are very well protected. you, equally, expressed your feelings and your love for mexico. the united states and mexico share a 2,000-mile border, a half a trillion dollars in annual trade and 1 million legal border crossings each and every day. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and the contributions of millions of mexican americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican-americans, not only in terms of friendships but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states and they are amazing people. amazing people. i have many friends, so many friends and so many friends coming to mexico and in mexico. i'm proud to say how many people i employ. and the united states, first, second, and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach, spectacular, spectacular, hard-working people. i have such great respect for them and their strong values of family, faith, and community. we all share a commo

public opinion in the united states, in the united states congress, in the united states press and also in europe. by 1913 and certainly by 1916 europe had seeded any rejection of american hegemony north of the amazon. the war in europe expanded the opportunity for the united states to tighten its hegemony and also made the united states even more -- the u.s. government -- even more eager to assert, to establish stability in the region. when there was so much turmoil in europe it became even more desirable to try to impose what americans considered stable government in the countries of central america and the caribbean. when the election of 1916 occurred and wilson said that he wanted to keep the united states out of war of course there were u.s. troops in haiti, in the dominican republic and nicaragua. the united states didn't need to intervene in every country in the caribbean and central america. in a way it is a little bit like lynching. you don't need to lynch everybody. you lynch some people and that is the lesson that people learn. it is very possible to intimidate. in 1918-1919

as the level has destroy the united states responds to floor, wring hands, review. the editorial in "the washington post" today. the cries with the syrian government and its russian ally must therefore be shared by those including the united states who allow them to continue. a point i have made with the president of the united states about the judgment of history. this administration failed to do enough at several critical junctures to have perhaps made this war come to an end. mike: we have talked around this table a number of times -- charlie: about what has to be done, what has been done. mike: i do think we have missed some opportunities. i cannot guarantee you, have we provided significant assistance to the moderate opposition in the fall of 2012 when assad was a little shaky, that would have resulted in fall. i cannot guarantee that, but we did not try. the president's decision not to cross the red line -- he said, the syrians use chemical weapons, that will be a red line. his decision not to follow through on that, it was very interesting that assad moved ve

your visit to the united states marks the 50th anniversary of u.s.-singapore diplomatic relations. that singaporee the only southeast asian country to be welcome to the united states with a state visit during the obama administration. over 179 billion to motive foreign direct investment as of 2014, the united states is the largest foreign direct investor in singapore. singapore is tied with a fairly a beholden more of the. the agreement has been described as the united states most successful sta globally. in fact, since the fda took effect in 2004, u.s. exports .ave increased over 50% singapore was one of the p four who first initiated tpp which now includes eight additional countries including the united states. of -- i still too much don't want to steal too much of the thunder but it is a descendent say that tpp for not have existed if it were not for singapore. beyond the economic ties, the relationship at that important security and military convention. singapore air force pilots training the ice age and u.s. ships combat through singapore. as a result of the strong political, e

what should the united states do? at a public level, we should recognize and state that however appropriate, that taiwan remains a critical political and military asset to the united states. a democratic taiwan is proof to all ethnic chinese that political and economic freedoms could coexist. yes, this does undermine the legitimacy of the chinese communist party. it is probably the only real lever that the united states has to help chinese themselves decide that they deserve a better political system. we should also recognize that taiwan remains the capstone of the island chain. if you lose that, the chain is divided. america's allies are divided. and china can intimidate and isolate them much more readily. secondly, we should state that china's accelerating military threats to taiwan trigger policy causes to the policy track. their techniques make clear that the diplomatic relationship with china is based on peaceful resolutions of relations with taiwan. this is not happening. i'm not saying that we need to reverse th

the mexican people. donald trump: we are united by our superintendent ort -- support for democracy, great love for our people and the contributions of millions of mexican americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexico americans not only in terms of friendships but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states and they are amazing people. amazing people. reporter: donald trump is seen as public ebb emmy -- enemy number one by many mexicans who mounted protests ahead of his arrival, and this is one of the reasons why. it's the favorite chavent his supporters and the clearest policy pledge of his candidacy -- to build a wall along the border with mexico the donald trump: we're going to build a wall, folks. don't worry good. who's going to pay for the wall? who? reporter: it's the line he's repeated over and over. donald trump: we will build the wall 100 perks and mexico will be paying --% and mexico will be paying for the wull. -- wall. that wall will go up so fast your head will spin. the trump wall will be beautiful. that's why we have to make it beautiful because day after i'm gone they're going to name that wall after tr

>>. >> the answer to that have a latino immigrants coming into the united states but they were not welcomed but when latinos in the majority of mexican americans came to united states favored treated as second-class citizens in our never afforded the same type of white privilege the european immigrants have. so that from the very beginning of those policies automatically put them in a category from white european backgrounds and interestingly enough even though they can't sell identify because large historical circumstances has never viewed them also as the non-white status. >>. >> in some ways your immigrant status is then measured for minorities and ethnic or racial minorities so with that survey data data, americans you emigrants and this focuses primarily the attitudes of white americans but i have looked at that question, and attitudes vary by ethnic or racial groups in for a certain period up to the 1980's there was intention in the way black attitudes fought about immigration isis source of competition that has changed significantly so blacks are much more like others with a policy p

that is perceived -- from the united states. that is perceived among think tanks from scholars in d.c.. mr. romberg: any more questions? please. >> we have been focused almost entirely on east asia, but today the news is about a terrorist bombing -- bombing of a chinese embassy. ended,e cold war expected that the united states would involve in a war in for years? extending that is where we are. are we looking in the wrong 's future china security threats? hung-jen wang: thank you very much. it is another tough question. think thetent i answer is yes. strategy, this. selfof -- we call this a prophecy theory -- i mean, the post. is what you better result of because of your better policy -- the strategy from the united states. is very impolite to say so, but i think it is wrong in terms of -- too many people, who have these bad memories about policies, especially those people in asia, they have these entertainment -- education systems -- is better memories about world war ii, the chin thisty, interfering in intervening in domestic p

united states leading two sets to one. and off the block and out of bounds. >> united states has two of its max holt missed. matt anderson skipped it off the tape. france breathes a sigh of relief. >> with this jump float, united states out to take it overhand. >> russell, what a dig by tillie. and saved. get back on the court, rouzier. and again with the dig. >> shades of 2000. put those two highlights side by side. what an effort. filling the stat sheet on one play. >> overhand pass into david lee. dug by tillie again. it was so loud. net violation called against ngapeth and france but they're going to challenge the call. given france's track record, just give it to them right now. they've been really good on challenges so far in this set. >> they is a good way to describe it. excellent way to talk about it. >> there's a net. it was ngapeth's hand. >> they have to communicate whether they did or in this case earvin ngapeth may have numb hand because it was in the net. aaron russell back to serve. if you're just joining us, the unite

united states leading two sets to one. and off the block and out of bounds. >> united states has two of its best servers in this match. tape. france breathes a sigh of relief. >> with this jump float, united states out to take it overhand. >> russell, what a dig by tillie. and saved. get back on the court, rouzier. and again with the dig. >> shades of 2000. put those two highlights side by side. what an effort. filling the stat sheet on one play. >> overhand pass into david lee. dug by tillie again. and a net violation. net violation called against ngapeth and france but they're going to challenge the call. given france's track record, just give it to them right now. they've been really good on challenges so far in this set. >> they is a good way to describe it. excellent way to talk about it. >> there's a net. it was ngapeth's hand. >> they have to communicate whether they did or have numb hand because it was in the net. aaron russell back to serve. if you're just joining us, the united states a stunning comeback in the opening set.

singapore air force pilots train in the united states and u.s. combat ships rotate through singapore. as a result of the strong political, economic and defense ties, singapore has served as an anchor for the united states pivot to asia. now it's my honor to introduce the president and c.e.o. of the u.s. chamber of commerce mr. tom donahue. tom has led the chamber almost 20 years and as a result of his leadership the chamber has played a dominant role in defending and promoting free enterprise and free trade in the united states and beyond. tom, thank you for all you've done to advance american business interests and thank you for your partnership tonight. mr. donahue: thank you very much. good evening everyone and welcome to the u.s. chamber of commerce. i'd like to join alex in they thanking all of you for being here and thanking our sponsors this evening. your support in every way for this meeting and this relationship is very important. we gather to celebrate the friendship between the united states and singapore and our robust commercial partn

states and the secretary of state for the united states accompanied by the prime minister of singapore. [applause] sec. kerry: thank you very much. please come everybody, please take your seats. welcome to the state department, mr. prime minister and mrs. lee and mr. vice president, dr. biden, my counterpart, foreign minister and distinguished guests. we are really delighted to welcome you here this afternoon. your excellency, we have been very, very much well looking forward to welcoming you here. i am personally pleased for the chance to repay you for the many visits i have made to your beautiful country in the warm hospitality i have continued to receive. in particular, last year where we had a chance to visit. as the president said repeatedly in both private conversation and public, singapore may be a small country, but it is a small country with an extraordinarily large impact on its region and in the even on the world. your leadership, mr. prime minister over the last years has contributed very significantly to a model of good

to about the united states involvement in it. think the fact that we were probably a couple of hours too late to the game for those conspiracies. the we areiven dynamically have with turkey -- blaise: given this weird dynamic turkey, and democracy had been eroding for at least the past three years and has eroded significantly in the aftermath of the coup, talking about tens of thousands of orple who have been detained fired who presumably could have had no direct involvement in the coup, how do you balance this on the one hand support the turkish government because they are democratically elected and on the other hand, try to push them to rein in their authoritarian? alan: it is a difficult balance. there is no doubt. we do not know how many of these people are guilty and we really do not know anything at his point. we know what the accusations are. i think we caught people by surprise here is the fact that so many tens of thousands of civil servants, including judges and press hitters and police, were so rapidly rounded up and fi

when pennsylvania became part of the united states, i became a citizen of the united states. i did so by choice. it has been commented upon by those who choose their religion in adulthood, that they often adhere to that more vastly than those who are born to it. the same could be said of immigrants. because their choice was a conscious decision, irrespective of the source of their departure from their original land, whether it was persecution, religion, or political opinion, or in search of economic betterment, it does not make a difference. adherence to a philosophy found here, that is what sets us apart. maybe more steadfast than for those who are nativeborn. his excellency, general washington spoke in his first state of the union in january of 1790, addressing the matter of immigration, he asked congress to adopt procedures to transform foreigners into citizens. his excellency understood the need to integrate thousands of citizens that came yearly into our body and country. yet in the debate of naturalization, there were disagreements on whether we should allow a free flow

gulen, since the individual bits in the united states -- the individual that has been in the united states is opposite the subject of some concern that has been expressed, to put it mildly, by the turkish government, vice president biden will come if asked, will say to his counterpart for president obama has indicated directly to president erdogan, which is a that there is a treaty, and extradition treaty that's been on the books between the states and turkey for more than 30 years. the united states is committed to following the procedure and guidelines that are outlined in that treaty. and you've already seen extensive coordination between officials at the department of justice and their turkish counterparts. i understand some department of justice officials are traveling to turkey this week to meet with her counterparts to review some of the materials that have been produced by turkish officials. but openly this decision about extradition, it's not a presidential decision. there is a process that is codified in that treaty and in u.s. law that will follow. and that's what is department

hopefully connecting in a way that kenexa jobs in the united states. you go back to the 1980's and 1990's, the united states corporate tax cut was similar to that of other countries. the changes in dozens of countries to simply cut -- simple father ted: -- fact -- tax code, they are seeing things in real time. me ask you one economic question. there's a striking quote in this report from its predecessor, a by1 report that was chaired bob ruben. interesting directed by tim geithner at the time. in that report, just 10 years ago they wrote the gains in trade are broadly shared. asoughout the last decade the u.s. has become significantly more open u.s. employment and wages have increased. that's not a statement you could make in 2011. what changed? >> the academic in me says we are still working on trying to understand that. it's clear that on an amazing in which technology the world has become more global has something to do with the fact that job growth has been slower in america. wage growth has been nonexistent majority ofe american workers. that's the

on the united states. now, i love the united states very much and we want it make sure that people of the united states are very well protected. you equally expressed your feelings and your love for mexico. the united states and mexico share 2,000-mile border. half a trillion dollars in annual trade and 1 million legal border crossings each and everyday. we are united by our support for democracy, a great love for our people, and a contributions of millions of mexican/americans to the united states. and i happen to have a tremendous feeling for mexican americans. not only in terms of friendships but in terms of the tremendous numbers that i employ in the united states. and they are amazing people. amazing people. i have many friends, so many friend, so many friends coming into mexico. i'm proud to say how many people i employ and the united states first, second and third generation mexicans are just beyond reproach. spectacular, spectacular hardworking people. i have such great respect for them and their st

united states leading two sets to one. and off the block and out of bounds. >> united states has two of its best servers in this match. max holt missed. matt anderson skipped it off the tape. france breathes a sigh of relief. >> with this jump float, united states out to take it overhand. >> russell, what a dig by tillie. and saved. get back on the court, rouzier. and again with the dig. >> shades of 2000. put those two highlights side by side. what an effort. filling the stat sheet on one play. >> overhand pass into david lee. dug by tillie again. and a net violation. it was so loud. net violation called against ngapeth and france but they're going to challenge the call. given france's track record, just give it to them right now. they've been really good on challenges so far in this set. >> they is a good way to describe it. excellent way to talk about it. >> there's a net. it was ngapeth's hand. >> they have to communicate whether they did or didn't. in this case earvin ngapeth may have numb hand because it was in the net. aaron ru

that undermines what the united states is trying to do. tin has his intelligence agencies, right, trying to get that kind of propaganda. this has been free propaganda for putin in the united states of america. and charlie, putin would never ever say this, of course, but i believe putin sees trump as a tool of his now. that is why that i said what i said. charlie: he thinks he can elect trump? mike: he wants trump to be elected. and there is some evidence that he trying to help that along. charlie: president obama says i don't trust vladimir putin. that is an opinion. donald trump says, he likes him. mike: he says he is a great leader. a guy i can work with. charlie: hold on a second on "great leader." take a look at what he has done with respect to russia as president, has he been a terrible leader, a good leader? mike: terrible. charlie: made russia more of a player in the world more than it was earlier? mike: so this is the conversation you had with the vice president. so, yes, he has made russia more of a player, but i will tell you that

prior to 1979, the united states provided the military infrastructure to support iran's defenses. were an ally. good diplomatic relations with them. then they purchased everything pretty much from the united states. their military infrastructure. >> in 1979, the shah of iran lost his reign as the supreme leader. an anti-u.s. regime took over. they took our embassy by storm. took 400-plus american diplomats hostage. november 1979, we ended all diplomatic relations with iran. iran's entire military infrastruct surbased on u.s. military products. they require u.s. parts. they could not take their military defenses down and rebuild it again. so radar, sonar, all the military components they'd need to keep running they had to obtain from the u.s. but they had to do it illegally. >> i think it's important to keep in mind what iran has been doing over the past several decades. i mean, one is it's been developing a nuclear weapons program. secondly, it's been supporting terrorism internationally. and third, it's been developing a ballistic missile program. and all of these activities are

united states leading two sets to one. and off the block and out of bounds. >> united states has two of its matt anderson skipped it off the tape. france breathes a sigh of relief. >> with this jump float, united states out to take it overhand. >> russell, what a dig by tillie. and saved. get back on the court, rouzier. and again with the dig. >> shades of 2000. put those two highlights side by side. what an effort. filling the stat sheet on one play. >> overhand pass into david lee. dug by tillie again. and a net violation. net violation called against ngapeth and france but they're going to challenge the call. given france's track record, just give it to them right now. they've been really good on challenges so far in this set. >> they is a good way to describe it. excellent way to talk about it. >> there's a net. it was ngapeth's hand. >> they have to communicate whether they did or in this case earvin ngapeth may have numb hand because it was in the net. aaron russell back to serve. if you're just joining us, the united states a s

the united states said the soviets were asking the united states to give up their monopoly and make everything public before they agreed to comply. the u.s. said the soviets were being unreasonable. nothing happened and the cold war started. the cold war is where a lot of the radiation experiments took place. some of them started in the second world war. most of them in the cold war. what was the cold war all about? europe was divided. now, don't forget that the united states and the soviet union were allies. we were partners in the second world war. we were on the same side. no longer. tongue took over china. we had only a handle of warheads and only a few long-range missiles. of course, to no one's surprise in 1949, the soviet union obtained an atomic weapon. we got a hydrogen bomb in 1952. the soviets got a hydrogen bomb in 1953. we raced to develop more and more efficient ways of raining down destruction on each other. this is a titan-2 missile. this is the cull by nation that came along a little later. this missile which you can see is no longer functional, there's a girder covering the o

they believe the united states of america and the obama administration is not listening to them. at they've got points of view, that they feel strongly about -- another thing they believe is that the united states doesn't have their back particularly with regard to iran. they believe that we don't understand that they see iran as their soviet union, right? so there's two things say about secretary clinton. one they believe that secretary clinton listens and where secretary clinton is on iran based on what i heard her say and read, she thinks that and at the same time, i think she believes and i know based on what she said she believes we need to push back harder against iranian-maligned behavior in the region. charlie: what should we be doing? mike: let me give you an example. they provide -- they provide money and assistance to errorist groups, hamas and hezbollah. they supply money and weapons to shia groups in the region that groups. g to overthrow yemen. and they overthrough the government there. charlie: were tche competing with the saudis? mike: very simple example. ships le

so it was quite a triumph from the united states. e united states technology. >> c-span: how close did you come to the vietnam war question this is another document. >> guest: everybody my age came very close to the vietnam war i do not serve during the vietnam war but as a journalist i was involved in covering things that were going on at that time. like everybody, my generation i was very involved in the turmoil over the vietnam war. as a young boy in 1964 i was watching on television when president lbj announced to the nation and national televised speech that the united states have been attacked by the north vietnamese vessels in the gulf of tonkin. as a result, he was going to be authorizing the use of force and wanted congress to give him the authority that was necessary to effectively wage war against this aggressive power of north vietnam. this was during the presidential campaign he was going to be running against barry goldwater. of course it was really the beginning of a very long involvement, long war,. >> c-span: worded t

spellbound in the first amendment of the constitution of the united states. endment rights of health not only refrain from with peaceful assemblies that must restrain the restrainer's as well. the boston tea party let off a long chain of effective social protests in america. the suffragette demonstrations spread to many cities before their cause was victorious. the right to peacefully assemble and be heard. a renowned american jurist recently said -- a function of free speech under our system is .o invite dispute it may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have profound, unsettling effects as it moves towards the acceptance of an idea. moved ♪shall not be ♪ >> we are going to march. we are going to stand together. we are going to stay together. we are going to go together. we've got freedom, freedom, freedom. applause]d ♪ [applause] you mr. burt lancaster. applause]d >> traveling no matter where in the world today, we are in the position of ambassadors and are often made particularly aware of our country's reputation. it's not easy to be an american abr