it's the duty of the united states government. we will continue to execute that with great energy and vigor. second, i will get you the numbers. i want to make sure i get them right. iere's not a lot more that can say about it, other than to say this is not the last step. we will continue to do our own efforts, our own fact-finding to make sure that decisions that the united states makes are based on real facts and data that we can confirm ourselves. we will certainly take information that comes from other sources, the turkish intelligence service. we will evaluate that information and validated. we will form our own judgments about the fact and hold those responsible accountable based on the fact that we determine are appropriate. congress, i with have spoken to our allies around the world. we want to make sure that everyone understands that the united states doesn't believe that the killing of jamal khashoggi was anything other than a horrific act. we help we can work together with congress and our allies to hold those responsibl

in addition to the treaty of amity, i am announcing that the president has decided that the united states will withdraw from he optional protocol and dispute revolution -- resolution to the vienna agreement, this is in connection with a case brought by the so-called state of palestine naming the united states as a defendant, channeling our move of our embassy from tell avive to jerusalem. to stress, the united states remains a party to the underlying vienna convention on diplomatic relations and we expect all other parties to abide by their international obligations under the convention. our actions today are consistent with the decisions president reagan made in the 1980's and the -- in the wake of the politicized students -- politicized suits by nicaragua to comply with the optional jurisdiction of the international court. it's also consistent with the decision president bush made in 2005 to withdraw from the optional protocol to the vienna convention on consular relations following the i.c.j.'s interference in our domestic criminal justice system. so our actions today deal with the tre

legal immigration is the surest way to obtain the better life you are looking for here in the united states of america. from a security standpoint, there is no proper county of who these individuals and the caravan are. this poses an unacceptable security risk to the united states. moreover, many of these people are right targets for human traffickers and others who would exploit them. we don't want that to happen. i've spoken twice in the last two days to my counterpart. foreign secretary, peter. we trust the mexican leaders know with the best times are to resolve the situation. we urge timely action on their part. united states also has a message for those who are currently part of this caravan or any caravan which follows. you will not be successful at getting into the united states illegally. no matter what. i repeat, the caravan will not cross the second order under under any circumstance. if you seek to come here, go through the normal refugee process. if you apply for refugee status, a permanent solution in mexico or in a third country, but i can tell you, with certainty, we are dete

for some more than 430,000 chinese foreign nationals studying in the united states. they also alert chinese consulates and embassies when chinese students and american schools stray from the communist party line. at the university of maryland a chinese student recently spoke at her graduation of what she called, and i quote, the fresh air of free speech in america. the communist party official newspaper swiftly chastised her. she became the victim of a firestorm of criticism on china's tightly controlled social media and her family back home was harassed. as for the university itself, it's exchange program with china, one of the nation's most extensive suddenly turned from a flood to a trickle. china exerts academic pressure in other ways as well. beijing provides generous funding for universities, think attention, and scholars, with the understanding they will avoid ideas that the communist party finds dangerous or offensive. china experts in particular know that their visas will be denied or delayed if their research contradicts beijing's talking points. and even sc

military tools, as well as propaganda, to advance its influence and benefit its interests in the united statesa is also applying this power in more proactive ways than ever before, to exert influence and interfere in the domestic policy and politics of this country. under president trump's leadership, the united states has taken decisive action to respond to china with american action, applying the principles and the policies long advocated in these halls. in our national security strategy that the president trump released last december, he described a new era of great power competition. foreign nations have begun to, as we wrote, reassert their influence regionally and globally, and they are contesting geopolitical advantages and trying [in essence] to change the international order in their favor. in this strategy, president trump made clear that the united states of america has adopted a new approach to china. we seek a relationship grounded in fairness, reciprocity, and respect for sovereignty, and we have taken strong and swift action to achieve that goal. as the president said last year

>> i would say we have a crisis in leadership in the united states it's not the president of the united states or any single person, it's leadership at large. and as i studied this and we spent a lot of time. a lifetime of practicing leadership. when i come to conclusion leadership isn't what we think it is and it never has been. when we go back and look at the historical characters in this book. like harriet tubman or martin luther king jr. or margaret thatcher, what we find are complex characters and in many cases they don't produce the results we think they will. they sometimes take us into pretty difficult places. and it's really incumbent upon followers, leadership is not something that someone directs at us and effects us. leaderships is a relationship between leaders and followers. we have agency. we have responsibility. if we go a bad place with a leader who shouldn't have taken us there, we are equally responsible for all responses to that. i would say that there is a magnetism or almost like moths to a flame around charismatic or celebrity or very zealot like leaders because t

they're negotiating with the united states. it's that the united states would tell them hands on on trade negotiations with china. are they going to say yes, given that they're hit by tariffs, given they may want want to the geopolitical struggle, given they may want to protect autonomy in the trade policy? so, i think the tariffs are very much part of this nerve tiff. so the european union and the japanese governments would never say that they support the policy of tariffs, but the european union and japan have wanted changes in the rules to address their issues with china for a while. the problem is that the chinese. there's been nothing to get the chinese into the table. the tariffs get them to the table. so while they might not endorse that policy themselves. they are a helpful instrument in making that plan get any results. >> when it's a 301 vis-a-vis china and when it's metal and aluminum-- >> and so far we've seen it's impressive the compartmentalization of the issues. so far the eu and china have been able to separate t

he said, nobody ever did anything from the united states. n a 25% tariff on every car that comes from the united states into china we thought we would be rebuked. we thought it would be terrible. nobody ever called nobody did anything. that was years ago and we charged them nothing, 2.5, but we don't collect it we do now. so they charged 25%, we charged essentially nothing. i said how did it happen nobody called. there's no deal. they do whatever they want so we have a tremendous proble with theft of intellectual property we have primarily trade problems with china as you know they're having a much more difficult time now i don't want them to have a difficult time and we're doing better than we've ever done. everybody talked about the tariffs, the tariffs, the tariffs. the tariffs ended in 1913. they went to another system, totally unrelated. then in 1928 you had the great depression for a lot of different reasons not necessarily our country's fault but a little bit our country's fault. and then in the 1930s, they said we'd better start charg

indiana it's time to vote no on joe, and vote to send mike brown to the united states senate. the. [applause] >> if you're able, please now join me in rising as we have our invocation delivered by united states senator tod young, congressmen jim banks and susan brooks will lead us in the pledge of allegiance, and ms. indiana susan beckwith will lead us in the national anthem. >> it's a privilege to be here. please bow your heads and join me in prayer. lord, we come before you this evening recognizing the immense and world changing power of prayer. we pause to acknowledge that through you all things are possible. we need only to ask, knock, and seek your divine wisdom. you call on us to pray for political leaders, many of whom are in this room tonight. at the local, state, and federal level, are r our elected leaders strive to do right. we ask for your guidance. we ask for a measure of wisdom and understanding, and we ask for your grace when we fall short of your example. you call on us to pray for spiritual leaders. we pray for the pastors, clergy, and advisers in each of our lives.

with jamal khashoggi and everything going on in the world, that the signal this sends about how the united states and how the president of the united states views journalists when 44 journalists have been killed this year is what's really concerning. what i'm going through, it's not fun, i'll get over it, but there are people reporting all across the world right now who are actually, you know, in fear of their lives. and what this does is, you know, gives a blank check for governments who want to crack down on a free press in places that don't have the first amendment. >> it's entirely possible, not out of the realm of possibility that the president might say, wow, mbs is a strong reaction to jamal khashoggi, it was a really powerful reaction. you have no idea -- there's no telling what this president actually thinks about what happened to jamal khashoggi. steve scalia, republican congressman, said the president was clearly joking. said it's obvious he was not encouraging his supporters to engage in attacks. is that clear to you? because it's certainly not clear to me. >> steve scalise has been t

wa nts very hard to imagine the united states wants to see or prompt instability in saudi arabiald want to see, and i think the rest of the world, certainly the arab world, would be instability in saudi arabia. stephen, think we are looking at almost shakespearean drama here. you can see the promise of reform and the acts of reform by the saudi crown prince that will ta ke the saudi crown prince that will take saudi arabia followed, and then you see a dark side. you see the paranoia. you see the sense of vengeance. paranoia. you see the sense of vengeance. you paranoia. you see the sense of vengeance. you see paranoia. you see the sense of vengeance. you see this unbelievable violence inside the country, and the rest of saudi citizens, and the exile of other saudis —— the arrest. and it is unclear which way this is going to turn out, which way will this young man turned. but certainly the khashoggi event, if it is true he was murdered, this is going to be a watershed moment the inside saudi arabia and for those countries around the world that have closed relations with the kingdo

the u.s. government, we're not able to get to those targets we want ourselves to get to. this is what he told me about the state of affairs in the united states right now. >> donald trump has his head in the sand. he wants to destroy the vehicle emission standards that california and many other states are trying to implement. he's trying to bring back coal, a dying resource, and he's not making the investments in electric batteries and zero emission automobiles and trucks that china is doing. and all of this rhetoric about china, i'm afraid america, if we keep following trump, will wake up to find out that most cars in the world are made by china because america went down a rat hole of oil and coal dependency that is no longer consistent with the way the world is now going. >> and he also says that california, the world's fifth biggest economy, will be carbon neutral by 2050. which is what the u.n. is calling for. >> exactly. >> so that's what he says. what countries do you look at and say, wow, they are doing a great job? others are not doing such a good job. brazil maybe wants to pull out. what countries would you say the world needs

world that the united states will no longer be honoring one thousand nine hundred seventy intermediate range nuclear forces treaty or i.m.f. trump told reporters quote we'll have to develop those weapons we're going to terminate the agreement and we're going to pull out. this comes as our good friend national security advisor johnny bolton begins two days of meetings this week with russian officials in moscow for those not familiar with the i.n.f. treaty it was one of the biggest end of the cold war agreements between russia and the united states and its signing resulted in the destruction of over two thousand short and medium range missiles between the two superpowers signed by u.s. president ronald reagan and the soviet union president mikhail gorbachev back in one thousand nine hundred seven the treaty required the united states and the soviet union to eliminate him permanently forswear all of their nuclear and conventional ground launch ballistic some cruise missiles with ranges of five hundred fifty five hundred kilometers and other words

the u.s. constitution, which states -- "all persons born or naturalized in the united states, and subject to theurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the united states and of the state wherein they reside." the 14th amendment turned 150 years old in july. the american civil liberties union has lambasted trump's plan, tweeting -- "this is a blatantly unconstitutional attempt to fan the flames of anti-immigrant hatred in the days ahead of the midterms." juan: on tuesday, republican senator lindsey graham said he would introduce a bill to support trump's citizenship plan. but house speaker paul ryan criticized trump's comments while speaking to kentucky radio station wvlk. >> obviously, you cannot do that. you cannot end birthright consent of with the order. i believe in following the plaintext of the constitution. i think the four to the memo is pretty clear. amy: -- well, for more, we go now to baltimore, maryland where we're joined by martha jones, the author of the new book "birthright citizens: a history of race and rights in antebellum america." she is the society of black alumni presidential

and it makes it cheaper and better to invest in the united states. so i think there is a strong economic nationalist agenda here. i think the administration believe that the scales have been tilted against the united states have made it too attractive to outsource and export back to the united states. i think they are trying to push the scale in the other direction. >> i think there is a sense that the u.s. is being ripped off, and especially among people who support trump. and he came to washington and said, i am going to fix things. and that is what he was precisely saying during the election. and that's what he is supposedly doing in the white house today as well. so it is an important political message to his supporters that i am going to reduce the deficits. i think he will keep on saying that, and it's going to be a symbolic message, but whether it turns things better, i think that is a totally different story. >> let me build from that, toshihiro, because there was a political instinct behind the trump campaign in the sense that the trade messa

the united states president. so what's driving them to keep going. i mean. looking at the top of the table. that's boring. it's a game. that game. thanks so much for joining us u.s. president donald trump has told reporters that the u.s. will. agreement with russia the intermediate range nuclear forces treaty was negotiated more than thirty years ago by then president ronald reagan and soviet leader mikhail gorbachev it bans nuclear and commenced of missiles with ranges of five hundred to fifty five hundred kilometers from. russia violated the agreement. they've been violated here for many years and i don't know why president obama didn't negotiate or pull out. that we're not going to let them violate the nuclear agreement they go out of their weapons and we're not allowed to we're the ones that have stayed in the agreement and we bonded report russia's not fortunately on to the agreement so we're going to terminate a group that we're going to. go across not to moscow where the correspondent. is standing by really good to see you know his russia reacted to tr

phrase guardedly in the united states. the main battle is not between the united states and china or mexico or canada. though there are skirmishes there to be sure. the heart of this conflict involved actions taken by the government of the united states that curtail the economic freedom of american consumers and american businesses. the tariffs and quotas imposed by the u.s. government are a tax on u.s. citizens, this he reduce the flow into the united states of goods and services and investment capital, and those flows create our national wealth. in renegotiating existing trade agreements in south korea and especially mexico and canada, the u.s. government has claimed the right to control basic aspects of american company's business practices, including the amount and type of content they must produce in various locations, the wages they must offer and prices they must pay for raw materials. as other countries follow suit with new tariffs and controls of their own, the damage is compounded. markets shrink and trade, the ba

canada and the united states embarked on a cooperative satellite, and this time the united states provided a particularly important part of the satellite. the united states launched it and we shared the use of the satellite 50% and that pioneered the 14 gigahertz band. that was a commoninterests. in 1974, canada issued its first policy on space and the key element of that was international cooperation. canada is a small nation and so we recognized back in the early days thatinternational cooperation was really the only way which we could proceed. practically everything we've done since has been done with international cooperation. that policy led totwo significant things. by two canada speaking and being given membership in the european space agency and is the foundational policy document that allowed the canada arm program to receive. the rationale there was we need to participate in the programs of launching programs to ensure access to space. fallen the -- following the success, the united states generously astronauts in marker and that offered canada to fly two astronauts and we have h

what about the united states? do you believe the united states in the trump era is a nation of sheep? do you believe congress is a gaggle or a pack or whatever eep are in the plural? do you believe that if the military, the uniformed military of the united states is given an order that they not believe is a legal order? should they refuse it? >> well, for the military, i sort of take that off the table. i'm not on active duty anymore. if they get an order that is illegal, they absolutely are required not to follow it. i think that's separate. i think our political leaders, some of our social leaders, i think a lot have been quieted. i have a lot of conversations with people who have misgivings but they say, you know, but the economy is doing well or, but, we got this that we like. we got that that we like. the danger is as we attack the media or attack our political opponents or put names that is publicly shaming or embarrassing to people, we start to over time cause people to be more and more reticent to say anyth

when we elect mike braun to the united states senate. we reelect republican majorities and elect republicans all across america. [applause] but is going to take all of us to do it so as you get ready for dinner and the balance of wonderful evening of what to encourage you to do three things. number one, the side right now my fellow hoosiers that you're going to vote indiana on november 6 for the entire republican team. okay? remembered elections are won by those who show up, early voting started last wednesday. governor, i think i check that out. it runs through november 5. if you do an absentee ballot just a mill in by october 29. do your part and get it done early so you can work the polls and be knocking on doors in between now and then and remember my fellow republicans, friends don't let friends vote alone. go find a a friend. go find a family member. go find a coworker and make sure that they are registered and make sure that they vote. for the whole republican ticket. secondly, i hope you leave here tonight if you just tell someon

that is true in the united states as well as abroad. hostilityn to trump's towards democratic institutions in the united states, we have a billionaire president who according to a recent report in the new york times acquired his wealth through illegal means and blatantlyesident, has embedded his own economic interests and those of his cronies into the policies of government. one of the consistent themes coming out of the investigation into the trunk campaign -- trump campaign manager campaign is the effort of wealthy foreign interests seeking influence and access with trump and his organization and with trump associates seeking to trade their access for the promise of even more wealth. while the characters involved in these reports are particularly blatant and crumb clumsy in ther efforts, the details of the stories are not unique. never before have we seen the power of big money over governmental policy so clearly. but it it for granted, is important that we understand what is going on. aboutr we are talking spending hundreds of million

god bless you, and god bless the united states of america. ♪ >> the u.s.ate this morning voted 51-49 to limit debate on brett kavanaugh. we are expecting a confirmation vote tomorrow. you can follow senate debate on the nomination and the expected vote tomorrow on our companion network, c-span2. before the vote this morning, a group of protesters gathered at mitch mcconnell's office in opposition to judge brett kavanaugh's confirmation to the supreme court. here is a look. we have a message. [indiscernible]

or towards the end that is represented, you have this representation that the united states end of the world and above all wired. the internet opens to commercial traffic in 1996, bringing united states into the world and every household into this global network and internet -- an international work of network and wired magazine and other dedicated boosters of the internet and at the age of silicon valley punch for viewership want to assure comments hard to say, that the united states are wired together. any problems like the political polarization where the income inequality do we've been suffering will be solved by the internet. 1999, 2000, even 2001. there is a no restraint in the utopianism. it's quite interesting and in some ways unparalleled. the sense that there is a disaster that has befallen the otherwise never before attacked on the continent united states really challenges pictorial representations of the united states after 9/11, of yours challenges the united states and the world as well. talking about pictures here. the ways as manifested health. where i find some of the

not was a way that was authorized by the united states congress. meanwhile, in the midst of massive military spending, in the midst of a war that was not authorized, 30 million people in our country have no health insurance. tens of millions of people are living in dire poverty. have infrastructure in bridges and water systems that are collapsing. hundreds of thousands of bright and thisple in vermont country are unable to afford to go to college. it seems to me that the time is long overdue not only for a serious discussion about our foreign-policy but about our national priorities in general. upon onewant to touch trend, just one. affairs.rend in global this country gets far too little attention. that is that there is currently a struggle of enormous taking place in the united states and throughout the world. in it, we see two competing visions for the future. see a growinge worldwide movement toward oligarchy andsm, kleptocracy. hand, we see a growing movement toward strengthening democracy. toward respecting every city. fighting for yellow tammy

reporter: the 14th amendment states all persons born or naturalized in the united states and subject the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the united states. but the white house is zeroing in on the five words, subject to the jurisdiction thereof. to possibly make a case people who cross the border illegally may not be eligible for constitutional protections. >> the supreme court of the united states has never ruled on whether or not the language of the 14th amendment subject to the jurisdiction thereof applies specifically to people in the country illegally. i think the president is looking at executive action and i know congress looked at legislative action to reconsider that. reporter: the issue of birthright citizenship came up early in the 2016 campaign. donald trump and jeb bush both highlighting the problem of what they called, anchor babies and taking sharp criticism for it. >> if there is another term i could come up with, i'm happy to hear it. >> now a week before the midterms, president trump has picked up that torch again. >> we're only country in the world where a per

and 2001, what happened in the united states? you will remember that, you may be very small but you remember about it. when we have the beginnings of what was described as a period of the war on terror, we went back to something called the bush cheney doctrine and what did that doctrine say? it basically said invasions like the country of iraq, demonstrations of starvation were said to have a promising future when the norm of liberal internationalism is violated. so, it was used in the war on terror as something that could be done legitimately by the u.s. , it in fact helped and terrorism. i don't know if you will agree with that or not and i think we distributed this article by alex devol in the london review of books that is on our website, what it basically talks about is a review of policy about famine and international law. a fairly highly contested issue in light of the kinds of famine that we are seeing now. so, what i want to show you is this well-made video, by walt disney, the disney company was very engaged with the uni

history tells us that if china is indeed the united states' main rival for super power status, then wed rely less on military and tariff threats, but more revitalization at home. and the the united states got where it is not because it waged a war in vietnam and funded the contra contras, but because it had a vibrant economic model. the soviets pushed america to land a man on the moon and scientific and other technology developments. these may be tactical but they don't address the core challenge. the united states needs to readdress the infrastructure and spend more money on education, and scientific research and fund what has made the model so much less appealing around the world. to confront china, that is the way to do it. for more, you can go to my full column on cnn.com/fareed zakaria gps. >>> we will get back to the china in a moment, but first i wa want to go to the stock market, because the stock market plummeted in saudi arabia, and they promised to retaliate against any sanctions imposed on the kingdom coming two weeks after the disappearance of the journalist kamaal khashog

i have been here 26 years, in the congress of the united states. i believe, and i think the last couple of weeks are demonstrative of that, that i helped create an immigrant movement in the united states of america, and in the democratic caucus and the democratic party, and in many areas and spaces, economic, business spaces, educational spaces, and most importantly, in this political space that is the congress of the united states, a genuine support and majority for immigration reform. so i thought, now i have done that, now let me elected president that will implement that immigration reform. secondly, the tragedy of puerto rico. there is always something special about the birthplace of your parents, just something. i wasn't born in puerto rico but my mom and dad were, and it has always held a very special place in my heart and the hearts of my children. and i saw the devastation. i saw the terrible, poor, miserable, lame response of the federal government, the richest, most powerful, most technologically-advanced nation in the world. and we now k

is some a governmental, and there was concern about it taking a certain dairy products from the united states. you have dairy farmers in every state of the union practically, and you have democrats like chuck schumer and others praising aspect of the deal that were going to expand a little bit the market axis of u.s. dairy producers to canada. so that was one of the very last things that was agreed on, sort of in the late hours of sunday night. did you see everybody. ms. you. good afternoon. in keeping with his campaign pledge, the president continues to note -- donate his salary on a quarterly basis to further important priorities. president trump is proud to donate his second-quarter salary to the small business administrator. administrator linda mcmahon is here to accept a check. i would like to bring her up to say a few words about how the funds will be used. >> thank you very much. this is awesome. i would like to think the president for his generosity and for his support of small business administration. he clearly understands the value of small businesses. approximately 30 million of t

and this is not the issue or story of your arm versus the united states but this seems with the policy we are seeing from the trump side this is the united states versus the world ok from iran's tasneem news agency thanks for joining us today good to get your take on the latest court ruling thank you. china is playing a more important role in the world today than the united states. what came at least for a recent poll conducted by the washington based think tank the pew research center it also shows that the chinese leader was more trusted globally than his american counterpart. what gets in donald trump obsessive his image sure but what else jonah has been attempting to interfere in our upcoming twenty eight. election i've done a lot of this is where china china's market distortions china china china sea route china talking china from and he has good reason to be fixated the rise of china is showing no signs of stopping with a nation poised to overtake america as the next world superpower polls conducted across twenty five countries show why the spread recognition that china is

dollar is the currency for trade and when a company is faced with the secondary sanctions from the united states versus the much smaller amount of trade that it could do with iran what does it use it chooses to stay on the good side of the united states so as you are saying despite the efforts of the governments in not only europe but in other places around the world they trumpet ministration is unfortunately being very successful in putting the squeeze on these countries and telling them. that if they dare continue tap trade with with iran they will incur the wrath of the united states government so it has been very difficult for companies to continue any run and very difficult for the european governments to try to find a path forward that would keep the iran deal intact. showing the power of america first i mean the end the usa in terms of trump also praised reforms in saudi arabia which you mentioned and blamed iran for the crisis in yemen . yes i mean i don't want to be defending the iranian government and it's up to the people in iran to determine what government they want but to have such

how much beholden still for oil, for instance, and for security in the region is the united states? actually, factually, how much does it depend on saudi arabia for that? >> probably less than it has at any time since the end of world war ii. the united states has become much more self-sufficient in terms of its oil production and has the capability of being even more so. that has leveled the geoeconomic position and it should have put us in the place where we are no longer so subservient to saudi arabia and can make decisions in the interest of the united states. i hope that this tragedy may be the turning point in our recognition of what our relative self-sufficiency and power, economic and military and otherwise is. >> i want to know what you make of crown prince mohammad bin salman came to the states many months ago, whether it was oi hollywood, silicon valley, all over the place, the top, top titans of every aspect of american corporate and hupublic life and business life met with him and were happy to do so. i want to know what you think about his reforms at home, his policies

mr khashoggi is also a permanent resident of the united states, of the state of virginia. columnist for one of our most prominent newspapers, the washington post. so from an american perspective there is a direct interest of the united states government in trying to pressure the saudi government to tell the truth over what happened. the denials of the saudi ambassador to the us can not be believed at this point and the saudi government has not offered any convincing evidence as to what happened. and so i think that pressure from all world leaders including from the turkish president has to continue on the saudi government. is your reading of what you have seen — donald trump has tweeted about it, as is his wont, and mike pompeo has talked about it too. is it your reading of the reactions from washington that the us government is, indeed applying the pressure that you talk about? it is. i think in a situation like this, the first reaction of the state department and the white house would be to contact the saudis. and hearing these reports, this would have been days ago now,

with president putin and he revealed john bolton i mean revealed two main factors as to why the united states still looks to abandon the deal one he says that russia has already deployed in europe some missiles that a band under the deal and two with the united states see this treaty as outdated and he says that the deal should include other nations like for example china and also john bolton talks about the key difference between russia and the united states when it comes to the understanding of the agreement with respect to the question of russian compliance as i said it is the american position that russia's violation it is russia's position that they're not violated so one has to ask how do you convince the russians to come back into compliance with obligations they don't think they're violating well the way russia sees the situation is kind of vice versa mosco has accused washington of minor violations when it comes to the ion of treaty and has said that it is in turn abiding to withstand it also russia views of the deal as key to international stability addressing that john bolton comba

foam is to break a silence the united states and china may well be on a path toward a nuclear war is no longer unthinkable in a few years china has become the world's second biggest economic power the united states is the world's biggest military power with bases and missiles and ships covering every continent and every ocean china threat to this dominance says washington who is a threat this film is about shifting power and great danger but it's also a film about the human spirit and the rise of an extraordinary resistance among people on the frontline of a coming war.

certain sanctions the united states has put on iran since walking away from the nuclear deal earlier this year around and argued that the i.c.j. the united nation's highest court that certain sanctions imposed against them by the trump regime has adversely affected the importation of humanitarian goods and products and that coupled with backing out of the nuclear deal violates the fifty's era treaty between the two countries and while the court didn't accept all of the rounds arguments they did in a preliminary ruling find that the united states must remove by means of its choosing any impediments arising from sanctions that affect humanitarian goods and services and that u.s. assurances that sanctions won't hurt humanitarian aid were not adequate. but rather than really examine the impact of these sanctions or at the very least start some form of dialogue with iran over them secretary of state decided to put sanctions over people and announce to the world the united states is terminating the nine hundred fifty five treaty of amity with iran this is the decision it's frankly thirty ni

that has been apparent on the recent hurricanes hitting in the united states. sea level -- global average sea level has gone up by 20 centimeters because of greenhouse warming, which is about eight inches. but along the coast, eastern coast of the united states, it is about twice as much. and when you add that sea level rise to the storm surges, it makes them that much worse. of course, the warming also increases the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, increases the rainfall totals. affectthe global warming has been making hurricane affect significantly larger. paper thato a recent argues the speed, the translation speed of these storms in many cases has been slowed down. and in the case of the houston and carolinas hurricanes, they moved slowly so the rainfall totals were exceptionally large. and this is attributable, the slowing of the speed in general, can be related to the global warming. amy: emily johnston, you cofounded 350.org in seattle, washington. onwe wrap up, your thohoughts what your plans are now that you are acquitted? >> well, in the immedi

infamous cambridge analytical, have also been key backers of donald trump and operate in europe, the united states, and israel to advance the same anti-immigrant, anti--muslim agenda. sheldon adelson gives generously to the republican party and right-wing causes in both the united states and israel, promoting a shared agenda of intolerance and bigotry in both. however, that if we are to effectively oppose right-wing authoritarianism, we cannot simply be on the defensive. we need to be proactive and understand that just defending the failed status quo, just wanting to go back to the way it enough.be is not good in fact, we need to recognize that the challenges we face product of the status quo. what do i mean by that? in the united states, in the u.k., in france, and in many other countries around the world, people are working longer hours for stagnating wages. they are going nowhere in a hurry, and they are not happy .bout that our job is not to simply accept the status quo, not to accept andive levels of income wealth inequality were the top 1% of the world's population owns half the planets weal

to the united states. to france and to italy. during our travels we stablish to this unprecedented amount that regarding the transfers of priests involved in cases of pedophilia. deck a man sits in dig. that up with his off by a few that must evolve after it was you and i got into a bang up stakes i mean that and the victims number tens of thousands marked with scars for the rest of their lives. our investigations would lead us all the way to pope francis who revealed how when he was charged. when a series he tried to influence the argentine justice department. to sunday that they didn't feel it was these out in the night and he kept up the last few. investigated the mysteries of the church where on the altar of truth god's law seems to prevail over that of a myth.

is simply saying let's bring this back to let's bring the manufacturing back to united states the tariffs frankly are not and then another themselves there are there a way to get the parties that have taken advantage of the united states and frankly those are taking advantage of canada as well back to the table to renegotiate a more fair deal this is not what the president wants is a free trade or has trade across our free trade. as you say the trump of ministration is a free trade administration why then. his own party republican speaker of the house paul ryan so opposed to the tariffs that he's imposed on i mean store generalized canada the e.u. well i'll tell you why it's because you know the many establishment republicans are are giving a selling out so they're selling out to industry they're selling out the industry the same industry the same corporations that have built their empires on the backs of american labor that have been treated so unfairly american workers have been treated so unfairly and so a lot of individuals a lot of establishment republicans and many democ

john bolton didn't make it any clearer about how and when the united states wants to pull out of the i in af nuclear treaty he said there wasn't any clear timeframe yet what he did say though was that the united states hasn't started the official withdrawal from the treaty which takes about six months to do he did say and that's what they say most what the president was saying over the last couple of days is that russia has been violating this treaty time and time again but interestingly also said that the russians agree with the united states that the tweet is outdated and none of the russian officials have said that in public but he said the russians agreed to back down when the treaty was signed in one thousand eight hundred seven it was a different world the only two major nuclear superpowers over you the soviet union and the united states well this situation has changed now there's also china he mentioned and he said to bear information china has a ha for one third of their missiles that would actually violated this treaty this is what we had to say i think you were primarily res

efforts to stop them from reaching their final destination the united states president. so what's driving them to keep going. back on the scoresheet. beat. the best of the weekend's football action from germany. thanks so much for joining us. president donald trump has told reporters that the u.s. when you need to pull out of a nuclear arms agreement with russia the land locked into media crean's nuclear forces treaty was negotiated more than thirty years ago by then president reagan and soviet leader mikhail gorbachev it bans nuclear unconvinced of missiles with ranges of five hundred to fifty five hundred kilometers there is what to say russia has violated the agreement they've been violating it for many years that i don't know why president obama didn't negotiate or pull out. and we're not going to let them violate a nuclear agreement that go out of their weapons and we're not allowed to wear the ones that have stayed in the agreement and we've honored the agreement but russia is not fortunately on to the agreement so we're going to terminate it we're going to pull out

your opinion about confirming brett kavanaugh and are you concerned about how the world views the united states? mr. kaine: april, i am always concerned about how the world views the united states. the hearing did not change my view because i met with judge kavanaugh, read his opinions and law articles and decided after the hearing to oppose his nomination for a couple of important philosophical grounds, mainly that he was too willing to defer to the executive and not be an independent check. but the allegations that then came up from dr. ford i think were very, very serious, and i thought it was important that the hearing's be held so that we could send a message to women or anybody who has suffered sexual assault that we consider this a serious matter and should get to the bottom of it. i think it is important we have these hearings. i will be reviewing the fbi report and there will be a vote soon, but i think the important thing is to send the message that we take claims of sexual assault seriously. my opponent indicated when the allegations were made by dr. ford -- he called them a bunch of

the thing is some military experts see this deal as very one sided and tipping in the favor of the united states because back in the day when the united states and then soviet union the kind of brokered the deal it was very much. just to cut the long story short it did impaired the soviet union's and now russia's ability to expand its its military and want to deploy missiles that had that the soviet union used to intimidate europe and in turn in its own to unite. and states did not make concessions of the same scale so to speak i would i don't want to go into too much detail because this could really take up the rest of the program time but that's what some military experts are saying and we've already heard some worry some reactions coming out of europe for example the french president of an oil mccraw now has said that well the i.n.f. treaty is key to european stability and he's he wasn't the only voice in the choir he was he was backed by his other partners by the european union as a whole body also coming not just from europe but coming from asia japan has said that while the deal is should

china does not want to have a conflict with the united states but if the united states really wants to impose these things onto china i think the chinese people will be fully mobilized behind the chinese government and the chinese military will be fully mobilized into action and that means china and the united states may really stare at each other each other's i and these two nuclear weapon ob the countries you are talking about a possible i'm a god i'm evolving mankind as a whole the view from beijing victor gao director of the china national association of international studies thank you for a full and frank interview this hour. the devastating conflict in yemen has long been regarded as the world's worst humanitarian crisis but it's a war that's bypassed nearly half of people in britain according to a new poll what makes that more alarming is that the u.k. is the second biggest supplier of weapons to the country waging the bombing campaign is probably political report. it's taken the lives of thousands of civilians and caused an unprecedented humanitarian crisis and yet acc

leadership in space and why canada works well with the united states? >> well, when you look at the sizes of the country, you have the united states down here and canada up here and the same goes with respect with space and our national priorities can be slightly different, as well. so what the relationship allows us to do, those that are at a lower status in terms of budgets and what wannot. the cooperation allows us to get to places we never would before and the ways the models have evolved over time is we have a barter arrangement for each kinds of these collaborations and canada would have a niche of expertise and we would provide that to a particular mission in exchange for data that canadian scientists would have access to in a privileged fashion. so that kind of quid pro quo is clearly a win-win proposition, but also from a canadian perspective allows us to get access to data in science that we would never have been able to get access to before. so it provides a privileged access benefit as we look at it moving forward. so that model has been used