. >> and that may be the explanation for the post tragedy spanned by theadministration, that their ideology which blinded them to the threat and the first place, which either caused a gap in intelligence or a refusal to ask for the intelligence. had to be interpreted as something other than a resurgence of al qaeda. evidence on the war on terrorism was still very much with us and that sweetness and light have now broken out and libya. the president really, especially given vice-president biden performance ought to be questioned on this at the next two debates. this is the commander in chief we are about to pick. here's an examplef this commander-in-chief not being the bridge when he was needed. lou: put some distance between these elements between what is a tragedy and the immense challenge to u.s. special interests. there is a political aspect. what if, and i ask this -- i want this to be your judgment. is there, in your judgment to any possibility that political decisions were driving decisions on security in an gauzydriving decisions about what would be shared with the american people, d