we knew we were talking about projects applied for their e.e.a., 2013, 14 ask 15. we knew we had projects from three different years applying threw this process. at that point, there was zero opposition from the commissioners or staff members about how we set up the use it or lose it clause. this was a carefully negotiated deal that supervisor peskin and i engage in with mayor lee at the time, and a number of projects in this pipeline and at that point not a single person brought up the equity that some projects may be coming along later in the pipeline than others. in fact, most of these projects aren't from 2013. they really are the projects later down the pipeline. so i think for me, it's a little puzzling why this issue is coming up today and why this issue wasn't identified earlier when this ordinance was written with the consensus of our board, the mayor and the planning department? i mean, the point you are bringing up is not new. right? it's not like we didn't recognize this issue when we cut this deal back in april of 2016. why is this an issue today? why