that is thejudgment that has been handed down at the supreme court in the last few moments.t hearing from, who handed down thejudgment on behalf just hearing from, who handed down the judgment on behalf of the five justices, they roar that they were substantial grounds to believe that genuine refugees, if they were sent to rwanda, there were substantial grounds in the judgment today, lord reid said there were substantial grounds to believe that genuine refugees sent to the country, rwanda, could be at risk of being returned to countries from which they fled. that breaking news in the last few moments from the supreme court, the uk's highest court, the government has lost its appeal. that means the rwanda plan has been ruled unlawful. that was what the five justices endorsed in the earlier court of appeal ruling, which again ruled it was unlawful. they were looking at in particular if rwanda is a country will say for asylum seekers, and also was there a substantial risk that some asylum seekers, if they were sent from the uk to rwanda, once they got to rwanda, was there a sub

——so thejudge decides everything.he has nothing to lose, and that is the judge's fault with the judge ruling upfront that he has lost. it doesn't give him much incentive to behave. i also think he is getting political traction here. it seems that the poles are cooperating with him. clearly donald trump sees this as politics. this is political theatre for him. in his mind he may have lost legally but he may think he is winning politically. we legally but he may think he is winning politically.— winning politically. we will aet winning politically. we will net to winning politically. we will get to the _ winning politically. we will get to the political- winning politically. we will get to the political side - winning politically. we will get to the political side of| get to the political side of it, butjoe, iwanted get to the political side of it, butjoe, i wanted to follow—up with a question. we have seen donald trump's legal team say we are getting a fair trial, this is a case that has been decided. we might put in a

the second problem and it depends on your interpretation of thejudgment, the government it depends one able to respond to thisjudgment by hopes it will be able to respond to this judgment by tweaking the deal and turning it there are those who read thejudgment and and turning it there are those who read the judgment and say it will require much more therefore there may be a? about whether anybody will get to central —— might be sent to rewind at the general election,

he been very competitive, repeatedly sparring with thejudge.l rally, it is a courtroom. during a court brickie suggests he has been told to... zip it. how long will that last? mr trump has previously attacked the judge personally, posting on social media she is a wacko, working to damage and defy me for purposes of interfering with the 2024 presidential election. donald trump could lose control of trump tower if he is barred from doing business in new york. thejudge has already ruled that trump properties, like his mar—a—lago golf club were fraudulently overvalued. this trial will determine the penalty. you are witnessin: will determine the penalty. you are witnessing the _ will determine the penalty. you are witnessing the most _ will determine the penalty. you are witnessing the most corrupt - will determine the penalty. you are witnessing the most corrupt and i witnessing the most corrupt and blatant weaponisation of law enforcement.— blatant weaponisation of law enforcement. ., , enforcement. campaigning is the victor or political _ enforce

exchanges between donald trump and the judge who wants him, this exchanges between donald trump and thejudgeho wants him, this is not a political rally. these are the pictures of donald trump as he comes out of that courtroom. of course, as we were hearing there, that has been going on for the last hour or so. it has been tense inside of the court room with a warning from the judge about those attacks that donald trump has made and politicising the case but those at the live pictures coming into us from new york. our other headlines, israel's military says it is effectively split gaza into two, saying it hit a50 targets into two, saying it hit a50 targets in the last 2a hours and seized a hamas military compound. the ms run health ministry said more than 10,000 people have been killed in gaza since the war began. other major un agencies have again called for a humanitarian ceasefire, saying enough is enough. welcome to verified live. donald trump has arrived in court in new york in a civil case that could determine the future of his property empire. as he walked into the court mr trump dismi

thejudges said haj kadour demonstrated incredible courage by hitting the road in complete darkness andering unique and compelling footage of the destruction and rescue effort. what stood out to us was the keen attention to detail, from the hospital to the recovery efforts to the stunning drone footage. in 2022, madagascar was rocked by two cyclones which destroyed farmland and infrastructure in the south—east. as a result, hundreds of thousands of people were left on the brink of starvation. winners of the news award jedida andriamasy, gaelle borgia, caroline breniere and jeremy martin travelled to isolated villages to investigate claims about the extraordinary lengths some families were going to in order to survive. msf told us that villagers were offering to sell their children in order to no longer have to look after them and in order to get some money to feed the other children or themselves. while reports of children being sold or abandoned were denied by the government, thejournalists won over the trust of locals, who offered first—hand testimony that the practice was taking plac

the other difference is here in the civil trial, thejudge, and nonjury trial, thejudges the civil trialge, and nonjury trial, the judges are decided liability. so thisjudge in new york has already said, the trump organisation is liable for committing fraud in these financial statements and defrauding the banks with consequences. the only thing i trial that was the amount of damages to impose. trial that was the amount of damages to im ose. ., ., , trial that was the amount of damages to imose. ., ., , ., to impose. how long will it be to know? it will— to impose. how long will it be to know? it will be _ to impose. how long will it be to know? it will be long, _ to impose. how long will it be to know? it will be long, the - to impose. how long will it be to know? it will be long, the trial. know? it will be long, the trial has to end which _ know? it will be long, the trial has to end which will _ know? it will be long, the trial has to end which will be _ know? it will be long, the trial has to end which will be in _ to end which will be in december, then thejudge has to end which will

but thejudgment for prince harry and the others.remain confidential. it is really ironic that the daily mail, the newspaper which is often called for transparency from organisations and people in all other walks of life, have gone so far to try and restrict the information that is accessible to the claimants in this case. h0 the claimants in this case. no direct response yet from the duke of sussex to the judgment today. it is now likely he will be back in front of thejudge now likely he will be back in front of the judge next year. tom now likely he will be back in front of thejudge next year. tom symonds, bbc news. the time is 1.15. our top story this lunchtime! the chancellor has distanced himself from the home secretary�*s controversial comments yesterday, when she accused the police of showing favouritism to pro—palestinian demonstrators. and we catch up with fiona the loneliest sheep in britain — now settling into her new home coming up on bbc news: the father of liverpool winger luis diaz has been reunited with his family fol

thejudge told him, "this is not a political rally. it's a courtroom".e, taking a quote from the proceedings out of context. he is baiting a judge who will decide this case without a jury. during a court break, he suggested he has been told to zip it. mr trump, how is it going in there? but obviously didn't heed that advice. mr trump's lawyers' legal strategy is to complain that the judge is biased against their client and treating him unfairly. thejudge doesn't like when president trump explains what actually happened because it is not good for his narrative. donald trump could lose control of trump tower if he is barred from doing business in new york. the judge has already ruled that trump properties like his mar—a—lago golf club in florida were fraudulently over—valued. this trial will determine the penalty. but you're witnessing the most corrupt and blatant weaponisation of law enforcement... campaigning as the victim of political persecution is working for now, with polls suggesting he is currently leading joe biden in the presidential contest. but

the second problem and it depends on your interpretation of thejudgment, the government it depends on your interpretation of the judgment, the government clearly hopes it will be able to respond to thisjudgment by hopes it will be able to respond to this judgment by tweaking the deal and turning it there are those who read thejudgment and and turning it there are those who read the judgment and say it will require much more therefore there may be a? about whether anybody will get to central —— might be sent to rewind at the general election, by january 2025 at the latest. —— mike rwanda. but the government i think over emphasises the extent to which its electoral fortunes rest on this issue. if amongst those people who voted conservative in 2019 and you look at it separately, first of all those who believe illegal immigration has been going up and those who don't, you discover that those who believe it is going up, they are no more or no less likely to vote conservative now. in other words, no less likely to vote conservative now. in otherwords, it's no less likely to vote conservativ

the implications politically are after thejudgment. ago.ically are after the judgment. this are after the “udgment. this intervention _ are after the judgment. this intervention from _ are after the judgment. ti 3 intervention from suella braverman was expected. we had her scaling resignation letter only yesterday in which she accused a prior minister of not having a plan b. just to unpick what she said. she is talking about the government to introduce legislation, emergency legislation, which would bypass the european convention on human rights and the human right act, which enshrines the convention into uk law, in order to get this policy three. couple of points, the first is she's not the first mp to suggest it. this issue about whether the uk should signed up about whether the uk should signed up as a divisive one. it was always expected thisjudgment up as a divisive one. it was always expected this judgment from the supreme court would fuel that the bait. it is worth saying in the supreme court's judgment read bait. it is worth saying

thejudge told him, "this is not a political rally. "it's a courtroom." taking a quote from the proceedings out of context. he is baiting a judge who will decide this case without a jury. during a court break, he suggested he has been told to zip it. mr trump, how is it going in there? but obviously didn't heed that advice. mr trump's lawyers' legal strategy is to complain that thejudge is biased against their client and treating him unfairly. thejudge doesn't like when president trump explains what actually happened because it is not good for his narrative. donald trump could lose control of trump tower if he is barred from doing business in new york. the judge has already ruled that trump properties like his mar—a—lago golf club in florida were fraudulently over—valued. this trial will determine the penalty. but you're witnessing the most corrupt and blatant weaponisation of law enforcement... campaigning as the victim of political persecution is working for now, with polls suggesting he is currently leading joe biden in the presidential contest. but th

and then in september this year, almost three years since the trial began, thejudge finally issued a courts, and we've been waiting for a very long time for thejudgment and it's finally come. we hope thatjustice is going to be served today. in conclusion, ifind that the prosecution has established a case beyond reasonable doubt against the first accused, and he is hereby convicted of conspiracy to commit a felony, namely trafficking in person, trafficking in person of three subjects, and child neglect of three persons, of three children. adoption has a process for a reason. it's for the safety of the child. and fred sold a child to us without even knowing who the potential buyer is. he is supposed to be the safety net. but actually he was the complete opposite. fred's conviction made headlines. but for the parents of missing children, the verdict brought little comfort. their endless and sometimes hopeless search for answers continues. every morning, rosemary leaves her house to put up posters of her missing granddaughter chelsea in the hope that it will bring fresh news of her where

well, thejudge has already business in that state of new york.ss licence should be revoked, and his businesses should be liquidated by a receiver. those two decisions were stayed pending appeal, so it'll be up to the appellate court whether those remedies are available. the only thing that's left for the trial court to determine is how much he's been unjustly enriched and should have to disgorge, in terms of getting back money, how much money does he have to pay back? it's not so much a penalty, but the claim is that he's been unjustly enriched. and as i said, none of the witnesses that are getting publicity have testified regarding that issue. there have been to other witnesses who have gotten almost no publicity, who have gotten almost no publicity, who are the relevant witnesses on that issue. the attorney general has called michael mccarty, an investment baker who's tried to come up investment baker who's tried to come up with some estimates of how much she's been unjustly enriched —— investment banker, and there's been a deutsche bank execut

thejudge even instructed mr trump's lawyers to "control" their client.terference and political warfare. mr trump and two of his sons are accused of fraudulently inflating the value of assets owned by the trump 0rganisation by billions of dollars. this is what he had to say. i it's a very sad situation for our. country, we shouldn't have this — this is for third—world countries. and it's very unfair, it's very unfair. - but in the meantime, - the people of the country understand it, they see it, and they don't like it, - they don't like it, _ because it's political warfare, as you would call it, _ or political lawfare, another name — i got a lot of names for it, but usually it takes placel in third—world countries and banana republics. i nobody's ever seen that to this . extent, we've never seen it here. but we will go along - and we will hopefully do very well in every regard, _ we will win the election and make america great again, - that's what we're going to do. 0ur north america correspondent, nada tawfik, in new york, has the latest. this was classi

today, over to thejudges, who said no. send illegal migrants to rwanda was ruled unlawful, partly on the principle of non—refoulement, that refugees must not be returned to their country of origin if their life or freedom would be threatened. that is guaranteed under the un refugee convention. thejudges guaranteed under the un refugee convention. the judges also guaranteed under the un refugee convention. thejudges also raised concerns about compliance with international agreements on civil rights, torture and the european convention on human rights. today, the suweme — convention on human rights. today, the supreme court _ convention on human rights. today, the supreme court has _ convention on human rights. today, the supreme court hasjudged - convention on human rights. today, the supreme court hasjudged that i the supreme court has judged that the supreme court has judged that the rwanda policy requires a set of changes in order to be lawful. to the prime minister, who announced a three—point plan to answer the supreme

thejudge, mrjustice nicklin, said that the seven claimants have a "real prospect" of proving that associatedgal action. now, the seven do still have to prove that but they will now get the chance to do so in a trial at court, probably next year. associated newspapers�* response... "as we have always made unequivocally clear, the lurid claims made by prince harry and others of phone hacking, landline tapping, burglary and sticky window microphones are simply preposterous. we look forward to establishing this in court in due course." potentially crucial evidence could include mail newspaper records of payments to private investigators. but they were passed confidentially to the leveson inquiry and thejudge ruled they should remain confidential. it�*s really ironic that the daily mail, which is a newspaper which has often called for transparency from organisations and people in all other walks of life, have gone so far to try and restrict the information that�*s accessible to the claimants in this case. it�*s now likely that prince harry will be back in court next year. love you, harry! tom sym

thejudge convention and that was relevant in this case.s not as a country because it could not process claims properly leading to arrest refugees would be returned to their countries of origin where they would be at serious risk and that would be a risk to the life or liberty. —— their life are at liberty. live now to yasmine ahmed, uk executive director of human rights watch. well you surprised about the focus on rwanda? irate well you surprised about the focus on rwanda?— well you surprised about the focus on rwanda? ~ ., on rwanda? we have documented the extensive human _ on rwanda? we have documented the extensive human rights _ on rwanda? we have documented the extensive human rights violations - extensive human rights violations occurring in rwanda and documented threats to extradition killings and deaths in custody and restrictions on media and politicalfreedom and the lack of independentjudiciary. we were not surprised that the court found there was a lack of independentjudiciary which meant independent judiciary which meant that i

but donald trump, he feels he has nothing to lose, and that is the judge's fault with thejudge ruling has lost. it doesn't give him much incentive to behave. i also think he is getting political traction here. it seems that the polls are cooperating with him. clearly donald trump sees this as politics. this is political theatre for him. and in his mind, he may have lost, legally, but he may think he is winning politically. we will get to the political side of it, butjoe, i wanted to follow—up with one more question. we have seen donald trump's legal team say "we're not getting a fair trial, this is a case that has been decided, we might put in a motion for a mistrial." do they have a case to make? i don't think they'll get — no, they won't get approval of a mistrial motion at the trialjudge level. he'll say no, i have covered this trial just fine and thereforejudge engoron will refuse that motion. they will have to raise it on appeal. that is clearly where donald trump and his legal team feel that their avenue now for any kind of legal relief is. this is a lost cause at the trialjudge

we expected that but he did go on the offensive from the stand, attacking thejudge in the new york attorneyu are a political hack and repeatedly being acknowledged by the judge. and repeatedly being acknowledged by thejudge. —— admonished at one point, he said if you don't control them i will. a faraday as we expected and wants a game of the stand, afterwards, again attacking the whole process. really shaping this as part of a political attempt to undermine him and election interference. all key messaging for his supporters. china's leader, xijinping, has praised his country's improved ties with australia, saying the two sides had "worked out some problems". mr xi made the comments as he met the visiting australian prime minister, anthony albanese, in beijing. mr albanese said progress had been made. in recent years, china and australia have clashed on a number of political issues. beijing imposed restrictions on australian imports, some of which have now been lifted. earlier, i spoke to former australian ambassador to beijing, geoff raby. i began by asking him what he made of the meeting.

at one point, thejudge asked mr trump's lawyers to control their client. the trial "unfair." everything we did was absolutely right. to think we're being sued and spending all this time and money and you have people being killed all over the world that this country could stop. inflation and all the other problems that this country has, i think it is a disgrace. the $250 million lawsuit was brought against mr trump and his family by the new york attorney general�*s office. the judge already ruled that mr trump is liable forfraud. the trial is now exploring what he'll have to pay in damages. after court, new york attorney general letitia james defended her case, and said mr trump engaged in "distractions" while on the stand. he rambled. he hurled insults. but we expected that. at the end of the day, the documentary evidence demonstrated that he falsely inflated his assets to basically enrich himself and his family. he persistently engaged in fraud. live now to our washington correspondent, gary 0'donoghue, who's been covering the trial in new york. he has th

he called thejudge a fraud to his face.is the behaviour we expect from a defendant. but, of course, this performance and it was really that, it was a performance, was much more to do with politics than it had to do with this case. he is risking a heavy penalty by antagonising the judge. but at the same time, this narrative that he's been running, that he's being victimised by these politically—motivated prosecutions, it's doing very well for solidifying his support among his base, for raising him millions and millions of dollars in campaign funds and seems to be doing pretty well with voters across the board. you might think thatjoe biden would be reconsidering his position, but there doesn't seem to be any sign of that at the moment, does there? no, no. no sign of that at all from joe biden or the white house. the issue voters say is the most important to them is the economy. now, if you look at the american economy, actually a lot of the statistics will tell you it's going pretty well. hmm. but every voter you meet will t

thejudge granted organisation. that is the official charge.onal bail, and he said they would be able to attend any protest in the future in the interim between now and the trial. he said it is because it is the human right in the uk to attend protests. he said it is incredibly important. but he did warn the women that if they get arrested again at a protest, then they would be in peril because they would be able to be detained in custody by police. this investigation came about by the metropolitan police terrorism command. they say they would not hesitate to arrest and charge anyone suspected of committing offences that encourage hate and are harmful to communities. just to let you know, this kind of terror offence has a maximum sentence of six months in prison and a £5,000 fine.— in prison and a £5,000 fine. louisa, thank yom — in prison and a £5,000 fine. louisa, thank yom just _ in prison and a £5,000 fine. louisa, thank you. just staying _ in prison and a £5,000 fine. louisa, thank you. just staying with - in prison and a £5,000 fine. loui

thejudge had already ruled the former president and his sons and the wider trump organization lied aboutnalties if any. donald trump is facing multiple cases on both criminal and civil fronts including multiple cases on both criminal and civilfronts including for trying to overturn a 2020 us presidential election. but israel unlike the others goes to the heart of his identity as a businessman in a city where he built his name. he had his organisation could be fined up to $250 million and lose control of some of his iconic real estate to a court appointed receiver will be banned from doing business in new york. to the war in ukraine now, and ahead of winter, both russia and ukraine are trying to consolidate their recent military advances. ukrainian counteroffensives in the east saw small territorial gains around such cities as robotyne and bahkmut. but there are growing concerns that the war has now reached a stalemate. renewed russian assaults on the town of avdiivka, with increasing use of heavy artillery along the front line is forcing thousands of ukrainians to leave their homes. and

thejudge, mrjustice nicklin, said that the seven claimants have a "real prospect" of proving that associatedng them from taking legal action. now, the seven do still have to prove that but they will now get the chance to do so in a trial at court, probably next year. associated newspapers�* response... "as we have already made unequivocally clear, potentially crucial evidence could include mail newspaper records of payments to private investigators. but they were passed confidentially to the leveson inquiry and thejudge ruled they should remain confidential. it�*s really ironic that the daily mail, which is a newspaper which has often called for transparency from organisations and people in all other walks of life, have gone so far to try and restrict the information that�*s accessible to the claimants in this case. it�*s now likely that prince harry will be back in court next year. love you, harry! tom symonds, bbc news. the time is 6.16. our top story this evening. an exclusion zone has been set up around the cenotaph in london amidst concern about protests over remembrance weekend. and co

on the other issue about the receipts, associated newspapers have won that bit, thejudge has said it confidentially to a public inquiry and cannot be used in this case. but there is a but because the judge has also said the claimants, the seven, prince harry and the duke of sussex and the rest, they can go to the originaljudge of the inquiry and try to get the restriction lifted, so they have a little hope there and that is quite important because the ledgers as they are known to contain quite a lot of information about who the newspapers were paying and for what sorts of activities. ~ ., , ., ., activities. when it goes to trial, if it does go _ activities. when it goes to trial, if it does go to _ activities. when it goes to trial, if it does go to trial, _ activities. when it goes to trial, if it does go to trial, what - activities. when it goes to trial, if it does go to trial, what could j if it does go to trial, what could we expect? could we see prince harry giving evidence? i we expect? could we see prince harry giving evidence?— giving evidence? i think it is very likel . in

thejudges agreed there were substantial grounds to believe there was a real risk that genuine refugeesld wrongly be sent back from rwanda to countries they fled from. . . , ., from. the changes needed to eliminate _ from. the changes needed to eliminate the _ from. the changes needed to eliminate the risk— from. the changes needed to eliminate the risk of - from. the changes needed to. eliminate the risk of fulfilment from. the changes needed to - eliminate the risk of fulfilment may be needed in the future but they have not been shown to be in place now. the home secretary's appeal is therefore dismissed. the? now. the home secretary's appeal is therefore dismissed.— therefore dismissed. they also a . reed therefore dismissed. they also agreed there — therefore dismissed. they also agreed there hadn't _ therefore dismissed. they also agreed there hadn't been - therefore dismissed. they also agreed there hadn't been a - therefore dismissed. they also i agreed there hadn't been a proper assessment on whether rwanda is safe for asylum seekers. how assessment on whether rwanda is safe for

thejudge, mrjustice nicklin, said that the seven claimants have a "real prospect" of proving that associatedgal action. now, the seven do still have to prove that but they will now get the chance to do so in a trial at court, probably next year. associated newspapers�* response... potentially crucial evidence could include mail newspaper records of payments to private investigators. but they were passed confidentially to the leveson inquiry and thejudge ruled they should remain confidential. it's really ironic that the daily mail, which is a newspaper which has often called for transparency from organisations and people in all other walks of life, have gone so far to try and restrict the information that's accessible to the claimants in this case. it's now likely that prince harry will be back in court next year. love you, harry! tom symonds, bbc news. and there's much more on that story in the bbc news website in bbc news app. a coroner has ruled that the death of a couple in egypt was caused by carbon monoxide poisoning. john cooper, who was 69 years old, and susan, who are 63, or staying

prosecutors and thejudge have institutions.jr said while he may have signed off on the documents, he relied on his accountants to keep accurate values. he said thatis keep accurate values. he said that is what he paid in full. he returns tomorrow in court to finish off his testimony and then we will hear from the other trump children. eric trump, responsible for the day—to—day operations of the company, and then evoke a trump, although her attorneys said today that they are appealing the ruling that she needs to attend to court and testify. —— ivanka trump. find testify. -- ivanka trump. and congressman _ testify. -- ivanka trump. and congressman george - testify. —— ivanka trump. and congressman george santos has survived to expel him by his fellow members of the us house of representatives. the vote failed by 179— 213, five short of the two—thirds majority needed to oust a house member. santos is accused of 23 charges including fraud and theft. the first time congressman denies any wrongdoing. the house really expels its membe

even if thejudge sentences 110 years in prison.he do it will still amount to a life sentence.— do it will still amount to a life sentence. . ~ ., life sentence. he talked about the crypto _ life sentence. he talked about the crypto currency _ life sentence. he talked about the crypto currency industry i the crypto currency industry and the message the prosecutors have for the industry. what impact do you think his downfall has had on the industry?— downfall has had on the indust ? ., ., ., industry? he rode the wave of c to industry? he rode the wave of crypto when — industry? he rode the wave of crypto when times _ industry? he rode the wave of crypto when times were - industry? he rode the wave ofj crypto when times were good. industry? he rode the wave of. crypto when times were good. in 2021 when crypto was at its height so was sam bankman—fried but then his stunning fall in 2022 sent a chill to the industry and we have seen prices down and venture capital investment down and we've seen not only mr brinkman freed's own fall fro

thejudge, mrjustice nicklin, said that the seven claimants have a "real prospect" of proving that associatedwere passed confidentially to the leveson inquiry and thejudge ruled they should remain confidential. it�*s really ironic that the daily mail, which is a newspaper which has often called for transparency from organisations and people in all other walks of life, have gone so far to try and restrict the information that�*s accessible to the claimants in this case. it�*s now likely that prince harry will be back in court next year. love you, harry! tom symonds, bbc news. to stay with us on bbc news. hello. some of us are set to start the weekend with a touch of frost and some fog patches. and where that fog does develop, it could be quite slow to clear. saturday should be a mostly dry day with some sunshine. things change a bit on remembrance sunday with some outbreaks of rain in places. now, as we head through the rest of this evening and tonight, we will continue to see some showers here and there. but most of those will fade. clear spells, the winds falling lighter. that will allow som

so it was a very moving morning in court, thejudge said it was a very moving morning in court, the judgen to him to spiesify exactly how long he had to spend in prison before being considered for release, he would have imposed a very lengthy specific time in indeed but under irish lawjudges do not have that power and the judge suggested maybe that was something that should be looked at. so for now, the police, the family of aisling murphy, the lawyers involved in this case, it is over, but through is no doubt that this murder and this trial has certainly left its mark on society in ireland, it has prompted changes in government poll circumstance it has prompted new conversations about what needs to be done to try to stop attacks on women, and the legacy of aisling murphy certainly will live on, and thatis murphy certainly will live on, and that is a point that her friends and family have been making as this case has come to its conclusion. am sure they have drawn comfort from that as well. rescue workers in india have temporarily spending their efforts to reach a0 construction workers in

thejudge made that before being considered for parole. judge made that decision based on our crime of particularly high seriousness it would start at 30 years minimum term, then she increase that by 13 years because of some particularly nasty aspects of the crime, including what she described as zara aleena suffering inordinately. then she took five years of that minimum term because he had pleaded guilty. the appeal courtjudges have decided that by adding that 13 years to the 13th judge had perhaps gone far. because she had already set the minimum term so high, they said it was difficult to be sure zara aleena had suffered inordinately because she had probably gone unconscious 30 seconds into the attack. they have reduced that 13 year increased 98, ten with five years for a guilty plea, that reduces the minimum term to 33 years before he will be considered for parole. even so, he will be 63 before there is even a chance of somebody considering he would be allowed to come out of prison. what allowed to come out of prison. what has been th

that there was no doubt that it was racist and that it was offensive and that in his adjudication, thejudged that in his adjudication, the judge agreed with the prosecution and said that it was a restless message —— racist method. so there we have five who were found guilty of sending these messages and they will be sentenced in the next half an hour or so. i they will be sentenced in the next half an hour or so.— half an hour or so. i had what you said about _ half an hour or so. i had what you said about the _ half an hour or so. i had what you said about the fact _ half an hour or so. i had what you said about the fact that _ half an hour or so. i had what you said about the fact that they - half an hour or so. i had what you j said about the fact that they were retired met officers but what have the metropolitan police said about this particular case? 50. the metropolitan police said about this particular case?— this particular case? so, the metropolitan _ this particular case? so, the metropolitan police, - this particular case? so, the metropolitan police, as - this particular case? s

thejudge made that before being considered for parole. it would start

thejudge has ordered $840 billion for alleged tax evasion.d airbnb was suspected to withhold 21% of lands rental income and pass it onto the italian tax authorities as required by law. the period question covers 2017 to 2021. airbnb has told the bbc they are surprised and disappointed by the announcement. let's go back to our breaking news story this hour. wework has filed for bankruptcy protection in the united states. we will have a lot more on that story next hour. do join us if you can. for now, thank you so much for watching asia business report. it may look like a trip to the science museum, but believe it or not, this is gatwick. it is a new centre with hands—on experiments with the hope of inspiring schoolchildren to considerjobs in stem, science, technology, engineering and maths. it technology, engineering and maths. , ., ., , maths. it is fundamentally about our _ maths. it is fundamentally about our future _ maths. it is fundamentally about our future pipeline l maths. it is fundamentally | about our future pipeline of talent _ ab

, son so he is focused on provoking a fight with the judge, trying to argue that thejudge fight withng to argue that the judge is unfair and none of that helps them from a legal perspective. it only helps him from the perspective of trying to influence his followers and his supporters. i influence his followers and his sunporters-— supporters. i was reading one prosecutor — supporters. i was reading one prosecutor who _ supporters. i was reading one prosecutor who said - supporters. i was reading one prosecutor who said anything | supporters. i was reading one i prosecutor who said anything can happen when you have in the dark. when you have donald trump in the dark, perhaps times that by 100. absolutely. he's going to be very difficult to keep on to a particular planner agenda. difficult to keep on to a particular planneragenda. if difficult to keep on to a particular planner agenda. if i was cross—examining donald trump i would try to goad him into or pushing into saying that he actually was responsible for these numbers. because i don't think he is the sort of person i like to say

your reaction to thejudgment. it was personal capacity. your reaction to the judgment.ew this plan was unlawful. ., , ., , unlawful. the 'udgment was worse than we unlawful. the judgment was worse than we feared. _ unlawful. the judgment was worse than we feared. the _ unlawful. the judgment was worse than we feared. the previous - unlawful. the judgment was worse j than we feared. the previous court has acknowledged the legality of the rwanda _ has acknowledged the legality of the rwanda policy. it makes a sweeping range _ rwanda policy. it makes a sweeping range of— rwanda policy. it makes a sweeping range of rejections, notjust human rights, _ range of rejections, notjust human rights, the — range of rejections, notjust human rights, the foundation of the ruling, — rights, the foundation of the ruling, but a whole list of other obligations it invokes, including united — obligations it invokes, including united nations ruling. we have a broad _ united nations ruling. we have a broad problem. how do we maintain and fulfil— broad problem. how do we maintain and fulfil o

remember thejudge has undervalued those properties.ember the judge has already found that those financial statements included fraudulent valuations. he went and talked about a powerpoint presentation that was shown in court that was put together by the trump organisation's own media department. theyjust organisation's own media department. they just went meticulously through each property, sounding like his father, bragging about the central park view from trump tower, the vaults in a0 wall st and how mar—a—lago was an american castle. time and time again just bragging about these properties and how his father had taken them from disrepair to truly exceptional assets. it was interesting because then he was cross examined by prosecutors and that took all of five minutes. in that took all of five minutes. in that time they tried to strike at the glowing image of the trump organisation by asking him about the occupancy rates at a0 wall st going down, the fact that hotel was switching from trump to a hilton property. so it was quite intere

we urge the government to review thejudgment this policy. review the judgment as i'm sure they will do and consider how to take a more sensible approach in the future, respecting the rule of law, the human rights as part of parliament in their future proposals. parliament in their future mammals-— parliament in their future --roosals. ., . ~' . proposals. you talked about it in our first proposals. you talked about it in your first answer _ proposals. you talked about it in your first answer but _ proposals. you talked about it in your first answer but just - proposals. you talked about it in your first answer butjust some i proposals. you talked about it in i your first answer butjust some up for us the significance of today, we are standing outside the uk's highest court, there can't be any further appeals at all, the significant of the judgment in your view today. this significant of the 'udgment in your view toda . , ,, , ., view today. this supreme court 'ud . ment view today. this supreme court judgment is _ view today. this supreme co

let's get some reaction to thejudgment boats., ,, . ., here today. this is such an important _ here today. this is such an importantjudgment, i here today. this is such an importantjudgment, it i here today. this is such an importantjudgment, it is. here today. this is such an | importantjudgment, it is a here today. this is such an - importantjudgment, it is a defence of all— importantjudgment, it is a defence of all the _ importantjudgment, it is a defence of all the uk's international treaty application from the un convention on refugees, the un convention against — on refugees, the un convention against torture and other international obligations, including but not _ international obligations, including but not limited to the unhcr. it is the principles we have signed up to and they— the principles we have signed up to and they found they were truly important and all the needs have been _ important and all the needs have been respected and they were not in this policy. _ been respected and they were not in this policy, which

does that tell you about the judgment and the allegations as well, and did any details come out in thejudgment out in the judgment with mark yeah, you know, they probably did. there in the judgment with mark yeah, you know, they probably did.— know, they probably did. there were some, it know, they probably did. there were some. it appears _ know, they probably did. there were some, it appears to _ know, they probably did. there were some, it appears to me _ know, they probably did. there were some, it appears to me that - know, they probably did. there were some, it appears to me that there i some, it appears to me that there were perhaps thejury some, it appears to me that there were perhaps the jury found there was some truth to what she was saying. remembershe was some truth to what she was saying. remember she did initially request i think around $12 million so she actually requested more than $1.2 million. but was only awarded $1.2 million. but was only awarded $1.2 million. but both sides actually made accusations. she said during the trial, there were many times she was asked to do stu

and did any details come out in thejudgment? yeah, you know, they probably did.there was some truth to what she was saying. remember, she did initially request, i think, around $12 million. so she actually requested more than $1.2 million, but was only awarded $1.2 million. but both sides actually made accusations. she said during the trial that there were many times that she was asked to do stuff that she shouldn't be doing. she said at one point that he asked her to scratch his back and she said," why can't you just use a back scratcher?" he said, because i want you to do it? on the other side, you had robert de niro testifying and his new his girlfriend, who is a mother of his youngest child, six month old baby, basically saying that they bumped up her income from 100000 to $300000 and that she misappropriated funds and used thousands and thousands of dollars of frequent flyer miles that weren't hers and that she had aspired to do more and go further than what her position was. so both sides were making allegations at one another. and at one point, i'm told th

this will last until december probably and ultimately thejudge will decide whether to fine the trumpresent hunter is the for the 2024 election but he has one less competitor. —— president trump. tim scott has suspended his campaign, he was known as rising star with a large financial resources but he struggled to break through in the polls. in san francisco, a key global summit is about to get under way. us presidentjoe biden is hosting the asia—pacific economic co—operation forum, better known as apec, all eyes will be on his meeting with china's president xijinping, only the second time the pair have met in person in the past three years. i spoke to matt goodman. all eyes will be on that bilateral summit between xijinping and mr biden, bearing in mind they haven't met since the g20 in bali in 2022. a lot has happened since then. what do you envisage could come out of that meeting? well, this is a very important opportunity for the leaders of the two largest countries in the world to meet and go through a number of difficult issues between them. i don't think this is going to fundame

the eight people whose crimes "plunged the depths of human depravity", thejudge said.exual abuse, including rape. four of the gang were also convicted of attempting to murder one of the youngsters. by by trapping her in a cupboard, a fridge. the case centred around two girls and a boy, all under 13. a number of witnesses became emotional as they told the court in glasgow how the youngsters changed from being happy and friendly to withdrawn and tormented. for seven years, the children suffered their abuse in silence. how can this possibly happen in this day and age? but it is unusual, its extreme. but all of us need to ask ourselves... you know, these were children living in the community, that surrounded them and would have been around and itjust fills you with horror, the thought that that sort of thing can go unnoticed and we all need to take a look at ourselves. one of the youngsters described the location where the abuse took place as the "dark and scary beastie house". police praised the courage of the victims, who they said were subjected to unimaginable abuse an

trumer took the stand for a second time and again he was casually answering questions, joking with thejudge trump organization's properties and the way the company operated. in fact, the prosecution tried to stop this lengthy testimony at one point, but the judge said that he should be allowed to speak about how great the trump organisation was and that it had relevance for the judge to understand the company's history. now, donald trump, jr and defense lawyers have argued that donald trump's net worth and the value of his properties were actually far more than what was listed on his statement of financial condition. so he was going through meticulously a powerpoint presentation that was put together by his marketing team, boasting the properties from trump tower to 40 wall street to mar a lago. there he put up pictures of its beaches, its ballrooms, and said it was an american castle. donald trumer has also argued that he was somebody who dealt with the big projects in the company and relied on the accountants for numbers and valuations. he reiterated that today on the stand after testifyi

has concluded giving evidence in his civil fraud trial in new york, after repeatedly clashing with thejudget was warned to answer the questions put to him, and not to treat his court appearance like a political rally. mr trump, who is the frontrunner to become the republican party's presidential candidate, has described the case as political interference. it is a very sad situation for our country. we shouldn't have this — this is for third—world countries. and it's very unfair, it's very unfair. but in the meantime, the people of the country understand it, they see it, and they don't like it, they don't like it, because it's political warfare, as you would call it, or political lawfare, another name — i got a lot of names for it, but usually it takes place in third—world countries and banana republics. nobody�*s ever seen that to this extent, we've never seen it here. but we will go along and we will hopefully do very well in every regard, we will win the election and make america great again, that's what we're going to do. we're going to make america great again. gary 0'donoghue in washin