on thek time energy front they e y he's going to end a clean energy no more clean energy. wanted to have all the things all the time joint nuclear fossil feels a course we can have solar and wind but not at the expense of the american p people. john kerry said the whole same old shtick. one ceo saidfort it was unfortue to see the net zero coalition follow part because it was big u business for us.t not that it mattered what was happening to the people because as all energy prices went up all food prices went up and everything with it that's one ofis o the big things i liked about>> today.g th >> harold you must have been bummed at not being there withli your elitist friends thereos skiing. >> o skiinf never been there mau and i should go next year i have a place t year, i have a place. >> harold: can i? >> greg: yes. >> harold: i think that president trump, the unconventionality of him is refreshing. he is a different kind of leader, and democrats and those who did not support him, whatever their political stripe, need to understand that. he is a risk-taker, and he is goin

. >> yeah, and we'll get a check of our weather up here in thek bay area. >> yeah. so it's going to feel a lot cooler today guys. yesterday it was warm. it was sunny. changes are afoot the next couple of days. a live look outside from our tam cam this morning. it is chilly. 34 right now in santa rosa and the lightest wind out of the northwest at five miles per hour is creating a bit of a wind chill this morning. 30 degrees is how it feels outside. if you were to step outside right now, the 24 hour temperature change is showing you that we are significantly cooler along the coast right now. more than 20 degrees cooler in half moon bay than this time yesterday. so you'll feel that brisk air first thing this morning. we don't have any frost advisories or freeze warnings in effect, but it is a chilly start. 30s and 40s right now, 33 in danville. we're at 48 in the city, 34 in santa rosa, 44 right now in san jose. so future weather will show you a couple of things. we'll have partly cloudy skies throughout the day as a cold front approaches the region. this afternoon. we

we know that our largest corporations are a significant percentage of carbon emission, and that thek communiy has significant role to play in reducing carbon emissions. unfortunately, we have no idea and no requirement that they disclose anything about the carbon footprint, the core operation and sp360 stands for the basic notion that large corporations should be transparent about the carbon footprint. it makes all the sense in the world and very common sense but is controversial. any time you are proposing a policy that is going to make real change and that will change behavior because we know that when corporations havo disclose and be transparent and have that kind of accountability, there is going to be opposition. >> we have to provide technical assistance to comply with■?gisl requires them to have a food donation program. we keep the edible food local. and we are not composting it because we don't want to compost edible food. we want that food to get eaten within san francisco and feed folks in need. it is very unique in san francisco we have such a broad and expansive educatio

worked on and now needs to be finished, how does this rank in a priority for youou to fulfill which by thek way is the law to have a way to be able to look at a program and to see how it's evaluated if it's evaluated at all, that helps all of us around this dias to be able to look at it and say, you know, there's 12 different programs that seem to do the exactt same thing and to of them seem to be successful and ten of them aren't. we can't see all of that unless we ask gao, how does this rank in a priority for you? >> it would be for a high priority. as youon know, when i came to o, i had gone through the process the first time the and clearly made aware of the extent of these transparency apparatus that was intended by congress and there was a lot of objections from individuals, not the bandwidth to do this and we brought all sides of omb together internally and put someone in charge, director leadership that to the say that i will push through the barriers to get this set up and i'm looking toward to seeing where we are and i would want to finish the job if given another opportunity by t

i think the point of thek disclosures, as the sec itself has made clear, is to warn prospectively abees of risks that a c would face. and a perverse consequence of the other side's approach here is that a company could effectivy penalize -- justice jackson: but why? why -- but can i just ask you why are you warning about the isn't it because the investor is trying to determine f any of those risks happen, it's going to be lem for the investment? mr. shanmugam: yes, but a company is not ordinarily making ananty about the probability of the risk occurring. and the way in which these ements are framed really now i do want to acknowledge something that i ts underlying your hypothetical and was also underlying justice kagan's hypothetical. in many of these cases, the omitted information is something that an investor might like to know. i think we wcknowledge that in these hypothetical material.nformation may be but the problem withther side's approach is that it really conflates materiality with falsity, and while both of those elemtart from a reasonable investor, they measure very differe

intend traditional. 0n the question of the length of time it would take to have an impact, i do not thek for a moment, and i have spent many hours with al experts to test those propositions that the timeframes are much shorter than that. it is not a 10% increase, get about many who say productivity will double in a short period, that is the potential for the difference at with mick. and there are many examples of that.— with mick. and there are many examples of that. your predecessor had an ai summit _ examples of that. your predecessor had an ai summit then _ examples of that. your predecessor had an ai summit then had - examples of that. your predecessor had an ai summit then had a - examples of that. your predecessor had an ai summit then had a very i had an ai summit then had a very chilly— had an ai summit then had a very chilly one—on—one broadcast session with elon _ chilly one—on—one broadcast session with elon musk. you must be a but worried _ with elon musk. you must be a but worried that — with elon musk. you must be a but worried that not only is presumably elon musk— worried