when the proposal was unveiled recently, the epa highlighted , two in thelants u.s. and one in canada. all of the power plants have hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding even the one in canada. how do we go forward with this without federal subsidies? it seems you need money. you talk to these builders and they are sent without this we are not going to do it. how is this feasible without a huge investment on the part of the u.s. and taxpayers? >> i think we should emphasize this was a proposed rule for new power plants. they would come online and have 40-50 year lifetimes. this is saying that new power plants which will have this very long run, a lot the capital investment, utilities are planning on 50 year lifetimes, they have to have a modern technology where modern means being able to meet reasonable standards for what we believe is in essential future low carbon economy. that is the first point. they are going to have a very long future. i also might add that the notirement was certainly for a full capture. it was 430% to 50% of co2. epa administrato