reporter: and thenen the hordesf tourists w wouldn't have come, eithther.here, in osl,, these huge fish have found vovoted fa. course, there are certain ruleles, such as a f four-meter safefety zone. t peopop often g far tooclost. perhapbecaususe r too many pele now come to s them. the number of vitotors h inineased six-fold sce 2 201 turning oslolob into one o ofe bibiggest urisist atactionons e philippines. the fascinatioexexerted thehese gentle giants is simply too rorong to sistst. >>>> its big mouth, and its si. >> it's keke a b -- dinn. >> yeses, it's amazizing. it's o once in a lififetime. 's a good thing for tourism ththe ea, as well, you knonow at i meme? so, i don't thinink it's a bad thing. >>>>'m not surure if they're hu, bubut i dot ththink at thehey shouldld be fed. reporter: whwhy do you thihinky shshld not be fed? >> so they can roam around and . reporter: every day in oslob,s this r relationship p betweenn and beasast really a h healthyd sustainable one? we notice injuries, fresh wounds on a whale shark's fin. what might have caused that? w

thenen everything g will go bao how itit used to be. reporter: no o wanantshat.ot josÉ, who's no the oud d owneof a k karke machine.e. he's also bubuilt a house.e. he's grarateful to the w whale shararks, and for r every day t they c come. josesÉ: i earn m much more thi did d before. baback then i eaearned eight eua weweek. nowawadays i can e earn up to . and wewe only work u until no. wewe finish at 1:00 p.m. reporter: a a lot of thingngs e imimproved in ososlob. t there's no happy ending fort. rultitimately, theyey are the s who wiwill pay the p price fore ose encounter with humankind. hostand here'shat's cookinghe s who wiwifor xt week. price fore the dedemand for chicken is growing in g ghana, so it't's g imported from europe and the u.s. consumumers want lotots of it,d as cheapap as possible, , a ce this time. don't forget to write us, glglobal3000@d@dw.com. and check out our new facebook page, dw women. ♪ [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, 04/05/19 04/05/19 [captioning made possible by democracy now!] amy: from pacifica, this is dem

. >> i just heard shots go off, and thenen people raran out ty mom's house.nd i saw that my daddy was shot. >> he told me that they wanted to kill him. the e guys were calling. but i couldn't understand, becaususe he was so peacaceful. he said, "mom, if anything happens to me, remember that i never signed up as a gang member." >> alcardo andrews' mother insists his murder could have been prevented. in other parts of the world, he might have been able to ask the police for help. but here, say locals, the authorities gave up the fight for law and order years ago. but there is a team dedicated to taking up that fight, led by local pastor craven engel. they've installed microphones and cameras in the hanover park and manenberg neighborhoods, enablingng them to see and her whenever there's a shooting. they typically occur around three times a day. instead of waiting for the police, the group prefers hitting the strereets themselv. they have their own approach and strategy. >> this is not arresting someone and putting them in prison. he's going to come out again. h

if te ipcc systematically downplays those outcomes, thenen it does't seserve thatat larger process of societal risk assessment as it should. qualitatively speaking, if you look at impacts on human health, water availability, human water resources, food resources, land, the global economy, pretty much every sectoror of our lives, of human civilization, what you see is a business-as-usual fossil fuel burning scenario, by the end of the century gives us highly y negative impactsts acrs the boards in all those categories. i forgot to mention biodiversity, a potentially large-scale extinction of species. some of these we can ququantify ecoconomically or w n try to. some of them we can't even qualify how important they are. what is the value of the earth? well, it's infnfinite because if we destroy the earth's environment, there is no plan "b." there is no planet "b" that we can go to. how do you put a cost on, you know, on the health of the environment? arguably you can't even do so. and in fact it's that principle that it's an infinite cost when we start talking about those sorts of scena

to to generate -- financial reserves i'm to make sure that t there we jobs in particular areas and thenen old so making sure that e wall t they are p producing is t being usesed to commmm. atrocities to to commit crimes against humanity or war crimes so it's a really dififficult balance once a again but i'm i'm pleased to hear thahat that they'r're all groups t that a cooling calling these issues ou. the holding govovernments to account iff they are all issues that are at play here. and that. just just briefly i mean the the war in yemen is now in its. fifth year is created the world's worst humanitarian crisis and there is a peace process it has stalled with both sides acute accusing the other of v violating a cease f fire wn you see it g going frorom head.. well i hope that the the piece takes a long time to build generally and and the complexity of things s in yemenen with thee two varirious proxy access. ththe saudi -- direct milititary invovolvement be alleged iranian involvement a secessionist movevement various othther islat groups t tribal groups it's goig to takee a long timime t

part of the issue is they were widen, thenenator representative cox, concerned they had this new industry. they thought it had a lot of potential and they did not want to stifle it. what would stifle it? let's say facebook or whomever was responsible for everything published on their platform. how do you respond to that kind of danger as a business leader? a libel finding could go into the millions and millions. it could destroy your business. that is your attitude in 1998. what do you do? two choices. you do nothing and let everybody on. is that going to make a successful business? what are these companies want to look like now? the other alternative is what i would call the take no chances. you see this in a facebook board meeting or whatever. take no chances. if it looks like it might be defamatory, might lead to a court case, take it down. what you end up with, if you don't have these kinds of protections and you are not able to decide what everything is that goes on the platform, you don't make a judgment about it when it goes up, you are going to end up probably taking down a lot of

and stir to significantly enhance to significantly diminish of the ability to spoof caller id and thenen will continue to do so through 2019 andns consumers today have more tools than ever hundreds of such are available on their smart phones and to integrate these tools into their networks. third us telecom industry which seeks to identify robo callers is enhanced through recent automation it has been reduced from weeks to days or hours. fourth. while the civil enforcement actions of the f fcc are effective increased criminal enforcement is needed. first the standard established last year to have the implementation of the protocol. and with day to day operations. moving swiftly to have this authentication technology once implemented the ability of robo callers will be significantly reduced that consumer knowledge of the validity and as this process moves forward they are already deploying the shaken standard internetworks qualcomm companies have advised the fcc of these deployment efforts to start as soon as the end of 2019. testing is well advanced. last month comcast and at&t verified