context of the criminal prosecution afforded to the ofcef esent have been laid out by our founders, theonstitution and most recently interpreted by the u.s. supreme court in the maer of trump versus the u.s., which was delighted july 1, 2024 -- which was decidedul 1, 2024. as with every other defendant in your position, it's my obligation to csider any and all aggravating, mitigating factors to inform my decision. some of those aggravating factors ha bn articulated at the start of this trial. my renwritten decisions on december 16 a january 3, thus they need not be repeated at this time. however, considerable, indeed extraordinary legal protecon afforded by the officofhe chief executive is a factor tt overrides all others. be clear, the protections afforded the office of the president are not a mitigating factor. they do not reduce the seriousness of the cri o justify its commission in any way. the protections are however a legal mandate pursuant to the rule of law, this crt must respect and follo however, despite the extraordinary breath of those protections, one power they do not prodes the powe

criminal prosecution afforded to the office of the president have been laid out by our founders, theonstitution, and most recely interpreted by the united states supreme court in the matter of trump versus united states, whi was decided on july 1, 2024. as with every other defendant in your position, it is my obligation to considerll aggravating and mitigating circa -- facto. some have already been articulated in my sandoval rulingt the beginning of the trial and my recent written decions on december 16 and january 3. thus, they need not be repeated at this time. however, the considerable, indeed extraordinary legal prections afforded by the office othe chief executive is a factor that overrides all others. to be clear, the protecons afforded the office of the president are not aitigating factor. theyo not reduce the seriousness of the crime or justify itcommission in any way. the protections are however a legal mandate which pursuant to the rule of law this court must respect and follow. however, despite the extraordinary breadth of those protections one power they do not provide is the power