but that's very different from saying that nato dismantles theresa fallon nano is if they don't like, why just if nato were the, the only problem. why did president put in choose to invade the crimea after ukraine find the corporation deal with the european union? was not natal, that was the problem in that case, there was a deal with the european union's well, it's set to launch extend customers for la tactics. it, it can see what's coming down the road. i'm in the nato started with expanding to a couple of countries now it just keeps expanding. and obviously the u. s. s. as a state that it's intention of dragging ukraine into nato, even when only a small minority wanted to be part of nato. and furthermore, didn't simply sign an agreement with you. there were, there was a qu, backed by balsa, united states, and that you. and because of this, the russians reacted as a status quo. a route built by, by claimed, by holding on to its naval base in crimea. so again, if nato had not had the worst on the back, the crew in ukraine and nato hadn't threatened to expand into ukraine. russia woul