this is from theresa ohada, inside planning. it all looks good and healthy. this looks good as well, so my goal was to replicate her findings. i want to be clear i am not saying hers are wrong, i failed to replicate it given the publicly available data, and i think that's because we are still not releasing all of the data that the planning department has on the sf open data website, and so i've reached out to theresa and asked her to see if she can help me figure out where the problem lies. wondering if there is a internal process the planning department can institute to make sure that the internal data matches external data on sf open data. i am sure you can't tell me right now, but if that is something you could look into i would appreciate it. on that graph it shows 7,000 unit proposed in 2017 and on the data available on the website it's only 3,000, so clearly something is amiss, so i don't have any specific, but if we could somehow make sure the data matches, that would be excellent. thank you. >> thank you. >> since press has covered extensively the tra